PoE: Switch vs. Midspan

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Mar 12, 2012

Whether to use PoE switches or midspans is a fundamental decision with strong opinions on both sides. Some insist that midspans are completely unnecessary, given the reliability and lower costs of PoE switches today. Others insist that midspans offer flexibility and reliability that switches do not. To find out what is really selected, we asked 100 integrators what they used as part of our Winter 2012 Integrator Survey.

The Responses

Here is a visual breakdown of their responses:

An overwhelming majority of respondents (86%) preferred PoE switches to midspans. This is not surprising, as past discussions have indicated preferences for PoE switches, as well.

PoE Switches

By far, the most common reasons given for using PoE switches were lower cost and greater simplicity. PoE switch pricing has come down in the past few years, making the combination of a non-PoE switch plus a midspan more expensive, as we discussed in our PoE cost comparisons. Additionally, a midspan takes up another space in the rack, and requires two patch cables instead of one, making PoE switches simpler to install.

  • "No brainer here. Why use two devices when the job can be accomplished by one. Reliability of the power is not a factor. POE switches are cheap. The installation is cleaner with a single switch."
  • "Where ever possible we use quality PoE switches, again fewer components. Keep it simple"
  • "PoE switches where possible. Gives me the possibility to remotely reboot cameras that have lost contact. Injectors only when installing in an existing network with existing non-PoE switches or at low cost installations with outdoor cameras that we power through the housing and need one or two indoor cameras."
  • "Keeps the installation simple and clean. A switch is a required component; adding power to it reduces cost and total number of parts to install."
  • "PoE switch is cheaper than a midpsan plus a regular switch. Some midspans cost more than PoE switch! PoE switches have worked fine for us."
  • "Fewer components, lower cost. We don't get into situation requiring super heavy duty high power POE so off the shelf power is fine for nearly all of our applications."
  • "Less rackspace, less heat, the patch cables. Less is better. Now if it's a couple cameras then we use single port injectors"
  • "Simplicity and cost. If you are providing the switches for a separate network (my preference) then just make the switch POE. All of the IT departments we have dealt with if they are providing the switches go this route as well."
  • "For standard 15W PoE, we find that PoE network switches work best. Many of our municipal clients furnish their own switches or have direct accoutns with HP, Dell, or Cisco and want to purchase them direct. The cost differential between a PoE switch and a non-PoE siwtch is usually less than privding a midspan."

Another feature which received multiple mentions is the ability to remotely monitor and reset power on specific ports:

  • "POE switches give you much more control, the ability to remotely power cycle a port is a big advantage where you have very dispersed installations."
  • "PoE switches where possible. Gives me the possibility to remotely reboot cameras that have lost contact."
  • "Going directly to a switch offers the management capabilities to see power used and reset power to a given port. There are a few midspans that offer such, but many times at a greater cost."

As the last commenter said, these features are available in some midspans, but typically add to cost, making midpans even less cost effective compared to switches.

Midspans

The most common reason given for preferring midspans was that it created a clear delineation of responsibility. Using a midspan also allows IT departments to deploy their typical equipment, often non-PoE switches.

  • "I prefer injectors, it gives a good point of demarcation between the IT and Security departments. It also gives our technicians the ability to plug a laptop into an IP camera without the connecting the laptop to the corporate network."
  • "We have seen issues with bad ports and faulty ports as well as ghost issues with POE power. We typically spec the switch but don't always offer so it would be best to use injectors to keep the burden off of our solution (responsibility wise)."
  • "Most importantly for us is the midspan provides an excellent boundary between what we are providing and what the owner is responsible for. We dont need to worry about the owner wanting a Cisco, HP, etc. type switch."

Trends

These preferences remained fairly unchanged across all average system sizes. Integrator preference towards analog or IP cameras had no material impact.

4 reports cite this report:

PoE for IP Video Surveillance Guide on Mar 08, 2018
This guide provides comprehensive explanations of the elements in selecting and using Power Over Ethernet with IP cameras, covering: PoE vs Low...
5 Most Common PoE Questions on Feb 02, 2017
In our IPVM IP Networking course, Power Over Ethernet (PoE) is a core component that students show significant interest in. The top ones...
PoE Midspan With Switch Tested on Mar 23, 2016
Both PoE switches and midspans generally provide power to network devices. One question that is regularly raised in IPVM classes is whether...
Video Surveillance Statistics Directory Vol 2 on Mar 18, 2012
In this report, we aggregate and present numerous statistics about how surveillance is being used in the real world. Recently, we conducted an in...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports on Power

Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Bad: Dahua Villa Video Doorbell Tested on Jan 11, 2019
Doorbells are one of the hottest segments in the residential market but Dahua's Villa Video Doorbell is the worst we have tested.   We bought and...
Managed Video Services UL 827B Examined on Jan 09, 2019
Historically, UL listings for central stations have been important, with UL 827 having widespread support. However, few central stations have...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
DirectView Aims To Be A Video Surveillance Power Like Tyco on Jan 02, 2019
DirectView is a publicly traded US company that tells IPVM that it has ambitions to be the next ADI, Anixter, or even Tyco. In this note, we share...
Startup Sunflower Labs' Autonomous Drone Security System on Dec 11, 2018
Startup Sunflower Labs is claiming a unique design on a home security system, combining autonomous drones and 'Sunflower' sensors. Imagine an...
Ideal SecuriTest IP Vs Unbranded IP Camera Install Tool Tested on Nov 21, 2018
In our recent IP camera installation tool shootout, multiple members questioned the Ideal SecuriTest IP's features compared to low-cost unbranded...
Openpath Access Control Tested on Nov 20, 2018
Big investment in access startups is uncommon, but Openpath has recently attracted $20 million doing just that. The company has limited security...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact