Resolution vs Compression Tested

By: John Honovich, Published on Nov 24, 2014

They are not the same thing.

Unfortunately, too many industry people conflate them.

Worse, resolution and compression can silently undermine each other.

The Impact

Compare the two images below. The resolution (aka pixel count) is exactly the same but the compression levels (and bandwidth) are much different:

 

Because of the compression difference, even though everything else is the same, the visual quality is much different.

Resolution vs Compression

Resolution, in surveillance, means the number of pixels (1MP, 2MP, 5MP, etc.) See: IPVM's Resolution Tutorial

Compression, in surveillance, means how much the pixels / video is compressed. There is a scale from minimum to maximum. In H.264, it is called quantization, ranging from 0 (least) to 51 (most). See: IPVM's Video Quality / Compression Tutorial

Compression Defaults

All IP cameras compress video, typically in the middle of that scale. IPVM testing shows 28 is average though manufacturers vary somewhat. Moreover, manufacturers generally do not reveal the actual quantization level, displaying their own scale. To learn more, see: IP Camera Manufacturer Compression Comparison

Making Lower Resolution Look Like Higher Resolution

In this test, we took a series of 720p IP cameras, decreased the compression levels to see how far we had to go to make it 'look' like a 1080p camera with default compression levels. We then compared bandwidth consumption of each camera.

Making Higher Resolution Looks Like Lower Resolution

Also, in this test, we took a series of 5MP and 1080p cameras, increased their compression levels to see how far we had to go to make it 'look' like lower resolution cameras (1080p / 720p respectively) with default compression levels.

Why

Our goal is to understand and show you:

  • How much compression can impact visual quality?
  • What benefits are there to reducing compression levels?
  • What benefits are there to increasing compression levels?
  • Can you get better quality or bandwidth consumption from such changes?
  • **** *** *** *** same *****.

    *************, *** **** ******** people ******** ****.

    *****, ********** *** *********** can ******** ********* **** other.

    The ******

    ******* *** *** ****** below. *** ********** (*** pixel *****) ** ******* the **** *** *** compression ****** (*** *********) are **** *********:

     

    ******* ** *** *********** difference, **** ****** ********** else ** *** ****, the ****** ******* ** much *********.

    Resolution ** ***********

    **********, ** ************, ***** the ****** ** ****** (1MP, ***, ***, ***.) See: ****'* ********** ********

    ***********, ** ************, ***** how **** *** ****** / ***** ** **********. There ** * ***** from ******* ** *******. In *.***, ** ** called ************, ******* **** 0 (*****) ** ** (most). ***: ****'* ***** ******* / Compression ********

    *********** ********

    *** ** ******* ******** video, ********* ** *** middle ** **** *****. IPVM ******* ***** ** is ******* ****** ************* vary ********. ********, ************* generally ** *** ****** the ****** ************ *****, ********** their *** *****. ** learn ****, ***: ** ****** ************ *********** Comparison

    Making ***** ********** **** **** ****** **********

    ** **** ****, ** took * ****** ** 720p ** *******, ********* the *********** ****** ** see *** *** ** had ** ** ** make ** '****' **** a ***** ****** **** default *********** ******. ** then ******** ********* *********** of **** ******.

    Making ****** ********** ***** **** ***** **********

    ****, ** **** ****, we **** * ****** of *** *** ***** cameras, ********* ***** *********** levels ** *** *** far ** *** ** go ** **** ** 'look' **** ***** ********** cameras (***** / **** respectively) **** ******* *********** levels.

    ***

    *** **** ** ** understand *** **** ***:

    • *** **** *********** *** impact ****** *******?
    • **** ******** *** ***** ** reducing *********** ******?
    • **** ******** *** ***** to ********** *********** ******?
    • *** *** *** ****** quality ** ********* *********** from **** *******?

    [***************]

    Lesson * - ************* ******** *********** ******

    ****** *.*** ****** *********** / ************ ****** ** 0 ** **, **** manufacturers ******** *** ****** or **** *** **** can ********.

    ** ****** * ************* using ****** ******** ****, **** ***** *** and **** *********** ******** to ********* **** ***** constraints ****:

    • ******* ** - **
    • ********: **-**
    • ****: **-**
    • *****: *-**
    • *********: **-**
    • *******: **-**
    • ****: **-**

    ******, **** *** ******* the **** *****.

    **** ***********, ******** *** the **** ***********, ******** the ********* ***** ** compression ******, ********** ******** high *********** ******.

    ********: *** **** *** can ************** (** *********************) ** ******** ********* (by ********** ***********) **** be ******** ** **** your ****** ** ****** allows. ***** ****.

    Lesson * - ****** ********** ******* *** **** **** ***** ********** **** *** **** *********

    **** ***** ** * 'hack' ***** ***********. ** you **** * ****** resolution ****** (*** *****), increase *** *********** ***** (say ** ~**), ** will **** ******* ** a **** ****** ** default *********** ******, **** so:

    *** *** ******* ** found *** **** *** 1080p / **** *********** video ***, ** *******, 50 ** **% ***** bandwidth **** *** **** / ******* *********** ***.

    ** ***** **** ** be *** **** **** in **** ****** **** relatively *** ***, **** so:

    *****, ********* *** *** 1080p / **** *********** cameras *** ** ** 75% **** **** *** 720p / ******* *********** one.

    ******* * *** / high ****** ** * 1080p ******* ******, *** same ******* *******.

    Lesson * - ****** *** / ****** *********** ****

    ** *** ******** ***** the ***** ** ******* a ****** ********** ****** and ******* ** ** a ****** *********** ** get *** ********* ******* of * ***** ********** camera ** * ***** bit ****, **** **** the ****** ********** ****** still *** *** **** feature **** ** *** lower ********** ****.

    ** **********, ****** **** it *** *** *** light, *** *** ***** rates *** ******* ** some ****** ********** ******* have *********** ************ *****.

    Lesson * - ***** *** / ***** *********** *** ****

    **** ****** **** *** idea ** ******** *** compression ***** ** * camera ** *** ****** quality. *** ******* ***** this ** * *** idea, ******* ** ********* spikes *** ********** ** increasing *******.

    ** * **** *** / ****** ***, *** testing *** **** ** get * **** / low *********** ****** ** 'look' **** * ***** default *********** ******, **** so:

    *******, ** *** *****, the ********* *********** ** the **** / *** compression *** ***% ** 400% ******* **** *** 1080p / ******* *********** cameras. ** ****, *** penalty ** ****** ** make ** **** ******, both ** ******* *** storage *****, *** ***********.

    ** **** *****.

    ** * ******** *** / **** ***, *** testing *********** *** * **** / *** *********** ****** to '****' **** * 1080p ******* *********** ******, like **:

    ******* ***** ** ********** with ******** *********** ** the **** ******, ** was ***** ******* ******** inferior ** *** ***** one.

    ***, **** ****** ***** quality *** ***** ********, bandwidth ****** **** **% to ***% ******* *** the **** / *** compression ****** ******** ** the ***** / ******* one.

    *****

    **** ** ****:

    • ** *** *** ***** to **** *********** ** your ******'* *********** ******, understand **** *** ***** will ***** ** ***, because ************* ***** ***** this. ********** * ***** ******** tool** *** ******* *****.
    • ** *** ****** ** do **, *** * higher ********** ****** **** higher *********** ******** ** save ********* **** ********* quality *********.
    • ***** ****** * ***** resolution ****** *** ****** to ******** *** *********** level. ******** ****** * higher ********** ****** ***** may ** ****** **** to ******* **** ******* at *********** ***** ******* / ******* **** **** decreasing *********** ******.

Comments (20)

...try a higher resolution camera with higher compression settings to save bandwidth with minimized quality reduction. Avoid taking a lower resolution camera and trying to decrease its compression level. Consider buying a higher resolution camera which may be better able to deliver that quality at comparative lower network / storage cost than decreasing compression levels.

Higher than what? Than other cameras I have? Other cameras I could buy?

Lower than what?

Roger, as explained in the examples throughout the test report.

his assumption.

 

we dont think about YOU and your property incessantly.

 

...... and you'll be fine  ;)

John, this report is very beneficial to better understand the relationship between resolution and compression settings and the impact upon a users perceived impression of picture quality and standards. However, the image samples generally relate to static targets. If you have a moving target and considerable scene change would there not be an increased risk of more compression artefacts at higher resolution with higher compression? Which would you expect to look better and have sharper stills, a 6 IPS recording at 720p resolution at 2Mbps CBR or a 6 IPS recording at 1080p resolution at 2Mbps CBR assuming it was a Hikvision or Dahua camera at the highest quality setting?

"Which would you expect to look better and have sharper stills, a 6 IPS recording at 720p resolution at 2Mbps CBR or a 6 IPS recording at 1080p resolution at 2Mbps CBR assuming it was a Hikvision or Dahua camera at the highest quality setting?"

If you are using CBR, you can not control the quality settings, by definition. The camera will do that automatically (i.e, as it hits / exceeds the bandwidth ceiling, it will increase the compression level to maintain the bit rate requirement).

As for 720p vs 1080p, I would expect the 1080p to deliver more details than the 720p, even if it had moderately more compression than the 720p in your 2Mb/s fixed bitrate scenario (i.e., the increased pixels would more than offset the moderately higher compression).

Your scenario would need an even, well lit scene to be true John. In low lit areas, a typical Dahua or HikVision camera will well surpass the 2Mbps mark natively and would then become heavily compressed. From the article above, it seems like the 720p would suffer far less than the 1080p.

So I think the real question become where is the trade off from higher res/higher comp to lower res/lower comp a net zero vs a bias one way or the other. I would assume this is a very subjective test and also model/firmware specific.

We'll run a test of 720p vs 1080p in low light this morning.

Please don't speculate. If you think something should be tested, either ask us to test it or submit your own test results.

Btw, we tested 7 models and the patterns were clear across the models, so your assumption that this is 'very subjective' and 'model/firmware specific' will need more evidence to back it up.

John,

We both have speculated here to a degree. My usage of Dahua and Hik cams have shown me that, generally speaking, it is hard to keep them anywhere near 2Mbps in darker scenes, IR or not. It's not to say it isn't possible to turn down sharpness and change other settings to keep the bitrate as low as you can, but under 2Mbps is a stretch. So, as per your testing has shown above, if you have a lower compressed 720p image vs a higher compressed 1080p image, the 720p may win out. However, you suggested the 1080p camera would provide more detail in your reply to Andrew above, which seems to cut against your own findings. So you can see the source of my confusion.

As far as the subjective comment, I was referring to the judgement we all have to make about which image looks better. We can measure many things, such as resolution, compression, etc., but I don't know of a quantitative factor for image quality. I think we would all most likely agree on our picks of favored images, but that just means we are being equally subjective.

"So, as per your testing has shown above, if you have a lower compressed 720p image vs a higher compressed 1080p image, the 720p may win out."

Please stop speculating. We are literally testing this right now. We'll post the results when finished.

"In low lit areas, a typical Dahua or HikVision camera will well surpass the 2Mbps mark natively"

As a point of reference, the typical Dahua or Hikvision camera has integrated IR. More than 60% of both Dahua and Hikvision models have integrated IR, verified by the 400+ models we track in the IP Camera Finder.

So we will test a Dahua and Hikvision IR camera here.

Looking forward to the results of the tests. Ideally would appreciate tests being also performed with good lighting conditions and with high scene change. System designers are always asking me what bit rate they should set a camera at relative to resolution and recording frame rate to achieve high quality play back without compression artefacts. It would be great to establish some guidelines to follow for popular cameras such as Dahua and Hikvision.

"System designers are always asking me what bit rate they should set a camera at relative to resolution and recording frame rate to achieve high quality play back without compression artefacts."

They should not set bitrates (i.e. CBR). Use VBR to ensure that you do not get compression artifacts.

We have done many bandwidth tests (each camera tests comes with bandwidth stats at the bottom). The level of bandwidth depends on the camera model and the scene.

The findings of this test is about patterns, not specific bandwidth levels for individual models. The same thing for a test like Testing Bandwidth vs Low Light (e.g., this shows that when lights go down, bandwidth goes up significantly, but the absolute amounts will vary).

John, most of the projects we get involved with for end users and integrators require continuous recording with a guaranteed recording duration. Dahua hardware is typically deployed at VBR with a capped bit rate setting and the highest quality setting (= 6), typically an IP-HDBW3202 camera may be configured at 6 IPS, 720p resolution, VBR capped at 1,920Kbps highest quality setting (= 6) or at 6 IPS, 1080p resolution, VBR capped at 3840Kbps highest quality setting (= 6). This method allows us to guarantee a minimum recording period as we can calculate the worst case storage requirements and our field testing suggests at these settings we hold picture quality and don't get compression artefacts. However, knowing the "sweet spot" per camera model for encoding settings for holding picture quality with complex changing scenes and guaranteeing recording duration and bandwidth usage is very valuable and any further advice is much appreciated. Dahua claim their newer Eco Savy series such as the IPC-HDBW5202 is more efficient with compression and can provide savings with bandwidth and storage. Have you or can you do comparisons between these different series cameras to confirm if their claims are correct or not without sacrificing picture quality?

We did some additional testing with integrated IR cameras this morning, on this topic, and as well as our Bandwidth vs. Low Light test which we've updated and added to our Bandwidth Guide.

In answer to specifics regarding Dahua and Hikvision 720p/1080p in low light:

  • 1080p does not have a major advantage over 720p in low light, even uncapped. See this example below. Details are only very very slightly improved in the 1080p stream. Quantization on both of these streams was ~29 in Hikvision and ~24 in Dahua (for some reason Dahua quality "4" didn't result in Q28 as it normally has in other models, so it was a bit lower than Hikvision).

  • With a 2Mb/s VBR cap, the same is true. Quantization is higher in the 1080p stream than 720p (Q35 vs. Q33 in Hikvision, Q30 vs. Q29 in Dahua), details delivered are still only marginally different.

Ethan,

Thanks for taking time to test this out. That said, I do have a few questions if you don't mind me asking.

1) The uncapped cameras you used were which models?

2) Did you happen to note the bandwidth usage for the uncapped tests?

3) When you said the quantization increased from 29 to 30 for the Dahua cams, was that true for both 720p and 1080p? They both had the same quantization with the 2mbps cap?

Again, great work. It's much appreciated by members such as myself.

Sorry to dig this from the grave, but I was still hoping for a response from Ethan above.

John,

I don't think Benros has enough pixels between his eyes there, I would not be doing my job if I did not tell you :)

Look familar?

Hi John,

do you have a camera with controllable preprocessor (noise reduction step)? so, is it possible to play trade-off between compression and noise reduction, keeping the same visual quality or same bitate and monitoring bitrate or quality change?

my understanding of your results with resolution / compression / bitrate is that low resolution with low compression ratio can't provide better visual quality as it effectively wasting bitrate to encode noise. and hi-res/hi-compression has a side effect of aggressive noise reduction.

or we can turn this inside out - instead of reducing noise algorithmically it is possible to reduce (lab-only, not in real life) noise physically, by providing more light. is it possible to test, how this hi-res/hi-compression vs lo-res/lo-compression will behave if you increase illumination 2 or 4 times?

can you take a try with that?

"do you have a camera with controllable preprocessor (noise reduction step)?"

Do you mean a camera that allows us to adjust the DNR setting? e.g., see: Camera DNR (Digital Noise Reduction) Guide

yes, exactly that. thank you for that link - this is what i was asking for!

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,376 reports, 859 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Resolution Tutorial on Dec 28, 2017
Understanding video surveillance resolution can be surprisingly difficult and complex. While the word 'resolution' seems self-explanatory, its use...
Introducing Effective PPF (ePPF) - Improving Video Surveillance Designs on Jun 11, 2018
Pixel density (PPF / PPM) is the best metric the industry has to define and project video quality. It allows simple communication of estimated...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Exporting Video Surveillance Tutorial on Oct 05, 2017
Exporting video surveillance is important when incidents or crimes occur. However, there are multiple ways to export video which have their pros...
CBR vs VBR vs MBR - Surveillance Streaming on Nov 21, 2017
How you stream video has a major impact on quality and bandwidth. And it is not simply CODEC choice (e.g., H.264 vs H.265). Regardless of the...
Video Surveillance Bandwidth Guide on Dec 16, 2016
Bandwidth is one of the most fundamental, complex and overlooked aspects of video surveillance. Many simply assume it is a linear function of...
IP Camera Manufacturer Compression Comparison on Nov 27, 2017
Despite the use of standards-based video compression (H.264/H.265), our tests show that default image quality settings for different manufacturers...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
Biggest Low Light Problems 2019 on Nov 08, 2019
Over 150 integrators responded to our survey question: "What are the biggest problems you face getting good low-light images?" Inside, we share...
Video Analytics Integration Guide on Aug 16, 2018
Video analytics is hot again (at least conceptually) but integrating video analytics with VMSes can be challenging. This is especially significant...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Avigilon ACC Cloud Tested on Jul 08, 2020
Avigilon merged Blue and ACC, adding VSaaS features to its on-premise VMS, offering remote video and health monitoring that was previously limited...
The US Fight Over Facial Recognition Explained on Jul 08, 2020
The controversy around facial recognition has grown significantly in 2020, with Congress members and activists speaking out against it while video...
Sperry West / Alibaba Tablet Temperature Measurement Tested on Jul 07, 2020
In April, we ordered a ~$500 temperature tablet from Alibaba. We set it to the side while doing 18 other temperature screening tests but, after...
Facial Recognition: Weak Sales, Anti Regulation, No Favorite, Says Security Integrators on Jul 07, 2020
While facial recognition has gained greater prominence, a new IPVM study of security systems integrators shows weak sales, opposition to...
Video Surveillance 101 Book Released on Jul 07, 2020
IPVM's unique introduction to video surveillance series is now available as a 145-page eBook. Designed for managers, salespeople, and engineers new...
Startup Duranc Presents AI VSaaS on Jul 06, 2020
Duranc presented its system at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from Duranc including IPVM Q&A Background on the...
Low Voltage Nation Wants to "Help You Carve Out A Fulfilling Career" Interviewed on Jul 06, 2020
It is difficult to make your way in this industry as there is little formal schooling. However, one person, Blake Urmos, the Founder of Low Voltage...
The Next Hot Fever Detection Trend - $100 Wall-Mounted Units on Jul 06, 2020
The first wave of the booming fever detecting market was $10,000+ cameras, now interest for ~$2,000 tablets is high and the next big thing may be...
Cisco Meraki Unlocks IP Cameras With RTSP Tested on Jul 06, 2020
Meraki opened up its cameras to 3rd party NVRs/VMSes by offering RTSP streaming because of "the need to solve a business problem". We tested...