Top 9 Actual Excuses of Unethical Relabellers

By John Honovich, Published Jun 02, 2021, 01:57pm EDT

IPVM Image

Here are the top actual excuses unethical relabellers make, and the reality explained, from a conversation IPVM had this week with an ADI salesperson.

Putting one's label on another company's finished product (relabelling) encourages widespread unethical behavior and harms buyers who are deceived in the process.

Sellers make all sorts of excuses to justify their unethical actions but rarely do they do it in writing and at such great length as this 6-year industry veteran of ADI (and previously Anixter) did in a subsequently deleted 20+ comment thread.

These problems have come to the forefront with the NDAA ban of Dahua and Hikvision products and recently ADI's decision to secretly relabel Dahua. Indeed, this ADI salesperson objected to this news. In the process, we cataloged 9 top excuses that are commonly made and in this exchange.

Let's break down each one.

(*) ******** **** ** - ** ******* **** arguably *** **** ****** excuse, **** *********** ******** does **, ******:

** *** **** **** [ADI] ***** ** *** as ***** ***** ***** a *******, *** *** bad **** *** *** about *** *** ******** Video.

******* ***** *** ****** that **** *** *********** thinks ** ** ********* IPVM ** **** *********** (see ******** *** *********,********* *** *********,******* *** *********, ***.), **** ** no ******* *******. ********** wrongs *** ***** ******.

(*) ** *** **** Admit - ** ***** admonishes ** *** ***** foolish ** ***** **** anyone ***** ***** **, saying:

** ****** ****’* ******* to **** *** ***. If *** ****** ******* to **** *** *** OEM **, ** *** industry, * **** * bridge ** **** *** in ********.

*** **** **** ****** will *** ***** **, shows **** **** ** is ***** *** *** important ** ** *** these ********* ** **** their ******, **** ****** realize *** ***** ** what **** *** ******** getting.

(*) ** ***'* *** - ** **** ****** that **'* ** ******* they ***'* ******** *** about *** ******:

***** **** **** ******* it’s ****? *** ************* it *** ***** ******* they **** **** ********, so ** *** **’* being “******” ** ********** and **************** *** *** sake ** ***** **.

**** ** * ****** challenge *** ********* ***********, understanding *** ******* ** basic ***** **** '******'.

** ** **** **** a ******* **** * potentially ******* *******, ** is ********* **** ** their **** ***** **** never ******** **** ** did *** **** **** illegal *******, **** **** are ****** **.

**** ****** ** ** the **** ****:

(*) **** *****, ** Tell - ******* **** is ** ******* ** you *** *** ********* salesperson ** ** ****** has **** ******* *******, they ****:

** **’** *****, ** tell **** **’* *** NDAA *** ****** **** to **** *********.

****** *****, *********, ****** you *** *** *** OEM ****** ** *** then *** *** ****** a **** *** **** asking.

*** *** ***** **** buyers **** ** *** ADI ** ***** ******** companies **** ***** ******** are ********** **** * company **** ** **** banned *** ********** *** human ****** ******?

(*) ** *** ** Stop ** - *** he ******* ********* ** by ****** **** ****** they ******** **** **, that **** ********* ********* to **** ****** **** breaking *** ***:

** *** ***** ********* in ****** *** ******* if **’* ** **** required ********* **** ** suspect ** *** **

******* ** ****** ********** this **-***** (***** ***** of ****** ****** *****), they *** ** ******** that **** **** **** it, ** **** **** out *** ***********, ***** most ** *** **** they **** ***.

**** ** *** ****** one-line ********** ** ***********:

IPVM Image

**** *** *********:

****’* ** ********* **********. We **** ***** ** customers **** ***** **** 10000s ** *********** *** what ** *** ** the ******. ***, *****, the *********** ** ******** disclosed. **** *** ** the ******** ****** *** specifically ******. ** *** feel ****’* ***** ****** to ******* ** ******* a ***** *******, ****’* your ******** ******, ** is ******** *** ******** facts **** **** ********** disproved **** ****** ** “not **********”.

(*) ** **** ***** - ** ******, **********, it **** **** ** selling ** ***** ****** than ***********:

***’* ***** **** ***** out ** *** ******

*** ** ****** **** what **** **** ******** buying **** ********* *******, many ***** ******* *** more ** ***** *** problems ** **** ********.

(*) **'* **** ******** - ****, ***** ******** that:

**** ******** ** * business

********* ******* *** ********* see **** ** **** business *** ** ****** personal **** ** *** buyers *** *** ***** advantage ** ** ******* who **** ***** ******** details.

(*) ********* ** ********* - ******* ** ****** responsibility *** *** ****** they ****, **** ******* it ** ******* ******** else ** ******* ********** they **:

*’* ******** **** ***** item ** **** ****, your *******, **** *** been ****** ** ** made ******** ** ********* that *** ***% ***** rights ******** ******** **** then?

*** *** * **** specific, ***** ******* ********, that ******** ** *** (the ****) *** **** fail ** ******** ** but ******** **** ****** ignore ****, *** ******* investigate ***** **** ** one's ****.

***** ** ****** *** strive ** ********* ********* practices, **** ** ** rationale ** ******* ***** own ***** ******* *****.

(*) **’* *** ******* - *******, *** ********* counter ** **** ** may ** ********* *** it's *** *******:

*** ******* ** *** allowed ** ** **** in ********** ************ ** government ****** ************. ****’* not *** **** ** “illegal”.”

*****, **** ******* ********* is *** ******** *******, does *** **** ****** should ** ********* ******.

********, *** ****** *** these *** ******** *** 'not *******' ** ** used ** *** ** Federal **********, **** ** federal *****, *** *** contractors ** *** ** federal ********** ** **** it ******** ******* *** of *** **** ****, i.e., ** ** *******.

Comments (46)

Avatar

Anthony Jones

06/02/21 06:46pm

***'* ****** ********** *** industry ****** ****** ** every ***** ****!

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 10

Max Protein

06/02/21 07:43pm

** ** **** *********** point **** ********** ** unethical; **** ********** ** unethical; **** ****** *** fallible *********; **** *** is ****; ** ********* else? **’** *** ***** lying *** ********* ** immoral *** *********, ********** of *** ******** ** if ********** ** ********. What ** *** ***** of **** *******?

Agree: 6
Disagree: 2
Informative: 3
Unhelpful: 9
Funny: 1

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Max Protein | 06/02/21 09:06pm

*** ***** ** ** expose *** ******* ******* that *********** **** ** that *** ****** *** be ****** ******** ** the ******* ****. **** that ****?

Agree: 6
Disagree: 1
Informative: 2
Unhelpful: 5
Funny: 1

Undisclosed Integrator #1

In reply to John Honovich | 06/02/21 09:24pm

* ***** **** **'* saying ** **** ***** a *** **** *** "blog" ********** **** *** are ** ********** ******* of. ***'* *** * disagree. **** ***'* ****, it's ** *********, *** it ****** ** ************* as ****.

"**********" ** *...*...

Agree: 9
Disagree: 4
Informative
Unhelpful: 1
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1 | 06/02/21 05:31pm

* ** *** ***** to **** *** ** unhelpful.

******* ** ****, ****** positions ** ******?

**** ** **** **** (the ******* ** ** actual *****) *** *********, as ** **** ** what **** ********. ** you ***'* **** *** style, **** ****. *** Internet ** * *** place. ** *** ******** with *** ******** *** conclusions *******, *** *** welcome ** **** * thoughtful ***************.

Agree: 5
Disagree: 1
Informative: 2
Unhelpful
Funny

Max Protein

In reply to John Honovich | 06/02/21 09:48pm

* *** *** ********* to ** ********* **** my ********. * ***** did *** ********** *** point ** *** *******.

Agree: 3
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful: 1
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Max Protein | 06/02/21 09:53pm

***, * *** ********** there ** #*'* ******** in ** **** *******. If * *** ******* further, ****** *** ** know.

* **** ***** ***** of ******* **** *********** regularly ** * ****** them ********* ** * single ***** ** *** industry *** *** *** pattern *** *** ****** with ***** *******.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Max Protein

In reply to John Honovich | 06/02/21 06:15pm

** *** ****** ** the ******* ** ** inform *** ****** ** the ********* ******* ********* (better *** *** ******** makers ******) *** ** abuse *************, **** ******* agree. ******* ************* ** relabeling ** *********** ************* is **** ******* **** just *** ** ****. I ********** **** ******’* Kirkland ********* **-***** *****, and ** *** **** they ****** ******** ***** procurement *******.

Agree: 6
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful: 1
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Max Protein | 06/02/21 10:39pm

* ********** **** ******’* Kirkland ********* **-***** *****

********* *** ******* *** others:

IPVM Image

* ***** ********** ** that ***** (********) *** not *** ******* *** for *** **** ********, they *** ***** ******* by *********** ********* ************.

** ******* *** ********* than ******* ** **** the ****** ******** ** software **** ******* **** time *** ** ************ remotely **********.

Agree: 3
Disagree: 1
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

Max Protein

In reply to John Honovich | 06/02/21 10:53pm

** **** ********** ** disclosure ****** ** ******* on * ******’* ***? Verbatim ******.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Max Protein | 06/02/21 11:01pm

*** *******

******: ******** *************** **., ***

**** ** *****

**** **** ******* *** Non-Compliant

**** ********?

Agree: 10
Disagree: 2
Informative: 1
Unhelpful: 1
Funny

Max Protein

In reply to John Honovich | 06/02/21 11:05pm

** **** ********** ******* only ** **** ****** sources **** ******* ********** and ***% *********. *******, if *** *********** ** an **** ****** ************, then ** ********** ******** (as **** ***** ****** be ********* ********* *** protected ***********).

Agree: 3
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Max Protein | 06/02/21 07:06pm

*******, ** *** *********** to ** **** ****** manufacturer, **** ** ********** required (** **** ***** simply ** ********* ********* and ********* ***********).

** **** ******* ** such *********** '*********'?

** ** '*********' *********** for * ******** **** provider ** ******** **** ingredients *** ********? * see ** ************** ** analogous ** **** *** IoT *******. **** ********?

Agree: 1
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Max Protein

In reply to John Honovich | 06/02/21 07:17pm

’*********’ *** ** *** legal *****, ** ** my *********** ***** ** free ******; ********* ** in * ** * business ***** ******* ** procurement *******.

****** ** ******** ** components ** * *********** advantage *** *** ********. To **** * **** Chinese ************, *** **** to ** ******* ******** of ****** ****; **** takes ******** *********, *** thus ** ** ****** intellectual ********.

***** ** ** ****** benefit ** ********** **** entire ****** *****; ********* so ***** ** ** overreach ** ********** ******. And ** ** ***** this ******-**-******* ********** ** all ******* **** ********?

Agree: 5
Disagree
Informative: 5
Unhelpful
Funny

Max Protein

In reply to John Honovich | 06/02/21 11:30pm

****’* ** *******: **** we ************ * ******, we ****** ********** **** 5-10 ********* (*******, *******, light ******, ***, ******, etc). **** ** ** disclose ** *** ******’* box?

Agree: 3
Disagree
Informative: 3
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Max Protein | 06/02/21 11:50pm

**** ** ************ * camera, ** ****** ********** from *-** *********

****, ****'* *********. ** you ***, ** *** are '*************' * ****** that's ********* **** **** ADI *** **** ******** is *****, **** *********** a ******** *******.

Agree: 4
Disagree: 3
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

Max Protein

In reply to John Honovich | 06/02/21 11:58pm

**** *** ******* ****** include * *********** ** at ***** * ***** definition ** “*****-********.”

** ** ***** *******, it ** ********** *** warranted ** ******** ** the ******* “*********” ** the *** ** ******* from **** (**** ****** a ****** *******). ******* not ********** ** ******** all ***** ******* (**** harms ** ********).

Agree: 5
Disagree
Informative: 2
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Max Protein | 06/03/21 12:03am

**** *** ******* ****** include * *********** ** at ***** * ***** definition ** “*****-********.”

****'* *** ** **** it *********** *** *** the ***** ****** ** the *******, ********* *****:

IPVM Image

Agree: 2
Disagree: 2
Informative: 1
Unhelpful: 1
Funny

Max Protein

In reply to John Honovich | 06/02/21 08:15pm

******* ********: *** **** NDAA ***** ************ **** it’s ******* ******* ** sell **** ********* ** gov‘t? ********* **** *** absolve *****. *** ****** and ***** *** **** guilty ** ********* ** the ***********, *** **** should ** *********, *** thus ******* **** ***** disincentives (** ****, $$$ fine, ******* ** *******). The ******** ** *** of ********** *** *** illegal; **** ******* ***** certain ************.

Agree: 3
Disagree: 3
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #6

In reply to John Honovich | 06/03/21 06:35am

"* ***** ********** ** that ***** (********) *** not *** ******* *** for *** **** ********, they *** ***** ******* by *********** ********* ************"

******* ***** ********** ** that *** **** ******** can **** **; *** cameras, *** ** **** (unless *** *** ********** and ***** *** ******* to ****** ***, *** purchaser, ** ********* ***** rights ******) . *'** bet *** *** *** use **** ***** ***'* Iot *******, *** **** products ** ****** **** in ********* ***** **********. I ****** ** *** PRC **** ** *** frisbees **** ************** **** can ******* ******** ** allow **** ** ***** at ****** **** * higher ****** ** ******** and ***** **** *** the *** ** * building, ***** *** ******* distributor ** ********* ** they ********* *** **** sold *** ********* ******** elsewhere, *** ****** ******* sporting *** *******, ******* disclosing *** ***.

Agree
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful: 2
Funny: 2

Undisclosed Manufacturer #4

In reply to Max Protein | 06/02/21 06:39pm

******* *****. * **** no ******* ********** **** this ******, *** ** I ***** ****** *** source (*** ****** ************) is *********. * **, however, **** ***** ** an ******* ************** ** ensure **** ****** ** products **** *** **** of * ******* *** for *** **** ** national ******** ******** *** made *****. ** **** have ** ******* **** it, **** ** ** it.

*** ***** ****, * believe, ** **** ***** involved ** **** **** of ******** ***** **** this ****. *** ************ the **** ***** ********* / ************** ** ***** doing ** ** ********* worthy ** *** ********** here ** ****.

Agree: 2
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Blake Murphy

In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #4 | 06/03/21 09:20pm

***** ******* *** ******** "capitalism ** *********; **** humans *** ******** *********". While * ************* **** agree, ****'* ** ****** for *** *****? ***'* this *** **** **** era **** **'** *** in ****** *********? **** in **** **** ** they **** **** ********** or **** * *** treason? * ***** * am **** ****** **** we *** ***** ** be ****** **** **** now, ** *** ***** to ** ********** *********** in **** *** ***. Shame ***** ****** ***** ethics.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Max Protein

In reply to Blake Murphy | 06/03/21 09:36pm

** ** ********* *****: I *** *** ******* that ********** ** *********. I *** ****** ** that ** *** ** the ******’* ******.

** *** *** ******** that *** ****** ** be ************ **** *** in ***** ** *** must **** ********** ********* for **** ****** ****, including **********? **, ****’* a ***** *** ********** opinion. ** *’* *** understanding. **** **** **** have ** ** **** CCTV *** *************?

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #1

In reply to John Honovich | 06/02/21 06:10pm

* ****'* ********* ** Unhelpful **** ***, * know *** ****** **** that.

* ******* *** *************** is *** **** *** language ** *** ******* is ****** ************. ** reads **** **** ***'** pissed *** ***** ********* and ****** ** *** aren't ***** ** ********* about **!

***** *** **** ***** exposé ****** ****, *** this *** ****** **** like *** *** ******** a ***** *** **** telling ******** **** * bad ****** *** **** were *****.

** $*.**, ***** **** you **** *** **.

Agree: 2
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #6

In reply to John Honovich | 06/03/21 05:29am

"* ** *** ***** to **** *** ** unhelpful.

******* ** ****, ****** positions ** ******?

**** ** **** **** (the ******* ** ** actual *****) *** *********, as ** **** ** what **** ********. ** you ********* *** *****, that ****. *** ******** is * *** *****. If *** ******** **** the ******** *** *********** reached, *** *** ******* to **** * ********** counterargument."

** ** *** ******* of **** ********** *** doing *** **** **** are ********* ******* *** deem *********? *'* ****** certain ****** ******* *** stories ** **** **** are ***** ** **********. What *** *** ********* to ** *** ******** of ********** ******** ******* from ********* ***'* ******** are **** ********* ** what *** *** ****** call ***** ****** *******. If ***** ******** **** not **** ********* ** said ******** ** *** specific ******** ********** ****** their ******** **** ******* can ** **** ** assist ** *** ******** of ************ ******** ***** rights ******, ** ***** be ** ** *******/******* and ** ***** *** really ****** **** ****** they ******** ******* ** would ** ****** ** unethical ** ** **? I ***'* *** ********** as ** ********* ********. If *'* *** * say " ******* ** relabel * ***** ***** or *** *** *** why ** **** ** your ********. ** ** state *** ******* ** not **** ********* (***** you ****** *** ***** - ********* ** *** an ****** ****'* **** the ******** ****** ****** every ***) *** *** purchase *** *** ** or ****** ** ** a ****** **** ** illegal, **'* ** *** and *** *** ****. If ** *** ***** it ***** **** *********, it's ** **. ** doesn't ****** ******* ** not ** ***** ** disclose **** ********** ** not ****** ** *** legally ********* **" ***** that ****? **** ******* is ***** ** ********** from * *********** *** you ****'* ** ** senior ********* **********? ** I'm ***** ** ********* an ***** *** ******* attendant ***** *** *********** used ** ******* ***** regional **** ******, ******** that ****** ***** **** I **** ** ********* or *** ********* ** raw ******** ******* *** then ***** ** **** one ******'* ********* ***** a ********* ********** **** as *********** ********..

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed #2

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1 | 06/02/21 09:35pm

"**** ***** * *** like *** "****" ********** that *** *** ** frequently ******* **"

*** **** *** - "by ***** ******* ***** arguments ** *** ********* comments **** **** ***** and *** **** ******* in * ****** ***** such ******"

Agree: 4
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful: 1
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #6

In reply to John Honovich | 06/03/21 05:00am

"*** ***** ** ** expose *** ******* ******* that *********** **** ** that *** ****** *** be ****** ******** ** the ******* ****. **** that ****?"

** - * ****** salesperson ******** ** * single *******.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #6

In reply to John Honovich | 06/03/21 06:00am

"*** ***** ** ** expose *** ******* ******* that *********** **** ** that *** ****** *** be ****** ******** ** the ******* ****. **** that ****?"

*'* ***** ****** ** determine ** **** *** lowly *** *********** *** more ******* **** *** ones *** ****** ** the ******* ** "***" and *** **** ***** sources *** *** ********* in ***** ** ******* these ****** *** *** "top" ******* ** *** one ******* ********* **** one *********** ** * single *********? *, **, 100? *** *** **** other *******? *** ***********; a *** ****...

"******* ***'* ***** ** another *******'* ******** ******* (relabelling) ********** ********** ********* behavior *** ***** ****** who *** ******** ** the *******."

** *** *** *********** the ******** ** *******? Unethical? ** *** *** generalizing; **** ********* ******** is ********** ***** **** the ****** **** ***'** attempting ** **** ** your ********* ****?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #6 | 06/03/21 09:39am

*’** ****** ** ****** of ***** ****** **** the **** *** ***** with ******* ******* **** this. ********* * **** them ** ****** ** on *** ***** ** in ******* ******** **** email *********. ** *’* quite ********* **** **** this ********** ***** ****** sad ** ****** ********** of **** **** *********** say.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Distributor #3

06/02/21 09:57pm

****** ***** *** *********** changes **** ** *** baseline ******* * **** that **** **** ** badge *********** ****** ** banned.

** *********** * ** not **** *** **** on *** **** & skin ******* ** *** firmware.

Agree: 2
Disagree: 1
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Distributor #3 | 06/02/21 10:01pm

* ***** * ********** solution ***** ** ********* disclosure ******* ** ********** guidelines, ****:

IPVM Image

*** *** *** *******.

Agree: 4
Disagree: 2
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #6

In reply to John Honovich | 06/03/21 03:17pm

** ***** ** **** the ******* **** ****** are *** *** **** nutritional.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 7

Undisclosed Integrator #6

In reply to Undisclosed Distributor #3 | 06/03/21 03:20pm

"****** ***** *** *********** changes **** ** *** baseline ******* * **** that **** **** ** badge *********** ****** ** banned.

** *********** * ** not **** *** **** on *** **** & skin ******* ** *** firmware."

*'* ******** ***** ********* the ********* ********* ** be **** ********* ***** suffice..

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 1

Undisclosed Manufacturer #4

06/02/21 10:14pm

**********, * ** **** information **** **** ** being *** *** *****. But **** ** **** is ******* *'** *** to **** **** **** customers **** ****'* **** they **** ****** ********* product ****** ***** ****** making *** ******** ** (unfortunately) ***** ***** ****'** made *** ********. ** both *****, **** **** they **** ********.

* *** **** ********** is * ****** ****** used ** "*************" *** don't **** ** ******** make ***** *** ***** -- *** ****'* ********* acceptable -- *** **** the ******* ****** ******** the **** *** ********* aren't **** ** *****, then * **** ****'* unethical. **** ** ****, though, ***** ** *** integrator / ******** **** actually **** *** ******** to *** ******** *** NOT *** ************. **'* their ************** **********, *** if **** ** ***** hidden **** ****, **** either *** ************ ** being ********* *** *** making ** ***** ** front, ** *** ******** for *** ***** ***** due ********* ** ****** they're ******* ****** ********, or (****** ******) ****.

** *** *** ** the ***, * ******* that ****** **** *** a ******* **** **** content ****** ***** ***** product (******** ** *********) or ** **** ******* to ********. ** **** mentioned, *****'* * *** of ***** ****** *** can ** ****** ** elsewhere ****** **** ** critical ** ******* **** don't ***** ****.

Agree: 4
Disagree: 1
Informative: 2
Unhelpful: 1
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #6

In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #4 | 06/03/21 05:42am

" ** **** *********, there's * *** ** other ****** *** *** do ****** ** ********* rather **** ** ******** of ******* **** ***'* agree ****"

**** *** ** ****?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 2

Garry Clark

In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #4 | 10/13/21 02:12pm

*** ************ ****** *** where *** ******* **** from *** ** ** not **** *** **** of *** ** ** say ***, ** **** with ****.

** * ***** * car ** * **** and ** ****** **** out *** ***** ** the **** *** **** back **** *** *** , ** **** *** guilty.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Manufacturer #5

06/02/21 11:57pm

***** ** ******* ********** unethical ***** ********** ** OEM *** *** ************ this **** ** *** the ****** **. ****** every ******** **** **** in **** ******** ****** tangible *** ********** ********. House ****** ** ******* stores, ******* ******* ******, and ******** ******* *** perfect ********.

************* ** **** * federally ****** ******* ***, in ****, ** ***** rights ********** ***\** ******** security ******** ********** ** IoT ******** **** ******* confidential ****.

******* *** *** ****** lobby *** ********** ** make ******** ***-********* ******* the *** **** **** surgeon ******* ******** ** alcohol *** ******* ********. My ********: ** ** anti-capitalistic ** ***** ** OEM ** ******** ***** source, *** ** *** public ******** ** ***** such *** ** ***-**** compliant.

Agree: 2
Disagree: 3
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #6

In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #5 | 06/03/21 07:13am

"************* ** **** * federally ****** ******* ***, in ****, ** ***** rights ********** ***\** ******** security ******** ********** ** IoT ******** **** ******* confidential ****. "

********* ****** ** ******** use *********; *** ****** the ***** ** *** moment. ** ******* ** why *** ********** ****'* ban **** ******** *** all *** *********; ***** a ******** ******** ****** and ***. *** *** do *** *** ***** in *** ***** *****? The *** *** ** charged **** * ****** degree ** ********** *********** of ****** ************ ** we ***'* **** ** worry ***** *** *** Dahua. ***'* ****? **'** going ** **** **** new ********** - ****, keep *** ****** ****** up. *** *** **** still ****** ***** ****** abuses; ** ***'* **** them * *** *** we *** **** **** we *** ********* **** to **** ****** *** own *** ****. ***** may *** *** ** collect ** **** *********** from ** *** *** own *********** ***'* **** a ****. * **** so **** ****** *******. I'm ******** ****** **** the **** *** *****.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Ross Vander Klok

IPVMU Certified | In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #6 | 06/03/21 01:34pm

*** *** ** *** job ***** ** *** first *****?

*****......... ******* ** ** the **********?

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny: 2

RICHARD STUART

In reply to Ross Vander Klok | 06/07/21 01:20pm

**** ****** ******* *** administration ** *** **** did **** **** ***** in *** *********** ** a ******** *************. ***** need *********** ** ******** to ** *******.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Blake Murphy

In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #5 | 06/04/21 01:24am

** ******* ** ****** capitalism ** *** ******* of ******. **** ** why * *********** ******* with ** ****... ******* we ****** **** ** a ***** ****** **** "services **********" & ***** creating ********* ******* ** on-selling **** ** **** on ***'?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #6

06/03/21 03:11pm

"*****......... ******* ** ** the **********?"

*** **

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed #7

06/09/21 02:01am

** ** **** ***** before * ***** -- and *** **** **** can ***** ** **** history -- *do ******, ****, ** ********* any *** ** ***** products (** *** ** the ******* *************, *** that ******), *** ** fact * ******** ********* against ****. **** ** NOT * **** ** support ** ***** ******** in *** ***, *****, or ****.

**** **** -

**** ** ** ********** pointless ****.

*****, *** **** ** NDAA ********** ** *** something **** *** ************ should ** ******** ** broadcast, ******* ** ** not ********* **** ******* everyone. ***** * ***************** *** * ********** ban ** ***** ********, the ******* ** **** there ** ***.It ** *** ************** ** *** ***** ** ****** ** **** ** *** ***** **********************.*** ****** *** ** obligation ** ******* ***** certification ****** **********, *** beyond ****, ***** ** no "**********" ** *** vast ******** ** ******** -- ****** *** ******** industry ** ******* ** it -- **** ***'* meet **** ******** *************. An ******* ****** *** industry ** ***/***** ***** printers -- **** **** an ****-********* *******, *** the ******** ****** *** not ****-********* *** ***** is ** "*** **** COMPLIANT" ***** ******** ** them. *** ****** ***** be.

******, ***** * ***'* support ** *** ***'* buy ** ********* ********* products, *** ******** ** relabeling ******* ** ***** industry *** ** *** from ********* ** *******. There ** ******* ********** unethical ***** **. *****, it ** ** ** the ***** ** ********* the ********** ** *** devices **** ****** ** buy. ** **** ** a ******** ***** *** the ***** *** *** seller ******* ** ******** it? ***** ****, *** buyer ****** ** ********* else.

****, **** ******** ** posting ** *********** **** a *********** ** ********* that * **** ******* in *** ****. ** least **** **** ***** is ** **** ******** to **, *** ** doesn't **** **** ******** any **** ********. ****** the ******* (** ** clear, ******* ******* * have ** ********** ******* and ******** ***'* ******) and ********* ***** **** based **** ** *********** with * *********** ** entirely ********** ** *** clickbait ********* **** ***** has ** *****. ****** this *********** ** ******? Yes. ** **** * poor ********** ** ***? Of ******. **** *** inclusion ** *** ** this ******* **** ** better ** *** ***? Absolutely ***.

***** ***** ** ***** completely ********* *** ***** of **** ****.

Agree: 1
Disagree: 2
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | 06/09/21 11:32am

*****, *** **** ** NDAA ********** ** *** something **** *** ************ should ** ******** ** broadcast, ******* ** ** not ********* **** ******* everyone.

*** ***'* ******** ******* that ** * ******* principle, *.*., **** ********* only ***** ** ** disclosed ** ** ******* everyone. ** ********* ** illegal ** ********* ** a ****** ** ******, it ** ***** ********** and **** *********** ****** regularly. **** *** ***** are ** ******* **** of ****, **** ** only * *** ** 100 ****** ***** ** made **** ** **, it ** ***** *********.

******, ***** * ***'* support ** *** ***'* buy ** ********* ********* products, *** ******** ** relabeling ******* ** ***** industry *** ** *** from ********* ** *******.

**** ****** ****** ****** does *** **** **** ethical. ** *** ***** it's ******* ** **** one's ******, **** *** case *** ***'* ****** to *** ***** ** happens. **** ** ********* things ****** ******** *** that **** *** **** it *****.

**** *** ********* ** ADI ** **** ******* make ** ****** ** any ***? ********** ***.

*** ********* ** *** shows **** ** **** a ***** ****** (*** US' ******* ******** ***********) and **** *** ******* from ***** **** ****** controversy **** -*** ******** ******** *****.

Agree: 2
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Manufacturer #8

10/13/21 02:07pm

** *** **** ***** the ********* ** *** article, ***-****** *** ** enrolling.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 1

Undisclosed Integrator #9

10/14/21 04:45am

** ******* ****** **** to ******** ** **** are ******* ******** ***.

**'* * ********** ***** to **** *** ******** them ********.

Agree
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 1
Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 7,270 reports and 968 tests and is only available to subscribers. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a subscriber? Login here | Join now
Loading Related Reports