PPF vs Lighting Variances

By: John Honovich, Published on Oct 08, 2012

A major flaw in using Pixels Per Foot (PPF) to specify surveillance cameras is how easily the metric is undermined. Theoretically, you should specify a PPF number, say 50, and know that you will be able to capture facial details regardless of the camera or situation.

The great hope of PPF is that it is an independent, cross industry metric. Unfortunately, it is not. In this note, we show a practical example where even modest lighting variances undermine the accuracy of the metric.

The image below is from a 10MP camera that a manufacturer uses in their standard marketing. We have zoomed in and overlayed the image detail for two portions of the scene (A and B) to demonstrate differences in actual image quality. Take a look:

--

Try it yourself with the original 10MP image. Digitally zoom and pan to compare the image quality of different portions of the scene.

Notice how the facial details in zone A are much more detailed than those in zone B, despite zone A having less PPFs than zone B.

Why?

Cameras are sensitive to both the amount of light in the scene and the variance of light within the Field of View. While the image as a whole is in fairly ideal conditions - not low light nor faced with direct sunlight - zone A is evenly, brightly lit, while zone B, underneath the awning is darker.

Though some cameras are better than others in WDR, this common situation, will regulary cause variances in image quality, regardless of a PPF specification.

Hurts Megapixel More - Indirectly

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

While any camera faces lighting variances, megapixel (especially multi-megapixel) ones are more likely to find this to be a practical problem. Since megapixel cameras often are used to coverage larger areas, whether it be through fisheye or simply wide angle lenses, the larger the area covered, the more lighting variances are likely. The example above shows that even in a hand picked manufacturer marketing sample, such variances can still impact details captured notably.

What to Do?

One either needs to overspecify the PPF level (i.e., 70 instead of 50, etc.) or accept that some areas of a scene with fail to capture the level of detail projected due to lighting variances. Ultimately, this is not just a specific camera problem but a fundamental flaw of the PPF methodology (though cameras that are better at WDR or night time imaging can somewhat help minimize these problems).

This, of course, gets far worse when dealing with very demanding situations, like low light or direct sunlight. See our PPF test results for more.

Lessons from IPVM Class

This issue was raised in an excellent discussion during a class of the IPVM Advanced Surveillance Course (hat tip Rod for calling out the specific example above).

Earlier in the course, we asked the following question:

ppf results

The right answer is that you cannot abstractly know how many pixels per foot you need to capture a face until you understand the scene conditions. The example above is an excellent example of that. You might just 'throw more pixels at it' by specifying a higher metric (say 60ppf instead of 40ppf) but it's still an imprecise (and potentially inefficient) way of doing so.

Unfortunately, this shows that there is no easy way out if you want to both capture high quality details and not 'waste' pixels. Carefully evaluating site conditions and setting the right customer expectations is essential.

Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Integrated IR Camera Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 30, 2020
The best and worst cameras tested in this IPVM shootout showed major...
Cheap Camera Problems at Night on Feb 19, 2020
Cheap cameras generally have problems at night, despite the common perception...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of...
Facial Recognition 101 on Mar 18, 2020
Facial recognition interest, use and fear is increasing. This guide aims to...
Anixter Runs Fake Coronavirus Marketing Using Shutterstock Watermarked Images on Jul 24, 2020
Coronavirus faked marketing is regrettably commonplace right now but Anixter...
Injes Tiny Temperature Terminal Tested on Jul 17, 2020
While temperature terminals have trended bigger, the Injes DFace801 is...
TVT / InVid Facial Recognition Tested on Mar 25, 2020
Facial recognition is frequently sold for thousands of dollars per channel...
Fever Camera Sales From Integrators Surveyed on Jun 01, 2020
Fever cameras are the hottest trend in video surveillance currently but how...
Sunell Panda Cam Body Temperature Measurement Camera Tested on May 14, 2020
Sunell is far less well known than its gargantuan domestic competitors Dahua...
Video Analytics 101 on Mar 16, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals of video surveillance...
Faked Convergint Fever Camera 'Expert' Marketing on Jun 16, 2020
Convergint touts they are "THERMAL CAMERA SOLUTION EXPERTS" while faking...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new...
Convergint Refuses To Fix Faked Fever Marketing, FTC Complaint Filed on Jun 19, 2020
Since Convergint has refused to fix their faked fever camera marketing, IPVM...
Monitoreal "Completely Autonomous" Home AI Tested on Feb 12, 2020
Monitoreal claims to allow users to "see the things you want (people,...
Opgal ThermApp MD Thermal Screening System on Apr 21, 2020
Israeli thermal provider Opgal claims they were first on the market detecting...

Recent Reports

Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...