in terms of the chart, 'Private Branded' means it may be 3rd party, but the company directly offers it as their own part number or private labels.
Your points about Avigilon and Genetec are interesting though, because while they have their own part numbers, neither companies hide the original manufacturer brands. I'll edit that chart based on this. Thanks for raising it!
Thanks, Brian. I thought that might be what you meant.
They definitely don't hide them at all -- Genetec literally only adds "SY" (for Synergis) in front of the standard Mercury part numbers. Avigilon's are much more convoluted, but even they have more recently started using "LP1502" for controllers, and the MR-52s have always been designated as such --- thus my confusion.
If slapping your name on someone else's product is ""Private Branded", then there needs to be a completely different category for "Proprietary" like Software House, S2, AMAG, etc. I suppose maybe there is a case there for the Synergis IX line if it couldn't be used as a standalone ICT system separate from Genetec (I have no idea), but as far as I know there is nothing about the VertX units from Avigilon that is any different than the Mercury boards -- their product under a different name.
Not sure how it should be defined. However the Synergis IX was specially/braded made for Genetec, not sure if it will work with standard ICT software or not. Prowatch hardware is another one that is custom made by Mercury but could be used by other systems by updating chips. Avigilon has their own software embedded on Vertx (small systems only) so it's not merely a sticker.
I'll ask around about this and see how complex the list might be. As the saying goes 'There's more than one way to peel the banana' (yikes) so this pragmatically means that different combinations of hardware and software functions produce similar platform abilities.
'Elevator Access' is one example. Lots of platforms claim this, but some use I/O hardware contacts, while others integrate with elevator control systems. Same claims, but (very) different control types.
Nice article and charts, might add Gallagher, have done some work with them in past, particularly around their PIV offering, they have their own controllers. Might you consider OSDP and other standards mappings?
I'm reading the article in question but, I mean you put AXIS as a main manufacturer of Access Control systems?? Axis is Big on cameras and VMS systems, no doubt about that but AXIS is not relevant when it comes to controllers for Access controls!
I get HID and Mercury but why Axis ??
You could've included names such Software House, Lenel/S2, UTC. which are big in the Industry !!! I know they're not Open platforms but for Big Jobs only HID and Mercury are fitted..
The subject of this post is clearly: 3rd party, interoperable controllers. This is not a list ordered by overall market share. Whatever the market share, Axis controllers are supported by a number of other systems.
To your point about including 'Software House, Lenel/S2', both of those platforms are listed.