QoS for Video Surveillance

By: IPVM Team, Published on Dec 29, 2017

Along with VLANs, QoS is one of the most misunderstood topics in IP surveillance networks. Many purported "experts" claim it is required in any and all surveillance systems, but little clear guidance is given about why, leaving those new to the field confused. In this note, we cover the basics of QoS, what it is, how it is applied, and when it should be used.

Inside we explain:

  • What is Quality of Service
  • How Quality of Service is Applied
  • Limitations
  • Practical Uses
  • Setting up QoS
  • Quiz Yourself: 5 Question Quiz to measure your knowledge on QoS for Surveillance

This is one of many tutorials on networking for surveillance. Others include: Wireless Networking for Video Surveillance, Network Addressing for Video Surveillance, Bandwidth Guide for Video Surveillance, Remote Network Access for Video Surveillance, Network Monitoring / SNMP for Video Surveillance, and more.

***** **** *****, *** is *** ** *** most ************* ****** ** IP ************ ********. **** purported "*******" ***** ** is ******** ** *** and *** ************ *******, but ****** ***** ******** is ***** ***** ***, leaving ***** *** ** the ***** ********. ** this ****, ** ***** the ****** ** ***, what ** **, *** it ** *******, *** when ** ****** ** used.

****** ** *******:

  • **** ** ******* ** Service
  • *** ******* ** ******* is *******
  • ***********
  • ********* ****
  • ******* ** ***
  • Quiz ********: 5 Question Quiz to measure your knowledge on QoS for Surveillance

**** ** *** ** many ********* ** ********** for ************. ****** *******:******** ********** *** ***** Surveillance,******* ********** *** ***** Surveillance,********* ***** *** ***** Surveillance,****** ******* ****** *** Video ************,******* ********** / **** for ***** ************, *** ****.

[***************]

What ** ******* ** *******?

******* ** *******(***) ****** ** ********** used ** ****** ********************* ******** ************. *********, it ** ******* **** IP ***** ** **** services *** ******* ** the **** ******* ** typical **** ******* (**** transfers, ******** ***, ***.). Video *** ***** *** highly *******-*********, ****** ***** other ********, *** *** be ********* ******** ** bandwidth ** *** *******, resulting ** **** ******* and **** *******. ***** issues *** ****** ** dropped ******, ******** *******, camera ************** ** ***** undesirable ** ************* *******.

How *** ** *******

***** *** ***** ******* by ***** *** ** generally *******:

  • ** ***********:******* *** ** *********** is ******* **** ******. This ****** *********** *** allocates ********* ***** ** the **** ** *********** it ******. *** *******, FTP ******* *** ** assigned * ***** ******** than ********* *****, ** maintain ****** ***** ***** and *******. ******* *** by *********** ******** **** all ********** (*******, ********, servers, ***.) ******* ***, normally ***********, *** **** ****** means ***** ** ******* traffic ** *** ***********.
  • ** ****:***************** ** ******** ********* QoS, ******** * ******** VLAN ****** ******** **** the ****** ***, ** cameras, *******, *** ******* clients ******* * ****** share ** *********. ******* QoS ** **** ******** that *** ******* ******* VLAN *******, *** *** is *** ** *** switch, ********* ******* ******* at *** *******.
  • ** ****:*******, *** *** **** be *** ** ****. This ** ********* *** used ** ********, *** may ***** ** ********* by ******* ************** ** database ******* *** ******* a ******* ****** ** guaranteed ********* ** ******* their ****, ***** ***** performing ******* *****, ** not. **** ****** ** more ****-********* ** *********, since *** ***** **** be **** ** ******* login, ****** ********** **********.

** ****** ***** ****** is ****, ** *** is *******, ******* ******** must ** ****, ** QoS *** *** ** configured ** ********* ********. Below ** ******* ** example ** ******* ******'* QoS ******** [****: * Cisco ****** ** ***** as**** *** **** ****** in ************ ********].

QoS Settings on Managed Switch

**** *******, ***********, **** ********* ******** that ***** **** ***.** and **** ******** ****.

No **********

*** ** * ************** in **** *****, *** not * ********* *********, arranging *** ***** ** which ******* / **** are ****** *** *******. Some ******** *** ***** bandwidth ***********, ******** ******** services ** ******* **** X ****** ** *********, instead ** * ****** prioritization. *******, **** ** generally *** ****, ** it ** ******** ** more ********* ********** ********, and ********** ** ***** connections ******* ******** ** WAN ***********. ** **** cases, ************** *** ******** is **********.

Dedicated ** ****** ******* ***

*** ************* ***** * dedicated ******** ******* (**** ****** ** ** video), *** **** **** little ********* ******. ***** below *** *** ********** derived **** ********** ******* which ********** *** ***** majority ** ************ ******** are *********, *** ******** likely **** *** ******* from ***.

***** *** ** ********* gains ** ******** *******, i.e., ************, ****** *******, and ** ******** *** used ** *** **** network, *** ******* **** is ****** ***********.

** ****** ********, *** may ** ***** *** systems ** *** ****. In * **** ** eight ****** ****** ******* a ****** ** * small ****** ** ****** applications, ******* *** **** available ********* ******* *** is **********. *******, ** larger *******, **** ** schools, ***-***** *******, ****** environments, ***., *** ** more *********, ** *** necessary, ** ***** ******** may ****** ****** *********.

Setting ** ***

*** *******, ** * shared ********** *******, ***** IP ************, *****, *** data *** *** *******, QoS ** ********* *** in *** ** *** ways:

  • *****, ** ***********, ***** DiffServ ******* ** ********** applications. *********, ***** ** prioritized *****, ******** ** video, **** **** ********, internet ****, *** ***** general ****. *********** ** voice ** **** ********** to *****, ***** ***** may ****** ***** ******* better, ****** ***** *** higher ********. ** ** example ** **** ** IP ****** ***** *****. When ***** ********, *** must ** ********** ** each ******, ********* ** entering * ******** **** point (****), ***** ********** to ******** *****, ******** in *** ******. ** some *******, ********* ***** may ** *** *** services **** ** *****, video, *****, *** **********, so ***** ********* *** prioritized **********. ****, *** not ***, ** ******* supports ******** ** ***** ahead ** *** **** to *** **** ******. Below ** ******** ************* for * ********* ******:

DiffServ Configuration on IP Camera

  • ******, ** ****. ** this ****, *** ****** voice ****, ******** ** security, *** ******* ** file ******** *** ******** data ***** ***** ** assigned *** ** * whole. *** *** **** part, **** ** *********** the **** ** *** by ***********, *** ********************* ** *** ****, meaning **** ********** *****, audio, */* ****, *** other ***-***** ****** ********* all ******* *** **** priority.

CBR **. *** *** ***

**** ******* * ******* enabled *** ***, *** can *** ** **** camera ******* ** ******* quality ** *******. ** do **, ****** / *** **** bit **** ****, ** CBR, ** **** **** constrain ******* *********** **** network. ********* *** *** will ******* *** **** predictable *******. ***** *** or *** **** **** provides * ***** ********* target, ******** ****** ********** of **********, ***** *** provides ************** ** *******, reducing ******* *** ****** loss. *****, ***** *** bitrate ******* *** * Hikvision ******.

IP Camera Bitrate Settings

***********

***** **** *********** ****** to *** ***** ************ systems ** * ********* network, *** ** ********* not ******. ** ******, shared ********, *******, ** becomes ***** ** ********** unexpected *********** ***********.

Test **** *********

**** ***** ******** *******

[****: **** ******** *** originally ********* ** **** and ************* ******* ** 2017]

Comments (14)

Randy Lines

12/29/17 05:16pm

Thanks for the great article :) Would love to see more on managed switch settings for video optimization and security. Personally I don't think that I use a managed switch to its full capacity.

rbl

Chad Rohde

In reply to Randy Lines | 01/06/18 03:42am

Extra security always a good idea. But if you don't have any video quality issues then I would say let it be unmanaged. And you will never use a truly managed switch to its full capacity capabilities because many of the settings are for special situations and sometimes old technology. I see more problems with customers that decide to tinker around in the settings doing more harm than good. Not saying you would be one. But I know I have locked myself out of my share of switches/routers. 

Chad Rohde

In reply to Randy Lines | 01/06/18 03:49am

You may already be aware of this, but one beneficial thing your managed switch should be able to do that comes in handy is turning POE on and off for each port. Network admins lazy cure all. Boot it.

Undisclosed Manufacturer #1

12/29/17 05:19pm

Great article

Undisclosed #2

12/29/17 06:41pm

Given most integrators prefer to run their surveillance systems on a dedicated network, QoS is generally not needed. 

Yes but even with all the cameras on a dedicated network, the viewing clients are typically on the corporate LAN. Moreover, this bandwidth demand is not bound to the number of camera streams, but to the number of viewers of those streams.

Wouldn’t QoS possibly be helpful when deployed on those segments?

Avatar

Walter Holm

IPVMU Certified | In reply to Undisclosed #2 | 01/05/18 03:44pm

Given most integrators prefer to run their surveillance systems on a dedicated network, QoS is generally not needed.

QoS could still be important on a private LAN if you consider that you may have cameras that are more critical than others and possibly have choke points with uplinks in your network.

Wouldn’t QoS possibly be helpful when deployed on those segments?

This would depend on the capabilities of the camera, are you multicasting?  Then no, but if you set up multicast into the customer's environment will you melt their core?  Maybe.  Without the correct forever morphing network design (or you can use the right core equipment and then yes, multicast is easy), this might not be the route you want to go.  If you do, call us.

If you are doing two unicast streams from the camera (if capable), then you are using twice the bandwidth (assuming same quality, frames, etc.).  QoS will be helpful if you have cameras more important that others.

However if you are pulling from the VMS, then you can design it such that this should not be an issue.

 

 

Undisclosed #2

In reply to Walter Holm | 01/05/18 06:43pm

No, Walter I’m not talking about multicasting or ‘melted cores’ or ‘forever morphing network design’ or even cameras really.

I’m talking about QoS as it pertains to video distribution on a corporate LAN.  Your garden variety stuff.

Avatar

Walter Holm

IPVMU Certified | In reply to Undisclosed #2 | 01/05/18 08:49pm

I was trying to answer the question completely. I will try a general answer though, gotchas included:

If you have a lot of camera data and certain cameras matter or on the customer's network camera data means more that other traffic (like general internet) then yes, QoS can benefit if there is a constriction in the network.

My 1st answer was trying to address the challenges in the dedicated network, the uplinks to the customer network and possibly video needed across a WAN link. QoS can address priority or address reserved bandwidth, usually not both.

Chad Rohde

In reply to Walter Holm | 01/06/18 03:32am

forever morphing network design

Sounds cool. What is it?

Chad Rohde

In reply to Undisclosed #2 | 01/06/18 03:27am

QoS of some type is beneficial to any size network. Even a single computer. Especially a windows PC. Usually one PC on an Internet connected network has sufficient amount of bandwidth. But lets just say they only have a 5 mbps up and down Internet connection. And user leaves Window updates to default settings. When patch tuesday rolls around the corner while the user is online gaming, there will be issues. Microsoft will open about 30 download and 30 upload connections at once. Which stomps the quality right out of your service.

Undisclosed #2

In reply to Chad Rohde | 01/06/18 05:45pm

Microsoft will open about 30 download and 30 upload connections at once. Which stomps the quality right out of your service.

With or without the gamer online, it sounds like the Internet for the office is going to be impacted.  So how would you configure the QoS in such a situation containing surv video as well?

Avatar

Walter Holm

IPVMU Certified | 01/05/18 08:48pm

.

Chad Rohde

01/06/18 03:13am

However, this is generally not used, as it is featured in more expensive enterprise switches, and restricted to trunk connections between switches or WAN connections.

Generally not used maybe, but it is also featured in sub $20 SoHo wifi routers/switches/APs. No restrictions that you mention either. 

I know my beloved Mikrotik will win this argument and require an edit to original post.

Dennis Ruban

01/07/18 10:54pm

You're doing great job posting those network-related articles!

regarding this one, I agree with a conclusion: most of the security networks are physically separated from the data networks, so QoS is not something people need to think about. And if we have a big corp network with different services, including CCTV, there's always a qualifier network admin to think about architecture so CCTV guy don't need to do anything, except setting up the numbers in the device settings

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,298 reports, 840 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Last Chance - Spring 2020 IP Networking Course - Register Now on May 06, 2020
This is the last chance to register for the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals, taught...
Converged vs Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial on Feb 12, 2020
Use the existing network or deploy a new one? This is a critical choice in designing video surveillance systems. Though 'convergence' was a big...
BICSI For IP Video Surveillance Guide on Feb 11, 2020
Spend enough time around networks and eventually someone will mention BICSI, the oft-referenced but only vaguely known standards body prevalent in...
Glossary / Acronyms for Video Surveillance on Feb 10, 2020
This directory provides definitions and explanations for over 70 common video surveillance industry terms, including links to related IPVM...
Network Cabling for Video Surveillance on Jan 15, 2020
In this guide, we explain the fundamentals of network cabling for video surveillance networks, how they should be installed, and the differences in...
Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. Because video surveillance can consume an immense...
Horizontal Cabling for Video Surveillance Guide on Jan 03, 2020
There are a few options when it comes to professionally installing horizontal cabling for video surveillance networks. The three options examined...
Altronix Claims Tango 'Eliminates Electricians' on Oct 15, 2019
Power supply provider Altronix claims its new Tango power supply 'eliminates the need for an electrician, dedicated conduit and wire runs'. In...
Siklu $400 Compact 60GHz Radio on Jul 24, 2019
Siklu first entered the video surveillance market with a $6,000 per link solution, is now aiming down market with their newest 60GHz wireless...
Dahua ePoE Long Distance UTP / Coax Tested on May 03, 2019
Dahua's Enhanced PoE (ePoE) line is claiming extended video and power transmission over 600m without repeaters, with devices interchangeable via...

Most Recent Industry Reports

LIVE NOW "Fever Camera" Show on Jun 02, 2020
IPVM is excited for the world's first "Fever Camera" show, to be held today Tuesday, June 2nd and Wednesday the 3rd from 11am to 4pm EDT, giving...
Smart Entry Systems Presents Cloud Multi-Tenant Access Control on Jun 02, 2020
Smart Entry Systems presented Cloud Multi-Tenant Access Control at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video...
Genetec Drops Support for Dahua and Hikvision on Jun 01, 2020
Genetec has dropped support for Dahua and Hikvision, citing US blacklisting and ONVIF conformance blockage, the company informed partners in an...
Dotty "Hot Or Not" Elevated Body Temperature App Tested on Jun 01, 2020
What if you could take an existing phone or tablet and transform it into "fever camera"? That is what DottyAR is doing with their strangely named...
Optris "Fever Screening Systems" Examined on Jun 01, 2020
German manufacturer Optris has been building temperature measuring instruments for industrial manufacturing for over 15 years, and thermal cameras...
Fever Camera Sales From Integrators Surveyed on Jun 01, 2020
Fever cameras are the hottest trend in video surveillance currently but how much are integrators selling them? 220 integrators answered the...
Proxy Presents Mobile Credentials For BLE Devices and Access on May 29, 2020
Proxy presented Mobile Credentials For BLE Devices and Access at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video...
ISC West 2020 Moves To The Basement on May 29, 2020
The twice cancelled/postponed show will now not only be held in a different month (October) but on a different floor, moving down to the...
Integrators Avoiding Coronavirus Air Travel on May 29, 2020
IPVM asked integrators if air travel is part of their 2020 plans to see how significantly Coronavirus will impact future...
Viakoo Presents Cyber Hygiene for Cameras on May 28, 2020
Viakoo presented its 'Cyber Hygiene' and 'Service Assurance' products at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A...