Panasonic Free VMS Licenses Program

By: John Honovich, Published on Apr 21, 2015

Looks like Tyco is a trendsetter.

Weeks after Tyco starting giving free Exacq licenses, Digital Watchdog followed suit and now the biggest camera manufacturer yet is offering free VMS licenses.

In this note, we look at Panasonic's move, what it includes and how this is likely to impact the market.

***** **** **** ** a ***********.

***** ***** **** ******** giving**** ***** ********, ******* ******** ******** suit *** *** *** biggest ****** ************ *** is ******** **** *** licenses.

** **** ****, ** look ** *********'* ****, what ** ******** *** how **** ** ****** to ****** *** ******.

[***************]

********

** ******** ****,********* ****** ** *** manufacturer ***** *******. ** **** ****, Panasonic ********** *** ***** for ** *** ********* in ***** ******* *** that **** ********** ******* for ***** ***** *****.

**** **** * ******, Panasonic *** ********* **** for **** ********* ****** models ******, * **** Video ******* *** ******* would ** ********.

How ** *****

***** ******* / ********* explained *** ** ****** to **:

"******** *** *** **** license ** *** ******* and ******* * ** serial ****** *** *****.  During *** ************, *** customer **** ****** “********* Bundle” *** *** *** will **** *** ******** cameras (** *** ******** can ******** ***** *** IP ******* ** *** cameras.) ** *** ****** app ** ** * workstation **** *** ***** the ********, *** *** will **** *** ***** and ****** ******* ** VI *** ** ***** activated.  ** *** ****** is *******, *** *** will ***** *** **** to ******** * **** and ************ ****** ** to *** ** ******* within ** ****."

*** ******* ****** ** May *, **** *** does *** ******* ********** purchased ********* *******. *******, VideoInsight ***** **** **** "******** ** ***** * perpetual **** $** *** camera *********** ******* **** allows ********* ******* ***** VMS ******** ** ****** to ** *** ******* not ******** ** *** bundle."

** **** *** ******* buying ************'* ******* / appliances (****** ******** *******), ******** ********* ***** to ****** ***** *** COTS ********.

************ ********* **** ****** ******* software *** ****** ****.

What ******* ** ******

***** *** ~*** ********* cameras *******, ********* **** we ******* ** *** of ***** ************ ******* and **** * *** of ***** *** / consumer ********* **** *** **-*****. ** **** ***, it ** ****** *********. On *** ***** ****, Panasonic **** *** **** $100 ** *******, ** almost *** *** ******* eligible *** **** ******** are ***** ** ** $300+, **** **** ~$*,***.

Competitive ******

*** **** *********** ********* impact ** *********** *** growing ******** **** *** software ****** ** ***** away ** **** ** a ****** ****. *** since **** **** ********* started ****** *** *** ***** level ***, *** *** ****** seen **** ****** ***** pressure.

*** *********, **** ******* a ****** ***** ****, since ** ***** ******* a ******* ***** / offset **** ***** **** no *** ****. ** course, *** ***** *******, it ***** *** **** people ****** / ***** their ********, ** ** taps **** *** ****** large ********* ** ****** customer ****.

*** ******* ** **** will ** **** *** can *** **** ********* that ******* **** ***** manufacturers *** **** ***** VMSes *** ****** ****** or ****** *** ***'* needs **** ************ (**** would ** * ********** Genetec response, *.*.).

**** ******* ** ** seen ** *** *** manufacturers ** **** *** free *** ******. ************ manufacturers ***, *******, ********** to ****, ** **** might ** **** ********* to **** **** *** software ** **** ******* it **** ******** ***** camera *****.

What ** *** *****?

Comments (6)

Chris,

While we have you here, as one of the last independent VMSes left, I'd be curious to hear your specific pitch against the free VMS bundles.

From an outsides perspective, I would be weary of using anything free for such a critical process. More importantly how will the customer react when they learn the software selected to secure their facility was free?

From an insider's perspective, IPConfigure invests blood and treasure into developing innovative software solutions with a team that's passionate about the important work they are doing. I could not imagine how the team might react if I told them we are selling the business to a camera manufacturer who will be giving our software away for free. Needless to say their best work would be behind them.

The consolidation of VMS manufactures went all wrong and will negatively impact the rate of innovation in the market. Silicon Valley was suppose to make the big move into this space, not the old guard who have been getting it wrong for so long.

Innovation and great customer support can only come from independent VMS companies. For they have everything to lose if they don't get it right.

I think it's a mistake to simply take the fact that vendors are offering their cameras with 'free' VMS licensing to mean that they don't recognize the value of VMS software. Just the opposite.

The reason bundling is attractive to buyers is because they save money, of course. And the reason it is attractive to the vendors is because they can make a sale that they may have not made otherwise.

And if that were all there were to it, then there is definitely an argument to be made saying the VMS license is worth so little that it can be just thrown in for free.

But another big vendor benefit, apart from the initial $ from the sale, is the channelling of the user into a controllable eco-system of the vendors choosing. And that can translate into many times the profit down the line as the end user is more likely than not to continue on their initial path with respect for to purchases.

Since the vendors cameras will always be supported first and best by their own VMS, this adds stability to the system that the end-user may not want to risk.

On the other hand if one were to buy one Panasonic cameras, and seperately purchase Christopher's IPConfigure product the situation changes. Even assuming that IPConfigure were to be an overall better VMS, there would be times when integration with Panasonic would be behind VI.

That's when the customer starts to think, "maybe I should buy the cameras that have the best features AND are supported by IPConfigure", instead of thinking Panasonic automatically.

This unrecognized eco-system affinity is a large part of the value of the VMS for a camera manufacturer, and bundling is the natural way to derive maximum value from it.

"But another big vendor benefit, apart from the initial $ from the sale, is the channelling of the user into a controllable ecosystem of the vendors choosing."

We call this vendor lock-in, which makes for a difficult exit if the customers finds the solution inadequate or seeks features not available in the Free VMS.

"Even assuming that IPConfigure were to be an overall better VMS, there would be times when integration with Panasonic would be behind VI."

This is where ONVIF profiles -S and -Q address integration gaps with VMS manufacturers. Note, not all integration is equal but the VMS should have those risky manufactures identified for their resellers.

"This unrecognized eco-system affinity is a large part of the value of the VMS for a camera manufacturer, and bundling is the natural way to derive maximum value from it."

If you are in a race to the bottom then I completely agree.

Regards,

Chris

Thanks for the insightful response.

The customer saves money while the vendor/reseller makes more money? Actually, the vendor is losing the VMS revenue opportunity under the free model.

The customer appears to save money, the 'free' VMS appears to be a total loss. Neither is necessarily the case.

Yes, this is vendor-lock in strategy, and I'm not advocating it, only recognizing its overlooked contribution to the vendors decision to bundle in the first place.

Yes, ONVIF has made great strides in reducing the degree to which one is limited by such an arrangement. That is why I used the term vendor affinity instead of lock-in. But still there will be at least some benefit for some time to come.

And from an independent VMS manufacturer's perspective, it might seem like it is purely a 'race to the bottom', but from the point of view of someone who sells both cameras and VMSes, it may not be the case.

Imagine you are Panasonic and want to increase sales, you could just discount your hardware and charge fairly for your VMS, or instead keep the hardware the same and give the VMS away 'free'. Its a trade off from their point of view, not necessarily a race to the bottom. Anyway it's not a race because $0 is the bottom.

But I do agree with you that the appeal is lessening everyday as interoperability increases.

Login to read this IPVM report.

Related Reports

JCI "Fever Camera" Partners With China TVT on May 19, 2020
Johnson Controls (JCI) is the next big player to get into the 'fever camera'...
OnSSI Founders Return, Start Corsight on May 25, 2020
The OnSSI founders are back, less than 2 years after selling OnSSI to...
FDA Defines Correct Operation of "Fever Cameras" on May 26, 2020
The US FDA has now defined the correct operation of "Thermal Imaging...
Motorola Solutions Speaks on Avigilon / Video Strategy on Feb 04, 2020
2 years ago Motorola Solutions acquired Avigilon for a billion dollars but...
Euklis Presents AI Analytics on May 05, 2020
Euklis presented its AI facial recognition, LPR, and object recognition...
VergeSense Presents People Tracking Sensor on Jun 04, 2020
VergeSense presented its people tracking sensor and social distancing...
Video Surveillance 101 Book Released on Jul 07, 2020
IPVM's unique introduction to video surveillance series is now available as a...
Avigilon Integrates With Motorola Radios on Jan 29, 2020
Motorola is best known for its radios. Now, the company has taken a step...
Cisco Acquiring Fluidmesh on Apr 09, 2020
Cisco announced it is acquiring niche wireless manufacturer...
Openpath Presents Two Door PoE Controller on May 21, 2020
Openpath presented its new PoE controller at the May 2020 IPVM Startups...
Genetec Security Center 5.9 Release Examined on Feb 06, 2020
Genetec released the next major version of Security Center, less than a year...
USA's Seek Scan Thermal Temperature System Examined on Apr 01, 2020
This US company, Seek, located down the road from FLIR and founded by former...
LSP Presents 2nd Generation FP Power Supplies on Apr 29, 2020
Life Safety Power (LSP) presented its FP2 power supply in the April 2020 IPVM...
Ivy League Grads Present Percepta Shoplifting Detection on Jun 17, 2020
Ivy League graduates of the University of Pennsylvania presented their...
Startup Solink $17 Million USD Fund Raise Expands To Mass Market on Jun 24, 2020
Solink has raised ~$17 million USD, a sizeable round for the company that...

Recent Reports

Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...