Milestone Adds Manufacturer Reps

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Jan 06, 2014

A number of prominent manufacturers, like Axis, Avigilon, Genetec and Milestone, use their own internal sales people rather than manufacturer representatives. Now, in a surprising move, Milestone is adding manufacturer representatives in North American. In this note, we share feedback from Milestone and our analysis of the significance of this move.

Milestone Feedback

********* ********* ** *** ********* ***** *** ****. **** ** the **** **** ** *** ********* *** ***** *******:

*** *** *** ******* ******* ***** *** *****?

*** ** ******* *************** ** ******* ****** ******** ********* ******** ** *** better ***** *** **** ******* ** *** ****** ** **** utilizing ************ **** ** ****** ***********.

***** *** ***** *** *** *****? ** **** ***********?


** **** ********* ********** ** ****** *** *** *********** *** some ***** *********** ** *** ********, *******, **** *** *** ready *** ************ ** **** ****.

** **** ******* ** *** ******* ******* **********?


** ** ******* **** **** **** **** ** **** *** Husky ******, ** **** ** *** ********-**** ********. *** **-**-****** sales ********* ********* *** **** ******** **** ******* ***** ******* to **** *** ********-**** *** *** ******* *****.  ****** ************ rep ***** ** ******** ** ******** *********’* ***** ******* ************ towards **********, *********** *** ***-******** *****.

**** **** ****** *** ******* ***** *****/********?


***** ** ** ****** ** *** ******* **-**-****** *** ***** strategy, ***** * *********** ** ***** ***** ********* ** ******* integrator ********’ ********** ******** *** ****** ***** ********* *** ******* additional ******* ** *** *** ******** ******** ********** ***** ********* business.

What ** *** *****?

IPVM ********

*******, ** ***** **** ***** ***** *** *********, *********, ******* of ***** ********* **** ****** ***********, ***********, ******* ** *******************. ************ **** ***** ** ******** *** **** ******* *** for ******* ***** **** ** ******** ***** ***** *** ******. In ***** ***** ***********, **** **** ** **** *** ** involved ** **** ** ******** **** ***** *** **** ***** for * ************ ******** ** ** ********* *******. *** ***** dealers *** **** ** **** **** ** ** **** ** sophisticated *** ***** ******* ********, ****** *** ********** ** *********. Plus, ***** **** ******* **** **** ****** ** ** ***** largest *****, ****, ****** * ******* **** *** * ******** for ****, **** ** ** *********** *** ********* ** *******.

*** ********* *** ***** **** *********'* ************* **** ****** ************. Rep ***** ********* **** * ******** ****, * ****** ****, an ****** ******* ****, ***. *** ********, ************ ***** **** ********* *******, ** *** ********** *** ***** two ******* *** ****** ******** (** *** *** ****). ********* on **** ******* *********'* *** ***** *********, **** ***** **** that *********** ***** ********** ***** ********* ****** ********.

Comments (8)

"In their local territories, reps tend to know and be involved in lots of projects that would not make sense for a manufacturer employee to be dedicated towards."

That's true and I agree, IF you find a decent rep firm. I've known rep firms that didn't do squat but sit back and earn commissions on sales that had nothing to do with. I've also known firms that checked up on and supported us regulalry and were a real credit to the manufacturers they represented.

Out of curiosity, how do most rep firms work? Is it usually commission on sales on their territories?

Yes, and we've covered the good and bad of rep firms here.

My understanding is that rep firms typically get a percentage of total sales that occur in their geographical territory. I've heard 5 points, 7 points, etc. Distributors report back to manufacturers what sales occurred in what states and then the manufacturers tally that up for each of their rep firms.

So it's in a firms interest get out there and help drive up the sales numbers. But at the same time if the product almost "sells itself" due to market recognition and name brand, it's easy for them to sit on their laurels.

Can any manufacturers comment on how often they have to "fire" reps, or how do they measure the reps efforts? Do they look strictly at sales numbers and set quotas, or do you also make regular visits or require regular reports?

On the other hand, if a manufacturer is declining in the marketplace, life is very tough for reps. I mean, just ask Pelco's :-O

That said, manufacturers generally have the upper hand with their rep firms. Most are heavily dependent on 2 to 3 manufacturers for their company's financial fortune. Plus, rep agreements can typically be cancelled very quickly (in a matter of months). So the rep firm always face the risk of losing 20 - 50% of their company's revenue if the manufacturer is unhappy. It's one reason why I think being a rep firm is a hard life.

Rep firms get fired all the time, it's not really all that uncommon.

It can happen because they aren't performing well, because an employee of theirs that was considered the expert on a particular product left the company (so then the manufacturer decides the firm might not be able to do them justice), because another firm hired a key employee and the manufacturer wants to switch firms, or because the manufacturer hired or fired key sales people that have extremely good or bad relations with particular firms.

A good rep firm will submit some kind of report outlining their efforts and productivity on a weekly or monthly basis. You can also tell how good a firm is doing by how many meetings they set for your sales people (and the quality of those meetings), or how often their sales people contact your inside sales or tech support people for information or questions.

In many cases the reps are given quotas, where you would expect them to generate and close a certain amount of business on their own, without requiring heavy involvement from your direct sales force.

I have some experience in this area, having reppped for Dvtel, FLIR, and AD and Kantech to name a few. I think the business model is somewhat flawed because the manufacturer typically 'holds the keys' with a short term contract and high expectations. John is right, the Man Rep life is a tough one.

The question whether this is good or bad for Milestone is clearly 'yes' that it is. It will give them exposure to smaller projects and more sophisticated dealers. (more...sophisticated, not more sophisticated) It is the other manufacturers in the stable of the Rep Firm who will suffer because of the shifted 'mind share' of the reps. Milestone does not care, but it feeds the proliferation of a well worn path that the Rep Firm will eventually lose on one end while he succeeds on another.

The rep firm will have a hard time succeeding long term as long as this strategy continues, with the Manufacturer and the Rep Firm always chasing the greener grass.

Interestingly I was until recently the country manager for Milestone UK and Ireland. One if the key directors asked me if I could consider hiring a manufactuers rep for the UK to cut costs.This is not a usual approach in the UK.

When I spoke to a manufacturers rep and asked him what life was like. He said that its very tough and that he hates it. Only planning to do this before he gets a proper paid salary with a company that can look after him and offer job security.

So if this is the normal attitude of manufacturers reps then continuity of staff will change and installers stil buy from partners who they have a relationshiop with. So I think it is a poor idea.

Interestingly I was laid off by Milestone shortly afterwards. (after 7 years) so I guess it is a new global strategy they are working on. Also I guess it highlights that it is not necessarily any more secure being full time employed.

This is an interesting report. Though the information is outdated, it is telling of the psychology within the companies and within the industry. It's clear that camera and VMS manufacturers/developers are seeking a competitive and profitable balance of product development, meeting market demands, effective and profitable marketing, and establishing regular business for their target demographics. It's not been uncommon to see companies test the waters before diving in.

Later that year, they reversed the decision by terminating market reps. The interesting thing is that IPVM polls showed that a plurality of those polled saw the hiring of market reps as a good move for the manufacturer, while a plurality (later that same year) also agreed that firing the manufacturer reps was a "bad idea."


Consumers don't seem reluctant for their two cents, and their demands/opinions seem to be somewhat consistent.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Sales

Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jun 14, 2018
Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security Sales Course Summer...
Buy Arecont: Top Bid $10 Million Cash on May 22, 2018
Last year, Arecont had a deal for a purchase price of $170 million (see Failed Arecont China Acquisition). This year, Arecont has a deal for a...
Stealth / UCIT - Remote Video Monitoring Provider Profile on May 18, 2018
Can 2 remote video monitoring companies, Stealth Monitoring from the US and UCIT from Canada combine to impact the market and compete in a changing...
Worst Manufacturer Technical Support 2018 on May 16, 2018
5 manufacturers stood out as providing the worst technical support to 190+ integrators in new IPVM results. These integrators answered: In the...
March Networks Targets Cannabis Market on May 10, 2018
Will the next March Networks customer appreciation event be held a steakhouse or at a Taco Bell at 2 am? Can March sell the types of systems to the...
Canon Acquires Briefcam, Now Owns Briefcam, Milestone and Axis on May 09, 2018
Canon already owns two of the biggest names in video surveillance, Axis (acquired in 2015) and Milestone (acquired in 2014). Now, Canon...
Integrators Divided On Website Importance to Business (Statistics) on May 04, 2018
Are websites important? Still quite a number of integrators have no websites.  New IPVM statistics show that nearly half of all integrators find a...
Correcting Hikvision USA's False Accusations on May 01, 2018
Hikvision USA has falsely accused IPVM's DeepInMind test. The truth, which Hikvision USA knows, despite their statements to the contrary, is...
Rare Video Surveillance Fundraising - Verkada $15 Million on Apr 19, 2018
Fundraising in video surveillance (and the broader physical security market) has been poor recently. Highlights are few and far in between...
Worst Access Control Manufacturer 2018 on Apr 18, 2018
Three access control providers stood out as providing the most problems for integrators. In this report, we analyze the answers to: "In the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jun 22, 2018
  This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals. Register now. Lots of network training exists...
Installation Hardware for Video Surveillance - Indoor Fasteners on Jun 22, 2018
As part of our Installation for Video Surveillance series, in this note, we cover drywall anchors. A key part of installing security hardware is...
Hikvision ColorVu Integrated Visible Light Cameras Examined on Jun 22, 2018
When it comes to low light, infrared light has become the defacto standard in surveillance. But IR is limited to monochrome images, making colors...
'Secure Channel' OSDP Access Control Examined on Jun 21, 2018
Despite claiming to be better than Wiegand, OSDP's initial releases did not address the lack of encryption between reader and controller, leaving...
Most Wanted Improvements In Manufacturer Technical Support (Statistics) on Jun 21, 2018
5 key areas of improvement and 1 clear wanted support feature were voiced by 140+ integrator responses to: What improvement in manufacturer...
GDPR / ICO Complaint Filed Against IFSEC Show Facial Recognition on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM has filed a complaint against IFSEC’s parent company UBM based on our concern that the conference violates core GDPR principles on...
IFSEC 2018 Final Show Report on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM attended the IFSEC show for the first time this year. The Chinese took over the show, centered on Hikvision, flanked by Dahua, Huawei and a...
Mobotix Releases 'Move' Into 21st Century on Jun 20, 2018
For years, Mobotix stood resolutely against, well, every other manufacturer, selling it as a virtue: MOBOTIX equipment is designed with no...
Cybersecurity Startup VDOO Disclosing 10 Manufacturer Vulnerabilities Starting With Axis And Foscam on Jun 20, 2018
Cybersecurity startup VDOO has uncovered significant vulnerabilities in Axis cameras along with many others not yet disclosed. In this report, we...
Axis Guardian - Cloud VMS And Alarm Monitoring - Released on Jun 19, 2018
Axis has struggled to deliver a cloud-based managed service video platform. Video service providers have utilized AVHS for over a decade, and have...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact