Panasonic Free VMS Licenses Program

Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 21, 2015

Looks like Tyco is a trendsetter.

Weeks after Tyco starting giving free Exacq licenses, Digital Watchdog followed suit and now the biggest camera manufacturer yet is offering free VMS licenses.

In this note, we look at Panasonic's move, what it includes and how this is likely to impact the market.

***** **** **** ** * ***********.

***** ***** **** ******** ********** ***** ********, ******* ******** ******** **** *** *** *** ******* ****** manufacturer *** ** ******** **** *** ********.

** **** ****, ** **** ** *********'* ****, **** ** includes *** *** **** ** ****** ** ****** *** ******.

[***************]

********

** ******** ****,********* ****** ** *** ************ ***** *******. ** **** ****, ********* ********** *** ***** *** ** was ********* ** ***** ******* *** **** **** ********** ******* for ***** ***** *****.

**** **** * ******, ********* *** ********* **** *** **** Panasonic ****** ****** ******, * **** ***** ******* *** ******* would ** ********.

How ** *****

***** ******* / ********* ********* *** ** ****** ** **:

"******** *** *** **** ******* ** *** ******* *** ******* a ** ****** ****** *** *****.  ****** *** ************, *** customer **** ****** “********* ******” *** *** *** **** **** for ******** ******* (** *** ******** *** ******** ***** *** IP ******* ** *** *******.) ** *** ****** *** ** on * *********** **** *** ***** *** ********, *** *** will **** *** ***** *** ****** ******* ** ** *** be ***** *********.  ** *** ****** ** *******, *** *** will ***** *** **** ** ******** * **** *** ************ upload ** ** *** ** ******* ****** ** ****."

*** ******* ****** ** *** *, **** *** **** *** include ********** ********* ********* *******. *******, ************ ***** **** **** "******** ** ***** * ********* **** $** *** ****** *********** upgrade **** ****** ********* ******* ***** *** ******** ** ****** to ** *** ******* *** ******** ** *** ******."

** **** *** ******* ****** ************'* ******* / ********** (****** the***** *******), ******** ********* ***** ** ****** ***** *** **** ********.

************ ********* **** ****** ******* ******** *** ****** ****.

What ******* ** ******

***** *** ~*** ********* ******* *******, ********* **** ** ******* is *** ** ***** ************ ******* *** **** * *** of ***** *** / ******** ********* **** *** **-*****. ** **** ***, ** ** ****** *********. ** *** other ****, ********* **** *** **** $*** ** *******, ** almost *** *** ******* ******** *** **** ******** *** ***** to ** $***+, **** **** ~$*,***.

Competitive ******

*** **** *********** ********* ****** ** *********** *** ******* ******** that *** ******** ****** ** ***** **** ** **** ** a ****** ****. *** ***** **** **** ********* ******* ****** *** *** ***** ***** ***, *** *** ****** **** **** ****** ***** ********.

*** *********, **** ******* * ****** ***** ****, ***** ** helps ******* * ******* ***** / ****** **** ***** **** no *** ****. ** ******, *** ***** *******, ** ***** get **** ****** ****** / ***** ***** ********, ** ** taps **** *** ****** ***** ********* ** ****** ******** ****.

*** ******* ** **** **** ** **** *** *** *** less ********* **** ******* **** ***** ************* *** **** ***** VMSes *** ****** ****** ** ****** *** ***'* ***** **** VideoInisght (**** ***** ** * ********** ******* ********, *.*.).

**** ******* ** ** **** ** *** *** ************* ** with *** **** *** ******. ************ ************* ***, *******, ********** to ****, ** **** ***** ** **** ********* ** **** away *** ******** ** **** ******* ** **** ******** ***** camera *****.

What ** *** *****?

Comments (6)

Chris,

While we have you here, as one of the last independent VMSes left, I'd be curious to hear your specific pitch against the free VMS bundles.

From an outsides perspective, I would be weary of using anything free for such a critical process. More importantly how will the customer react when they learn the software selected to secure their facility was free?

From an insider's perspective, IPConfigure invests blood and treasure into developing innovative software solutions with a team that's passionate about the important work they are doing. I could not imagine how the team might react if I told them we are selling the business to a camera manufacturer who will be giving our software away for free. Needless to say their best work would be behind them.

The consolidation of VMS manufactures went all wrong and will negatively impact the rate of innovation in the market. Silicon Valley was suppose to make the big move into this space, not the old guard who have been getting it wrong for so long.

Innovation and great customer support can only come from independent VMS companies. For they have everything to lose if they don't get it right.

I think it's a mistake to simply take the fact that vendors are offering their cameras with 'free' VMS licensing to mean that they don't recognize the value of VMS software. Just the opposite.

The reason bundling is attractive to buyers is because they save money, of course. And the reason it is attractive to the vendors is because they can make a sale that they may have not made otherwise.

And if that were all there were to it, then there is definitely an argument to be made saying the VMS license is worth so little that it can be just thrown in for free.

But another big vendor benefit, apart from the initial $ from the sale, is the channelling of the user into a controllable eco-system of the vendors choosing. And that can translate into many times the profit down the line as the end user is more likely than not to continue on their initial path with respect for to purchases.

Since the vendors cameras will always be supported first and best by their own VMS, this adds stability to the system that the end-user may not want to risk.

On the other hand if one were to buy one Panasonic cameras, and seperately purchase Christopher's IPConfigure product the situation changes. Even assuming that IPConfigure were to be an overall better VMS, there would be times when integration with Panasonic would be behind VI.

That's when the customer starts to think, "maybe I should buy the cameras that have the best features AND are supported by IPConfigure", instead of thinking Panasonic automatically.

This unrecognized eco-system affinity is a large part of the value of the VMS for a camera manufacturer, and bundling is the natural way to derive maximum value from it.

"But another big vendor benefit, apart from the initial $ from the sale, is the channelling of the user into a controllable ecosystem of the vendors choosing."

We call this vendor lock-in, which makes for a difficult exit if the customers finds the solution inadequate or seeks features not available in the Free VMS.

"Even assuming that IPConfigure were to be an overall better VMS, there would be times when integration with Panasonic would be behind VI."

This is where ONVIF profiles -S and -Q address integration gaps with VMS manufacturers. Note, not all integration is equal but the VMS should have those risky manufactures identified for their resellers.

"This unrecognized eco-system affinity is a large part of the value of the VMS for a camera manufacturer, and bundling is the natural way to derive maximum value from it."

If you are in a race to the bottom then I completely agree.

Regards,

Chris

Thanks for the insightful response.

The customer saves money while the vendor/reseller makes more money? Actually, the vendor is losing the VMS revenue opportunity under the free model.

The customer appears to save money, the 'free' VMS appears to be a total loss. Neither is necessarily the case.

Yes, this is vendor-lock in strategy, and I'm not advocating it, only recognizing its overlooked contribution to the vendors decision to bundle in the first place.

Yes, ONVIF has made great strides in reducing the degree to which one is limited by such an arrangement. That is why I used the term vendor affinity instead of lock-in. But still there will be at least some benefit for some time to come.

And from an independent VMS manufacturer's perspective, it might seem like it is purely a 'race to the bottom', but from the point of view of someone who sells both cameras and VMSes, it may not be the case.

Imagine you are Panasonic and want to increase sales, you could just discount your hardware and charge fairly for your VMS, or instead keep the hardware the same and give the VMS away 'free'. Its a trade off from their point of view, not necessarily a race to the bottom. Anyway it's not a race because $0 is the bottom.

But I do agree with you that the appeal is lessening everyday as interoperability increases.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on VMS

'Best In Show' Fails on Apr 19, 2018
ISC West's "Best In Show" has failed. For more than a decade, it has become increasingly irrelevant as the selections exhibit a cartoon level...
Worst Access Control 2018 on Apr 18, 2018
Three access control providers stood out as providing the most problems for integrators. In this report, we analyze the answers to: "In the...
Axis VMD4 Analytics Tested on Apr 17, 2018
Axis is now on its 4th generation of video motion detection (VMD), which Axis calls "a free video analytics application." In this generation, Axis...
Best and Worst ISC West 2018 on Apr 16, 2018
ISC West 2018 had strong attendance, modest overall new products, and a surge in Artificial Intelligence marketing. First, here are 20+...
Eocortex / Macroscop VMS Company Profile on Apr 09, 2018
Eocortex is the international brand of Russian VMS manufacturer Macroscop. Macroscop was founded in 2008, and the Eocortex name created in 2013. We...
Hanwha Mega ISC West Product Releases on Apr 05, 2018
While overall new product releases have been slowing over the past few years, Hanwha is releasing a slew of 6 new offerings for ISC West,...
VMS New Developments Spring 2018 (Avigilon, Exacqvision, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone, Network Optix) on Apr 04, 2018
What's new with VMS software? In this report, we examine new features and releases for Spring 2018 to track different areas of potential...
Hikvision LPR Camera Tested on Mar 26, 2018
Hikvision has expanded into the LPR market, claiming up to 99% capture rates, 95% recognition rates at speeds up to 75mph  / 120kmh. We bought and...
Network Racks For Surveillance Guide on Mar 21, 2018
In this guide, we look at network rack infrastructure, one of the fundamentals of IP video surveillance. Inside, we cover: What is a rack unit...
Network Addressing for Video Surveillance Guide on Mar 14, 2018
The goal of this guide is to explain addressing devices on IP networks, focusing on how IP cameras and recorders are used in those networks. For...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Global Real-Time Video Surveillance - EarthNow on Apr 20, 2018
A new company, EarthNow, with backing from Bill Gates, Airbus and more, is claiming that: Users will be able to see places on Earth with a delay...
Dedicated Vs Converged Access Control Networks (Statistics) on Apr 20, 2018
Running one's access control system on a converged network, with one's computers and phones, can save money. On the other hand, hand, doing so can...
April 2018 IP Networking Course on Apr 19, 2018
This is the last chance to register for our IP Networking course. Register now. NEW - 2 sessions per class, 'day' and 'night' to give you double...
Rare Video Surveillance Fundraising - Verkada $15 Million on Apr 19, 2018
Fundraising in video surveillance (and the broader physical security market) has been poor recently. Highlights are few and far in between...
'Best In Show' Fails on Apr 19, 2018
ISC West's "Best In Show" has failed. For more than a decade, it has become increasingly irrelevant as the selections exhibit a cartoon level...
Security Camera Cleaning Frequency Statistics on Apr 18, 2018
150+ integrators told IPVM how often they clean cameras on customer's sites and why.  Inside we examine their answers and break down feedback...
Worst Access Control 2018 on Apr 18, 2018
Three access control providers stood out as providing the most problems for integrators. In this report, we analyze the answers to: "In the...
Axis VMD4 Analytics Tested on Apr 17, 2018
Axis is now on its 4th generation of video motion detection (VMD), which Axis calls "a free video analytics application." In this generation, Axis...
Arecont CEO And President Resign on Apr 17, 2018
This is good news for Arecont. Arecont's problems have been well known for years (e.g., most recently Worst Camera Manufacturers 2018 and starting...
Strong ISC West 2018, Says Manufacturers, GSX / ASIS Expected Weaker on Apr 17, 2018
Manufacturers say ISC West 2018 was strong, continuing the trend we have seen in 2017 results and 2016 results. However, those same 100...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact