ONVIF Profile G Video Storage Test

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Aug 26, 2016

A standard to retrieve video stored on 3rd party devices. This is the aim of ONVIF Profile G.

The proprietary nature of accessing recorded video has been a problem for years, forcing most users to limit themselves to a single recording platform and holding back the use of edge storage.

Now, after 2 years of release, 1396 devices, across more than 30 manufacturers, officially support ONVIF Profile G.

But does it work?

We tested 16 cameras from 6 manufacturers (Axis, Dahua, Hikvision, Panasonic, Pelco and Samsung) to see how well it did.

* ******** ** ******** video ****** ** *** party *******. **** ** the *** ** ***** Profile *.

*** *********** ****** ** accessing ******** ***** *** been * ******* *** years, ******* **** ***** to ***** ********** ** a ****** ********* ******** and ******* **** *** use ****** *******.

***, ***** * ***** of *******, **** *******, across **** **** ** manufacturers, ********** ******* ***** Profile *.

*** **** ** ****?

** ****** ** ******* from * ************* (****, Dahua, *********, *********, ***** and *******) ** *** how **** ** ***.

[***************]

*******

** *** *****, ******* G ****** **** **** the ******** ** *******, with ****** ***** ********, and *** ***** ** playback.

*******, ** **** ****** with *****'* *** ******* of ******* *'* *** support *******. ** ** this ***********, **** * VMSes *** ******* * conformant, ***** ***********. ***** *** ******* use ** *** ******** and ******** ** ********* unknown.

Key ********

**** *** *** *** findings **** **** ****:

  • ******* * ****** ******** on ** *** ** 16 ********** ******* ******, from *** *************.
  • ***** ** ****** **** recording **** ** ********* via *** ******'* *** interface, *** *** ***.
  • *** ************* ******** **** turning ******** ******* **.
  • ******* * ********* *** playback ********** ******** *** both ***** ** **** and ******* *******.

Outlook ******** ** ***** *****

*** **** **** ******* G ****** ****** ** a ***** ******* ***** how **** ******** ******* S *** *** **** anything ****** ********* *** configuration (*.*., ****** **** VMD, ***** *********, *** controls, ***.).

**** ** ******* ** whether ***** **** ******** adopt ******* *. ***** is ********** ******** *** doing ** ***** ****** integration ** **** ******'* edge ******* ** **** consuming *** ******. ***********, adoption ** ***** ** far ****** *******. *** notable *** *********** ** Milestone, *** *** *********** parts ** ******* * in ************** ***** ****** **** unfortunately ***** ******.

Cameras ******

** ****** ** ********** cameras **** *** *************, testing ******** ****** **** each ***** ********.

**** *** **** ***** did *** **** ** all, ******* ******** ************* attempts, *** ******* ***** configured *** ********* *** same ** ***** **** models.

*** ********* *** *** tested ** *** ******, only **** ** ***** functionality.

Axxon **** ******* * *************

** **** ***** ** show *** ***** ************* and ********* ** ******* G ******** ******* ******* **** * (*** our ****), *** ** *** VMSes ***** ******* *** Profile.

************* ** *********** ******* to ******** ******** ******* and ********* ******** ******** from ***** ******* ** embedded ** **** ******.

Playback ******

***** *** **** ******** of ******* ********** ******** using ******* *, ** saw **** ****** ****** playback:

******** ***** ** ****

** **** *******, *** timeline ***** ** ******** display ***** ***** **/** not *********. *** ********, in *** ******* *****, the ***** **** ***** no ***** ** *** timeline, *** ***** **** without *****.

***** **** ********* ** Archive

** **** *******, ***** is * ******** ****** delay **** ******* ***** from ******* * *******. For *******, **** ********* to ******* **** ** the ******* ***-**** *****, there ** * *-* second ***** ****** ******** begins. **** ******* ****** widely ******* *******, *** increased **** ******** ** cameras. ******* *** ********* 781 ** ******, *** instance, ******** ** * <1 ****** *****.

Recording ***** ** ****** ****

**** **** ***** **** did *** ***** ************* of **** ********* **** the ******. *** ********* schedules, ******* *********, ******, etc., **** ********** ** each ******. ***** *** each ************ *** **** specific ***** ******, ***** on ******* **** ******* SD ***/** ******* *******, how ********* *** ** configured, ***** **. **********, and ****.

***** ****** *** ********* **** ******* / Recording *********** **** *********** ** the ****/**** ** **** storage, ** **** *********, NAS *********, *** ****.

Comments (21)

The fact that Profile G widely worked is a minor miracle

Indeed it is. I had a privilege to witness Profile G evolving and would like to thank several really nice people behind it:

  • Steven Dillingham, chairman of Onvif Profile G work-group, former Bosch employee
  • Priyesh Fatnani, Canon, active member of Profile G work-group
  • Fredrik Svensson, Axis, active member of Profile G work-group
  • Hugo Brisson, Genetec, chairman of Onvif Test Tool work-group
  • Hirokazu Kitaoka, Panasonic, active member of Profile G work-group
  • + all other people from dozens of companies who twice a year participate to Onvif Plugfests in seek of better interoperability.

Thanks for you hard-work guys, you made this possible!

Anzor,

Thanks for sharing that.

Do you have any sense of why VMS adoption is so lacking? Do you see it as being hard for VMSes technically to adopt or?

The imbalance between VMS and camera support is extreme.

As a technical guy I would like to answer only technical part:)

Do you see it as being hard for VMSes technically to adopt or?

Short answer: not really. But it depends on VMS software design.

ONVIF has extensive embedded storage support, with 3 dedicated services:

I would consider first two relatively simple two implement from VMS side and Recording Control I find challenging for the both sides (camera, VMS)

Profile G is really about first two. Recording control is mostly intentionally moved to conditional part of ProfileG because of it's complexity.

If we consider only mandatory features, Onvif replay streaming format has some extensions to standard RTSP protocol. This means that you have to hack your rtsp library to work properly and implement some things. And it is not as simple as receiving live stream from camera, for that you can use freely available standard libraries. But this work have to be done from camera side also, so it does not answer your primary question.

Most challenging part I see is to integrate this feature to legacy VMS design. And this task is really depend on internals of specific VMS.

Nevertheless we successfully implemented ProfileG client for Intellect and Next. This two products are very different inside.

Anzor, thanks, that's great.

Recording control is mostly intentionally moved to conditional part of ProfileG because of it's complexity.

If one does not implement recording control, what cannot be done?

Related, does Axxon implement the recording control?

Recording Control gives ability to manage space of device onboard media and ability to configure recording job.

Oversimplifying things, "managing space" means that if you have 16 channel NVR, you can create separate recording archive for each camera with different size.

With recording jobs - ONVIF gives ability to start or stop constant recording with specified fps, resolution, video codec. Limitations: only constant recording, there is no way to configure recording based on onboard motion detector events.

Related, does Axxon implement the recording control.

No, we don't have it currently. We are eager to implement recording jobs control - ability to start stop recording. In fact we have most of the work done for that, but lack of proper support from device side is the main problem for us.

Anzor, thanks! Very clear and informative.

Now, after 2 years of release, 1396 devices, across more than 30 manufacturers, officially support ONVIF Profile G.

Wow, 813 of them are Hikvision.

Considering the fact that Axis has implemented G in numerous cameras, as well as the fact that they are an active member in the G committee, not to mention the fact that they started and chair ONVIF itself, one would expect that their "top 5" VMS would implement G matter of factly.

Anyday now, probably...

I have been advised by Luxriot that the new Evo VMS does support profile G.

Thank you for the test, I have been eager to start testing this technology myself.

Cameron,

Thanks for the feedback.

Luxriot might have developed code for profile G but they are not allowed, by ONVIF rules, to claim they support until and unless they run and submit the conformance test. Luxirot has not.

There are only 2 VMSes (i.e., clients in ONVIF terminology) that ONVIF lists as supporting Profile G:

Moreover, Luxirot EVO has is NOT ONVIF conformant. You can verify this by searching under their corporate name (A&H Software) which only returns their old VMS from 2014.

If you use Luxriot, please encourage them to obtain official ONVIF conformance for both legal and performance reasons.

Hi John

Yes I have raised that matter with them and they tell me that since the product is so new they have not had it submitted to the conformant database yet, though it is coming.

Luxriot might have developed code for profile G but they are not allowed, by ONVIF rules, to claim they support until and unless they run and submit the conformance test. Luxirot has not.

What's Milestone's excuse?

Milestone hedge it by saying 'relevant parts of' so they can reasonably argue that they are not claiming to be fully conformant.

Of course, the bigger problem with the Milestone ONVIF Bridge is that it works poorly.

Milestone hedge it by saying 'relevant parts of' so they can reasonably argue that they are not claiming to be fully conformant.

Do you personally find it reasonable?

What about a camera without conformance claiming

"XYZ Camera is compliant with the relevant parts of Profile S"?

Where is Milestone's certificate of "relevant" conformance showing where it passed and where it failed?

Its deceptive: most people trusting in Milestone would get the impression that it was Profile G compliant, or at worst that Profile G itself was somehow flawed with irrelevant requirements.

I do not like it and do not think they should use that. Related, I think ONVIF should not allow it, not only because it could mislead but because the likelihood of 'relevant parts' actually working is much lower.

We develop onvif G cloud storage solution I am looking for list of cameras that support onvif G - at the moment we support hikvision dahua pannasonic but I would like to add more brands    Dov Avnon the Netherlands

2400+ cameras from 25 manufacturers are currently listed as officially ONVIF G conformant (check their conformant directory).

Here is a CSV export of those 2,400+ ONVIF G cameras.

2400+ cameras from 25 manufacturers...

and curiously ~1200 from 1 manufacturer, Hik.  Btw, did you notice Hik is in ONVIF vendor list twice now, with and without "Hangzhou"? Choose the old one for no results.

I had not but see it now. I forwarded this to ONVIF to let them know.

Can IPVM have a revisit of this test as Milestone have released 2020R1 which includes updates and improvements to the ONVIF Bridge with more ONVIF G features being implemented. Thanks IPVM!

I want to set appropriate expectations. Because Milestone rarely promotes the ONVIF bridge and its a niche thing to begin with, it's low on our list of priorities. If Milestone or you feels that it really works now, that would makes us moderately more interested in testing. I don't want to spend resources testing something that was broken and that a company does not promote, because very few will then benefit from it.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,367 reports, 855 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

New Axis M30 Cameras Tested on Mar 26, 2020
Axis has released a new generation of, for them, relatively low cost M30 series cameras, claiming to deliver "sharp video quality even in poor...
Budget Covert Cameras Tested on Nov 26, 2019
Covert cameras under $100 are widely available online but are they any good? To see how these models really work in the real world, we bought...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...
The HIVIDEO $31 Face Detection DVR Tested on Apr 25, 2019
Face detection in a $31 DVR? That is what "HIVIDEO" (not to be confused with Hikvision, even if the company intends to do that) was promoting at...
HTTPS / SSL Video Surveillance Usage Statistics on Apr 01, 2019
HTTPS / SSL / TLS usage has become commonplace for websites to improve security and, in particular, to help mitigate attackers reading or modifying...
Solink Raises $12 Million - Company Profile on Feb 12, 2019
Most industry professionals have never heard of Solink, a company whose tagline is: It's time to revolutionize the way business uses...
NTP / Network Time Guide For Video Surveillance on Jan 10, 2019
Inaccurate time can lead to missing or inadmissible video, yet this topic is often overlooked, with cameras and servers left defaulted,...
Cisco Meraki New Cameras and AI Analytics on Dec 14, 2018
Meraki has released their second generation of video surveillance with 3 new cameras, AI-based video analytics, and 2 cloud-based storage...
Snap Surveillance Profile on Jun 26, 2018
There are not a lot of video surveillance companies that survive 9 years with only one feature that makes their product stand out. In the case of...
Remote Video Monitoring Providers Directory on May 21, 2017
Remote video monitoring can help integrators generate RMR plus end users lower their security costs and/or improve response to critical...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM is 'not a good look' and that 'IPVM should never be your source of...
Vintra Presents FulcrumAI Face Recognition on Jul 02, 2020
Vintra presented its FulcrumAI face recognition and mask detection offering at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A...
Uniview Wrist Temperature Reader Tested on Jul 02, 2020
Uniview is promoting measuring wrist temperatures whereas most others are just offering forehead or inner canthus measurements. But how well does...
Dahua USA Admits Thermal Solutions "Qualify As Medical Devices" on Jul 02, 2020
Dahua USA has issued a press release admitting a controversial point in the industry but an obvious one to the US FDA, that the thermal temperature...
Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...