Police Require Problem Businesses To Get Video Surveillance

By: Ethan Ace, Published on May 31, 2016

Government intrusion or smart practice?

One city is requiring business that cause repeated problems to get video surveillance. In this note, we examine what they are doing and the pros and cons of this approach.

********** ********* ** ***** practice?

*** **** ** ********* business **** ***** ******** problems ** *** ***** surveillance. ** **** ****, we ******* **** **** are ***** *** *** pros *** **** ** this ********.

[***************]

Approach ********

*** **** ** ********* has ***** ********* ********** classified ** ******* ******** Properties [**** ** ****** available] ** ******* ************ systems. ******* ******** ********** are ***** ***** ******* three ***** ********** ** a ** *** ****** (noise, **** *******, *********, harassment, *** ****) ** two ******* ******* ** a ****, ********* ****, weapons, *******, ************, ***. These *************** *** ***** to **** *********** *** business **********, *** **** businesses *** ******** ** install ************.

**** ********** ** * nuisance, ****** *** ******* a **** ** ******* these ********* **** **********. Businesses *** ******** ** install ************ ** **** of **** **** (****:***** ************ *** *** shown ** *** ******** above). ****** **********/**** ******* is *** ********, **** that *** ****** ** installed *** *********.

********** *** ********** ***** *** improvement ** ******** *** ******* (via *****) *** ****** response ** ***** ********, and ***** ***** ********* being *******, ***** ** to $*,*** *** ****** for ********** ***********.

**********

***** *** *** ********* advantages ** ***** ************:

  • ******** *****:** **** ** ****** incidents, ********* ************ ******* may ******* ****** **** video ** ********* ***** none *** ********** *********.
  • **********: **** ******* ************* ********* and *******, ********* *** be **** **** ****** to ****** ****** ******. Some ******** ******** *** stop ******** **** ************** as **** ****** ***'* want *** ****** ** them ********.

*************

*******, ***** *** *** disadvantages *** ****** ***, as ****:

  • ********* ********* ************:****** *** ****** ****** in *** ******** ************ system **** *** **** to **** ***** ************, with ****** ******* ***** to ****** ****** *** positioning, ******* *******, ** professional ************, ****** *** system *********** ******* **** the *****.
  • ****** *** ********* ** maintain: *******, ****** ****** *** install ************ ** ***** to **** **** ***********, they *** *** ** motivated ** ******** * system **** **** ****** to *******. *******, ******, or ***** ********** *** fail, ******* ****** **** no ***** ** **** of *********. **** **** no *********** ************ *** codified ** *** ******** ordinance.

** * ********* ******** for *** ******** *****, some *********, **** ***** doing ** *****, *** simply *** **** *** notion **** ****** *** be "********" (****** **** view ****** ** *** required and ** ********) *** stop *********** *** ********, affecting *******. 

****

**** ** *** *****? Is **** ********** * good ****, ****** ** reduce ********* *** **** police *** ***** *****? ** is ** * *** idea, ********** ********* *** unlikely ** ******* *******?

**** ** *** **** and *******:

Comments (15)

Must require a minimum base line spec to be followed and approved by City through permit process.

Is that from a document?

From a UK perspective, this is the default for bars, clubs. Part of the licensing conditions will be the requirement for CCTV.

The issue is its not "to a standard" but its still a general requirement.

More regulations imposed by bureaucracy that has minimal understanding of what they are requiring always sounds like a good idea. Also love the idea of mandating an additional cost of doing business.

The Police tend to find its a waste of time just arresting, charging etc,its often the same people fighting / dealing or causing issues. Using the CCTV they tie in "pub watch" schemes and Police orders banning individuals from the venues or the areas.

To work you need the full circle, councils, businesses and Police to buy in. If you don't its seen as an extra cost and wont be used effectively :)

Businesses are required to install surveillance as part of this plan...

Is this actually part of the Milwaukee Nusiance Ordinance, or some creative police interpretation of the statute?

Well, it would appear to be a strong arm tactic of LE since there is no explicit remediation involving purchasing video surveillance anywhere in the very long statute.

Police must approve of a plan, if they don't they can put a 24/7 cctv truck watching the property and charge you for it.

So I assume that threat is enough to make property owners comply with the far less costly suggestion of self monitoring.

Overreach for sure, but couldn't be for a better cause!

note: I voted "just show me the results".

Detroit is saying they will eventually require businesses that are opened past 10pm to connect to the PD.

"Chronic Nuisance Properties are those which receive three minor complaints in a 30 day period..."

Required upon COMPLAINT? Not upon conviction?

What a great new lever to push! Three noise complaints in a month? Thousands of dollars in costs as well as the disruption of an installation?

In one case, a disgruntled individual made verifiably false official statements which successfully enlisted the coercive power of government to place demands upon business resources. Resultant government inspections cost about half a person-day. Proving the statement false required more than an additional person-day. Beyond these costs, no long term ill occurred, but those false claims had the (unrealized) potential to terminate the business.

The individual wasn't punished -- for him: mission accomplished.

If only I were a trunk slammer....

Step one: purchase a few dozen TracFones (burner phones)

Step two: Call in three noise complaints on each and every piece of city-owned property, forcing the city to install video surveillance.

Step three: Show up at City Hall with a van full of DVRs and Cameras.

Step four: Profit?

As a potential downside for the business owner, some clientele, even those doing no wrong, may simply not like the notion that police may be "watching" (though live view access is not required and is unlikely) and stop frequenting the business, affecting revenue.

Why would the clientele think the police were involved at all, and not just think that the business put in a security system on their own?

Related: I just saw this article about a town in Iowa expanding their surveillance ordinance to businesses other than convenience and liquor stores:

While the current ordinance essentially requires convenience stores and liquor stores to have cameras, the proposal would add banks and credit unions, carry-out restaurants, coin dealers, payday lenders, firearm dealers, hotels, cellular phone dealers, money transmission services, pawn brokers, pharmacies, scrap metal dealers and second-hand goods dealers.

Most of these businesses are likely to have systems anyway (which the police acknowledge in the article) but interesting that they require it by law for this many categories.

Video has not proven to be a deterrent for many of the named crimes listed above so that pro is out the window. Sounds like more uninformed government overreach.

This was mandated by the State of Florida in the late 80's for C-Stores and the like, open after 11PM along with lighting, clear windows, etc. Lots of pushback and rebellion from C-Stores until they could buy $300 DIY systems from Sams!

Another simple solution that might work. 

From the perspective of local municipalities… for private property deterrent alarm systems.   

No permits, no registration, no regulations, no requirements of any kind, except fines/fees for false police reports, paid by the caller.   Calls from monitoring firms for emergency police response to private property deterrent alarm systems will receive the same priority as all other citizens.  

Emergency police response only IF witness to a 911 type emergency.  Lower priority response would apply for all other "suspicion calls".  

Remote Video or remote audio could qualify as remote witness (but not ECV).  This would be motivation for private upgrade to audio/video witness technology if wanting the emergency service. 

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Police

Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Oct 17, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Critiquing Carnegie's AI Surveillance Paper on Sep 25, 2019
The Carnegie Endowment has issued an ambitious paper on the Global Expansion of AI Surveillance. While its aim is applaudable, the paper has...
UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019
Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Aug 13, 2019
Biometrics are commonly used in phones, but how frequently are they used for access? 150+ integrators told us how often they use biometrics,...
Embattled $400 Million China Funded Philippines Surveillance System Proceeds on Jun 13, 2019
An embattled 12,000 camera surveillance system project that will cost ~$400 million will proceed. The project contract was awarded, had its...
China Jaywalking Facial Recognition Guide on May 27, 2019
News reports touting the PRC's AI prowess often showcase facial recognition cameras being used to automatically catch and fine jaywalkers. In...
Kidnapping Victim Rescued With Video From Ring Doorbell Camera on May 24, 2019
A kidnapping victim was rescued within 24 hours, with the police crediting video from a Ring Doorbell camera as key to solving the case. A girl was...
Amazon Ring Public Subsidy Program Aims To Dominate Residential Security on May 20, 2019
Amazon dominates market after market. Quitely, but increasingly, they are doing so in residential security, through a combination of significant...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Door Controllers Guide on Oct 22, 2019
Door controllers are at the center of physical access control systems connecting software, readers, and locks. Despite being buried inside...
Alarm.com Acquires OpenEye on Oct 21, 2019
Alarm.com is targeting commercial expansion and now they have a commercial cloud VMS with the acquisition of OpenEye. In this note, based on...
Government-Owned Hikvision Wants To Keep Politics Out Of Security on Oct 21, 2019
'Politics' made Hikvision the goliath it is today. It was PRC China 'politics' that created Hikvision, funded it, and blocked its foreign...
Integrated IR Camera Usage Statistics 2019 on Oct 21, 2019
Virtually every IP camera now comes with integrated IR but how many actually make use of IR or choose 'super' low light cameras without IR? In...
Alarm Veteran "Demands A Criminal Investigation" Of UL on Oct 18, 2019
The Interceptor's Project pressure against UL continues to rise. Following Keith Jentoft's allegation that "UL Has Blood On Their Hands", Jentoft...
Camect "Worlds Smartest Camera Hub" Tested on Oct 18, 2019
Camect is a Silicon Valley startup that claims the "Smartest AI Object Detection On The Market", detecting not only people and vehicles, but...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Oct 17, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Camera Calculator V3.1 Release Improves User Experience on Oct 17, 2019
IPVM has released a new version of our Camera Calculator, V3.1, with significant user experience improvements, a new development plan, and an...
Securing Access Control Installations Tutorial on Oct 17, 2019
The physical security of access control components is critical to ensuring that a facility is truly secure. Otherwise, the entire system can be...
Access Control Course Fall 2019 - Last Chance on Oct 17, 2019
Register Now - Fall 2019 Access Control Course. Thursday, October 17th is the last day to register. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access...