What The Run Over Child Means For The Future of Security Robots

By: Brian Karas, Published on Jul 21, 2016

Robot security guards recently received unprecedented news coverage. Unfortunately, not good:

We spoke with Knightscope CEO William Li [link no longer available] about this incident, and what it means for the robot guard market in general.

In this report, we analyze the current state of robots as guard alternatives, what their limitations mean for today and future projections for security robots.

***** ******** ****** ******** received ************* **** ********. *************, not ****:

** ***** ****************** ******* ** [**** no ****** *********] ***** this ********, *** **** it ***** *** *** robot ***** ****** ** general.

** **** ******, ** analyze *** ******* ***** of ****** ** ***** alternatives, **** ***** *********** mean *** ***** *** ****** projections *** ******** ******.

[***************]

Stanford **** ********

* *********** ** **** on ****** ** *** Stanford **** ** ********, CA *** ****** ** avoid * ***** ***** and ***** ** ********* with *** *****, *** allegedly running **** ***. ** case *** ****** **, here ** * *******:

*********** ****** ****** *******, ************ **** and ***** ****** ******* incident, *** ********* ****** that *** ***** *** over *** ***** (*** not **** **** ********), stating

**** *** ********* ********* the ***** *** *** path *** *****, *** machine ******* **********

*** **** *** *** robot ******* **** *** child, ** ****** *** understanding ** *********** ***** what ** ** ** that ********* (****, ***** on ****** ** *** child, **** *** ****, etc.)

Security ******** **** ****'* ***

***********'* *** ******** *** current ***** ** ******** robots ** ****'* ***, stating **** ** **** at * ***** ***** technology ** ***** ** be **************, *** ** a ***** ** *********** a ******** ** **** it **** ********** ******. Unlike ***, ***** **** roughly ** ***** ** really ****** **********, ** expects *** **** * years ** **** ******* advancements ** ********** **** enables ****** ** ****** practical ** ****** ******.

** *** ********* ***** of ** ********* **** of *** ********** ******* of *** ******* *********** robots: 

******* *** ***** ** sensors *** ************, *** device ******* ** ** somewhat ****** "*******", ***** in *** *********, ***, according ** *********** "********* ********* ** ************* 1 ***":

*** ***** ********, *** the ***** *****, ********* how *********** ***** ********** still **. ***** ****** **** run **** **** ***** and ***** ****** *********, they ** ***** ****** the ******* ** ****** the ********* ****** ********** further, ** ***** ** apology. *** ****** *** forced ** ****** ** low ***** ** ***** to ********** *** ***** inability ** ******** ******** in * ***** ********** by ******. * *** pound ******, *** ***** aware ** *** ************, traveling ** ***** ***** pose * ****** ******.

Machine ******** **** ***** ********

**** ***** ***** ******** technology ************ **** ***** impact ****** *** ********, machine ******** *** *** CEO's ***** ******.  ** do ***** **** ******* learning/neural ******* ********** *** been ******* ************ ** recent *****.  *** *********/****** *********** ***** ** ******* ** machine ******** ********** ************ ** security ************. 

Mobility ****** ********* ** ********

* ***** *****, *** liability, *** ******* ****** is ********, ** ** clearly ********* ** **** a ******** **** ** both ******* ** ****** about, *** ***** ** without ********* ****** ** the ****. ****** *** batteries *** ***** *****, which ****** ******* ********, and *** **** *** device **** ********* ** it **** *** ** to * *****, ** mis-navigate ** **** *** fall *** * **** or *****.

******** **** **** ****, for *** ***** ** a *********** *****, * user *** ****** ******* fixed ******* ***/** ****, giving **** ******* ******* to ******* *****, ******* having ** ***** ***** mobility ** ********* ******.  

Robots ** ***** ************ *******

*** **** ******* ******** technology ********* ** ********** robotics *** ** ******* to ***** *******, ***** also **** *** ******* of ********** ******* ** an ****, *** *** ******* to **** ** ******** or ***** ***** ******** to **** **** *** a ***** ** ****.

******** ****** *** ***** positioned ** ** *********** to * ***** *****, but **** *** **** ** * ******-**-*-****** base. **** ** *** cost *** ********** ** the ****** **** **** the ****** *** ******* required ** **** ** both ****** *** ********-*****, costs **** ***** ** simply **-********* ** ****** more ******* ** * site.

Knightscope's ********* ******* ***** *** ******

***** ***** **** ** would **** *** ****** to ****** ** *********** as *****'* **** ****, Knightscope *** **** "*** *** we **** * ****, or ******* * ********" would ** * ******* point *** ********, ******** making ** * "********* not ** **** *** technology" *** ********* **** the ******** ****. ***** this ***** ** * good ******** *** ********* more ***** ******, ** also ***** **** * goal **** **** **** more **** * ***** to *****. *** ******* ** a ***** "****** * life" ******** ***** ***-*******, though *** ***** *** be **** ** ******* an ***** ** ** event, ** **** *** same *** *** ****** of ***** ******** ******* do *****.

Equivalent ** ****'* ***** ********

***** ***** **'* **** expensive, ***********, *** ********** simplistic ** **** **** could **, **** *** offer **** ******** ** a ***** ***** ** users **** **** ******* and * **** *********** to *** (*.*., *******, science, **********).

*** *** *** ***** adopters ** ******** ****** that *** *** *** high ***** (*********** ******* $50k *** **** *** robot) *** *** ****** the *********** (* ***, near **** ****** *****)? * mall ******** ***** *********** does *** **** ** be *** *****. ** surely ** ** ************ novelty *** *** **** of * ******** *****.

***********'* *** ********* *** they *** ******** ** rolling *** *** ********** in *** *** **** first, *** **** ** slowly ****** ****** *** US *** **** ****** deployments.  *** **** ********* are ***** ** ********** early ********, **** *** benfit ** * **** cooperative *******, ***** **** there *** *** *********** indicators ** ***** ***** viability.  **** *********** *** proven *********** ** "******" ****** sectors, **** * ***** of ********** ** ******** Detroit, ** * ***** mall ** ***** ** will ** * **** larger ********* ** ** emerging ****** *** ***** guards.

[UPDATE ****** *, ****]

*********** *** ****** **** ***** *******, ********** * statement ** ***** ******* release***** *** ***** ******* backwards. *** ******* *** states *** ***** *** running ********, ******* *** unit, *** ******* ****. However, *** ****** ** which *** ***** *** running ****** **** *** change *** ******* ****** surrounding *** *********.

Comments (24)

Lets go find one and barricade it in an area like a roomba lol

If these things become even mildly popular I would expect bored kids to come up with various games or ways to troll the units, similar to what you described.

I can envision a K5 dutifully patrolling a parking lot with a "Kick Me" sign on its back.

Robot vendors don't seem to have thought about edge cases. Which is pretty scary considering some of them are selling into nuclear power stations. This is one of those cases where "what's your security story" should produce an answer other than "huh?".

A legitimate question... What is the better approach (better being defined as: if you were the company trying to get these to market and raise more money), should they spend years in the lab and try to test and design for every possible edge case, or should they make it "safe enough", set it loose, and then iterate on the feedback?

Taking the Silicon Valley approach of "fail early, fail often" to a 300lb stack of batteries and motors really changes the considerations a bit.

Yo, yo, yo, security robot.

Where is your video??

They ordered body cameras but Taser was a no bidder.

Where is your video??

We asked for the video from the robot. It is not being provided. My guess is that it would not make things any better and might make things far worse seeing a 1 year old colliding / being run over by a 300 pound robot.

Kit, the car traveled at much higher speeds and never ran over a kid. Where is the Hoff when you need him.

My guess is that it would not make things any better and might make things far worse seeing a 1 year old colliding / being run over by a 300 pound robot.

Even if 'it would not make things any better', it would be better to be transparent. If it would 'make things far worse' then I would have to think that this statement is inaccurate:

a child left the vicinity of his guardians and began running towards the machine. The machine veered to the left to avoid the child, but the child ran backwards directly into the front quarter of the machine, at which point the machine stopped and the child fell on the ground.

'Running backwards' is tricky, try it. Best way to do it is to run forward and have someone run faster behind you with a camera... :(

it would be better to be transparent. If it would 'make things far worse' then I would have to think that this statement is inaccurate

I am quite skeptical of that statement for the reasons you bold above and its generally convoluted / unclear manner in which it was written.

So, yes, my suspicion unless this goes to court they will do well not to show it to anyone. Most people do not like to see 1 year olds injured by anyone, including robots...

Asked about what it would take for robots to become as commonplace as today's mall cops, Knightscope CEO said "The day we save a life, or prevent a casualty" would be a tipping point for robotics, possibly making it a "liability not to have the technology" for customers like the Stanford Mall.

This is a really bad answer.

Automation for the sake of automation is a gimmick. Automation needs to be demonstrably better than human alternatives in some, even multiple aspects to reach a 'tipping point'.

In every example of automation reaching a 'tipping point', it is because the cost of technology is cheaper than human resources, automation does a superior job to a human, or automation can withstand environments that humans are harmed by.

For example: automobile assembly robotics. It wasn't until robots could lift more, quicker, more accurately, for longer hours, and in an hot, fume filled environment that car companies replaced human 'panel beaters'.

Knightscope's CEO says saving lives or preventing casualties is something his current robots are unable to achieve. That's fair, but then again why would anyone be interested in buying something that just rolls around? How hard is it to sell that!?!

Similarly, the Robolliance says that robots can be used for jobs that are dirty, dull, or dangerous, but in security these are almost always in environments that make it hard for a robotic platform to be practical.

The automotive robot comparison is interesting, I was thinking about those and trying to draw comparisons when writing this article. In that case those robots have even less intelligence than the K5. They are fixed-location units, designed to repeat a very specific pattern endlessly, without factoring in much of their environment at all (as a side-story, I once watched a robot in a glass manufacturing facility that was programmed to place the metal "knob" for a rear-view mirror on windshields as they moved down an assembly line happily smash the knobs through about 50 windshields in a row, as it had no idea its parameters were off).

Automotive robots replaced humans in what were extremely boring and precisely repetitive jobs, and even then they are far from perfect. Scaling that up to a mobile unit that can interpret ever-changing surroundings is no small task, even when you factor in technological advancements.

Alot of the youtube pranksters live in california, lets put one of them up to messing with the robots

The robot has been suspended without pay while the investigation is pending.

Newer models will not need to roll over citizens, relying on an electrically controlled riot stick, when necessary:

The issue is the technology and analytics are not advanced enough to deal with a chaos situation.

You can assume an adult walks and moves in a way that is defined in a mail.

A kid doesn't, they often run off and find a robot more toy like so will test it. It's how children learn they test things. Everything we do is built around these invisible laws except one thing. Cars, guess what kids walk out in front and die.

I think it's a bit unfair on the technology, if it was at commercial site closed off patrol that would make sense. I wouldn't put it in a mail with kids doing random things.

I wouldn't put it in a mail with kids doing random things.

Then you evidently wouldn't make it as a Silicon Valley marketer! ;)

I agree with you operationally and technologically. I still do not understand what real security role that robot could play at Stanford mall compared to its cost and functionalities.

But it (was) great marketing for Knightscope and probably for the mall as well until this incident. Then, of course, disaster.

But having your product as a walking billboard across the street from the Sand Hill Road venture capitalists? That's tough for a startup CEO to pass up.

"I still do not understand what real security role that robot could play at Stanford mall compared to its cost and functionalities"

Security guards and electric are the 2 largest expanses for shopping centers after they are built. Management is always trying to find ways to lower these bills. The goal was not to increase security but more as a test to cut expanses.

Security guards and electric are the 2 largest expanses for shopping centers after they are built.

Citation for that?

Even assuming this is true, at $50,000 per year for this robot, how much are they really going to save? And a mall security guard can actually do things, like give directions to people, mediate basic disputes, etc.

Hi John, I know this from direct conversations with top property management companies.

I agree with you on cost but the plan is according to the article below is to have a combined machine/Man guard unit and the technology will get more cost effective.

Universal Protection Service the current security guard providor for stanford mall have partnered up with knightscope to promote "Machine a service" and this was a test sites.

http://www.securitysystemsnews.com/taxonomy/term/10451

I don't believe this Robot will make it to south CA in September after this issue.

I read the article but I am no clearer about what the value proposition will be. What will the robots be doing that will provide value? Is the belief that robot will deter crime or?

Related, can anyone provide any clarity what the robots were doing for security at the Stanford mall?

Btw, as for largest expenses, security does not appear to be in the top 2, e.g.:

Services, from what sources say, includes security, landscaping, trash removal, etc.

45% for insurance is looking like a good deal for the Stanford mall at this point.

Hi John, Most of these large property management companies are self insured but I believe they are looking at expanses that they can control. Insurance/tax is not one them.

As for the value, I visited their website and could not find anything interesting other than “see, feel, hear and smell” enabling a unique approach to sensor fusion and analytics"

I won't be surprised if this was a free demo. Stanford mall is owned by Simon properties, the largest shopping center operator in the US.

Knightscope forgot to put a big bright warning sign on the robot "DO NOT TOUCH" lol

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

From The Basement To Buried Behind Chinatown: ISC West Emerging Technology Zone on Feb 22, 2019
What does ISC West think about 'Emerging Technology'? Well, last year, they put those companies in the basement. This year, they moved them up to...
Church Technology Director Security Interview on Mar 07, 2019
With 40+ years of experience in IT from a wide array of verticals, including US and foreign military, and large corporate and industrial settings,...
Large Hospital Security End User Interview on Mar 21, 2019
This large single-state healthcare system consists of many hospitals, and hundreds of health parks, private practices, urgent care facilities, and...
ASIS Sells GSX 2019 Education Sessions on May 01, 2019
New for 2019, ASIS is selling GSX education sessions, an ethically problematic approach and something we have not seen before in this...
Restaurant Security Manager Interview on May 06, 2019
Wright’s Gourmet House in Tampa, Florida has been around for over 50 years. During most of that time, there were no security measures in place. Now...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
IFSEC 2019 Show Report on Jun 19, 2019
The UK's largest trade show, IFSEC, is underway and IPVM has been examining what is new and happening at the show. Inside, we cover: Huawei...
"Stats Don't Lie" Says Deceptive IFSEC on Jul 30, 2019
While IFSEC has declared #statsdontlie and trumpeted seemingly skyrocketing visitor numbers, they are decieving about their show's problems. On...
ASIS GSX 2019 Final Show Report on Sep 12, 2019
IPVM went to Chicago for ASIS GSX 2019, with many exhibitors disappointed about traffic and the exhibitor schedule changing next year. However,...
"If You Have The Same Qualifications, And You're A White Male, You Are Going To Lose", Says Integrator on Dec 16, 2019
Diversity is a rising priority, overall and in the security industry. One integrator, touting diversity, emphasized that white men are 'going to...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Hazardous & Explosion Proof Access Control Tutorial on Feb 27, 2020
Controlling access to hazardous environments requires equipment meeting specific ratings that certify they will not start fires or will not...
Motorola / Avigilon Drops ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
Motorola Solutions has pulled out of ISC West 2020 effective immediately, because of coronavirus concerns, IPVM has learned. This is done amidst...
Cancel or Not? Industry Split Over ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
The industry is split, polarized, over whether ISC West 2020 should run or be canceled. New IPVM survey results of 400+ respondents show heated...
Coronavirus Hits Sony, Bosch Says Switch on Feb 26, 2020
Sony's fall in video surveillance has been severe over the past decade. Now, they may be done. In this note, we examine Bosch's new...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the basics of cameras and features used in 2020. In this report, we...
Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2020 on Feb 25, 2020
Video analytics is now as hot as ever, driven by the excitement of advancing deep learning offers. But what are actually integrator's...
Latest London Police Facial Recognition Suffers Serious Issues on Feb 24, 2020
On February 20, IPVM visited another live face rec deployment by London police, but this time the system was thwarted by technical problems and...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new IPVM test results show cause major problems for facial recognition...
Every VMS Will Become a VSaaS on Feb 21, 2020
VMS is ending. Soon every VMS will be a VSaaS. Competitive dynamics will be redrawn. What does this mean? VMS Historically...
Video Surveillance 101 Course - Last Chance on Feb 20, 2020
This is the last chance to join IPVM's first Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the...