Optex Redscan Reviewed

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Jun 07, 2012

Perimeter detection products are notoriously prone to false positive alarms. Optex REDSCAN claims it minimizes this problem with technology not found elsewhere. In this note, we examine REDSCAN, analyze the technology behind it, and contrast it with other perimeter technologies.

Overview

redscan

REDSCAN [link no longer available] is an intrusion detection sensor that uses 'laser based' detection, compared to common PIR, photoelectric (PE) beam, or microwave detection technologies. The product is designed to be less prone to false alarms than other sensors. Optex positions the product as an addition to 'video verification' systems, where this unit is used to trigger PTZ movement to specific locations.

  • Laser detection up to 200 foot, 190 degree detection range (depending on unit orientation)
  • REDSCAN has up to 8 gross detection zones designed to facilitate PTZ positioning
  • Integrated with a number of leading VMS platforms
  • Product only sold through trained integrators
  • MSRP pricing $5300-$6000 per unit

See sidebar image of the REDSCAN sensor. The unit is IP65 and IP66 rated, and a version with an onboard heater for cold environments is available.

Analysis

Laser detection is more sensitive than other technologies, because it 'actively' scans an area for movement changes, rather than alarming based on temperature changes in the detection area. For example, a PIR sensor compares heat energy within a scene from one interval to the next, and a slowly moving object may fall beneath detection sensitivity. See our PIR Selection Guide for additional detail. Laser detection is different because it rapidly scans a scene for active movement, and regardless of how slowly an object is traveling, its movement and velocity are detected.

Because laser detection is very sensitive, false alarms can be a problem. Optex claims that REDSCAN solves this by including firmware algorithms that normalize or 'learns' potential outside environment triggers such as foliage movement, rouge reflections, insects, and precipitation.

Unlike 'traditional PIR' sensor technology, REDSCAN's emitter assembly features no fixed facets, and zone sensitivity or exclusion zones are definable to specific X/Y coordinates, not coarse detection regions. While traditional PIR detectors may be limited to 15 or 20 zones, REDSCAN permits dynamic exclusion of objects within the entire area.

Optex has announced integrations with Milestone [link no longer available] and Genetec [link no longer available] VMS platforms. This integration entails sending alarm messages to the VMS platforms via ASCII strings. REDSCAN features a built-in Ethernet encoder module that allows a direct connection to a switch, and the unit has the option to be PoE+ powered.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Currently, REDSCAN is limited for purchase and install by Optex certified integrators. Optex does not intend for REDSCAN to be available for general purchase from distribution, but rather takes direct involvement in training an integrator on-site during first installation. In part because REDSCAN is more complex than most sensors, and additionally because it represents a different type of detection technology, Optex takes a 'hands-on' approach to ensure that training is complete and comprehensive with each integrator.

The pricing for this product will exclude it from consideration for general perimeter detection. The $5300+ price tag places well beyond more simple, coarse detection technologies. The product is positioned to be an answer for high-end, very sensitive or dynamic detection areas that overwhelm traditional detection technologies. Optex claims the most receptive vertical markets for the product are critical infrastructure and high-value installation like museums.

Competitive Comparison

While REDSCAN cannot be compared to an technicaly equivalent product as laser-based detection sensors are uncommon,  other technologies accomplish similar goals of wide area outdoor monitoring.

Optex makes it clear that REDSCAN is best positioned as an alternative to microwave and ground-based radar detection technologies. These detection methods are typically employed in mission-critical type of applications, and Optex is marketing REDSCAN towards the advanced end of the intrusion detection market.

Long range PIR and PE sensors, like those manufactured by Takex [link no longer available] and Optex, are commonly available for a fraction of the cost of REDSCAN. While these products are more prone to false alarming and lack onboard processing, they equal or better REDSCAN's modest coverage radius. If false alarming proves to be an issue, several of the more of these simple sensors can be wired in combination more inexpensively than a single REDSCAN unit.

Video analytics, either with day/night or thermal cameras are an alternative to REDSCAN. With day/night cameras, the total price is likely to be half (or less) than REDSCAN. However, accuracy issues are a concern especially in low light conditions. By contrast, combining analytics with thermal cameras will increase the cost to a similar range as REDSCAN. However, the accuracy levels are likely to be similar.

1 report cite this report:

Axis Network Radar Tested (D2050-VE) on Dec 19, 2017
Axis is expanding into a new market - radar. The company has released their D2050-VE Network Radar Detector, claiming to minimize false alarms, in...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Bezos-Funded Deep Sentinel Tested on Mar 28, 2019
Backed by Jeff Bezos, the Silicon Valley startup, Deep Sentinel, has declared: No One Does Home Security Like We Do Our Surveillance Team has...
Bosch AI Camera Trainer Released And Tested on Apr 09, 2019
Bosch is releasing a highly unusual new AI feature - 'Camera Trainer'. Now, coming as a standard feature in Bosch IVA/EVA analytics, one can train...
Camera Disruptor Wyze Enters Sensor / Security Market on Mar 28, 2019
Wyze, the company that has disrupted consumer IP cameras, combining American marketing and Chinese manufacturer, has just announced its expansion...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision, Now Improved, Now Being Terminated on Nov 25, 2019
When we originally tested Wyze's free person detection deep learning analytics in July 2019, they performed well, with few false alarms, but a long...
Yi Home Camera 3 AI Analytics Tested on Sep 10, 2019
Yi Technology is claiming "new AI features" in its $50 Home Camera 3 "eliminates 'false positives' caused by flying insects, small pets, or light...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Consumer IP Camera Analytics / AI Shootout - Arlo, Google / Nest, Amazon / Ring, Hikvision / Ezviz, Wyze Cam, Yi Home on Sep 26, 2019
AI analytics are hitting the mainstream in the consumer camera market, with entrants Wyze and Yi Home releasing free people detection on their...
Camect "Worlds Smartest Camera Hub" Tested on Oct 18, 2019
Camect is a Silicon Valley startup that claims the "Smartest AI Object Detection On The Market", detecting not only people and vehicles, but...
Halo Smart Vape Detector Tested on Jan 16, 2020
The Halo Smart Sensor claims to detect vaping, including popular brand Juul and even THC vapes. But how well does it work in real world...

Most Recent Industry Reports

"Hikvision Football Arena" Lithuania Causes Controversy on Jan 24, 2020
Controversy has arisen in Lithuania over Hikvision becoming a soccer team's top sponsor and gaining naming rights to their arena, with one local MP...
Axis and Genetec Drop IFSEC 2020 on Jan 23, 2020
Two of the best-known video surveillance manufacturers are dropping IFSEC International 2020, joining Milestone who dropped IFSEC in 2019. The...
Multipoint Door Lock Tutorial on Jan 23, 2020
Despite widespread use, locked doors are notoriously weak at stopping entry, and thousands can be misspent on locks that leave doors quite...
Avigilon Shifts Cloud Strategy - Merges Blue and ACC on Jan 23, 2020
Avigilon is shifting its cloud strategy, phasing out its Blue web-managed surveillance platform as a stand-alone brand and merging it with its ACC...
Verkada Paying $100 For Referrals Just To Demo on Jan 22, 2020
Some companies pay for referrals when the referral becomes a customer. Verkada is taking it to the next level - paying $100 referrals fees simply...
Camera Analytics Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 22, 2020
Analytics are hot again, thanks to a slew of AI-powered cameras, but whose analytics really work? And how do these new smart cameras compare to top...
Intersec 2020 Final Show Report on Jan 21, 2020
IPVM spent all 3 days at the Intersec 2020 show interviewing various companies and finding key trends. We cover: Middle East Enterprise...
Vehicle & Long Range Access Reader Tutorial on Jan 21, 2020
One of the classic challenges for access control are parking lots and garages, where the user's credential is far from the reader. With modern...
Clearview AI Alarm - NY Times Report Says "Might End Privacy" on Jan 20, 2020
Over the weekend, the NY Times released a report titled "The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It" about a company named...
Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2020 on Jan 20, 2020
The past 2 years of US bans and sanctions have shaken the video surveillance industry but what impact would this have on integrators' favorite...