Milestone Sues Hawk

Given that Hawk seems to be suing a wide array of companies / products / systems, I am not sure if that's a major factor in their lawsuit selection process.

Btw, from what I have seen from other large manufacturers is that they are less likely to want to litigate over small things like this, simply because the cost of litigation is more than the (likely) modest payment they would make to have this go away.

To recap that decision:

"The patents were held to be invalid because the claims were drawn to an abstract idea, and that implementing those claims on a computer was not enough to transform that idea to a patentable invention."

It was only handed down less than a month ago, so I don't think it has yet made an impact on this case / patent.

I am not aware of any surveillance products offered / made by Hawk.

Jeremiah, thanks for raising it. It does appear that many of the end users were found from case studies :(

It depends on how wide known, how impactful these suits become if it has a chilling effect on case studies.

...their shortest path to a payoff is in hoping for some settlements in lieu of lengthy, expensive litigation

Or in fiscal preparation of long, expensive litigation. As in: Win a few small cases, build a war-chest, then go after the big ones.

Alastair, that brings up an interesting point. Although the statute of limitations in patent infringement gives the owner 6 years after the date of the violation to file, there is also the doctrine of laches to consider. From uslegal.com

Laches is the legal doctrine that an unreasonable delay in seeking a remedy for a legal right or claim will prevent it from being enforced or allowed if the delay has prejudiced the opposing party. The doctrine is an equitable defense that seeks to prevent "legal ambush" from a party who is negligent in failing to timely make a claim. It recognizes that the opposing party's ability to obtain witnesses and other evidence diminishes over time, due to unavailability, fading memory, or loss. Disallowing the negligent party's action on the ground of laches is a form of estoppel.

It would seem the the big VMSes could appeal to this doctrine, among other defenses. That would also be another reason to target the end-user, because they presumably would not have been infringing as long, and also because they would be harder to identify as infringers. That would limit the applicability of laches as a defense.

Though by suing the end-user Hawk is still eyeing the mfr. since, I would guess that Hawk would like nothing more than to settle with the manufacturer in one-shot, in return for not pursuing its customers. Here is an article from ipwatchdog.com, regarding how the statute of limitations and doctrine of laches apply in patent law...