Pivot3 Edge Protect "Game Changer" Surveillance Appliance

By: Brian Karas, Published on Apr 05, 2016

Pivot3 has announced their "Edge Protect" appliance, described as "a game changer", claiming to provide "enterprise-class infrastructure without enterprise-class costs".

IPVM reviewed pricing and product details with Pivot3. Inside, we look at the Edge Protect in more depth and how it compares to rival products from Dell, Exacq, Avigilon and Milestone.

****** *** ********* ***** "**** *******" *********, ********* ** "* **** *******", ******** ** ******* "**********-***** ************** ******* **********-***** costs".

**** ******** ******* *** product ******* **** ******. Inside, ** **** ** the **** ******* ** more ***** *** *** it ******** ** ***** products **** ****, *****, Avigilon *** *********.

[***************]

COTS ******** + ****** ********

**** ******* ** * COTS ** ****** **** Pivot3's*********** ******** *********'* **** *********.

******** *****:

***** **** **-**** ** 3.6Ghz ***
**-**** *** (************)
***-**** **** ******* (************)
** **** ****

*******

****** ***** ***-****** ****** ******* from $**,*** *** **** of ****** ******* ** $39,000 *** **** ** usable *******.

******: ** ***** ****** for ************* ** *** pricing ****** ********** **** report, ***** ******** **** CMO ***** ***** ** below:

****** *** *** ****** the ******* ***** ***** is *** * "**** Pack" ** * ******* / **********. *** ******** description ** **** *** total ********* ******** ***** for *** ****, *.*., for *** *, *** 3 ********** **** * total ** **** ****** storage. *** **** *** those * **********, **** 15TB ****** *** ********** is $**,***.

* ****** ****** **** ~1/3 ** *** ****** specs ***** ** */* of *** ***** ***** above (*.*., *** ********* from *** * ***** be $**,*** ** $**,*** for *** ****).

Dual ********** *******: *****-***** *** ** **** ************ ******

*** **** ******* *** be ******** ** * stand-alone ******, ** ** a *-**** ******* ** provide ******'* **** ************ solution.

** * ********** ****, video ********** ** ***** at *******, ***** ** abnormally *** *** * modern ************ *********. ********** systems ** ***-***+****. *** limited ***** ********** ** due ** *** ********** overhead ** ******'* ********** software.

** *** *** *** deploying *********** ** * cluster ** *** *** resiliency ******** ** ******'* architecture ***** ** ** benefit ****** *** ****** hypervisor.

******** ** * *******, video ********** **** ** to *******, *** **** importantly *** *** ******* the "** ********" ***** on *** *********. ******'* architecture *** *** ******* of ***** **** ** sustain *** **** ** not **** * ***, but ** ****** ******. It ** *********** **** ** the ****** *****.

******* *** **** ******** still ******* * *******, and **** *** ******* *** **** ** *** licenses *** *** ********.

Comparative *******

************ ********* ***'* **** similar ***** *** ** found *** ************* ***** prices:

* ********** **** ****** with *** **** ***, 16GB ***, *** ** RAID5 *******, **** ****** pre-loaded *** ** ********* for ~$*,***.
********* ** **** ** Appliance **** **** ** storage *** ** **** of ~$**,***, ********* ** ACC ******** ******** (**** ~$4,000).
* **** ***** *** ******, **** ** ******** *** be ********* *** ~$**,***.
*** ***** *** *** ******* ****** $*,*** for * **** ***** with ** *** *****.

***** *** ***** ** the ****** ********, * customer *** ****** ******* resiliency ***** ****** * Windows-based ******** ** ********* and * *****-***** ***** recorder in * ****-******** ************. This ***** *** **** provide ********* *********, *** would **** ******** **** a ****-***** ******* ** either *** ********* ****** OR *** ***/***. **** is * **** ******** scenario, *** ********* **** only **** ******** ******** are ******** ** ** able ** ******* **** pricing.

********'* ******** ****** **** likely ** ** ******* they ************ ***** *** require ******'* ******** ** high ************.

Game ******* *********

****** **** ********* ****** hard ** ***** ******* for ******* *******, ****** their ******* ********* **** scale.

*** * * **** Pivot3 **** ******* ******, given *** **** ** failover, ******* ********** *** cost (****** **** $**,*** for *** *** ****** storage *****), ** ** unlikely **** ***** **** find ** *********.

* * **** ****** **** Protect ******, ***** *** failover ************ *** ********* throughput, ** ****** ** be **** *********, *** those **** ****** **** Pivot3's ******** *** ******* expansion ************ *** *** willing ** ******** * ~$5,000 ***** ******* ** get ****. ***** ****** ***** their *** ** ****** for *** ******** ** **** availability ******* **** ***** be ***** **** ** simpler ** *****.

** ** ***** ***** with ***** ****** ******, high ******* ******* *** uptime ************, **** ******** infrastructure *** ****** ****** may ** **** ***** markets.

*******, **** ** *** much ** * **** changer *** ** ***** some **** ** ******** for * ******* **** is ************ ******* ****************** *** *** ****** IT ******.

Comments (10)

Jon Dillabaugh

Pro Focus LLC | 04/05/16 04:00pm

Quad Gb NIC's, yet only 100Mb of processing power... brilliant!

Undisclosed Integrator #1

04/05/16 05:03pm

The game appears unchanged part made me laugh. It's insanely expensive.

Sean Nelson

Nelly Security | 04/05/16 07:49pm

I honestly dont see how they would sell even one of these at this price. The markup on these has to be insane.

Brian Karas

IPVM | In reply to Sean Nelson | 04/05/16 09:42pm

To be fair, they're not pushing these in a mainstream market, it's typically going to be companies that see the value in the whole "hyperconvergence" thing.

A friend of mine bought a new Lamborghini last year. One of the options added cupholders, and a couple of other interior bits and was $20,000. For most people $20,000 buys an entire car, in this case it was a "small charge" for some convenience items added to a larger product. He probably could have also gone to PepBoys and bought something that clips on a dashboard vent to hold his latte and saved $19,995.

I don't think Pivot3 will sell many (any?) of these as stand-alone servers, it doesn't make any sense. They might sell some that way to a customer who is planning to upgrade later but just wants to get something in quickly for now.

The more likely scenario is that a customer who has already bought into Pivot3's larger concept and has bigger servers deployed (the Lamborghini of this analogy) might buy these "cupholders" for some remote sites in order to keep their overall system consistent. Sure, they might be overkill compared to other options, but in the context of uniformity they can justify the price to themselves.

I would not anticipate many customers that aren't using Pivot3 hardware at other sites to look at this as a practical solution for their smaller/remote sites. Someone running a beefy Husky appliance at the main office would deploy a Husky appliance or 2 at the remote sites and call it a day.

In the past I was at another startup that sold "iron wrapped software" to a niche customer, similar to Pivot3's business model. It's tough because as a business you need to make some margin on the bare hardware, plus you need margin for your own software and for the build process (eg: technician time) to load it up. Even if you have an automated build process it can be more time consuming than you think. This naturally puts you into having to chase enterprise-class customers with bigger budgets. These customers have longer sales cycles, which increase the sales cost, which increases what you have to charge... In the end, you have to charge a LOT for what on the outside appears to be a run of the mill Dell/HP/Intel reference box with your "secret sauce" preloaded. Personally, I wouldn't want to chase that kind of business again.

Undisclosed #2

04/05/16 09:30pm

Given the price of a stack of 3 Edge Protect units, a customer who wanted maximum resiliency could deploy a Windows-based Avigilon HD Appliance and a linux-based Exacq recorder in a dual-recorder architecture.

At the time of failure though wouldn't all the monitoring users go down until they switched to the other appliance and loaded a different vendors client program?

I'm assuming that the Pivot 3 cluster users would not notice nor have to do anything in event of failure. If it don't do that then it's pointless.

That said, I agree that most businesses would rather deal with a failover headache in case of the loss of a server; and $30,000 buys a lot of aspirin.

Brian Karas

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #2 | 04/05/16 10:00pm

At the time of failure though wouldn't all the monitoring users go down until they switched to the other appliance and loaded a different vendors client program?

No, we'd have fully redundant operators too ;)

Yes, my proposed solution gives cheap/simple resiliency at the cost of operator stress of switching over systems. It's highly unlikely anyone would really want that approach, but it does technically offer benefits that even the Pivot3 solution does not.

In reality, dual identical Husky (or Avigilon or Exacq or whatever) servers with some disk RAID, and a competent IT staff that monitors and maintains the machines, does backups/archives and so on would likely cover you against most realistic outages.

I like what Pivot3 is doing in concept. I've liked it since my friend first showed me a demo in 2003 of a similar concept at a stealth company he founded called Katana that later became Virtual Iron. The problem is that it's expensive. It's expensive to develop, it's expensive to setup the initial clusters, and it's expensive to have N+1 (or more) of your required compute resources to make the whole thing tick. Very few companies are able to justify the added expense for the incremental resiliency.

Undisclosed #2

In reply to Brian Karas | 04/05/16 10:10pm

It's highly unlikely anyone would really want that approach...

No, I like it. It's the 'put each egg in a different basket' approach.

Much like when they select the tires on a newly commissioned jet how they intentionally choose from several different lots, to ameliorate the chances of a multiple tire failure on landing due to a single wonky production run.

Actually I don't know they do this, I just want to believe they do. ;)

Brian Karas

IPVM | 04/05/16 11:02pm

Pivot3's CMO provided the following response to this article in an email to us:

- There are significant benefits to a software-defined SAN that we believe are worth exploring in your analysis. All cameras have access to all storage regardless of which physical server they are associated with, and recorded video remains fully accessible even when an entire node fails. For customers for whom surveillance video is critical data, this is invaluable.

- We believe that the value of erasure coding is understated in the analysis as well. Using our patented techniques, we can protect data against the loss of up to 3 disks or an entire node plus one disk. This is not just RAID for servers, it is a much higher level of fault tolerance and a huge improvement over RAID.

- You have brought up throughput as an issue in the article. Our solution can scale up to 6 nodes/600 MBPS, and the traffic is automatically balanced across the cluster - this means that we scale very effectively and efficiently as end users' needs grow. So our system will handle roughly 600 Mbps of ingest, excluding live video redirect. One of the benefits is that it will sustain that throughput even during failures, a key differentiator from DAS. We also achieve this throughput at high fault tolerance levels (3 disk / 1 node + 1 disk) .... this is unique, since other DAS systems have to cut back their fault tolerance to achieve high throughput claims. We do not expect customers to have an issue with throughput with our systems based on our unique technology and approach; our benchmarks have borne out that most implementations of this scale in the market will be well served by our configuration.

We are also getting clarification on pricing and will update the post accordingly once verified.

Undisclosed #2

In reply to Brian Karas | 04/05/16 11:50pm

So our system will handle roughly 600 Mbps of ingest, excluding live video redirect. One of the benefits is that it will sustain that throughput even during failures, a key differentiator from DAS.

So then assumedly, it will still do 300Mbps on a three node cluster with one failure.

And 2 standalone servers can each do 100Mbps X 2 = 200Mbps.

Yet 2 clustered servers do 300Mbps? How? Because of the shared drive array? There must be a better answer.

Undisclosed #2

04/07/16 09:12pm

Forgive me but I'm confused about the pricing. In the UPDATE clarification you ask whether the $21000 is for one box or three. He seems to say "1". Yet you are saying it is for 3. Was the email recanted or am I reading it wrong?

Login to read this IPVM report.

Why do I need to log in?

IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019

While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...

Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019

This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...

Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019

Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...

Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019

Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...

Genetec Stratocast VSaaS Tested on Sep 05, 2019

The VSaaS market is rapidly expanding in 2019, with Verkada, Meraki, Eagle Eye, Avigilon and numerous startups growing their market share. When we...

Scylla AI Video Analytics Company Profile on Aug 29, 2019

Scylla, an AI analytics startup, says they are targeting 1 Billion dollar valuation in 5 years and it "is not rocket science" to detect weapons and...

Uniview Pro 4K Camera Tested (IPC3238ER3-DVZ) on Aug 29, 2019

In our 8MP / 4K Fixed Lens Camera Shootout, Uniview's low end 8MP was firmly in the middle of the pack. Does their higher end Pro Series 4K camera...

UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019

Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...

Warning: Windows 7 Update Crashing NVRs on Aug 26, 2019

Windows 7 updates are causing VMS servers to fail to boot. After running the update, impacted systems do not boot as normal, instead display this...

Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019

Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019

In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...

Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019

While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...

Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019

This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...

Uniview Prime Series 4K Camera Tested on Sep 18, 2019

Is the new Uniview 'Prime' better than the more expensive existing Uniview 'Pro'? In August, IPVM tested Uniview 4K 'Pro' but members advocated...

US Army Base To Buy Banned Honeywell Surveillance on Sep 17, 2019

The U.S. Army's Fort Gordon, home to their Cyber Center of Excellence, has issued a solicitation to purchase Honeywell products that are US...

Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019

Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...