HD Camera / Face Rec / Door Controller All-in-One

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Apr 30, 2014

Is it a security camera, face recognition reader, or a door controller?

Stand aside people: BioCam 300 claims to be all three, and more.

Should you consider this device for your systems? What are the downsides?

We take a look at the key features, pricing and competitive positioning inside.

** ** * ******** camera,*************** ******, ** * door **********?

***** ***** ******: ****** 300 ****** ** ** all *****, *** ****.

****** *** ******** **** device *** **** *******? What *** *** *********?

** **** * **** at *** *** ********, pricing *** *********** *********** inside.

[***************]

********

*************** ** ** "*** world's ***** ** ** camera **** ******** ****** recognition *** ******* ** a ****** ****" *** if *** ****, ********* has *** **** ****** equals. *** ~*"**"**" **** essentially ** * *****-****** bullet-style ******, **** ***** IR *** ****, *** a *" *** ******* dropped **********:

*** ************* ****** ****** to ***** ************ ******, * face-rec ****** ******, * public **** *******, *** a ********** **** ********** in * ****** ****. When *** ***** **** to ***** ******, *** camera ******** ************ ****** in *** *****

*** ********

  • **** ******: *** **** ** designed ** ** ******* near ***** ** ** can ******* ******** ** faces, *** **** ******* those ***** ******* *** database ** '****** ********' individuals. ** ** *** users *** ** ****** in *** **** (** templates *** ****), ***** it ****** ** ***** and ******** ** **** than * *******. *** unit ****** ** *** scan ** ** ** feet ****, *** *** included ** **** ********* lighting **** ** **** locations.
  • ** ************ ******: *** **** **** includes * **** ****, 30 ***, ***/***** ****** that ******** *****. *** unit *** ** ********** to ****** ** ****** locally ** *** ******, includes ********/******, ***** *** **********, and **** *.***.
  • **** **********: ******, *** **** coordinates ******** ** *** door, *** *************** ***** *** ***** readers, *******, ** *** devices. ********* ** ******** to **** ** * 'standalone' ****** ******, *** while **** ********* *** credentials *** ** ****** internally, *** **** ****** be ********** **** ****** 3rd ***** ****** *********.
  • *** ***: ***********, **** *** the ******* ******** ** one ****, ** **** not *** ***** **** ethernet, *** ******* ******** a ***** @ *.** power ******.

****

***** *** ****** *** is ***, ** ** expected ** **** * ~$1,300 ****** *****. *** manufacturer********** ******** *** ****** to *** *********, *** the ******* *** ********** be ********* ***** ********* names, *** ********************.

*** * **** **** biometrics, ***** *** ****** control, *** ***** ** relatively ********** ****** ***** its **** ** ***********, one ** ****** ** more ** * ***** alone **** ***** ******. On *** ******** / residential ****, ******* **'***' - * **** recognition / ******** *******.

***************

***** *** **** ** features ** ****** ***** long, ** **** *** mean *** ****** **** to *** *** ***. Absent ** ****** ******* and ************ ** *******, potential ****** ****** ** wary ** ***** ******:

  • *****:******* *** *********, *** the ************ ******** ***** under********** ******* ******** ****** ******* * or '********* **************'. ***** the **** **** ***** claims, *** ****** ******** using *** ********* ** a ************ ****** **** caution.
  • **** *** ********:*****, ******* ******* *** unit *** **************************** *** *****, ****** claims ** **** ***** is *******. ***** ******* documentation **** *********** ****** at *** ***** ** less, ***** ** ** indication ** *** ******** these ******** *** **** even * *** *****.
  • ******* ***********:***** ********* ** ***** like * ****, **** aluminum ******** *** ***** size, ** ** ******* outdoor *****, ***** *********, nor ****** ***** *****. Apart **** ****, ************** on ********** ********** ** not ********, *** ** one **** **** ***, the ****** ****** **** be ********.

Unit *********** / *********** ********

*******, ** ****** *** effectiveness ** ********** ** the *******, *** ******* weakness ** *** **** responsibility ** *** ********* to *******: ******** ********.

*** *******'***************** *** ******** ********** below:

*** ****** **** ** mounted *** ****** **** it ******** **** ****** of *****, *** **** may ***** ** ********** to ********* ** *****. Other ************* **********, **** the ******** ** *** sun ** ***** ******* accessories **** ****** ** hats *** ********************* **** **********. ******* ******** ******** ** the ********* **** ** the **** ****** **** wiring ********** ** ******* tampering, ******* **** ********.

*** **** ** ***** in ********'* ********* ********* *****?****, *** ********* ******* of ******* ****** ***** walking ***** *********** **** to **** ******. ******** a ***** ** ******** in * *** *** not ** ****, *** it ******* ********* ** break **** **** ** tripping **** *** ****** in ***** ** *** while ***** **.

Comments (10)

If the system is running in a verification mode (1:1) as it should for access control applications, then the number of faces in the database will have no bearing on matching accuracy and false alarm rates.

... the number of faces in the database will have no bearing on matching accuracy and false alarm rates.

So are you saying if it doesn't work with ~400 faces don't expect it to work any better with ~40? That's too bad because the latter is probably closer to the SOHO sweetspot...

I may have expressed myself poorly. While running in verification mode the number of users enrolled in the database will have no bearing on 1:1 verification matching performance, because the user presumably asserts his/her identity and the live image(s) is compared to the database image(s) corresponding to that user only. The number of images captured during runtime and enrollment for each user will likely have a bearing on matching accuracy. However, the technical matching performance for each user may either improve or degrade with the nature and number of images used depending on how the system makes use of them.

Skip - I'm not sure I totally follow your post. Are you saying that facial ID should be used as a sort of secondary verification mechanism, instead of being the primary/only verification mechanism?

With regards to FR accuracy: The product does have provision for wiegand inputs, so it could run in a two factor verification mode: User asserts identity with a possession factor (e.g., card) and FR camera verifies identity with biometrics (1:1 match). The accuracy of this mode will be much higher than identification mode (1:Many). In ID mode, the user looks at the camera, and his/her face is compared to every other image in the database (up to 400 users @ several images / user). Achieving good technical performance in this mode requires much stronger biometric performance as the probability for false match is much higher.

What I don't get about the recent burst of face-recognition access control products is where the real application is.

It seems like there are two primary cases:

1) Face-as-credential. This one still seems way to prone to false reads and delays, negating the ease-of-use factor when users get locked out or spend 10+ seconds at the door trying to get through.

2) Face-as-secondary credential. This one seems more practical because you're comparing the face read at the door to a known set of profile images, but it's still generally more costly and time consuming that something like an iris scan or fingerprint scan. The hardware is also bulky and ugly (for a door ornament) relative to other options.

I can't help but feel like facial recognition access control and 3D printers have a lot in common as that "gee whiz" thing that just can't really find a feasible fit in the marketplace just yet. This limits it to novelty and niche applications, which slows down overall adoption and R&D.

Are you seeing facial recognition applications that are truly viable and practical for a mainstream deployment?

Shouldn't the door controller be on the secure side of the door?

What if I take a full sized picture of an authorized person and hold it up in front of my face? At least it would be cleaner than chopping their head off!

Ken - I actually tried that, didn't work. I am guessing the facial geometry stored as the credential doesn't work when you have a flat 2D image.

What if the spoofed face was 3d?

Shades of Brian's Frankenfinger...;)

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Verkada Attacks ONVIF on Jun 27, 2019
Verkada has now gone after ONVIF, expanding its attacks against the 'dinosaurs' of the 'ancient' video surveillance industry. In a recent...
FLIR Saros Visible / Thermal Analytic Camera Tested on Jun 26, 2019
FLIR's Saros claims "accurate, actionable alerts" with a combination of 1080p visible and dual thermal sensors along with IR and white light...
Directory of 59 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
HID Mobile Tested on Jun 21, 2019
HID Global is one of the largest access brands, but their mobile access has had challenges. Indeed, the company has already restructured their...
IFSEC 2019 Show Report on Jun 19, 2019
The UK's largest trade show, IFSEC, is underway and IPVM has been examining what is new and happening at the show. Inside, we cover: Huawei...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...

Most Recent Industry Reports

HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Beware African 50,000 IP Camera Contract Scam on Jul 12, 2019
A “Nigerian Prince” scam for the video surveillance market is going around. You, or at least we, could be lucky enough to be the single bidder for...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact