PoE vs Low Voltage Power Supplies Cost Compared

Author: John Honovich, Published on Jan 23, 2011

In this note, we contrast the cost of powering cameras via Power over Ethernet vs a non-powered switch plus a low-voltage power supply. Conventional wisdom tells us that powering cameras via UTP cable also carrying data provides great cost savings. Rarely, however, do we see costs comparisons from anyone but PoE manufacturers. To that end, we examine the economics of various configurations of PoE and low-voltage power supplies.

Factors Driving Costs

To understand which offers lower costs, we must appreciate the factors driving cost and how they favor one approach vs the other.

The following factors favor PoE:

  • Eliminates secondary power cable. Since power can run over the UTP cable needed for video transmission, a PoE solution eliminates the cost of an 18/2 power cable. Specific savings will vary greatly depending on (1) the length of the cable needed and (2) the requirements for plenum. The longer the cable run and the more plenum is required, the greater the savings are for PoE. We estimate savings of $5 - $20 per camera.
  • Eliminates a conventional power supply. Since the network switch acts as a power supply, a PoE solution eliminates the need to purchase a low-voltage power supply. We estimate this saves $5 - $10 per camera.
  • Eliminates power cable termination. Since power runs over the the UTP cable needed for video transmission, no additional cable termination is required. We estimate this saves $12 - $25 per camera (assuming labor rates of $70-$100 and 10-20 minutes per termination).

The following factors favor low-voltage power:

  • Allows using a much lower cost switch. Adding PoE power to switches significantly increases the cost of the switch. We estimate savings of $20 - $25 per camera
  • (OR) Eliminates the use of a PoE midspan. PoE midspans can be quite expensive. We estimate $20 - $25 per camera.

Note: for any given IP camera using PoE, power will be provided by a switch (with PoE) or a midspan (not both simultaneously). The total cost reduction is $20 - $25 from one of these two options.

Less expensive PoE switches are available but they only provide 7.5 watts per port which can cause risk for many deployments when the average IP camera requires more than 7.5 watts (up to 15 watts).

Cost Savings Overview

We expect PoE power to save about $10 - $30 per camera over low voltage power supplies - a modest but real savings. Savings increase (to the higher end of this range) with longer cable runs and requirement for plenum (as conventional power requires an additional cable). These savings decrease with larger camera counts as conventional power supply costs become more cost effective with larger sizes (i.e. the per camera cost of a 16 camera power supply is much lower than an 8 camera power supply).

Detailed Equipment Cost Comparisons

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

For these comparisons, we chose the Cisco 300 series, the lowest cost member of their small business managed switch line. Note that none of the 300 series switches used for comparison provide full PoE power to all ports. Only a single 8-port model offers 15.4 watts on all ports, with all others offering only 7.5 watts. This may be a problem, depending on the power draw of the camera. For more information on calculating power budget, see our Powering Video Surveillance Report.

For power supplies, we chose Altronix, simply because they are well known as the industry leader, and readily available. We will also examine the cost of utilizing a PoE midspan instead of a PoE switch, another common discussion in the industry. Microsemi 3500 midspans (their most cost-effective line) were used for these comparisons.

Cabling to each camera is assumed to be riser-rated, with an average length of 150’, and West Penn Wire (part numbers 224 and 4245) was used for pricing.

Using the 300 series, the numbers look like this:

Eight Cameras

Non-PoE

PoE Switch

PoE Midspan

Switch

$125

$225

$170

Power Supply

$70

N/A

N/A

18/2 Power Cable Plenum

$168

N/A

N/A

Midspan

N/A

N/A

$450

Cat 5e

$240

$240

$240

Additional Labor

$150

$0

$30

Total

$753

$465

$890

Note: additional labor is amount of labor costs above and beyond the simplest installation option - a PoE switch. Non-PoE will have the highest additional labor costs as cabling needs to be terminated for each camera to the low voltage power supply.

For 8 cameras, a cost savings of $293 in PoE’s favor (using a 7.5 Watt per port switch). Using a 15 watt per port network switch (the Cisco SF302-08MP runs about $300), the savings would reduce to about $220.

Sixteen Cameras

Non-PoE

PoE Switch

PoE Midspan

Switch

$200

$400

$200

Power Supply

$100

N/A

N/A

Midspan

N/A

N/A

$800

18/2 Power Cable Plenum

$336

N/A

N/A

Cat 5e

$480

$480

$480

Additional Labor

$300

$0

$40

Total

$1,416

$880

$1,520

For 16 cameras, a cost savings of $536 in PoE’s favor for using a PoE Switch (remember though this is a 7.5 Watt per port solution). Moving to a switch which provides 15.4W across all ports requires moving to the Catalyst 2960 line, which comes at a $1,400+ premium. This obviously makes lower-cost switches with midspans a more attractive option, especially when the other more advanced features of these switches are not required.

Other Factors to Consider

Considering that these are purely equipment and cable costs, PoE emerges as more cost-effective, with some key caveats: not every device will accept PoE power, and PoE will not necessarily provide enough power for every application. PTZ cameras, cameras with heaters/blowers or IR illuminators, or other devices may require dedicated low-voltage cabling. For more detailed information on power supply selection and application limitations, see our Powering Video Surveillance Report.Consider also that wall-mount power supplies were used, though rack-mount units are often preferred for neatness of installation and centralization of equipment. With rack-mount power supplies often costing up to twice as much as a comparable wall-mount unit, the gap between PoE and low-voltage power supplies increases further. PoE midspans drive up costs even further, above and beyond the pure equipment costs, in that they require an additional patch cord, and additional time to patch and manage cable in the rack. We recommend carefully examining camera and switch specifications before simply determining PoE is best for your application.

1 report cite this report:

PoE for IP Video Surveillance Guide on Mar 08, 2018
This guide provides comprehensive explanations of the elements in selecting and using Power Over Ethernet with IP cameras, covering: PoE vs Low...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
 Register for the Spring 2019 Access Control Course----Closed IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Door Operators Access Control Tutorial on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex. The mechanisms needed to...
Axis Supports HD Analog on Apr 15, 2019
In 2017, Axis declared 'Everything is IP': Now, in 2019, Axis has released support for HD analog, with their new encoders.  Why the change?...
Pole Mount Camera Installation Guide on Apr 11, 2019
Poles are a popular but challenging choice for deploying surveillance cameras outdoors. Poles are indispensable for putting cameras at the right...
Spring 2019 IP Networking Course- Register Now on Apr 04, 2019
Register now for the Spring 2019 IP Networking course here. Just $299 for the course. This is the only networking course designed specifically...
Large Hospital Security End User Interview on Mar 21, 2019
This large single-state healthcare system consists of many hospitals, and hundreds of health parks, private practices, urgent care facilities, and...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Cable Firestopping Installation Guide on Mar 06, 2019
Installing cables through firewalls is a critical installation issue. Failing to properly seal a penetration can cause smoke and fire to spread,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada Salesman: IPVM "Stuck In A The Stone Age" on Apr 25, 2019
Verkada is 'tackling dinosaurs' and battling those, like IPVM, who are 'stuck in a the stone age'. Verkada's recent sales recruiting promotion...
The HIVIDEO $31 Face Detection DVR Tested on Apr 25, 2019
Face detection in a $31 DVR? That is what "HIVIDEO" (not to be confused with Hikvision, even if the company intends to do that) was promoting at...
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact