ONVIF Profile G Video Storage Test

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Aug 26, 2016

A standard to retrieve video stored on 3rd party devices. This is the aim of ONVIF Profile G.

The proprietary nature of accessing recorded video has been a problem for years, forcing most users to limit themselves to a single recording platform and holding back the use of edge storage.

Now, after 2 years of release, 1396 devices, across more than 30 manufacturers, officially support ONVIF Profile G.

But does it work?

We tested 16 cameras from 6 manufacturers (Axis, Dahua, Hikvision, Panasonic, Pelco and Samsung) to see how well it did.

* ******** ** ******** video ****** ** *** party *******. **** ** the *** ** ***** Profile *.

*** *********** ****** ** accessing ******** ***** *** been * ******* *** years, ******* **** ***** to ***** ********** ** a ****** ********* ******** and ******* **** *** use ****** *******.

***, ***** * ***** of *******, **** *******, across **** **** ** manufacturers, ********** ******* ***** Profile *.

*** **** ** ****?

** ****** ** ******* from * ************* (****, Dahua, *********, *********, ***** and *******) ** *** how **** ** ***.

[***************]

*******

** *** *****, ******* G ****** **** **** the ******** ** *******, with ****** ***** ********, and *** ***** ** playback. 

*******, ** **** ****** with *****'* *** ******* of ******* *'* *** support *******. ** ** this ***********, **** * VMSes *** ******* * conformant, ***** ***********. ***** *** ******* use ** *** ******** and Hymatrom ** ********* *******.

Key ********

**** *** *** *** findings **** **** ****:

  • ******* * ****** ******** on ** *** ** 16 ********** ******* ******, from *** *************. 
  • ***** ** ****** **** recording **** ** ********* via *** ******'* *** interface, *** *** ***.
  • *** ************* ******** **** turning ******** ******* **.
  • ******* * ********* *** playback ********** ******** *** both ***** ** **** and ******* *******.

Outlook ******** ** ***** *****

*** **** **** ******* G ****** ****** ** a ***** ******* ***** how **** ******** ******* S *** *** **** anything ****** ********* *** configuration (*.*., ****** **** ***, video *********, *** ********, etc.).

**** ** ******* ** whether ***** **** ******** adopt ******* *. ***** is ********** ******** *** doing ** ***** ****** integration ** **** ******'* edge ******* ** **** consuming *** ******. ***********, adoption ** ***** ** far ****** *******. *** notable *** *********** ** Milestone, *** *** *********** ***** of ******* * ** their********* ***** ****** **** unfortunately ***** ******.

Cameras ******

** ****** ** ********** cameras **** *** *************, testing ******** ****** **** each ***** ********.

**** *** **** ***** did *** **** ** all, ******* ******** ************* attempts, *** ******* ***** configured *** ********* *** same ** ***** **** models.

*** ********* *** *** tested ** *** ******, only **** ** ***** functionality.

Axxon **** ******* * *************

** **** ***** ** show *** ***** ************* and ********* ** ******* G ******** ******* ******* **** * (*** our ****), *** ** *** VMSes ***** ******* *** Profile. 

************* ** *********** ******* to ******** ******** ******* and ********* ******** ******** from ***** ******* ** embedded ** **** ******.

Playback ******

***** *** **** ******** of ******* ********** ******** using ******* *, ** saw **** ****** ****** playback:

******** ***** ** ****

** **** *******, *** timeline ***** ** ******** display ***** ***** **/** not *********. *** ********, in *** ******* *****, the ***** **** ***** no ***** ** *** timeline, *** ***** **** without *****.

***** **** ********* ** Archive

** **** *******, ***** is * ******** ****** delay **** ******* ***** from ******* * *******. For *******, **** ********* to ******* **** ** the ******* ***-**** *****, there ** * *-* second ***** ****** ******** begins. **** ******* ****** widely ******* *******, *** increased **** ******** ** cameras. ******* *** ********* 781 ** ******, *** instance, ******** ** * <1 ****** *****.

Recording ***** ** ****** ****

**** **** ***** **** *** not ***** ************* ** edge ********* **** *** client. *** ********* *********, storage *********, ******, ***., were ********** ** **** camera. ***** *** **** manufacturer *** **** ******** model ******, ***** ** whether **** ******* ** and/or ******* *******, *** schedules *** ** **********, event **. **********, *** more.

***** ****** *** *** ****** **** ******* / Recording ******** *** **** *********** ** the ****/**** ** **** storage, ** **** *********, NAS *********, *** ****.

 

 

Comments (19)

The fact that Profile G widely worked is a minor miracle

Indeed it is. I had a privilege to witness Profile G evolving and would like to thank several really nice people behind it:

  • Steven Dillingham, chairman of Onvif Profile G work-group, former Bosch employee
  • Priyesh Fatnani, Canon, active member of Profile G work-group
  • Fredrik Svensson, Axis, active member of Profile G work-group
  • Hugo Brisson, Genetec, chairman of Onvif Test Tool work-group
  • Hirokazu Kitaoka, Panasonic, active member of Profile G work-group
  • + all other people from dozens of companies who twice a year participate to Onvif Plugfests in seek of better interoperability.

Thanks for you hard-work guys, you made this possible!

Anzor,

Thanks for sharing that.

Do you have any sense of why VMS adoption is so lacking? Do you see it as being hard for VMSes technically to adopt or?

The imbalance between VMS and camera support is extreme.

As a technical guy I would like to answer only technical part:)

Do you see it as being hard for VMSes technically to adopt or?

Short answer: not really. But it depends on VMS software design.

ONVIF has extensive embedded storage support, with 3 dedicated services:

I would consider first two relatively simple two implement from VMS side and Recording Control I find challenging for the both sides (camera, VMS)

Profile G is really about first two. Recording control is mostly intentionally moved to conditional part of ProfileG because of it's complexity.

If we consider only mandatory features, Onvif replay streaming format has some extensions to standard RTSP protocol. This means that you have to hack your rtsp library to work properly and implement some things. And it is not as simple as receiving live stream from camera, for that you can use freely available standard libraries. But this work have to be done from camera side also, so it does not answer your primary question.

Most challenging part I see is to integrate this feature to legacy VMS design. And this task is really depend on internals of specific VMS.

Nevertheless we successfully implemented ProfileG client for Intellect and Next. This two products are very different inside.

Anzor, thanks, that's great.

Recording control is mostly intentionally moved to conditional part of ProfileG because of it's complexity.

If one does not implement recording control, what cannot be done?

Related, does Axxon implement the recording control?

Recording Control gives ability to manage space of device onboard media and ability to configure recording job.

Oversimplifying things, "managing space" means that if you have 16 channel NVR, you can create separate recording archive for each camera with different size.

With recording jobs - ONVIF gives ability to start or stop constant recording with specified fps, resolution, video codec. Limitations: only constant recording, there is no way to configure recording based on onboard motion detector events.

Related, does Axxon implement the recording control.

No, we don't have it currently. We are eager to implement recording jobs control - ability to start stop recording. In fact we have most of the work done for that, but lack of proper support from device side is the main problem for us.

Anzor, thanks! Very clear and informative.

Now, after 2 years of release, 1396 devices, across more than 30 manufacturers, officially support ONVIF Profile G.

Wow, 813 of them are Hikvision.

Considering the fact that Axis has implemented G in numerous cameras, as well as the fact that they are an active member in the G committee, not to mention the fact that they started and chair ONVIF itself, one would expect that their "top 5" VMS would implement G matter of factly.

Anyday now, probably...

I have been advised by Luxriot that the new Evo VMS does support profile G.

Thank you for the test, I have been eager to start testing this technology myself.

Cameron,

Thanks for the feedback.

Luxriot might have developed code for profile G but they are not allowed, by ONVIF rules, to claim they support until and unless they run and submit the conformance test. Luxirot has not.

There are only 2 VMSes (i.e., clients in ONVIF terminology) that ONVIF lists as supporting Profile G:

Moreover, Luxirot EVO has is NOT ONVIF conformant. You can verify this by searching under their corporate name (A&H Software) which only returns their old VMS from 2014.

If you use Luxriot, please encourage them to obtain official ONVIF conformance for both legal and performance reasons.

Hi John

Yes I have raised that matter with them and they tell me that since the product is so new they have not had it submitted to the conformant database yet, though it is coming.

Luxriot might have developed code for profile G but they are not allowed, by ONVIF rules, to claim they support until and unless they run and submit the conformance test. Luxirot has not.

What's Milestone's excuse?

Milestone hedge it by saying 'relevant parts of' so they can reasonably argue that they are not claiming to be fully conformant.

Of course, the bigger problem with the Milestone ONVIF Bridge is that it works poorly.

Milestone hedge it by saying 'relevant parts of' so they can reasonably argue that they are not claiming to be fully conformant.

Do you personally find it reasonable?

What about a camera without conformance claiming

"XYZ Camera is compliant with the relevant parts of Profile S"?

Where is Milestone's certificate of "relevant" conformance showing where it passed and where it failed?

Its deceptive: most people trusting in Milestone would get the impression that it was Profile G compliant, or at worst that Profile G itself was somehow flawed with irrelevant requirements.

I do not like it and do not think they should use that. Related, I think ONVIF should not allow it, not only because it could mislead but because the likelihood of 'relevant parts' actually working is much lower.

We develop onvif G cloud storage solution I am looking for list of cameras that support onvif G - at the moment we support hikvision dahua pannasonic but I would like to add more brands    Dov Avnon the Netherlands

2400+ cameras from 25 manufacturers are currently listed as officially ONVIF G conformant (check their conformant directory).

Here is a CSV export of those 2,400+ ONVIF G cameras.

2400+ cameras from 25 manufacturers...

and curiously ~1200 from 1 manufacturer, Hik.  Btw, did you notice Hik is in ONVIF vendor list twice now, with and without "Hangzhou"? Choose the old one for no results.

I had not but see it now. I forwarded this to ONVIF to let them know.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
Commend ID5 Intercom Tested on Sep 12, 2019
Commend touts the new ID5 intercom as 'timelessly elegant' and the slim body, glass front touchscreen indeed looks better than common, but ugly,...
ONVIF Exposure To "Devastating DDoS Attacks" Examined on Sep 06, 2019
ZDnet reported "Protocol used by 630,000 devices can be abused for devastating DDoS attacks", citing exposure of ONVIF devices. And after an...
Genetec Stratocast VSaaS Tested on Sep 05, 2019
The VSaaS market is rapidly expanding in 2019, with Verkada, Meraki, Eagle Eye, Avigilon and numerous startups growing their market share. When we...
Scylla AI Video Analytics Company Profile on Aug 29, 2019
Scylla, an AI analytics startup, says they are targeting 1 Billion dollar valuation in 5 years and it "is not rocket science" to detect weapons and...
Uniview Pro 4K Camera Tested (IPC3238ER3-DVZ) on Aug 29, 2019
In our 8MP / 4K Fixed Lens Camera Shootout, Uniview's low end 8MP was firmly in the middle of the pack. Does their higher end Pro Series 4K camera...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Uniview Prime Series 4K Camera Tested on Sep 18, 2019
Is the new Uniview 'Prime' better than the more expensive existing Uniview 'Pro'? In August, IPVM tested Uniview 4K 'Pro' but members advocated...
US Army Base To Buy Banned Honeywell Surveillance on Sep 17, 2019
The U.S. Army's Fort Gordon, home to their Cyber Center of Excellence, has issued a solicitation to purchase Honeywell products that are US...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Schmode is Back, Aims To Turn Boulder AI Into Giant on Sep 16, 2019
One of the most influential and controversial executives in the past decade is back. Bryan Schmode ascended and drove the hypergrowth of Avigilon...
Manufacturers Unhappy With Weak ASIS GSX 2019 And 2020 Shift on Sep 16, 2019
Manufacturers were generally unhappy with ASIS GSX, both for weak 2019 booth traffic and a scheduling shift for the 2020 show, according to a new...
How Cobalt Robotics May Disrupt Security on Sep 13, 2019
While security robots have largely become a joke over the last few years, one organization, Cobalt Robotics, has raised $50+ million from top US...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...