HD Camera / Face Rec / Door Controller All-in-One

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Apr 30, 2014

Is it a security camera, face recognition reader, or a door controller?

Stand aside people: BioCam 300 claims to be all three, and more.

Should you consider this device for your systems? What are the downsides?

We take a look at the key features, pricing and competitive positioning inside.

** ** * ******** camera,*************** ******, ** * door **********?

***** ***** ******: ****** 300 ****** ** ** all *****, *** ****.

****** *** ******** **** device *** **** *******? What *** *** *********?

** **** * **** at *** *** ********, pricing *** *********** *********** inside.

[***************]

********

*************** ** ** "*** world's ***** ** ** camera **** ******** ****** recognition *** ******* ** a ****** ****" *** if *** ****, ********* has *** **** ****** equals. *** ~*"**"**" **** essentially ** * *****-****** bullet-style ******, **** ***** IR *** ****, *** a *" *** ******* dropped **********:

*** ************* ****** ****** to ***** ************ ******, * face-rec ****** ******, * public **** *******, *** a ********** **** ********** in * ****** ****. When *** ***** **** to ***** ******, *** camera ******** ************ ****** in *** *****

*** ********

  • **** ******: *** **** ** designed ** ** ******* near ***** ** ** can ******* ******** ** faces, *** **** ******* those ***** ******* *** database ** '****** ********' individuals. ** ** *** users *** ** ****** in *** **** (** templates *** ****), ***** it ****** ** ***** and ******** ** **** than * *******. *** unit ****** ** *** scan ** ** ** feet ****, *** *** included ** **** ********* lighting **** ** **** locations.
  • ** ************ ******: *** **** **** includes * **** ****, 30 ***, ***/***** ****** that ******** *****. *** unit *** ** ********** to ****** ** ****** locally ** *** ******, includes ********/******, ***** *** **********, and **** *.***.
  • **** **********: ******, *** **** coordinates ******** ** *** door, *** *************** ***** *** ***** readers, *******, ** *** devices. ********* ** ******** to **** ** * 'standalone' ****** ******, *** while **** ********* *** credentials *** ** ****** internally, *** **** ****** be ********** **** ****** 3rd ***** ****** *********.
  • *** ***: ***********, **** *** the ******* ******** ** one ****, ** **** not *** ***** **** ethernet, *** ******* ******** a ***** @ *.** power ******.

****

***** *** ****** *** is ***, ** ** expected ** **** * ~$1,300 ****** *****. *** manufacturer********** ******** *** ****** to *** *********, *** the ******* *** ********** be ********* ***** ********* names, *** ********************.

*** * **** **** biometrics, ***** *** ****** control, *** ***** ** relatively ********** ****** ***** its **** ** ***********, one ** ****** ** more ** * ***** alone **** ***** ******. On *** ******** / residential ****, ******* **'***' - * **** recognition / ******** *******.

***************

***** *** **** ** features ** ****** ***** long, ** **** *** mean *** ****** **** to *** *** ***. Absent ** ****** ******* and ************ ** *******, potential ****** ****** ** wary ** ***** ******:

  • *****:******* *** *********, *** the ************ ******** ***** under********** ******* ******** ****** ******* * or '********* **************'. ***** the **** **** ***** claims, *** ****** ******** using *** ********* ** a ************ ****** **** caution.
  • **** *** ********:*****, ******* ******* *** unit *** **************************** *** *****, ****** claims ** **** ***** is *******. ***** ******* documentation **** *********** ****** at *** ***** ** less, ***** ** ** indication ** *** ******** these ******** *** **** even * *** *****.
  • ******* ***********:***** ********* ** ***** like * ****, **** aluminum ******** *** ***** size, ** ** ******* outdoor *****, ***** *********, nor ****** ***** *****. Apart **** ****, ************** on ********** ********** ** not ********, *** ** one **** **** ***, the ****** ****** **** be ********.

Unit *********** / *********** ********

*******, ** ****** *** effectiveness ** ********** ** the *******, *** ******* weakness ** *** **** responsibility ** *** ********* to *******: ******** ********.

*** *******'***************** *** ******** ********** below:

*** ****** **** ** mounted *** ****** **** it ******** **** ****** of *****, *** **** may ***** ** ********** to ********* ** *****. Other ************* **********, **** the ******** ** *** sun ** ***** ******* accessories **** ****** ** hats *** ********************* **** **********. ******* ******** ******** ** the ********* **** ** the **** ****** **** wiring ********** ** ******* tampering, ******* **** ********.

*** **** ** ***** in ********'* ********* ********* *****?****, *** ********* ******* of ******* ****** ***** walking ***** *********** **** to **** ******. ******** a ***** ** ******** in * *** *** not ** ****, *** it ******* ********* ** break **** **** ** tripping **** *** ****** in ***** ** *** while ***** **.

Comments (10)

If the system is running in a verification mode (1:1) as it should for access control applications, then the number of faces in the database will have no bearing on matching accuracy and false alarm rates.

... the number of faces in the database will have no bearing on matching accuracy and false alarm rates.

So are you saying if it doesn't work with ~400 faces don't expect it to work any better with ~40? That's too bad because the latter is probably closer to the SOHO sweetspot...

I may have expressed myself poorly. While running in verification mode the number of users enrolled in the database will have no bearing on 1:1 verification matching performance, because the user presumably asserts his/her identity and the live image(s) is compared to the database image(s) corresponding to that user only. The number of images captured during runtime and enrollment for each user will likely have a bearing on matching accuracy. However, the technical matching performance for each user may either improve or degrade with the nature and number of images used depending on how the system makes use of them.

Skip - I'm not sure I totally follow your post. Are you saying that facial ID should be used as a sort of secondary verification mechanism, instead of being the primary/only verification mechanism?

With regards to FR accuracy: The product does have provision for wiegand inputs, so it could run in a two factor verification mode: User asserts identity with a possession factor (e.g., card) and FR camera verifies identity with biometrics (1:1 match). The accuracy of this mode will be much higher than identification mode (1:Many). In ID mode, the user looks at the camera, and his/her face is compared to every other image in the database (up to 400 users @ several images / user). Achieving good technical performance in this mode requires much stronger biometric performance as the probability for false match is much higher.

What I don't get about the recent burst of face-recognition access control products is where the real application is.

It seems like there are two primary cases:

1) Face-as-credential. This one still seems way to prone to false reads and delays, negating the ease-of-use factor when users get locked out or spend 10+ seconds at the door trying to get through.

2) Face-as-secondary credential. This one seems more practical because you're comparing the face read at the door to a known set of profile images, but it's still generally more costly and time consuming that something like an iris scan or fingerprint scan. The hardware is also bulky and ugly (for a door ornament) relative to other options.

I can't help but feel like facial recognition access control and 3D printers have a lot in common as that "gee whiz" thing that just can't really find a feasible fit in the marketplace just yet. This limits it to novelty and niche applications, which slows down overall adoption and R&D.

Are you seeing facial recognition applications that are truly viable and practical for a mainstream deployment?

Shouldn't the door controller be on the secure side of the door?

What if I take a full sized picture of an authorized person and hold it up in front of my face? At least it would be cleaner than chopping their head off!

Ken - I actually tried that, didn't work. I am guessing the facial geometry stored as the credential doesn't work when you have a flat 2D image.

What if the spoofed face was 3d?

Shades of Brian's Frankenfinger...;)

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
Access Control Request to Exit (RTE) Tutorial on May 13, 2019
For access controlled doors, especially those with maglocks, 'Request to Exit', or 'RTE' devices are required to override electrified locks to...
Mining Company Security Manager Interview on May 10, 2019
First Quantum Minerals Limited (FQML) is a global enterprise with offices on 4 continents and operations in 7 countries with exploratory operations...
10 Facial Recognition Providers Review (Secutech) on May 09, 2019
Adding to our 19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled report from ISC West, IPVM focused on facial recognition technology for our Day 2 coverage...
Proxy Access Control Tested on May 09, 2019
Silicon Valley Access Startup Proxy raised $13.6 Million in May 2019, focusing on mobile physical access control. Beyond the fund raising, Proxy...
Restaurant Security Manager Interview on May 06, 2019
Wright’s Gourmet House in Tampa, Florida has been around for over 50 years. During most of that time, there were no security measures in place. Now...
Ranking Manufacturer Favorability 2019 on May 06, 2019
24 manufacturer's favorability was ranked based on 170+ integrators feedback. Voting plus in-depth comments revealed insights on which brands were...

Most Recent Industry Reports

NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact