Milestone LPR Tested

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Mar 31, 2015

How well does Milestone's LPR work?

Milestone's LPR supports off the shelf IP cameras, integrating license plate recognition with the Milestone Smart Client for live video, playback, and alarms.

We tested Milestone's LPR with three cameras including Avigilon's H3 integrated IR bullet, Bosch's Super Low Light Starlight 5MP, and Messoa's specialty license plate capture cam, the LPR606.

The 1 minute video excerpt below, from our 15 minutes of video inside, gives an overview of Milestone's LPR:

The report answers the following key questions:

  • How accurate was Milestone's LPR?
  • What accuracy variance existed across the three cameras tested - Avigilon, Bosch and Messoa?
  • What factors most contributed to missed plates and inaccurate recognition?
  • What setup issues / factors do you need to factor in?
  • What processing load / server impact should you expect?
  • What issues caused missed plates and improper recognition?
  • How does it compare to Genetec's AutoVu LPR?
  • *** **** **** *********'* LPR ****?

    *********'* *** ******** *** the ***** ** *******, integrating ******* ***** *********** with *** ********* ***** ****** for **** *****, ********, and ******.

    ** ****** *********'* *** with ***** ******* ********* ********'* ** ********** ** bullet,*****'* ***** *** ***** Starlight ***, *** ******'* ********* license ************ ***, *** ******.

    *** * ****** ***** excerpt *****, **** *** 15 ******* ** ***** inside, ***** ** ******** of *********'* ***:

    *** ****** ******* *** following *** *********:

    • *** ******** *** *********'* ***?
    • **** ******** ******** ******* across *** ***** ******* tested - ********, ***** and ******?
    • **** ******* **** *********** to ****** ****** *** inaccurate ***********?
    • **** ***** ****** / factors ** *** **** to ****** **?
    • **** ********** **** / server ****** ****** *** expect?
    • **** ****** ****** ****** plates *** ******** ***********?
    • *** **** ** ******* to*******'* ****** ***?

    [***************]

    Key ********

    **** *** *** *** findings **** **** ****:

    ******* *********** ***********

    • ********** ** ******* ********* similarly, ********** ********* *** *********** ~95% ** ****** ****** the *** *** ~**% of ****** ** ***** with ******** *** ** 1/250 ****** (****** *******).
    • ******** ********** ** ****** was ****** ** ******* plates ***** ******* */*** exposure *** ** ************ and ******* ** ******* plates.
    • ***-** ******* ********** ********** ***** 94% ** ****** ****** the ***. ** *****, non-IR ******* ******** ********** only ~**% ** ******, as ~**% ** ******* plates **** *** ****** up ** ***, **** only **% ** ***** read ********** **********.
    • *********** ******** *** ******* at ******* ******, **** ~15 ** ~** ***.
    • **** ***** *** **** using ********* *********** ********, <1 ****** ******* ******* passing *** *** ***** generation.

    *********** ******

    • *** **** ****** ******* issues **** ********* ********** (0 *** *, * for *, ***.) *** failing ** **** *** or **** *********, ********* first ** **** ** the *****.
    • ****** **** ************ **** multiple ***** ** **** vehicle, **** ** ***** one ** ***** ***** being *******.
    • *** ***** ** ***-***** lettering **** ** *****, UPS, ***** *******, ***., only * ***** *** of *** *****.
    • ***-** ******* **** ***** missed ** ******* ****** due ** ***** ****** being *** *** ** gain/digital ***** ****** ***** too ****, **** ********* plate ********** ********* ** fully.

    ****** ******

    • *** ***********, *** ***** rate ***** ******* *********** by ********* **************, ***** substantially **** *********/******* **** H.264.
    • ********** ** * ****** LPR ****** ***** *********** settings ********* *** **** minimally **** ** ********, but ************* **** ******** in *** *****. ********** ***** cameras ************** ******** ** further ********, ** ** ~25% **** ******** ** scene ** *** ******* (on **** **** **** I7 *.* *** *******).
    • ********* ** ***** **** from * ** ** or ****** ********** ****** as *** ********** ***** filled **** ******, ******* delay ** ***** ******** and ******** ****** ***** at *****.
    • ********* ** *.*** ********** significant ****** ** *** event ******* ** **-** seconds
    • ********** ********** **** **** to ***** *** *** introduced ****** ** ** increase ** ****** ****, nor ********** *****.
    • **** ****** **** ** recorded (** ******) ** retain ***** ******. ******** H.264 ****** *** ** recorded ** ****, *** is *** ********** ** LPR ******.

    *******

    ********* ******** *** ******** three ********, **** *** following ****:

    • ******** *** **** *******: $300 *** **** (******** one ***** *******)
    • ******** *** ******* *******: $1,295 ****
    • ******** *** ***** *******: $645 ****

    *** **** ******* ** required *** ******, **** a ******* ******* ******** for **** ******. * plate ******* **** ** purchased ** ***** **** state ** ******* ** be **** **** *** system. *** *******, ** **** United *******, ******, *** Swiss ******, ***** ********* are ******** (*** ******** in **** **** *** additional).

    ***************

    ******** *** ******** **** accuracy **** ***** ********** are ********, **** ***** integration *** *** ********* Smart ******, ** * price ***** **** ***** than **** ********* *** systems, **** ********* ******, ****** ******* *** advanced ******* ***** ********* and ******* ****** ***** of *******.

    *******, ***** ****** ****** of ********* *********/******* ************ of *****, ***** *** stream **** *** *** processing **** **** ** retained ** ***** ****** are ** ** *****. Also, ****** ** **** PPF ************ ***** ****** preclude *** ******* **** being **** *** ******* surveillance ********.

    *******, ** **** ***** (>40 ***) *********** ** a ****, ********* ********/******** platforms *** ****** * better ******.

    XProtect ****** ***

    ** *** ****** **** be ***** ** **** client ******* ** ****** events. ****** *** ***** in * ******* *** pane, **** ***** ****** directly **** ** **** video. ******** ** ***** switches ** ******** **** in *** ********** ****. An *** *** ** also *****, ******** ***** to **** ******* ****** reads, ****** *** ******** plates (********* ******* *******), and ****** *******.

    **** ***** ******** ** overview ** *** *** in *** ******** ******:

    Server *************

    *** ******** *** ****** runs ** * ******** service, ***** **** *** XProtect ***** *** ********* servers. ********* ********** ** be *** ** * dedicated ******* *** *** the *** ******. ** *** tests, *** *** ****** increased *** **** ** about **% ** ******* (dual ****-**** ***** **, 2.4 ***), **** ****** impact ** ****** *****.

    **** ***** ******* ***** configuration ** *** *** server:

    ****** ******* ******

    ************ ** *** *** server, ** **** ** XProtect ********* *** ******** issues. ** **** *****, installation ****** ******* *** error ***********. ** ******, installation of ********* *** ****** multiple *****, *** ****** installation *** *** ********, despite ***** ********* ** per *********'* *************.

    ***** ****** *** *********** due ** *** **** and ****** ** *** Milestone ************, ***** *** easily **** **** **** an **** ****** * proper *******. ***** ****** be ******** ** **** ***** time (*****, ********) ****** installation ** ******* *** these ******.

    XProtect *** ****** *************

    ****** ** *** ****** to *** ****** ******** a ***** ************* *******, capturing ** ******* *********** of *** ***** ** view **** ******* ****** in *** *****, *** optional ********** ** * handful ** ******** **** as ********** *********, ****** of ****** ** *** scene, ***.

    *** ***** ******* ** ********** in *** ***** *****:

    ** **** ** ***** video ** ***** ******** parameters **** ** ********** frame ****, ****** ** plates ** *****, ********** time, *** ****:

    Milestone ****** ***************

    ********* ******** ********** *** following ******** *** *** cameras:

    • * ***
    • *****, ******* >**
    • ********** "*** *** ****"

    ***** ******** *** ********, to *** *** *****, since *** **** ******** of ** ******* ********* use *.***, **** ***** used **** ** ******* cases, **** ************. 

    *.*** **. *****

    *.*** *** ** **** for *** *******. *******, it ********** *********** ********** delay, **** *** **** between *** *** ******* and *** ***** ***** processed ********* **** second (***** *****) ** 10-15 *******.

    **** ***** ******** ** recognition events ******** ******* *** retrieval, ** *** ***** was ********* **** ***** the ****** ***** ********. ******* of **** *****, ******** on ** *** ***** retrieves ***** ***** *** car *** ******* ******, seen *****:

    ********* 

    ********* ********** ***** * FPS *** *** **********. Note **** **** ********* is ******** **** **** and ********* *********, ***** may ** *** ********** or *** ***** *******.

    ********** ********* **** *** recommended * *** *** processing ********** *********** ********** delay, ******* ** ***** H.264, **** *****, *** *** not ******* *********** ***********.

    **********

    ********* **** *** **** specific ****** ** ********** the ****** ** ******* of **********. *******, **** give *** ********** ** 130 *** ******* *** US ******, *** *** PPF *** ****-***** ******.

    ***** ******* *** ******** based ** * ******* recommendation ** *.* ****** per ********* "******" (**** making ** * *********), which ****** ** ***** size *** *****, *** equate ******* ** *** 130/180 *** ******* *****.

    ** ****** ****** *********** from **** ** ** *** and ***** ** *********** difference ** ********** **** or *****.

    Most ****** *********** ******

    ***** *** *** **** common ****** ***** ** our *******:

    *** *******: ********/****** **********

    *** **** ****** ***** we ***** ** *********** *** mistaken **********, **** ** B ***** ******** *** 8 ** * ******** for *. 

    ************, ********* ********** **** simply *** ****, **** commonly *** ***** ** last ********* ** * license *****:

    *** *******: ******** ***** Reads

    ******** *** ********** **** the **** ***** ******** times. ** *** *****, one ** ***** ***** was *******, ****** ****** may ** *********, ** seen *****:

    ***-** *******: ***** *** Gain ******

    *** *** ***** ***** caused ********* **** *********** ***** in ***-** ******* *** high **** ******. ** ***** to ******* ****** ** low *****, ***** ******* of **** *** *******, which ********* ******* *****, partially ** ***** ********* the ******* ** *** license *****. **** ****** complete ****** *** ******** in ***** ***** *** camera *** *******.

    ** **** (*** *** all, **** ** *** Bosch ***-***** **** *****) cameras, **** *** ** manually *******, *** **** darkens ******, *********** ****** them ******** ******* ****** visible ** ** ************.

    Versions *** ******** ****

    ********* ******** ********* **** 9.0c *** **** **** XProtect *** *.**. ******* module **** *** **, with ** ******** ***** modules ****. **** *** recognition ********** *** ***** from **** *** ***** collected **** ******** **** of *******.

    ****** ******** ******** **** as *******:

Comments (13)

We find its hit and miss. Complex and often lacks clear points in which to test and confirm the configuration. We have notice issues where we have had to remove and replace it for another solution after nine months of issues, even the "nothing is wrong its your hardware" only to find a new release fixed other issues - furthermore we have had been massive delays reading the plate up to a minute before it going in a database resulting in the gate opening too late or the system disregarding it. Milestone support is terrible. They do not understand the product enough, the logs files are poor leading to issues tracing any problems even for them.

BTW Milestone tell you that Express supports LPR, you pay your money, install it and then find out from support no it doesn't.. Their website tells a different story.

Currently we have another site which is taking Milestone over 2 days just to get the license to work!

Sorry but i'm on the fence on Milestone LPR, my gut tells me the dacollen system is too processor heavy and too poorly integrated.

Express can not support LPR, as this platform doesn't use a 'Management Server' in it's configuration - only Corporate, Expert and Enterprise use this function to 'centrally control' numerous recording servers.

In lower levels (like Express), they use a separate 'Management Application' to control each individual recording server.

They named each of these interfaces so similarly just to annoy people I think...

Can you confirm the model of processor used? We're trying to gauge the level of performance vs new i7 processors and also their Xeon equivalents.

If you can just get a generic US library, is there any advantage to paying for libraries for individual US states?

Will the generic US library work on Canadian license plates, as they are the same size and shape as US license plates?

The individual libraries are supposed to be "tuned" to specific states, to account for things like differences in character pattern, reflectance, etc. But we haven't seen much difference. We used the NJ library and tested with "Shore to Please" plate, which has stacked characters:

It did not read the stacked characters, and NY and PA plates read just as well as they did using the US generic module.

Because of that, I'd expect Canadian plates to work as well (but I won't guarantee it!), and we'll actually get one to add to the plate repertoire in the future.

it also seems the skew of the license plate is possibly greater than it should be for LPR technology with the above pictures.

The cameras were set up at an angle of incidence of about 19-20 degrees to the road, within Milestone's recommendations (<25 degrees). The vertical angle was very shallow as well, as cameras were only about 7' off the ground.

I am guessing that older analog D1 resolution license plate cameras would not work due to low resolution?

I wouldn't rule them out, but the FOV would need to be about 6' wide at most, and you would need to very carefully set it so you get multiple frames of the plate. Angle of incidence would need to be very shallow.

The up side to SD cameras, if there is one, is that the frame size is smaller, so the server should be able to process higher framerates, instead of the 4 Milestone recommends as their general rule.

Thank you for providing information on setup challenges and the impact on time frames. This is very relevant information.

We were struck with Milestone LPR, Thank you for publishing this article which indeed helped us in geeting out.

Is XProtect LPR 2.0a released as I cant find it in their website and I use 1.0c

Milestone supplied us with an advance (non-beta, but non-public as of test time) copy of 2.0a. They just put out a newsletter last week, however, claiming general availability April 15th, so check back in two days.

H.264 may be used for LPR cameras. However, it introduces significant processing delay, with the time between the car passing and the plate being processed increased from < 1 sec for MJPEG to 10-15 seconds for H.264...

Any thoughts on why decoding a 4 FPS H.264 stream would add 10 seconds of latency? Surely the VMS is capable of decoding multiple concurrent 30FPS H.264 streams in < 1 sec for live view as well as VMD, so what gives?

Makes you think that the application was written for MJPEG initially, and to make it compatible with H.264, they took the easy way out and are just decoding H.264 and re-encoding it as MJPEGs before sending it to the LPR server. Speculation? Justified because their abysmal performance invites it.

Was wondering what the camera processing time stat shows when using h.264. If it's < 1 sec even though taking ten, it's probably not the LPR server using up the time...

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to emerging into an AI cloud era.  The goal of this history...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Lens Focal Length Tutorial on Jul 10, 2019
3mm, 6mm, 2.8 - 9mm, 5 - 50mm, etc. Camera specifications often list lens lengths but what do they mean? These metrics are important in...
FLIR Saros Visible / Thermal Analytic Camera Tested on Jun 26, 2019
FLIR's Saros claims "accurate, actionable alerts" with a combination of 1080p visible and dual thermal sensors along with IR and white light...
Directory of 60 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Hikvision ColorVu Camera Tested on Jun 24, 2019
Hikvision says their new ColorVu line captures "vivid chromatic images in darkness", with unconventional white light illuminations whereas most...
Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider Profile on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&amp;D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...

Most Recent Industry Reports

History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to emerging into an AI cloud era.  The goal of this history...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact