I wonder if this is prompted by the recent discussion post or articles on here calling out various manufacturers?
ONVIF Launches Enforcement Campaign
Dozens of manufacturers abuse ONVIF conformance, as demonstrated by IPVM’s recent ONVIF faking directory.
Campaign Launched
***, ***** *** ******** ** “*********, Enforcement ******** ** ****** ******* *********** [link ** ****** *********]” **** *****’* ******** ******** **** “we ************** ** **** ***** **** *********.”
Complete ********
**** ** * **** ****** ***** face **** *** ****** **** ******* where ** ********** **** “***** ***** * ******** ************… *** ****(*) *** ******** ** manage **** ** *** **** ******** now.” **** *** *********** ** ********** to *****.
Abuse **********
** **** ****** ** *** ***** faking *********, ************* ************ **** ********* of ****, *********** ************ ***** *********** as *** **** ** ***** ***** proposition.
**** *** * *** ** *** most ********* ********:
**, **, ** *** **:
***, ** ******, **** ***********, **** *** **** ** ****:
***** *** **** * *** ** the **** ********* **************.
The ****** ****
** ** ***** **********, *** ***** to ****** ******* **** ******* **** the ******* **** ****, ******** ******* in *** ******** ***** ******* ********* [link ** ****** *********].
**** *** ** ************* *** ****** ONVIF *********** *** *** ***:
- ********
- **** ****
- *******
- ******
- *****
- *********
- ***** ***
- *****
- ******
- *******
- ** ********
- ********** (****)
- *-****
- *******(**********)
- ******
- ******
- ******
- ** ********(*** ********** [**** ** ****** *********])
- **** ********
- ******(*** ********** [**** ** ****** *********])
- ********* (*** **********)
- ** '****
- *****
- *****
****: ***** *** ********* *** *** only ************* ******. **, *********, ************* resolve ***** ******, ** **** ****** them **** *** **** (****** ***** us *******-*****@****.******* **** ******** *** ***** ** the ******** ***** *********).
A **** ***** **** ***…
****** * *****, ****** ***** ******* abuse ** ** ********* ***** **** for *****.
** *** **** ****, ***’* **** the ********* ** ***** ****** ** continue ** ******** ***** ** **** action.
* ****** **************** ******** **** ***** reliably ** * *** ******* *** all ** ** *** ********. ** can **** **** ** ******.
I have to admit I was surprised by 2 of the names on that list, especially since they have such well-regarded and recognized brand names. The rest.....I'm sorry...who are you?
You should check out the Cantonk Home page, where they invite you to "Creat (sic) the new World"
Long ago one bit-thrifty unix programmer decided that the word create was just a little too long for a function name, so instead chose:
int creat(const char *pathname, mode_t mode);
This could be the result...