ONVIF Mega Test 2014

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Apr 16, 2014

In this groundbreaking report, we share findings of in-depth ONVIF testing.

ONVIF Real World Integration

We tested 14 camera manufacturers with 5 VMSes, performing 70 total integrations.

The camera manufacturers included: ACTi, Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, DRS, Geovision, Hikvision, Honeywell, Pelco, Samsung, Sony, Wodsee (the super cheap Chinese offering).

The VMSes included: Exacq, Milestone, VideoInsight, Axxon and Wodsee. The first 2 are ONVIF Profile S conformant, the middle 2 are 1.x / archived products and the last is not officially conformant, just claims it in marketing. This provided a range of products / conformance to evaluate.

The testing checked (1) connectivity, (2) video streaming, (3) setting resolution, (4) setting frame rate and (5) enabling camera side motion detection.

ONVIF Test Tool

ONVIF has an official test tool that we accessed by paying $500 to become a member. This is the tool that each camera manufacturer uses to verify their conformance. We tested this with 15 cameras to determine how useful this tool is for verifying conformance and understanding problems.

ONVIF Device Manager

Finally, we tested the ONVIF Device Manager, an open source tool, to understand what value it offered and how it compared to the official ONVIF test tool.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Key Findings

Here are our key findings from this test:

  • Connecting a sampling of cameras from 14 different manufacturers to 5 recorders, the majority of cameras, 90%+, connected and streamed, regardless of ONVIF version and Profile conformance.
  • Profile S VMSs were far more likely to support motion detection, with Exacq and Milestone supporting 50% or more cameras. Non-Profile VMSs supported motion on nearly no cameras.
  • Support for changing framerate, resolution, and image settings (brightness, contrast, WDR) varied widely depending on VMS and ONVIF version used.
  • Compared to our 2011 ONVIF test, performance was radically better, with basic problems essentially eliminated.
  • In our tests using the ONVIF Device Test Tool, no cameras (out of 15+) passed a conformance test, even after following ONVIF recommendations and settings manufacturers used for their own conformance tests.
  • The tool itself is complex to operate, with little guidance on what settings to use (timeouts, event settings, etc.), and little clear feedback on what caused failures without intimate knowledge of low level camera and network performance information.
  • ONVIF Device Manager allows basic management, viewing, and configuration of ONVIF cameras, but does not provide conformance information and little in the way of diagnostics.
  • However, ODM may report features are available which are not, or are not properly implemented, limited its use to basic functions only.

Recommendations

ONVIF, especially the introduction of Profile S, has done much to increase camera/VMS compatibility, with most listed cameras and VMSs able to connect and stream. However, basic functions such as the ability to change resolution and framerate are not implemented across the board, and motion detection worked in few combinations, less than 25% of the time.

The ONVIF Device Test Tool is likely useful only to manufacturer technical staff, as the low level technical details required in order to properly run a test and interpret results are not available to outside parties.

ONVIF DM may be useful for basic camera configuration and feature checks, but does not perform any conformance testing, limiting its use to these tasks.

Unfortunately, the only way to truly test if a specific camera/recorder combination will work is to test it in the field. This is especially true of camera side motion detection, as neither tool discussed here can confirm that the VMS has integrated motion events specific to each manufacturer.

ONVIF Camera/VMS Field Test

We tested 14 cameras with 4 VMS systems and an NVR, varying in ONVIF conformance from Profile S to version 1.02 to claiming conformance without official listing. We tested the following parameters:

  • Does the camera connect?
  • Does the camera stream?
  • Can resolution and framerate be modified?
  • Can other image settings such as brightness, contrast, etc. be changed?
  • Does motion detection work?

The following charts detail each of these features for each VMS:

Connect/Stream

First and most basic, we tested whether the camera could be added to the recorder using proper credentials, and video streamed. In the most instances (90%+), this worked fine, with some glaring exceptions. The Wodsee NVR, which is not officially listed as conformant, crashed when the Avigilon H3 camera (Profile S) was connected. The Wodsee WIP130 would not connect to 3 out of 5 recorders.

Framerate/Resolution

Next, we tested whether each VMS had the ability to change framerate and resolution of each camera from the client. In Exacq and Milestone, the Profile S VMSs, most cameras could be changed, with few exceptions. Axxon Next, an ONVIF 1.02 VMS, was able to change resolution and framerate on all but Avigilon and Vivotek. Video Insight does not allow changing of framerate and resolution from the client, nor does the Wodsee DVR.

The non-conformant (but marketed as "ONVIF") Wodsee WIP130 could not be changed from any client whatsoever.

Motion Detection

Milestone integrates motion from most cameras in this test (9/14), while Exacq handles six (though Avigilon may be integrated by inserting a few lines in one file). In the version 1.02 VMSs, motion detection does not work at all. 

Most surprisingly, the Wodsee NVR received events from Bosch, Dahua, and Honeywell cameras, though it is not officially listed as conformant.

Imaging Settings

Finally, we tested whether the VMS could adjust imaging settings such as brightness, contrast, etc., from the client. These features are purely optional in the VMS client, with Exacq, Milestone, and Axxon integrating the majority of cameras, while VI and Wodsee could not adjust any.

ONVIF Device Test Tool

This video provides a brief overview of setup and operation of the ONVIF test tool:

Full tests take about an hour or more in many cases, depending on how many features are being tested, timeout settings, and camera performance.

Test Tool Usage Issues

Though it appears straightforward, we found several issues impacted conformance testing and we could not get any tested cameras to pass a conformance test. We contact ONVIF with these issues and failed test reports for feedback, but even after following their recommendations, we found issues still remained. 

These issues include the following:

Timeout and Event Settings

On the "Management" tab of the Device Test Tool are several timeout settings impacting testing. These settings include the time between the tool beginning tests, the time allowed for the device to reboot (occurs several times during testing), time the tool awaits for response to commands, etc.

Running a test with default settings resulted in large numbers of failed test steps. ONVIF pointed out that we refer to the "Feature List" XML document which is attached to each device in the conformance listing (see sample from Sony SNC-VB630 [link no longer available]) which shows what settings were used in the test. However, even though these settings decreased the number of failed steps, conformance still failed. 

This screencast details how to find this XML document and adjust settings accordingly, and demonstrates how much manufacturers may differ.

Limited Feedback on Failures

Limited detailed pass/fail information is provided by the test tool, except in raw XML data for each step. This leaves users without intimate knowledge of the camera and the ONVIF spec unable to understand exactly why the test has failed. 

In this screencast we show a failed test, which was run using recommended manufacturer specific settings and review the detailed feedback that is received on each step:

Test Environment

As per ONVIF, tests should be run on a closed network. Other traffic may cause unpredictable results, and increase latency, affecting the timeouts that were set in test configuration. Working DHCP and NTP servers must be available on the network, as the test tool uses these in the conformance test. Finally, ONVIF also recommends the test tool should be run as administrator.

ONVIF Device Manager

The ONVIF Device Manager (ODM) was created by a third party developer for basic viewing and configuration of ONVIF devices. This screencast shows basic use of ONVIF DM:

Unlike the official test tool, ODM does not perform any conformance tests. Instead, it is used for basic configuration and viewing of ONVIF devices. Some of this information may be quickly used to check if devices support ONVIF functions, but almost no diagnostic information is provided if specific functions do not work.

Methodology

We used the following VMS versions in this test:

  • Axxon Next: 3.5.0.819
  • Exacqvision: 6.0.8.58249
  • Milestone: 2013 (8.5e)
  • Video Insight: 5.5.26.4
  • Wodsee: V4.02.R11.63400083.12001

And camera firmware versions as follows:

  • ACTi D11: V6.06.16
  • Avigilon 2.0W-H3-BO1: 2.6.0.14
  • Avigilon 3.0W-H3-B: 2.6.0.18
  • Axis P3354: 5.40.17
  • Axis M3004: 5.40.5.4
  • Bosch NBN-733V: 5.90
  • Bosch NBN-932V: 5.90
  • Dahua IPC-HF3101N: 2.210.General 01.0R
  • DRS WatchMaster IP: v2.1.5770
  • Geovision GV-UBX1301: v2.11 2014-02-14
  • Hikvision DS-2CD2232-I5: V5.0.2
  • Honeywell HCW1F: 40.0.6
  • Pelco IME119: 2.0.0.11.8280-A0.0
  • Samsung SNB-5004: 1.13
  • Samsung SNB-6004: 2.22
  • Sony SNC-VB600: 1.12.0
  • Sony SNC-VB600B: 1.12.0
  • Sony SNC-VB630: 1.12.0
  • Sony SNC-CH140: 1.82
  • Vivotek IP8371E: IP8371E-VVTK-0100j
  • Wodsee WIP130-S20: 1.2.1.227383

7 reports cite this report:

ONVIF Video Surveillance Tutorial on Jan 29, 2019
ONVIF is well known within the surveillance industry as an interface to connect IP cameras and VMS systems. However, new users may find it...
DeskCamera ONVIF Screen Capture on Jan 05, 2017
Recording PC screens have historically been an expensive proposition, requiring dedicated hardware or specialized, proprietary software. However,...
HD Analog DVRs With Exacq, Milestone and Genetec VMSes Tested on Aug 23, 2016
HD analog offerings have proven to deliver HD video at radically lower prices. However, the main limitation for professional applications is their...
Milestone ONVIF Bridge Tested on Jul 06, 2016
The Milestone ONVIF Bridge could be a breakthrough. Enterprise VMSes have long restricted 3rd party access making larger system integration more...
Universal Camera Tester Tested (IPC-8600) on May 20, 2016
Setting up cameras is often a pain. A number of test tools exist but are frequently limited on camera support or have a small screen, slow...
You Cannot Trust the ONVIF Chairman on Jul 17, 2015
A fascinating question: Can you trust salesman? Posed SourceSecurity. Unfortunately and ironically, the ONVIF chairman [link no longer...
Milestone Acquired by Canon on Jun 13, 2014
Wow. Industry insiders have been speculating about Milestone being acquired for weeks. But the outcome is surprising. Milestone has been...
Comments (38) : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

ONVIF Video Surveillance Tutorial on Jan 29, 2019
ONVIF is well known within the surveillance industry as an interface to connect IP cameras and VMS systems. However, new users may find it...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on May 02, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
Camera Configuration Manager Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision on May 01, 2019
Which camera manufacturer has the best management tool? We tested 6 manufacturers - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision to find...
IndigoVision Control Center VMS Tested on May 30, 2019
IPVM's last test of IndigoVision's VMS was in 2010, which found enterprise VMS features and a simple client interface. but no 3rd party camera...
Avigilon ACC7 VMS Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Avigilon's Control Center 7 boldly claims it will "transform live video monitoring" with the new Focus of Attention "AI-enabled" interface. We...
Network Optix NxWitness 4.0 Tested on Oct 10, 2019
Network Optix released Nx Witness 4.0, proclaiming new features like a deep learning analytics metadata SDK, increased H.265 support, and UX...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R3 'Centralized Search' Tested on Oct 30, 2019
Milestone has had problems over the last few years releasing significant new software. Now, in XProtect 2019 R3, Milestone is touting "one search...
IP Camera Browser Support: Who's Broken / Who Works on Dec 10, 2019
For many years, IP cameras depended on ActiveX control, whose security flaws have been known for more than a decade. The good news is that this is...

Most Recent Industry Reports

"Hikvision Football Arena" Lithuania Causes Controversy on Jan 24, 2020
Controversy has arisen in Lithuania over Hikvision becoming a soccer team's top sponsor and gaining naming rights to their arena, with one local MP...
Axis and Genetec Drop IFSEC 2020 on Jan 23, 2020
Two of the best-known video surveillance manufacturers are dropping IFSEC International 2020, joining Milestone who dropped IFSEC in 2019. The...
Multipoint Door Lock Tutorial on Jan 23, 2020
Despite widespread use, locked doors are notoriously weak at stopping entry, and thousands can be misspent on locks that leave doors quite...
Avigilon Shifts Cloud Strategy - Merges Blue and ACC on Jan 23, 2020
Avigilon is shifting its cloud strategy, phasing out its Blue web-managed surveillance platform as a stand-alone brand and merging it with its ACC...
Verkada Paying $100 For Referrals Just To Demo on Jan 22, 2020
Some companies pay for referrals when the referral becomes a customer. Verkada is taking it to the next level - paying $100 referrals fees simply...
Camera Analytics Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 22, 2020
Analytics are hot again, thanks to a slew of AI-powered cameras, but whose analytics really work? And how do these new smart cameras compare to top...
Intersec 2020 Final Show Report on Jan 21, 2020
IPVM spent all 3 days at the Intersec 2020 show interviewing various companies and finding key trends. We cover: Middle East Enterprise...
Vehicle & Long Range Access Reader Tutorial on Jan 21, 2020
One of the classic challenges for access control are parking lots and garages, where the user's credential is far from the reader. With modern...
Clearview AI Alarm - NY Times Report Says "Might End Privacy" on Jan 20, 2020
Over the weekend, the NY Times released a report titled "The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It" about a company named...
Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2020 on Jan 20, 2020
The past 2 years of US bans and sanctions have shaken the video surveillance industry but what impact would this have on integrators' favorite...