Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained

OK, I'll admit I'm fighting a cold and hopped up on DayQuil, but I don't see any prices in this graphic:

Good article.  What about a whole home multi floor home network in a typical North American wood frame house.  Does non-rated cable add a fire-risk?  I’m hoping the answer is “no” due to the “wood frame” part?

• Cabling runs in or on Ductwork: Most AHJs adopt the 'if it touches plenum, it must be plenum rated', so even cables run outside a duct run must be CMP rated.

I'm trying to understand this.  If it touches the outside of a duct it must be CMP?  Is there a reference in NEC to this?

I regularly and purposely overspec cables because

1. The man-hours required to perform the installation are the true cost drivers, not the cable itself

2. Safety first; as Warren stated above, I won't put lives at risk for a few bucks

3. Future proofing; this is a slightly different point but also a cost driver: in addition to the overall shielding of the cable, it also makes sense to screen or shield each twisted pair to reduce interference and support higher bandwidths or future applications. In my own home, I went as far as to exceed Cat 8.2 specs (S/FTP, 2000 Mhz). It's much cheaper to do this than to rewire the place even once (see point 1 above).

Something worth noting and often overlooked is that if you are running non-plenum cabling and it traverses or enters a plenum space even if for only a minimal distance, say 6 inches, the entire run must be plenum rated cabling.  And honestly, the general statement that consultants are too lazy or too concerned about covering their butts is not only absolutely inaccurate but very unfortunate to see from a company such as IPVM, who is seen and read by so many people in this industry.  To me it simply shows that there is a significant lack of appreciation or true understanding of the impact that consultants have in this industry.  Do consultants sometimes make mistakes?  Absolutely and we have all seen some obvious mistakes on specs that just make you shake your head and wonder how this person gets paid for such work.  But at the same time, we have also seen some detailed specs that baffle you.  The level of detail and thorough understanding of the codes, the technology, the manufacturers, the industry trends and on and on are nothing short of amazing.  

The use of plenum over non-plenum is one that I have seen debated for the past 25 years.  Most companies I have worked for take the position that all projects should be run with plenum cabling period.  Sometimes the added cost to verify that each section the cabling will be installed into is plenum or not makes no sense.  Just run it with Plenum and call it a day.  Save money by not stocking multiple versions of the same type of cable.  Save even more money by not losing a lawsuit for specifying or installing the wrong cable.  Save a ton more by not accidentally contributing to the death of an innocent person in the building who was overcome with noxious gases.  Oh and to those who comment that what difference does it make when you have so many other materials that will release dangerous smoke and gases during a fire, they should really consider whether or not they should remain in an industry that is trying to protect assets and lives.  Just because there are other toxic fumes released by materials that are not as tightly regulated does not mean it is more than okay to go ahead and add even more toxicity especially when doing so is a violation of code and of morals.

Just my two cents.  Plus when you analyze the actual impact of the cost differential to err on the side of caution and choose to use plenum when maybe you could've gotten away with non-plenum, only comes down to just over 1%.  For example let's say you have a project that you sell for $117,000.  The cost of the plenum cabling runs around $3,800 ((6) 1000' spools of plenum rated unshielded CAT6).  The cost of non plenum unshielded CAT6 cabling is about 40% less which for (6) 1000' spools will run you about $1,520 less.  That equates to about 1.3% reduction.  If you are losing your projects based on that differential and the customer does not see the added value of your life safety consideration and understanding of code compliance, then I feel for you.  Maybe it would make sense to reduce your margin by 1.3% to cover the cost of doing it right especially if you know you are competing against the proverbial trunk slammer just to ensure you do not lose squarely due to your cabling selection.  The time spent researching non-plenum cabling alternatives to your most likely already stocked warehouse of plenum cabling and the added legal risks and all other concerns regarding this small decision just make no sense to me.  Use plenum and save yourself from the small risk that a fire marshal or other AHJ will require you to rip it out and start over with plenum-rated only cabling.  That brings up another point... Is everybody out there removing vacated cabling when running new cabling for systems? For example, when you install a new IP video system are you removing all of the existing coaxial cable, which may be tie wrapped or bundled tightly with other system cabling or in pipe with too many cables and a fill ration too close to 100%.  The NEC requires this and has for like 18 years or something.  I'm just curious if that is the standard method of operation being used by most integrators?  I do not want to be blamed for hijacking this forum and this plenum / non-plenum post but I am curious...