Panoramic Cameras Wall vs Ceiling Mount

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jul 12, 2016

Panoramic cameras are almost always ceiling mounted, looking down for a general overview of the scene, but is this really the best location, or can wall mounting provide similar or better details and overview?

To find out, we shot out panoramic cameras in two scenes, indoors and out:

Inside, we see how mounting style impacts performance and answer the following questions:

  • Which mounting style provides better facial details?
  • How does overview performance differ?
  • Does either mounting type waste significant FOV area?
  • How do software and hardware dewarping impact these issues?

********* ******* *** ****** ****** ******* mounted, ******* **** *** a ******* ******** ** the *****, *** ** this ****** *** **** location, ** *** **** mounting ******* ******* ** better ******* *** ********?

** **** ***, ** shot *** ********* ******* in *** ******, ******* and ***:

******, ** *** *** ******** style ******* *********** *** answer *** ********* *********:

  • ***** ******** ***** ******** better ****** *******?
  • *** **** ******** *********** ******?
  • **** ****** ******** **** waste *********** *** ****?
  • *** ** ******** *** hardware ********* ****** ***** issues?

[***************]

*******

**** ******** ********* ******* provides ****** ******* ** choke ****** (**** *******/***** or *************) **** ******* mount ***** ***** ********* good ******** ** *** scene. *******, ******* ******** the ****** (***** *** far **** ** * room, *** *******) *** delivered ** **** ****** than ******* ***** *** to ********* ********. ************, wall ******** ****** *********** portions ** *** *** on *******/***.

******* ******** ******* ******** worse ******* ** ***** points **** **** *****, as *** ****** ***** of ********* ******* ****** details. *******, **** ******** style *** ******* ****** overview ** ******** ** spread ********** ** ****, instead ** * ****** key **** (*.*., ******* lots **. ********** *****).

Technical ********

**** *** *** *** findings **** **** ****:

  • ** *** *****, **** mounted ********* ******* ****** ******** facial ******* *** ** their ****** ******** ** targets.
  • ******* ***** ******* ******** worse ******* ******* *** to ***** **** ***** of ********* ** ***** range, **** **** *** is ****.
  • **** ******** ***** ******** similar ********* ** ********** in *** *****, ****** ceiling ***** ******* *** see **** ** **** obstacles **** ** **** mount *******.
  • **** ******** ********* ******* potentially ****** *********** ******** of *** ***** ** view ** ***/******* *** ground/floor.
  • ***** **** ****** *** wall ******* ********** ********* this ****** ****, ****** not *** ************* ***** these ******.
  • ****** **** ********* *** offer *** ******* ** eliminate ***** ****** ***** from *** *****, *** the **** ****** ** still ***********/********.

Test ******

** ****** ** * ****** size ********** ****, **** the ****** ****** ** two ********* ***** ** the **** *****. *** wall ***** ******** *** chosen ************ ******* ** was **** *** **** entrance/exit ** *** **** of *** ****.

** **** ****** ********, with *** **** ***** camera ***** **** *** main ******** ** *** building. **** "*******" *******, the ****** *** ******* midway ******* *** **** of *** ******* *** and ********, ** * logical ******** *** * light **** ******* ** many *********.

Wall ***** ****** ****** *******

**** ******** *** ****** potentially provides ****** ****** ******* than ******* ***** *** to *** ********* ***** of ********* *** ******* to ****** ** ****** entrances/exits.

*** *******, ** **** scene, *** ******* ****** near *** ****** ** he ****** *** ****, providing ****** ******* (~*** PPF). However, **** *** **** camera ******* ** *** center ** *** ****, PPF ***** ************ ** ~30, **** ****** ******* barely *******.

*** ********** ***** ***** ******* details **** **** ******* as ** ***** *** room **** *** **** mount ******, *** ** he ****** ** *** ceiling *****:

 

Similar ******** ********** ** ********

** *** *****, **** mounting ****** ******** ******* similar capture ** ******* ******** in *** *****. *** example, ** *** ***** below, **** ******* ****** capture *** ******* ****** across *** ***** ** the ******** *** **** the **** ******** ****. 

*****, ** ******* *****, he ***** ****** *** "top" ** *** ***** in * ******** ***° panorama.

**** **** *******, ** is ***** ** ****, though ******* *** **** clearer ** ** ***** *** camera:

**** **** ** **** cases ******* ***** ******* may ******* ****** ********, as **** *** ****** able ** *** ****/**** obstructions. **** *** ** useful ** ***** **** shelving ** ****** ** people.

Wall ***** ****** ***

**** ******** ********* ******* wastes ******** ** *** field ** **** ** many *****. ***** *** camera's **** "****" ** all **********, ******** ** the ***** **** ** viewing *** *** ** ceiling *** ****** ** floor, **** ** *** example *****. ** ********, mounting *** ****** ************ eliminates **** ** ***** wasted *****.

*** ****** *** *******, if *** **** **********, inside:

Camera **** ********* ******* **** ***** *****

*******, ******* ***** **** dewarped ******** ******* *** eliminate **** ** *** of ***** ***** ** cropping *** *** ** more ****** ***** **** wall *******. *** *******, the *** ******* ***** show ****** **** ******** 180° ******** ******* **** two ********* *******. *** camera ** *** **** crops **** *******/***** ***** out ** *** *****, while ****** * ******* the ******** *** **** further.

**** **. ****** ********

**** **** ** **** cases **** ***** *** camera *** ** ** interest, ** ****** ******** very **** *** ******, objects **** ** *******, etc. ** ***** *****, angling *** ****** **** may ** *********, *** some (****** *** ***) manufacturers *************** ************ *** **** application.

**** *** ***** ******* are ****** **** ~**°, unusable ******* **** ** further ******* *** *** area ****** *** ******* becomes **** *******, ********* the ****** ***** *** wall (****** *** ** view **********).

******** ********* ***********

****** **** ********* *** allow ***** ** ****** wall ***** ********* ** eliminate ****** *****. *** example, ** *** **** below, ** ****** **** view ** ******* ***** NxWitness, ******** *** *** seen ** *** *** of *** ***** ** default *** ********** **** area ******* *** ******.

More ** ********* ******* 

*** **** ******* ** panoramic ******* *** ***** related ******, ***:

Comments (28)

Great report!

What is the height of the camera in both configurations under test?

Hm. All panoramic cameras - its "waste of pixels". Single 90 degrees camera in corner has more pixels density, at the same scene.

But, for wall mounted camera you can use another lens, than for ceiling mount, and get more pixels per meter.

A single 90 degree camera will still have a blind spot below it in this type of indoor scene. Also, outdoors, you are limited to a single 90 degree view, or you will need more than one camera.

In general, we use panoramic cameras to cover large areas where subjects have already passed through a pinch point covered by an identifying camera. We never rely on the panoramic view for identifying features. As long as you keep that in mind when designing the system, you should be fine using them.

We have done quite a bit of testing with Panoramic cameras. Our end users do not fond of the overhead shots of the Pano's. However, they do like the wall mount shots especially for smaller areas such as patios and courtyards. We will be replacing many fixed cameras with fewer Pano cameras.

We really like the new Hikvision DS-2CD63C2F-IVS model (12 MP). It can either give you a 180 degree panoramic view dewarped on the camera or it can give you three PTZ dewarped views on the camera. The nice thing about the PTZ dewarped views is that you can move the view port around to crop out any ceiling shots.

We have used the Hikvision wall base mount that is offered with the Panoramic camera. I think it provides about a 15 degree angle. There are cases though we would like to mount them at a 30 degree or even 45 degree angle. However, with the PTZ views, we usually can move the viewport around to find the shot we want.

Great report thanks :)

[Note: Bosch Employee]

To solve the issue of "Wall Mount Wasted FOV", some manufactures provide a true 180 camera next to their 360 cameras; e.g. Bosch NIN-70122-F1. These cameras provide a 180 FoV and higher effective resolution (pixels on target).

Does it really 'solve' the issue?

According to the camera's spec sheet, it uses a 12MP sensor and delivers the following:

The highest resolution panoramic 180 output is 2.15MP versus a 12MP sensor?

2.15MP is the resolution for camera side dewarping in panoramic mode.

The 360 image circle has a resolution of 2640 x 2640 (7.0MP) and the 180 image circle has 3648 x 2160 (7.9MP). The image circle is optimized for 180 view.

What is the highest dewarped output resolution that one can get in the 'true' 180 camera?

Dewarped it could be anything, dewarping creates multiple output (stream) pixels from a single input (sensor) pixels, no?

What is a true 180 degree camera? How does it differ from a 360 degree camera, other than mounting orientation on a different plane? Isn't it just a perspective change, not something physically or programically different?

180 camera can use sensor corners, 360 camera - can not. Bosch 180 camera is an example.

The Samsung and Dahua fisheye cameras I have installed both use the full sensor in 360 mode. The Dahua streams a 4000x3000 image. The Samsung was 2048x1536.

If the Bosch is cropping to an ultra wide shot, reducing the sky out of a 180 degree view, then it is likely cropping the warped image to do so, which isn't using the full sensor.

Yes, but corners are "black", with no useful image on them ;)

Can you show me an image from the Bosch 180 degree cam then? You can simply link to the full res image if needed.

Better ask Bosch. Anyway, in theory, for 180 image you can use more "effective" pixels for image, than from 360 camera.

like this ?

Link to product please, I don't see it.

[Bosch] 180 camera can use sensor corners...

I'm officially calling Boschsh*t on this ;)

Yes. Typical 360 image. Panomorph lenses use sensor pixels better, but, 180 panorama lens can use them better.

Here is from the Bosch website:

This shows the effective pixel output of each mode. As you can see, the 180 mode is just a crop of overall pixels on this particular model. It isn't using the full sensor as you claimed.

Off course, there no possibility to use full sensor in both modes.

Anyway, for 180 view them can be bused more effective :)

180 camera can use sensor corners, 360 camera - can not. Bosch 180 camera is an example.

Isn't that exactly what you alluded to here? In reality, the Bosch 180 isn't using the sensor corners. It is simply cropping the image to give you the sense that they are using the pixels more efficiently, but in reality, they are possibly wasting more?

Can use corners better, than 360 camera. I'm not mentioned full sensor.

As i'm told in my one of previous post, one 90 degree camera is even better, than 360 or 180 camera, when you thinking about pixels density per distance, and covers the same square area.

Off course, all cameras should be used for specified areas, there no best cameras for all.

Here is a visual version of the crop sizes of the Bosch 7000 series fisheye cameras. Neither crop, 180 or 360, use the full sensor. Neither use corners of the sensor.

180 camera can use sensor corners, 360 camera - can not. Bosch 180 camera is an example.

Can we now put this theory to bed? There is no difference between the 180 and 360 versions of the cameras, besides the cropped image size. There is not more effective resolution post crop. There is only a small difference in recorded bitrate and storage due to not recording the unused space that was cropped out.

Excellent. Thats, what i'm told. One 90 degree camera has more useful pixels for the same square area :)

Of course it does, it's covering 1/4 or 1/2 of the AOV....

(assuming the same sensor size)

This image is correct and both cameras do not use the sensor corners. The cameras use a dedicated lens: 2.1mm for 180 and 1.6mm for 360. The 180 image crop results in a higher resolution. The 180 cropped area is bigger (more pixels) than the 360 cropped area. On top of that, as the 360 is a full circle, it has more black area within the square image than the 180 (as it's not a full circle).

Login to read this IPVM report.

Related Reports

FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...
Dotty "Hot Or Not" Elevated Body Temperature App Tested on Jun 01, 2020
What if you could take an existing phone or tablet and transform it into "fever camera"? That is what DottyAR is doing with their strangely named...
HLC Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Uniview, Vivotek on Mar 02, 2020
Highlight Compensation (HLC) claims to reduce the effects of strong light sources, such as headlights, that can wash out an image. But how does...
Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming the "modular design allows for easy installation". We bought and...
FLIR A Series Temperature Screening Cameras Tested on Jun 04, 2020
FLIR is one of the biggest names in thermal and one of the most conservative. While rivals have marketed fever detection, FLIR has stuck to EST...
YCombinator AI Startup Visual One Tested on Apr 02, 2020
Startup Visual One, backed by Silicon Valley's powerful Y Combinator, aims to be "Your 24/7 Watchman" with advanced analytics and object...
Axis Thermal Camera / Grekkom Human Temperature Control Tested on Jun 10, 2020
While Axis has a temperature detection camera (the Q2901-E), they has been reluctant to market it for coronavirus. However, Axis partner Grekkom...
Kogniz Health Thermal Screening System on May 15, 2020
Kogniz, a Silicon Valley AI surveillance company is claiming to offer "real-time fever and exposure detection". We spoke to Kogniz and inside,...
Halo Smart Vape Detector Tested on Jan 16, 2020
The Halo Smart Sensor claims to detect vaping, including popular brand Juul and even THC vapes. But how well does it work in real world...
Directory of 164 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Jul 09, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers to help you see and research what options are available. There are...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Uniview Deep Learning Camera Tested on Jul 14, 2020
Uniview's intrusion analytics have performed poorly in our shootouts. Now, they have released their Prime Series Deep Learning cameras, with an...
Drako's Companies (Brivo, Eagle Eye) Take $4+ Million in PPP Funds on Jul 14, 2020
While centimillionaire Dean Drako is the owner of two of the largest SaaS businesses in the security industry (Brivo and Eagle Eye), Drako's...
Defendry Presents AI Active Shooter Security System on Jul 14, 2020
Defendry presented its Active Shooter security system at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from Defendry including IPVM...
Ban Rules Released: Use Dahua or Hikvision, No Government Contracts on Jul 13, 2020
The US government has released the rules implementing the "Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Using" Dahua, Hikvision, and Huawei based...
JCI Sues Genetec For Patent Infringement on Jul 13, 2020
Surprisingly, security giant JCI has sued their partner, security software developer Genetec, for patent infringement. Inside this note,...
Remove Dahua and Hikvision Equipment "Immediately" Or Else Banned From US Government Contracts on Jul 10, 2020
The US government has directed contractors to remove covered equipment, such as Dahua, Hikvision, and Huawei Hisilicon products, "immediately." If...
ZeroEyes Presents Firearm Detection Video Analytics on Jul 09, 2020
ZeroEyes presented its Firearm detection Video Analytics system at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from ZeroEyes...
Directory of 164 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Jul 09, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers to help you see and research what options are available. There are...
Clinton Public View Monitor (PVM) Mask Detection Tested on Jul 09, 2020
Face mask detection, or more specifically not wearing one, is expanding amidst the pandemic. Clinton Electronics has added this capability to their...
These Florida Real Estate Agents Are Now Selling "SafeCheck USA" Temperature Detectors on Jul 09, 2020
The "Kakon Brothers", William and Nathan, are self-described "south Florida Power Agents specializing in Luxury Real Estate" who "have closed over...