Pivot3 Edge Protect "Game Changer" Surveillance Appliance

Author: Brian Karas, Published on Apr 05, 2016

Pivot3 has announced their "Edge Protect" appliance, described as "a game changer", claiming to provide "enterprise-class infrastructure without enterprise-class costs".

IPVM reviewed pricing and product details with Pivot3. Inside, we look at the Edge Protect in more depth and how it compares to rival products from Dell, Exacq, Avigilon and Milestone.

****** *** ********* ***** "**** *******" *********, ********* ** "* **** *******", ******** ** ******* "**********-***** ************** ******* **********-***** *****".

**** ******** ******* *** ******* ******* **** ******. ******, ** look ** *** **** ******* ** **** ***** *** *** it ******** ** ***** ******** **** ****, *****, ******** *** Milestone.

[***************]

COTS ******** + ****** ********

**** ******* ** * **** ** ****** **** ******'************ ******** *********'* **** *********.

******** *****:

  • ***** **** **-**** ** *.**** ***
  • **-**** *** (************)
  • ***-**** **** ******* (************)
  • ** **** ****

*******

****** ***** ***-****** ****** ******* **** $**,*** *** **** ** ****** storage ** $**,*** *** **** ** ****** *******.

******: ** ***** ****** *** ************* ** *** ******* ****** publishing **** ******, ***** ******** **** *** ***** ***** ** below:

****** *** *** ****** *** ******* ***** ***** ** *** a "**** ****" ** * ******* / **********. *** ******** description ** **** *** ***** ********* ******** ***** *** *** pack, *.*., *** *** *, *** * ********** **** * total ** **** ****** *******. *** **** *** ***** * appliances, **** **** ****** *** ********** ** $**,***.

* ****** ****** **** ~*/* ** *** ****** ***** ***** be */* ** *** ***** ***** ***** (*.*., *** ********* from *** * ***** ** $**,*** ** $**,*** *** *** pack).

Dual ********** *******: *****-***** *** ** **** ************ ******

*** **** ******* *** ** ******** ** * *****-***** ******, or ** * *-**** ******* ** ******* ******'* **** ************ solution.

** * ********** ****, ***** ********** ** ***** ** *******, which ** ********** *** *** * ****** ************ *********. ********** systems ** ***-***+****. *** ******* ***** ********** ** *** ** the ********** ******** ** ******'* ********** ********.

** *** *** *** ********* *********** ** * ******* ** get *** ********** ******** ** ******'* ************ ***** ** ** benefit ****** *** ****** **********.  

******** ** * *******, ***** ********** **** ** ** *******, and **** *********** *** *** ******* *** "** ********" ***** on *** *********. ******'* ************ *** *** ******* ** ***** able ** ******* *** **** ** *** **** * ***, but ** ****** ******. ** ** *********** **** ** *** ****** level.

******* *** **** ******** ***** ******* * *******, *** **** not ******* *** **** ** *** ******** *** *** ********.

Comparative *******

************ ********* ***'* **** ******* ***** *** ** ***** *** significantly ***** ******:

  • * ********** **** ****** **** *** **** ***, **** ***, 8TB ** ***** *******, **** ****** ***-****** *** ** ********* for ~$*,***.
  • ********* ** **** ** ********* **** **** ** ******* *** an **** ** ~$**,***, ********* ** *** ******** ******** (**** ~$4,000).
  • **** ***** *** ******, **** ** ******** *** ** ********* *** ~$**,***.
  • *** ***** *** *** ******* ****** $*,*** *** * **** ***** **** ** PoE *****.

***** *** ***** ** *** ****** ********, * ******** *** wanted ******* ********** ***** ****** * *******-***** ******** ** ********* and * *****-***** ***** ******** ** * ****-******** ************.  **** ***** not **** ******* ********* *********, *** ***** **** ******** **** a ****-***** ******* ** ****** *** ********* ****** ** *** NVR/VMS. **** ** * **** ******** ********, *** ********* **** only **** ******** ******** *** ******** ** ** **** ** justify **** *******.

********'* ******** ****** **** ****** ** ** ******* **** ************ value *** ******* ******'* ******** ** **** ************.

Game ******* *********

****** **** ********* ****** **** ** ***** ******* *** ******* systems, ****** ***** ******* ********* **** *****.

*** * * **** ****** **** ******* ******, ***** *** lack ** ********, ******* ********** *** **** (****** **** $**,*** for *** *** ****** ******* *****), ** ** ******** **** users **** **** ** *********.

* * **** ****** **** ******* ******, ***** *** ******** ************ and ********* **********, ** ****** ** ** **** *********, *** those **** ****** **** ******'* ******** *** ******* ********* ************ and *** ******* ** ******** * ~$*,*** ***** ******* ** get ****. ***** ****** ***** ***** *** ** ****** *** *** ******** or **** ************ ******* **** ***** ** ***** **** ** simpler ** *****.

** ** ***** ***** **** ***** ****** ******, **** ******* demands *** ****** ************, **** ******** ************** *** ****** ****** may ** **** ***** *******.

*******, **** ** *** **** ** * **** ******* *** at ***** **** **** ** ******** *** * ******* **** is ************ ******* ****************** *** *** ****** ** ******.

Comments (10)

Quad Gb NIC's, yet only 100Mb of processing power... brilliant!

The game appears unchanged part made me laugh. It's insanely expensive.

I honestly dont see how they would sell even one of these at this price. The markup on these has to be insane.

To be fair, they're not pushing these in a mainstream market, it's typically going to be companies that see the value in the whole "hyperconvergence" thing.

A friend of mine bought a new Lamborghini last year. One of the options added cupholders, and a couple of other interior bits and was $20,000. For most people $20,000 buys an entire car, in this case it was a "small charge" for some convenience items added to a larger product. He probably could have also gone to PepBoys and bought something that clips on a dashboard vent to hold his latte and saved $19,995.

I don't think Pivot3 will sell many (any?) of these as stand-alone servers, it doesn't make any sense. They might sell some that way to a customer who is planning to upgrade later but just wants to get something in quickly for now.

The more likely scenario is that a customer who has already bought into Pivot3's larger concept and has bigger servers deployed (the Lamborghini of this analogy) might buy these "cupholders" for some remote sites in order to keep their overall system consistent. Sure, they might be overkill compared to other options, but in the context of uniformity they can justify the price to themselves.

I would not anticipate many customers that aren't using Pivot3 hardware at other sites to look at this as a practical solution for their smaller/remote sites. Someone running a beefy Husky appliance at the main office would deploy a Husky appliance or 2 at the remote sites and call it a day.

In the past I was at another startup that sold "iron wrapped software" to a niche customer, similar to Pivot3's business model. It's tough because as a business you need to make some margin on the bare hardware, plus you need margin for your own software and for the build process (eg: technician time) to load it up. Even if you have an automated build process it can be more time consuming than you think. This naturally puts you into having to chase enterprise-class customers with bigger budgets. These customers have longer sales cycles, which increase the sales cost, which increases what you have to charge... In the end, you have to charge a LOT for what on the outside appears to be a run of the mill Dell/HP/Intel reference box with your "secret sauce" preloaded. Personally, I wouldn't want to chase that kind of business again.

Given the price of a stack of 3 Edge Protect units, a customer who wanted maximum resiliency could deploy a Windows-based Avigilon HD Appliance and a linux-based Exacq recorder in a dual-recorder architecture.

At the time of failure though wouldn't all the monitoring users go down until they switched to the other appliance and loaded a different vendors client program?

I'm assuming that the Pivot 3 cluster users would not notice nor have to do anything in event of failure. If it don't do that then it's pointless.

That said, I agree that most businesses would rather deal with a failover headache in case of the loss of a server; and $30,000 buys a lot of aspirin.

At the time of failure though wouldn't all the monitoring users go down until they switched to the other appliance and loaded a different vendors client program?

No, we'd have fully redundant operators too ;)

Yes, my proposed solution gives cheap/simple resiliency at the cost of operator stress of switching over systems. It's highly unlikely anyone would really want that approach, but it does technically offer benefits that even the Pivot3 solution does not.

In reality, dual identical Husky (or Avigilon or Exacq or whatever) servers with some disk RAID, and a competent IT staff that monitors and maintains the machines, does backups/archives and so on would likely cover you against most realistic outages.

I like what Pivot3 is doing in concept. I've liked it since my friend first showed me a demo in 2003 of a similar concept at a stealth company he founded called Katana that later became Virtual Iron. The problem is that it's expensive. It's expensive to develop, it's expensive to setup the initial clusters, and it's expensive to have N+1 (or more) of your required compute resources to make the whole thing tick. Very few companies are able to justify the added expense for the incremental resiliency.

It's highly unlikely anyone would really want that approach...

No, I like it. It's the 'put each egg in a different basket' approach.

Much like when they select the tires on a newly commissioned jet how they intentionally choose from several different lots, to ameliorate the chances of a multiple tire failure on landing due to a single wonky production run.

Actually I don't know they do this, I just want to believe they do. ;)

Pivot3's CMO provided the following response to this article in an email to us:

- There are significant benefits to a software-defined SAN that we believe are worth exploring in your analysis. All cameras have access to all storage regardless of which physical server they are associated with, and recorded video remains fully accessible even when an entire node fails. For customers for whom surveillance video is critical data, this is invaluable.

- We believe that the value of erasure coding is understated in the analysis as well. Using our patented techniques, we can protect data against the loss of up to 3 disks or an entire node plus one disk. This is not just RAID for servers, it is a much higher level of fault tolerance and a huge improvement over RAID.

- You have brought up throughput as an issue in the article. Our solution can scale up to 6 nodes/600 MBPS, and the traffic is automatically balanced across the cluster - this means that we scale very effectively and efficiently as end users' needs grow. So our system will handle roughly 600 Mbps of ingest, excluding live video redirect. One of the benefits is that it will sustain that throughput even during failures, a key differentiator from DAS. We also achieve this throughput at high fault tolerance levels (3 disk / 1 node + 1 disk) .... this is unique, since other DAS systems have to cut back their fault tolerance to achieve high throughput claims. We do not expect customers to have an issue with throughput with our systems based on our unique technology and approach; our benchmarks have borne out that most implementations of this scale in the market will be well served by our configuration.

We are also getting clarification on pricing and will update the post accordingly once verified.

So our system will handle roughly 600 Mbps of ingest, excluding live video redirect. One of the benefits is that it will sustain that throughput even during failures, a key differentiator from DAS.

So then assumedly, it will still do 300Mbps on a three node cluster with one failure.

And 2 standalone servers can each do 100Mbps X 2 = 200Mbps.

Yet 2 clustered servers do 300Mbps? How? Because of the shared drive array? There must be a better answer.

Forgive me but I'm confused about the pricing. In the UPDATE clarification you ask whether the $21000 is for one box or three. He seems to say "1". Yet you are saying it is for 3. Was the email recanted or am I reading it wrong?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

VMS Export Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone on Sep 13, 2018
When crimes, accidents or problems occur, exporting video from one's video surveillance system is critical to proving incidents. But who does it...
Dahua Low-Cost 4MP Camera Tested (N44CL52) on Sep 10, 2018
4MP use continues to increase, especially in low-cost models, according to integrators in our 2018 Resolution Usage Statistics. We bought Dahua's...
Dell Launches IoT for Surveillance on Sep 05, 2018
Historically, Dell has been a PC and server provider (e.g., "Dude, you're getting a Dell") and widely used for surveillance storage. However, in...
Directory Of 110+ Video Management Software (VMS) Suppliers on Aug 30, 2018
This directory provides a list of Video Management Software providers to help you see and research what options are available. Listing...
Inputs/Outputs For Video Surveillance Guide on Aug 24, 2018
While many cameras have Input/Output (I/O) ports, few are actually used and most designers do not even consider them. However, a good understanding...
Luxriot VMS Profile on Aug 23, 2018
Luxriot is more popular than Hikvision and Milestone products according to ASMAG which was probably even surprising to Luxriot. The company has...
Synology Surveillance Station VMS Tested on Aug 22, 2018
With so many low-cost NVRs and enterprise VMSes, is there any place in the market for NAS-based VMSes? Recently, IPVM bought a Synology NAS for...
SNMP / Network Monitoring For Surveillance 2018 on Aug 21, 2018
Surveillance systems typically rely on the the VMS to report issues, but this most often just means knowing a camera is "down" with no warning or...
2Gig Gun Lock / Motion Detector Tested on Aug 17, 2018
Safer guns for families and an opportunity for security dealers to sell more services? That is the aim of Nortek's 2GIG 'Gun Motion Detector'...
Video Analytics Integration Guide on Aug 16, 2018
Video analytics is hot again (at least conceptually) but integrating video analytics with VMSes can be challenging. This is especially significant...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Alexa Guard Expands Amazon's Security Offerings, Boosts ADT's Stock on Sep 21, 2018
Amazon is expanding their security offerings yet again, this time with Alexa Guard that delivers security audio analytics and a virtual "Fake...
UTC, Owner of Lenel, Acquires S2 on Sep 20, 2018
UTC now owns two of the biggest access control providers, one of integrator's most hated access control platforms, Lenel, and one of their...
BluePoint Aims To Bring Life-Safety Mind-Set To Police Pull Stations on Sep 20, 2018
Fire alarm pull stations are commonplace but police ones are not. A self-funded startup, BluePoint Alert Solutions is aiming to make police pull...
SIA Plays Dumb On OEMs And Hikua Ban on Sep 20, 2018
OEMs widely pretend to be 'manufacturers', deceiving their customers and putting them at risk for cybersecurity attacks and, soon, violation of US...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...
Avigilon Announces AI-Powered H5 Camera Development on Sep 19, 2018
Avigilon will be showcasing "next-generation AI" at next week's ASIS GSX. In an atypical move, the company is not actually releasing these...
Favorite Request-to-Exit (RTE) Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 19, 2018
Request To Exit devices like motion sensors and lock releasing push-buttons are a part of almost every access install, but who makes the equipment...
25% China Tariffs Finalized For 2019, 10% Start Now, Includes Select Video Surveillance on Sep 18, 2018
A surprise move: In July, when the most recent tariff round was first announced, the tariffs were only scheduled for 10%. However, now, the US...
Central Stations Face Off Against NFPA On Fire Monitoring on Sep 18, 2018
Central stations are facing off against the NFPA over what they call anti-competitive language in NFPA 72, the standard that covers fire alarms....
Hikvision USA Starts Layoffs on Sep 18, 2018
Hikvision USA has started layoffs, just weeks after the US government ban was passed into law. Inside this note, we examine: The important...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact