Pixels Determine Potential, Not Quality

Author: John Honovich, Published on Oct 20, 2013

Pixels = resolution = quality is not always true, since other factors impact quality (low light, bright light, lens quality, etc.).

However, pixels determine potential quality. In this note, we explain why you will make much clearer and better decisions recognizing this.

Demonstrating **** **** ******

****'* * ********** **** *******, **** '**********' *****:

**'* *** ****** **** ****** * ***** **** ** * - * ****, ********** * **** ~******.

*** ******** **** **** **** *** *******, *** ********** *****:

**** ** * ****** **** *** * ***** ** ** pixels ******** *** **** ***** **** ** *** ***** ***** (enlarged ** *** *** *** **). **** ** ******* *** quality.

***? *** ****** *** ***** ****** ** ***** ***** ***** than *** ******* *******. *** *** *** ** *** ********** of *** *****. ***** ****** *** *** ****** ** *** pixel.

*** ***** ***** *** * ** *** ** ****** *** you *** **** *** ****** **** *** *** ********** ******.

*** ***'* ******** *** ****** / ********** *** **** *****.

* *** **** ******* *** ***** ******** ***, ** *** number ** ****** ********* **** ** ***** ** *** *** each ***** *** *** ***** * ******* ****.

***'* ******* *** *** ****** ** *** *** ******* ** the ***** *******:

** *** ****** *****, *** **** **** ****** **** *** pixels *** ********* ***** *** ** ********. *******, ** *** latter ***, **** ****** ***** ** **** ******* **** ** individual ***, ****** *** **** ** ** ******** ** *** black ****.

***'* ******** *** ****** *** **** *****, **** *** ** 240:

** **** ***** ****** * ******* ****, **** ******** ******** to ****** - ****, ****, ***. *** *** **** ****** more ******** (********, ****, ***.).

*******, ****'* * ******* ******* **** ** ** **** ****** covering *** **** ****:

*******, ** ** ********* ****** *********, *** **** **** ******* that *** ** ********.

*** ******* ***** ***** ******, ********** ** *** '****' *** camera ** ******* *** ***** *** ******* ***** ******* ******* the ****** **** ******** *** ***** ** **** *** ****. This ** **** ** **** ** ****** ********* *********.

Pixels ****** ** *******

* *** ****** **** ***** ******* *** **** ******* ** the **** ** * ******* ** * **' *******. ** ****** ***** *** *********, ******* *** ****** **** cover *** ***** ** **** ******** (*****) ** *** ***** a **** ** ** *** **** ********.

*******, * *** **** ******** **** **** **' **** ************* *** **** *******. ** *** *** *********, ******* *** pixels **** ** ******** ***** ****** ***** (*****).

**** *********, ******, ** * ******* *********** ***** ***** ** very ********* ******* ****:

  • ******* ** ******* ** *** ***** ****** (***** **** ***+ cameras *** ******** **).
  • ******* ** ****** **** ******* ***** ****** (**********).
  • ******* ** ****, *********** ** ***** *** *********** **************.
  • ********** *********** ********* / **** ** ******* (***********).
  • ***** ** ********* ** ******* ** ****** (** ********* ** *** ****** *** ****** ** ******* ***** **** *** ******, **** pixels **** *** ****).

Quality ** ******

**********, ***** ******* ** ****** ** * **** ***** ******* combined. ***** ***** ******* / ***** ********** *** ********* ******* and *** ******* ********** *******, ***** ***** *******, **** *** often ********** *** ******* ***** ************, ********* *** ***** ************ ********* *** ****** ***** ******* achieved.

Comments (6)

"Pixels Determine Potential, Not Quality" - very well said.

Point well made on pixel potential. Another area you may have already covered but I failed to locate, is the pixel as it stands alone. Maybe you have an opinion on the future of camera specifications and whether manufacturers will need to become more detailed in how they arrive at a product specification based on the construction of the sensor. just a few random thoughts here:

Are all pixels created equal? Isn't pixel size the most important part of imaging? When comparing same sized sensors with the same pixel count, one may have smaller pixels than another which could affect what? Is one sized pixel better than the other smaller or larger? Is this what makes one camera better than another?

If the cameras success is so dependent on 6 factors, how does this information help anyone decipher a manufacturer's specification or brochure to decide between the 100's of choices in cameras from 1MP to 5MP now? ie. what is the best sensor? what is the best SNR? what is the best WDR? What is the best light? What is the best sensitivity range? etc.

David, great observations / questions.

"Are all pixels created equal?"

No, just like all apples are not created equal. Problem #1 is figuring out how they truly differ and how significant that difference is. I just don't know. Also, since most major manufacturers obscure where they get their sensors from (is it an Optina XYZ or an Omnivision ABC), it's hard to even guess.

"Isn't pixel size the most important part of imaging?"

I think pixel size is quite overrated. We are doing a study of pixel size / imager size / resolution comparing it to our test results. My gut feel though is that the correlation between pixel size and quality is weak (even for low light where pixel size is most often argued as a key driver).

"If the cameras success is so dependent on 6 factors, how does this information help anyone decipher a manufacturer's specification or brochure to decide"

I do not think this is possible. Specifications/brochures are good starting points (what are the physical specs - focal length, f stop, pixel count, audio, IR, etc., etc.) but the things that truly differentiate image quality - low light performance, WDR capability, integrated IR adjustment - are hard to determine by simply comparing specs. That's why we do tests and that's why we find variances between specs and performances so commonly.

Is there a specific formula or rule of thumb to figuring out ppf (Example from above: 1mp camera with subject at 50' wide FoV= 25 ppf), or has this been determined from your own research? Im having trouble because it seems there are so many variables that there can't be a uniform way to do this. Perhaps some analyzing software? Thanks

Figuring out how many PPF you need or how many PPF you will get in a given scene? The latter is pretty simple - the formula is just horizontal pixel count / horizontal FoV width.

How many PPF you need is a little more tricky because there are a bunch of things that go into. See our Definitive Guide to PPF for an answer.

Perceived quality per pixel density is sometimes hard to overcome with the general public / business environment. In general, a quick metric is what is wanted in determining if a system is better than another. Unfortunately an attempt to establish a quick metric for a complex system usually means either don't have/want to take the time to understand or is a marketing ploy...

The movie Spinal Tap has a great analogy for an incorrect use of a simple metric for an amplifer, "these go to 11."

Just my rambling thoughts on the matter. Regards.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
Axis Perimeter Defender Video Analytics Tested on Jul 12, 2018
Axis 'high security' video analytics offering is Perimeter Defender, OEMed / developed with Digital Barriers. But how good is Perimeter Defender?...
Axis Guard Suite Video Analytics Tested on Jun 25, 2018
In 2015, we declared Axis' Guard Suite analytics "weak", with missed detections and false alerts common. But after nearly 3 years and a 2.0 version...
Installation Hardware for Video Surveillance - Indoor Fasteners on Jun 22, 2018
As part of our Installation for Video Surveillance series, in this note, we cover drywall anchors. A key part of installing security hardware is...
Introducing Effective PPF (ePPF) - Improving Video Surveillance Designs on Jun 11, 2018
Pixel density (PPF / PPM) is the best metric the industry has to define and project video quality. It allows simple communication of estimated...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jun 07, 2018
H.265 support has improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and more manufacturers...
Bosch IVA Video Analytics And Motion+ VMD Tested on Jun 06, 2018
Bosch's video analytics now ship on nearly every model, from indoor domes to high-end 5MP starlight cameras.  In this test, we evaluate Bosch's...
Keypads For Access Control Tutorial on May 31, 2018
Keypad readers present huge risks to even the best access systems. If deployed improperly, keypads let people through locked doors almost as if...
Installing Box Cameras Indoors Tutorial on May 22, 2018
This tutorial starts our physical installation for video surveillance series, starting with Box Cameras, one of the oldest and most basic types....
Dahua Intrusion Analytics And VMD Tested (Poorly) on May 21, 2018
Dahua ships basic analytics on practically all their cameras, ranging from low cost to high end. To see how these analytics work in real world...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Ladder Lockdown and Ladder Levelizer Tested on Jul 18, 2018
Ladders are a daily necessity for surveillance and security installers, but working on an unstable surface can be extremely dangerous. In addition...
FST Fails on Jul 17, 2018
FST was one of the hottest startups of the decade, selected as the best new product at ISC West 2011 and backed with tens of millions in...
Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...
Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 13, 2018
Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security Sales Course Summer 2018 This...
US Tariffs Hit China Video Surveillance on Jul 13, 2018
Chinese video surveillance products avoided tariffs for the first two rounds. Now, in the third round, many video surveillance products will be...
Last Chance - July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration ends today, Thursday. Register now. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact