Opposing the Hikvision / Dahua Ban

By: IPVM Team, Published on Aug 22, 2018

Here is a case against the US government ban of Dahua and Hikvision.

IPVM collected 160+ responses from integrators, dozens of which opposed the ban. Below is a collection of key themes and these integrator's case of why they are against the ban.

#1 - Isolate / Protect The Network

The most common theme amongst those opposing the ban was that if video surveillance is blocked from providing any remote access than even if vulnerabilities exist, they cannot be exploited. Comments included:

  • "No. This is a witch hunt driven by the expensive camera manufacturers. If you don't secure your network and change admin passwords you have problems with any brand of cameras."
  • "No. I understand why this ban was introduced but every other large manufacturers also have P2P in their cameras. This makes every manufacturer vulnerable to a hack. We simply need to require manufacturers to allow installers to simply disable P2P and force password changes."
  • "It is possible to lock down these camera systems from the vulnerabilities that are known. I think that a strong advisory and limited use application of more appropriate. Also, where does it stop. By adding Dahua into this mix, I am concerned about where you draw the line. Most all our products in the US have electronics that are manufactured or sourced from China with some possible ties to the government funding."
  • "No, I personally feel that as long as the User has a robust firewall, there should be no issues with ANY IP cameras."
  • "No, I think it's unrealistic to think there is a backdoor because it would be a "one time shot" if discovered. Also it's just as likely that Cameras made in another country have a back door too."
  • "No. The security issues are only issues should the device be allowed to see 'the outside world'. If the network is designed correctly and securely, the devices are on their own vlan, to a dedicated secure VMS, there should be no issue. Plenty of other brands have security issues that somehow don't seem to be an issue. As government projects are essentially paid for by the taxpayers money, the appropriate performing product should be used. If that means it is a cheaper chinese made product that performs to spec or out performs an american made product, then the chinese product should be used.
  • "If it is a closed system with no internet access, I think the ban is ridiculous."
  • "If cameras are installed properly on a dark network then the vuneralibilities are contained."
  • "No. If our biggest fear is that we have such porous IT infrastructure then we need to repair the infrastructure, not ban manufacturers."

#2 Undermine Free Market

The second most common theme was that the ban undermined the free market:

  • "No. This is an interference in the free market, as an official ban / law affects the entire global marketplace. There could just as easily be a memo sent to all that those devices shall not be installed on any facility, and further, that all such devices must be replaced as soon as possible. An actual law was unnecessary."
  • "I do not support the ban. When goods cannot cross borders, armies will. If the Chinese government wants to spy on the US (as it surely does, and as we do with respect to them), there are many other vectors for them to shift to if they were/are actually embedding back doors in Hikvision and/or Dahua cameras."
  • "I think it's just another element of the trade wars and isolationism which is getting more popular in the world these days. And the cybersecurity issues were just used as a cause to hit China."
  • "I don't support the ban - I believe the security problems that Hikvision had, have been fixed (we haven't sold Dahua) & I believe in a free market where competition is good and government should keep a "hands off" approach in the marketplace. Competition is good for the consumer, & the government is the largest consumer in the US."
  • "No. The ban is an extension of Trumps xenophobic trade ban and has been cobbled together by Politian's with no knowledge or experience of the CCTV industry. Its an entirely knee jerk reaction to garner populist votes. The same vote could have been applied to any product manufactured in China and would have had a similar response. Under Trump the US is becoming isolated, even more insular, xenophobic and is seeking confrontation on every front - EXCEPT in its support of Putin and Kim Jong-Un who have disgusting human rights records, proven state hacking profiles and are dictators - presumably what Trump is aspiring to with his ignorance of trade and his disgraceful treatment of allies and trading partners. Without a shadow of doubt the ban is an extension of this ignorance and supported by people with the same insular views."
  • "Any limitation of the competition brings the economy to the Soviet Union model of the planned economy, kills the innovations and motivation."

#3 Negative For the Industry

The third theme was that the ban was negative for the industry:

  • "I don't support the ban. The threat is exaggerated. Protectionist trends hurt and reward those undeserving of the outcomes. Not good for consumers, not good for business."
  • "Negative in terms of pricing/innovation."
  • "Negative. Other brand will increase there prices because of lack of lower price products."
  • "It for sure will be a negative on the industry. Limiting competition stifles innovation."
  • "Negative. It will drive prices up, as the competitors no longer compete on price and features but reputation and politics."
  • "Negative impact overall. It's not good when the government creates legislation to control the marketplace & tries to protect competitors who are weaker, with regulations."
  • "Will drive price back up and could have a potential negative impact overall."
  • "Positive to big American companies that will increase their profits and rip off the end user because they will have no one to keep their prices in check."

Indeed, according to one commenter, the winner is IPVM:

the US will be the only loser. Winners? IPVM through tabloid reporting and Johns continual tirade against Hik - with get greater coverage, more subscriptions and make John that much richer. Perhaps help paying for a family holiday in China?

1 report cite this report:

The 2019 Video Surveillance Industry Guide on Dec 10, 2018
The 300 page, 2019 Video Surveillance Industry Guide, covers the key events and the future of the video surveillance market, is now available,...
Comments (111) : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports on China

Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 22, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Trump Signs 'Huawei Ban' - Executive Order Targeting Foreign Adversary Technology on May 16, 2019
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order targeting technology provided by 'foreign adversaries', in what is widely being called a...
China PRC Government New National Video Surveillance Standards on May 14, 2019
The People's Republic of China (PRC) government has released a new set of overarching standards for authorities to follow when they install video...
Vivotek Talks About Taiwan, China, Bans, AI And Business Development on May 10, 2019
Vivotek, Taiwan's biggest manufacturer by revenue, did not have a booth at Taiwan's Secutech 2019 (which we are covering). However,...
10 Facial Recognition Providers Review (Secutech) on May 09, 2019
Adding to our 19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled report from ISC West, IPVM focused on facial recognition technology for our Day 2 coverage...
Secutech Taipei 2019 Show Report, Impacted By Expected Hikua Ban on May 08, 2019
IPVM is in Taipei attending SecuTech 2019: The most significant new development at the show is Dahua and Hikvision pulling out after many years...
Dahua and Hikvision Products Illegally Sold To US Government GSA on May 06, 2019
Dahua and Hikvision products are being widely and illegally sold to the US government GSA. The sellers are falsely claiming these China products to...
Hikvision Global News Report Directory on Apr 30, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Milestone Execs on Financials, China and Future on Apr 29, 2019
Milestone has released a 44-page annual report for 2018, an atypical and unrequired move for a subsidiary of a large company, however, Milestone...

Most Recent Industry Reports

NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact