Milestone Launches Disruptive ONVIF Bridge 'Out'

Author: John Honovich, Published on Dec 15, 2015

This is good news for the industry, for those wanting simpler integration and for the much battered PSIM market.

As part of Milestone's XProtect 2016 release, Milestone is adding an "ONVIF Bridge" that allows video to be sent from Milestone's XProtect VMS to third parties using ONVIF.

****** **** ****, ** ******* *** ** *****, *** ** helps *** *** **** **** ****** *** ******.

The *******

*********** ***** ********* ************ *** **** **** ********* *** ***** business ********. ****** **** ********* ***** ****, *** **** ** learn *** ********** *** ************** *** *** ********* **** *** SDK ******** ***** ***** ** ******** **** * ***** ***** can ** *** ******** ******* *** **** ****. *********, **** nearly ***** ***, ******** ******** ** *** *** *** ***** SDK ** ****. *** *******, **** ** *** *********** ****** in ***** *** ****:

***** *** *** **** ********** *********** ******** ************** ** ** ******** *** *********.

Milestone's ********

**** ********* ******* ***** ********** ******* '**' ** ***** ******. However, *** ***** ***** ******* ** ** **** *** ** their ******** / ***** ** *** *******.

**** ********* ** ***** **** ***** '***** ******' ** ******** third ******* ** *** ***** (* *** *) ** ******* to ******** ******** ** *** ****** ** ******* **** *** connected / ******** **** *********. ********* **** **** *** ********** live ***** ****** (*), ******** ***** ****** (*) *** *** controls.

*** *** ******* *********** ***:

  • *** ******** ******** ****** *** *** ****** *** **** (** and *********) **** ******* *** ***** ******.
  • ****, *** *** *** ** ***** **** ** *********, **** notably ******** ************** *** ***** **** *** ** *******, ** while ********* **** ***** ********** ******* **** ** **** ** access, ************, **** **** *** ******** *****, ******* ***, ***., it **** *** ** ******** *****.

************

***** *** *** *******, *** ********* ****** *** *** ** integrated **** ***** ******* ******* ********** *** ********* *** - whether ** ** * ******* *** ******* ******, ** **** another *** ** ** ****** ******* ******, ***. ******, *** inclusion ** ******** ***** ****** (*** ***** *) ***** ** a ****** ******** **************.

**** ***** ***** (******* ** ** ************ ** ******) **** multiple ******* ** ***** ** **** *** ****** ** ***** video **** * ****** ********* (****** **** ******* *** ********** clients ** **** ************). *** ********* ***** ****** ********** ****.

Limitations - ********* ******

*** **** ********** ** *** ** *** ********* ******** ***** via ***** *, ***** ** ***** ********** ********. *** *******, ***** are *** ***** * ********** ******* (*.*., *******) *** ** conformant *******, ** ** **** ***********. ******* ** ****, ******** accessing ******** ***** ***** ** ** *****, ***** / ** more ********* ******* ***** *.

Impact - ********* ** * ******* *****

****** **** *** ********* ********** ***** ** *** **** **** help ******* *** **** ************ ***** **** **** ****** ****** from * ***.

*** ***, ********* *** *** ******* **** ** * **************. The **** **** ***** *** ** *** '****' *** ******* any **** *** *** ******** ** ***********, ******* *** **** risk *** **** ************* *** ***** ***** ***********.

***** *********'* ********* ******** ** *** *** ** **** *** of *** ******, **** **** **** ***** ***** ** *** similar ************* ** **** (****) ******** ** ********* ***** *** users *** **** ** * ***** *********. ******, ********* ********* large *** **** ************ *** **** ********** ** * ******* driver ** ********* ****.

** ********* ****** ********* ****, ** **** ** *********** ** see ***** ***** ****** ** ***** *** *** **** ******* shift **** **** ***** ******** ***** ****** ***********.

Update: ******* ***

******* ******** ** **** **** *** ******* ***** ***, ***** they ****'***** ******' (*** ***** *****).

Comments (29)

I agree on the aspect on accessing recorded video via ONVIF Profile G, and to lead the pack going, the next thing Milestone System should adopt is to include the device driver for ONVIF Profile G devices where Milestone is able to read and playback its recording directly without it (the recording) to pass through Milestone recording server database. Again that been said will also help Milestone to have both live and recording database accessibility from both

1. Milestone Interconnect

2. ONVIF Profile G devices (Cameras or NVRs or DVRs)

This will definitely have an impact on the current adoption of "OPEN"

"Milestone System should adopt is to include the device driver for ONVIF Profile G devices where Milestone is able to read and playback its recording directly without it (the recording) to pass through Milestone recording server database."

In this case, why not just connect directly to the camera? Maybe I don't understand your suggestion. Can you clarify?

Hi John,

Connecting to the camera is already an option adopted by Milestone and also other VMS over Profile S/G ,

What i actually meant is

Milestone "incoming" video should accept ONVIF PROFILE G from DVR or other VMS (should other VMS also adopt Profile G recorded video"out")

This will set the pace such that "A" VMS is able to playback "B" VMS video directly without flowing through its database.

See: Milestone Releases 'ONVIF Edge Storage'

They basically already do this though it is primarily intended for cameras with SD card storage.

The main constraint with incoming video from DVRs or VMSes is that, as you note, most do not support that.

I do like this feature and think others should adopt it. Is there any mention as to how it will be implemented (i.e. will there be a limit on the available channels, only one camera at a time, the number of simultaneous connections etc?). Good read, thanks.

Milestone says they have placed no limit on number of cameras nor parallel access.

Are they allowed to describe it using the term ONVIF even if it is not fully compatible with a published Profile?

As in "partially compliant with Profile G"

I'd be interested if seeing a test of this and if any impacts on the server CPU. Geutebruck has had the ability to "rebroadcast" cameras out as RTSP streams for a couple years now I think, but the caveat is CPU usage.

Just the live view though or recorded video?

Dahua and Hik DVR's have done RTSP 'rebroadcasts' of live views for some time now.

Milestone is streaming out through ONVIF Profile G which mean if the client (receiving end) are able to receive Profile G , it is able to 1. View Live 2. Playback of recorded feeds 3. PTZ control

Milestone provided some general feedback, offering a rough rule of thumb of "Streaming e.g. 10 concurrent streams on a dedicated “standard” server/pc the load will be 2-3%", also noting that it runs as a separate service that can be run on a different machine.

Your point though is well taken. It will take resources to additionally send video out.

Does anyone know if the Milestone implementation is transcoding the video signal before resending it out through ONVIF, or is it just forwarding the h264 from the camera. If it is just forwarding the h264, the CPU should be almost zero I would think.

I have "played" with Milestone SDK before prior to this launch, Milestone do not really need to transcode the video again to receive H.264 feeds (apply to both live and playback) , the SDK allows the removable of the files header and footer exposing the video in its original format and that been said means that there is no transcoding and the camera must firstly stream in generic h.264 format

Milestone is not transcoding video for ONVIF out (this is for H.264, MJPEG, etc., not sure how a fringe codec like MxPEG would work).

But even if you are just forwarding video, basically as is, out its going to take some CPU, just as it would if it was sending out to their own Smart Client.

If no transcoding is required, the most difficult aspect of implementing ONVIF Out would be the RTSP server (assuming one is writing their own RTSP server, and not using open source...). So I would say ONVIF-out would be quite an easy feature for most VMS manufactures to implement, so I predict we'll see it the others quite soon. If we do, one area that will benefit are Access Control companies wishing to integrate their products with VMS's (typically a bit of a pain for Access companies). Although integrating directly to the VMS's using their SDK's will generally result in a tighter integration.

"So I would say ONVIF-out would be quite an easy feature for most VMS manufactures to implement"

Yes, this is not a technology breakthrough.

"so I predict we'll see it the others quite soon"

Maybe, but the barrier has never been the time or effort it takes to make this happen. It is the risk that competitors will take over 'your' account by using the RTSP or ONVIF out functionality to monitor / integrate legacy systems and transition the account to the rival's recorder.

That said, Milestone adding it will help motivate others to do so, if only because Milestone can now put pressure on in deals against those who do not support this.

Ok I see. Perhaps VMS companies could avoid this problem by charging/licensing ONVIF connections to the VMS. I assume Milestone doesn't do this?

Maybe, but the barrier has never been the time or effort it takes to make this happen.

Funny how Milestone touts itself as such an OPEN company, yet it is/was only really half open.

But since there is an SDK available, I'm surprised that a third party has not created this already. Maybe they would have blocked it if someone had written it.

Even if it is just a subset of Profile G, it's a good first step. Maybe call it Profile K: (Open) Kimono.

"Funny how Milestone touts itself as such an OPEN company, yet it is/was only really half open."

How many VMSes prior to Milestone provide open out for live and recorded video? Few if any. So Milestone is an early adopter / leader here.

Listen, I've criticized Milestone for many other 'open platform' issues, like selling their own appliances (to the detriment of their hardware partners), selling out to a hardware manufacturer, etc. But this is a positive step for Milestone.

How many VMSes prior to Milestone provide open out for live and recorded video?

I guess I don't understand fully.

Doesn't the Milestone SDK let anyone who wants do that do it anyway?

With the knowledge, time, abilities, etc. to do so, etc.

Previously - learn their proprietary SDK (and each VMSes proprietary SDK), now re-use ONVIF.

I am downloading the MIPSDK off their site but its 252 MB and downloading super slow. I am curious what other restrictions they put in and if they require approval of applications. That is the other general issue with manufacturer SDKs, they frequently require business approval. For example, if they did not, why wouldn't Genetec integrate Milestone years ago (and vice versa)?

That is the other general issue with manufacturer SDKs, they frequently require business approval.

Indeed.

Additionally, the SDK User agrees that the developed Software Integration for a particular project or installation shall not have a Commercial Availability prior to notification and written approval from Milestone.

You are a master of reading EULAs! I figured there must be something like that in it but missed it. Thanks for adding.

I am curious what other restrictions they put in and if they require approval of applications

Probably another reason PSIMs are so expensive, besides doing the one-off development, they probably have to pay a hefty kickback license fee.

In general, the license fees are not that significant - typically in the $2,000 to $8,000 range and generally one time.

The bigger issue is typically development with tens of thousands of dollars a general cost used to actually do the integration on the third party side.

IMHO, If this step by Milestone drives the rest of the industry to follow suit, it would be a huge thing. Compatibility with multiple VMS's has been a very difficult thing, both in getting approval and access to each SDK and in writing to all the different SDK's.

Any words on if it needs License in the Milestone system to be able to pickup these Onvif channles, in the same way when you have an Onvif camera directly connected to the system?

No additional licenses needed for ONVIF out. Only license restriction is that it has to be one of the higher end XProtect versions, not including Go and Essential.

Update: Aimetis notified us that they too support ONVIF Out, which they call 'ONVIF Server' (see their guide).

There is no additional cost for this and is included in all versions.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

4MP Camera Shootout - Axis, Dahua, DW, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Sep 24, 2018
4MP usage continues to climb, especially for low cost fixed lens models. To see who was best, we bought and tested seven 4MP models from Axis,...
October 2018 Camera Course on Sep 13, 2018
Today is the last day to save $50 on the October 2018 Camera Course, register now. This is the only independent surveillance camera course,...
VMS Export Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone on Sep 13, 2018
When crimes, accidents or problems occur, exporting video from one's video surveillance system is critical to proving incidents. But who does it...
Dahua Low-Cost 4MP Camera Tested (N44CL52) on Sep 10, 2018
4MP use continues to increase, especially in low-cost models, according to integrators in our 2018 Resolution Usage Statistics. We bought Dahua's...
Directory Of 110+ Video Management Software (VMS) Suppliers on Aug 30, 2018
This directory provides a list of Video Management Software providers to help you see and research what options are available. Listing...
Inputs/Outputs For Video Surveillance Guide on Aug 24, 2018
While many cameras have Input/Output (I/O) ports, few are actually used and most designers do not even consider them. However, a good understanding...
Luxriot VMS Profile on Aug 23, 2018
Luxriot is more popular than Hikvision and Milestone products according to ASMAG which was probably even surprising to Luxriot. The company has...
Synology Surveillance Station VMS Tested on Aug 22, 2018
With so many low-cost NVRs and enterprise VMSes, is there any place in the market for NAS-based VMSes? Recently, IPVM bought a Synology NAS for...
SNMP / Network Monitoring For Surveillance 2018 on Aug 21, 2018
Surveillance systems typically rely on the the VMS to report issues, but this most often just means knowing a camera is "down" with no warning or...
Video Analytics Integration Guide on Aug 16, 2018
Video analytics is hot again (at least conceptually) but integrating video analytics with VMSes can be challenging. This is especially significant...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Alexa Guard Expands Amazon's Security Offerings, Boosts ADT's Stock on Sep 21, 2018
Amazon is expanding their security offerings yet again, this time with Alexa Guard that delivers security audio analytics and a virtual "Fake...
UTC, Owner of Lenel, Acquires S2 on Sep 20, 2018
UTC now owns two of the biggest access control providers, one of integrator's most hated access control platforms, Lenel, and one of their...
BluePoint Aims To Bring Life-Safety Mind-Set To Police Pull Stations on Sep 20, 2018
Fire alarm pull stations are commonplace but police ones are not. A self-funded startup, BluePoint Alert Solutions is aiming to make police pull...
SIA Plays Dumb On OEMs And Hikua Ban on Sep 20, 2018
OEMs widely pretend to be 'manufacturers', deceiving their customers and putting them at risk for cybersecurity attacks and, soon, violation of US...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...
Avigilon Announces AI-Powered H5 Camera Development on Sep 19, 2018
Avigilon will be showcasing "next-generation AI" at next week's ASIS GSX. In an atypical move, the company is not actually releasing these...
Favorite Request-to-Exit (RTE) Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 19, 2018
Request To Exit devices like motion sensors and lock releasing push-buttons are a part of almost every access install, but who makes the equipment...
25% China Tariffs Finalized For 2019, 10% Start Now, Includes Select Video Surveillance on Sep 18, 2018
A surprise move: In July, when the most recent tariff round was first announced, the tariffs were only scheduled for 10%. However, now, the US...
Central Stations Face Off Against NFPA On Fire Monitoring on Sep 18, 2018
Central stations are facing off against the NFPA over what they call anti-competitive language in NFPA 72, the standard that covers fire alarms....
Hikvision USA Starts Layoffs on Sep 18, 2018
Hikvision USA has started layoffs, just weeks after the US government ban was passed into law. Inside this note, we examine: The important...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact