PoE: Switch vs. Midspan

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Mar 12, 2012

Whether to use PoE switches or midspans is a fundamental decision with strong opinions on both sides. Some insist that midspans are completely unnecessary, given the reliability and lower costs of PoE switches today. Others insist that midspans offer flexibility and reliability that switches do not. To find out what is really selected, we asked 100 integrators what they used as part of our Winter 2012 Integrator Survey.

The Responses

Here is a visual breakdown of their responses:

An overwhelming majority of respondents (86%) preferred PoE switches to midspans. This is not surprising, as past discussions have indicated preferences for PoE switches, as well.

PoE Switches

By far, the most common reasons given for using PoE switches were lower cost and greater simplicity. PoE switch pricing has come down in the past few years, making the combination of a non-PoE switch plus a midspan more expensive, as we discussed in our PoE cost comparisons. Additionally, a midspan takes up another space in the rack, and requires two patch cables instead of one, making PoE switches simpler to install.

  • "No brainer here. Why use two devices when the job can be accomplished by one. Reliability of the power is not a factor. POE switches are cheap. The installation is cleaner with a single switch."
  • "Where ever possible we use quality PoE switches, again fewer components. Keep it simple"
  • "PoE switches where possible. Gives me the possibility to remotely reboot cameras that have lost contact. Injectors only when installing in an existing network with existing non-PoE switches or at low cost installations with outdoor cameras that we power through the housing and need one or two indoor cameras."
  • "Keeps the installation simple and clean. A switch is a required component; adding power to it reduces cost and total number of parts to install."
  • "PoE switch is cheaper than a midpsan plus a regular switch. Some midspans cost more than PoE switch! PoE switches have worked fine for us."
  • "Fewer components, lower cost. We don't get into situation requiring super heavy duty high power POE so off the shelf power is fine for nearly all of our applications."
  • "Less rackspace, less heat, the patch cables. Less is better. Now if it's a couple cameras then we use single port injectors"
  • "Simplicity and cost. If you are providing the switches for a separate network (my preference) then just make the switch POE. All of the IT departments we have dealt with if they are providing the switches go this route as well."
  • "For standard 15W PoE, we find that PoE network switches work best. Many of our municipal clients furnish their own switches or have direct accoutns with HP, Dell, or Cisco and want to purchase them direct. The cost differential between a PoE switch and a non-PoE siwtch is usually less than privding a midspan."

Another feature which received multiple mentions is the ability to remotely monitor and reset power on specific ports:

  • "POE switches give you much more control, the ability to remotely power cycle a port is a big advantage where you have very dispersed installations."
  • "PoE switches where possible. Gives me the possibility to remotely reboot cameras that have lost contact."
  • "Going directly to a switch offers the management capabilities to see power used and reset power to a given port. There are a few midspans that offer such, but many times at a greater cost."

As the last commenter said, these features are available in some midspans, but typically add to cost, making midpans even less cost effective compared to switches.

Midspans

The most common reason given for preferring midspans was that it created a clear delineation of responsibility. Using a midspan also allows IT departments to deploy their typical equipment, often non-PoE switches.

  • "I prefer injectors, it gives a good point of demarcation between the IT and Security departments. It also gives our technicians the ability to plug a laptop into an IP camera without the connecting the laptop to the corporate network."
  • "We have seen issues with bad ports and faulty ports as well as ghost issues with POE power. We typically spec the switch but don't always offer so it would be best to use injectors to keep the burden off of our solution (responsibility wise)."
  • "Most importantly for us is the midspan provides an excellent boundary between what we are providing and what the owner is responsible for. We dont need to worry about the owner wanting a Cisco, HP, etc. type switch."

Trends

These preferences remained fairly unchanged across all average system sizes. Integrator preference towards analog or IP cameras had no material impact.

4 reports cite this report:

PoE for IP Video Surveillance Guide on Mar 08, 2018
This guide provides comprehensive explanations of the elements in selecting and using Power Over Ethernet with IP cameras, covering: PoE vs Low...
5 Most Common PoE Questions on Feb 02, 2017
In our IPVM IP Networking course, Power Over Ethernet (PoE) is a core component that students show significant interest in. The top ones...
PoE Midspan With Switch Tested on Mar 23, 2016
Both PoE switches and midspans generally provide power to network devices. One question that is regularly raised in IPVM classes is whether...
Video Surveillance Statistics Directory Vol 2 on Mar 18, 2012
In this report, we aggregate and present numerous statistics about how surveillance is being used in the real world. Recently, we conducted an in...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports on Power

Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
Installation Hardware for Video Surveillance - Indoor Fasteners on Jun 22, 2018
As part of our Installation for Video Surveillance series, in this note, we cover drywall anchors. A key part of installing security hardware is...
Powerline Networking For Video Surveillance Advocated By Comtrend on Jun 08, 2018
Powerline networking, using existing electrical wiring, has been around for many years. Indeed, over the years, some video surveillance providers...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jun 07, 2018
H.265 support has improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and more manufacturers...
Princeton Identity Access 200 Iris Scanners Examined on Jun 05, 2018
Iris recently registered a big jump as a preferred biometric in our Favorite Biometrics survey, but access-ready options can be difficult to...
Installing Box Cameras Indoors Tutorial on May 22, 2018
This tutorial starts our physical installation for video surveillance series, starting with Box Cameras, one of the oldest and most basic types....
Vivotek 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested (FE9391-EV) on May 08, 2018
Next in our 12MP fisheye camera evaluation, we bought and tested Vivotek's latest generation FE9391-EV, a new model claiming improved smart IR...
IP Network Hardware for Surveillance Guide on May 02, 2018
Video surveillance systems depend on IP networking equipment. In this guide, we explain the key pieces of equipment and features, explaining where...
Alarm.com Business Market Expansion on Apr 13, 2018
Alarm.com has millions of subscribers, but the company has traditionally been mostly a residential/home focused offering.  ADC's new Smart Business...
Axis Launches Mini Concealed IR PTZ on Apr 11, 2018
Axis has been a laggard in releasing IR PTZs. While the company released a laser focus PTZ (the Q6155-E tested) until now Axis has had no PTZs with...

Most Recent Industry Reports

AI Startup Anyvision Raises $28 Million Led By Bosch on Jul 20, 2018
Anyvision is the most ambitious heavy-spending video surveillance startup in many years. And, now, the startup has raised $28 million led by...
Fail: Dahua "Didn't Check The Lux Levels but It Was Dark" on Jul 20, 2018
Dahua UK has been promoting their camera quality on LinkedIn: I, and others, asked what the lux level of the scene was. (background: Lux Rating...
Free 100+ Manufacturer-Customized Camera Calculator Released on Jul 19, 2018
Now, any manufacturer has a customized IPVM Camera Calculator, free. The goal is to make it easier for companies to help their customers better...
Improved Security And Surveillance Bidding - 2018 MasterFormat Divisions Examined) on Jul 19, 2018
Navigating the world of system specifications and bidding work can be complex and confusing, but a standard format exists, and understanding it...
Last Chance - Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 19, 2018
Today is the last day to register. Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security...
Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Ladder Lockdown and Ladder Levelizer Tested on Jul 18, 2018
Ladders are a daily necessity for surveillance and security installers, but working on an unstable surface can be extremely dangerous. In addition...
FST Fails on Jul 17, 2018
FST was one of the hottest startups of the decade, selected as the best new product at ISC West 2011 and backed with tens of millions in...
Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact