Pixels Determine Potential, Not Quality

By: John Honovich, Published on Oct 20, 2013

Pixels = resolution = quality is not always true, since other factors impact quality (low light, bright light, lens quality, etc.).

However, pixels determine potential quality. In this note, we explain why you will make much clearer and better decisions recognizing this.

Demonstrating **** **** ******

****'* * ********** **** quality, **** '**********' *****:

**'* *** ****** **** across * ***** **** of * - * feet, ********** * **** ~100***.

*** ******** **** **** this *** *******, *** resolution *****:

**** ** * ****** wide *** * ***** of ** ****** ******** the **** ***** **** as *** ***** ***** (enlarged ** *** *** see **). **** ** clearly *** *******.

***? *** ****** *** being ****** ** ***** areas ***** **** *** details *******. *** *** see ** *** ********** of *** *****. ***** blocks *** *** ****** of *** *****.

*** ***** ***** *** 3 ** *** ** pixels *** *** *** make *** ****** **** all *** ********** ******.

*** ***'* ******** *** pixels / ********** *** this *****.

* *** **** ******* are ***** ******** ***, as *** ****** ** pixels ********* **** ** total ** *** *** each ***** *** *** cover * ******* ****.

***'* ******* *** *** images ** *** *** details ** *** ***** improve:

** *** ****** *****, the **** **** ****** than *** ****** *** therefore ***** *** ** captured. *******, ** *** latter ***, **** ****** cover ** **** ******* than ** ********** ***, allows *** **** ** be ******** ** *** black ****.

***'* ******** *** ****** for **** *****, **** 140 ** ***:

** **** ***** ****** a ******* ****, **** features ******** ** ****** - ****, ****, ***. and *** **** ****** more ******** (********, ****, etc.).

*******, ****'* * ******* ranging **** ** ** 2120 ****** ******** *** same ****:

*******, ** ** ********* pixels *********, *** **** fine ******* **** *** be ********.

*** ******* ***** ***** images, ********** ** *** 'good' *** ****** ** encoder *** ***** *** capture ***** ******* ******* the ****** **** ******** too ***** ** **** for ****. **** ** what ** **** ** pixels ********* *********.

Pixels ****** ** *******

* *** ****** **** never ******* *** **** details ** *** **** of * ******* ** a **' *******. ** ****** ***** the *********, ******* *** pixels **** ***** *** large ** **** ******** (25ppf) ** *** ***** a **** ** ** the **** ********.

*******, * *** **** covering **** **** **' wide ************* *** **** *******. It *** *** *********, because *** ****** **** be ******** ***** ****** areas (*****).

**** *********, ******, ** a ******* *********** ***** bound ** **** ********* factors ****:

  • ******* ** ******* ** low ***** ****** (***** most ***+ ******* *** terrible **).
  • ******* ** ****** **** dynamic ***** ****** (**********).
  • ******* ** ****, *********** of ***** *** *********** any***********.
  • ********** *********** ********* / loss ** ******* (***********).
  • ***** ** ********* ** subject ** ****** (** the****** ** *** ****** *** ****** ** looking ***** **** *** camera, **** ****** **** not ****).

Quality ** ******

**********, ***** ******* ** driven ** * **** dozen ******* ********. ***** pixel ******* / ***** determines *** ********* ******* and *** ******* ********** details, ***** ***** *******, that *** ***** ********** and ******* ***** ************, ********* *** ***** dramatically ********* *** ****** image ******* ********.

Comments (6)

"Pixels Determine Potential, Not Quality" - very well said.

Point well made on pixel potential. Another area you may have already covered but I failed to locate, is the pixel as it stands alone. Maybe you have an opinion on the future of camera specifications and whether manufacturers will need to become more detailed in how they arrive at a product specification based on the construction of the sensor. just a few random thoughts here:

Are all pixels created equal? Isn't pixel size the most important part of imaging? When comparing same sized sensors with the same pixel count, one may have smaller pixels than another which could affect what? Is one sized pixel better than the other smaller or larger? Is this what makes one camera better than another?

If the cameras success is so dependent on 6 factors, how does this information help anyone decipher a manufacturer's specification or brochure to decide between the 100's of choices in cameras from 1MP to 5MP now? ie. what is the best sensor? what is the best SNR? what is the best WDR? What is the best light? What is the best sensitivity range? etc.

David, great observations / questions.

"Are all pixels created equal?"

No, just like all apples are not created equal. Problem #1 is figuring out how they truly differ and how significant that difference is. I just don't know. Also, since most major manufacturers obscure where they get their sensors from (is it an Optina XYZ or an Omnivision ABC), it's hard to even guess.

"Isn't pixel size the most important part of imaging?"

I think pixel size is quite overrated. We are doing a study of pixel size / imager size / resolution comparing it to our test results. My gut feel though is that the correlation between pixel size and quality is weak (even for low light where pixel size is most often argued as a key driver).

"If the cameras success is so dependent on 6 factors, how does this information help anyone decipher a manufacturer's specification or brochure to decide"

I do not think this is possible. Specifications/brochures are good starting points (what are the physical specs - focal length, f stop, pixel count, audio, IR, etc., etc.) but the things that truly differentiate image quality - low light performance, WDR capability, integrated IR adjustment - are hard to determine by simply comparing specs. That's why we do tests and that's why we find variances between specs and performances so commonly.

Is there a specific formula or rule of thumb to figuring out ppf (Example from above: 1mp camera with subject at 50' wide FoV= 25 ppf), or has this been determined from your own research? Im having trouble because it seems there are so many variables that there can't be a uniform way to do this. Perhaps some analyzing software? Thanks

Figuring out how many PPF you need or how many PPF you will get in a given scene? The latter is pretty simple - the formula is just horizontal pixel count / horizontal FoV width.

How many PPF you need is a little more tricky because there are a bunch of things that go into. See our Definitive Guide to PPF for an answer.

Perceived quality per pixel density is sometimes hard to overcome with the general public / business environment. In general, a quick metric is what is wanted in determining if a system is better than another. Unfortunately an attempt to establish a quick metric for a complex system usually means either don't have/want to take the time to understand or is a marketing ploy...

The movie Spinal Tap has a great analogy for an incorrect use of a simple metric for an amplifer, "these go to 11."

Just my rambling thoughts on the matter. Regards.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Lens Focal Length Tutorial on Jul 10, 2019
3mm, 6mm, 2.8 - 9mm, 5 - 50mm, etc. Camera specifications often list lens lengths but what do they mean? These metrics are important in...
Hikvision ColorVu Camera Tested on Jun 24, 2019
Hikvision says their new ColorVu line captures "vivid chromatic images in darkness", with unconventional white light illuminations whereas most...
Hikvision DeepinView Camera Analytics Tested on May 08, 2019
Hikvision is expanding its 'deep learning' offerings with a new camera series called 'DeepinView' claiming false alarm reduction and improved...
Subnetting for Video Surveillance on Apr 30, 2019
This guide explains when subnetting is used on security networks, and how it works. We explain how to add or remove IP addresses to your range,...
The HIVIDEO $31 Face Detection DVR Tested on Apr 25, 2019
Face detection in a $31 DVR? That is what "HIVIDEO" (not to be confused with Hikvision, even if the company intends to do that) was promoting at...
Door Operators Access Control Tutorial on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex. The mechanisms needed to...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...
Pole Mount Camera Installation Guide on Apr 11, 2019
Poles are a popular but challenging choice for deploying surveillance cameras outdoors. Poles are indispensable for putting cameras at the right...
Axis 5MP P Vs Q Camera Shootout (P3227-LVE vs Q3517-LVE) on Apr 02, 2019
While Axis' Q3517-LVE tested well, it is one of Axis' most expensive dome cameras, over $1,000 USD. Because of this, members asked us how it...

Most Recent Industry Reports

History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to emerging into an AI cloud era.  The goal of this history...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact