Milestone Adds Manufacturer Reps

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Jan 06, 2014

A number of prominent manufacturers, like Axis, Avigilon, Genetec and Milestone, use their own internal sales people rather than manufacturer representatives. Now, in a surprising move, Milestone is adding manufacturer representatives in North American. In this note, we share feedback from Milestone and our analysis of the significance of this move.

Milestone Feedback

********* ********* ** *** ********* ***** *** ****. **** ** the **** **** ** *** ********* *** ***** *******:

*** *** *** ******* ******* ***** *** *****?

*** ** ******* *************** ** ******* ****** ******** ********* ******** ** *** better ***** *** **** ******* ** *** ****** ** **** utilizing ************ **** ** ****** ***********.

***** *** ***** *** *** *****? ** **** ***********?


** **** ********* ********** ** ****** *** *** *********** *** some ***** *********** ** *** ********, *******, **** *** *** ready *** ************ ** **** ****.

** **** ******* ** *** ******* ******* **********?


** ** ******* **** **** **** **** ** **** *** Husky ******, ** **** ** *** ********-**** ********. *** **-**-****** sales ********* ********* *** **** ******** **** ******* ***** ******* to **** *** ********-**** *** *** ******* *****.  ****** ************ rep ***** ** ******** ** ******** *********’* ***** ******* ************ towards **********, *********** *** ***-******** *****.

**** **** ****** *** ******* ***** *****/********?


***** ** ** ****** ** *** ******* **-**-****** *** ***** strategy, ***** * *********** ** ***** ***** ********* ** ******* integrator ********’ ********** ******** *** ****** ***** ********* *** ******* additional ******* ** *** *** ******** ******** ********** ***** ********* business.

What ** *** *****?

IPVM ********

*******, ** ***** **** ***** ***** *** *********, *********, ******* of ***** ********* **** ****** ***********, ***********, ******* ** *******************. ************ **** ***** ** ******** *** **** ******* *** for ******* ***** **** ** ******** ***** ***** *** ******. In ***** ***** ***********, **** **** ** **** *** ** involved ** **** ** ******** **** ***** *** **** ***** for * ************ ******** ** ** ********* *******. *** ***** dealers *** **** ** **** **** ** ** **** ** sophisticated *** ***** ******* ********, ****** *** ********** ** *********. Plus, ***** **** ******* **** **** ****** ** ** ***** largest *****, ****, ****** * ******* **** *** * ******** for ****, **** ** ** *********** *** ********* ** *******.

*** ********* *** ***** **** *********'* ************* **** ****** ************. Rep ***** ********* **** * ******** ****, * ****** ****, an ****** ******* ****, ***. *** ********, ************ ***** **** ********* *******, ** *** ********** *** ***** two ******* *** ****** ******** (** *** *** ****). ********* on **** ******* *********'* *** ***** *********, **** ***** **** that *********** ***** ********** ***** ********* ****** ********.

Comments (8)

"In their local territories, reps tend to know and be involved in lots of projects that would not make sense for a manufacturer employee to be dedicated towards."

That's true and I agree, IF you find a decent rep firm. I've known rep firms that didn't do squat but sit back and earn commissions on sales that had nothing to do with. I've also known firms that checked up on and supported us regulalry and were a real credit to the manufacturers they represented.

Out of curiosity, how do most rep firms work? Is it usually commission on sales on their territories?

Yes, and we've covered the good and bad of rep firms here.

My understanding is that rep firms typically get a percentage of total sales that occur in their geographical territory. I've heard 5 points, 7 points, etc. Distributors report back to manufacturers what sales occurred in what states and then the manufacturers tally that up for each of their rep firms.

So it's in a firms interest get out there and help drive up the sales numbers. But at the same time if the product almost "sells itself" due to market recognition and name brand, it's easy for them to sit on their laurels.

Can any manufacturers comment on how often they have to "fire" reps, or how do they measure the reps efforts? Do they look strictly at sales numbers and set quotas, or do you also make regular visits or require regular reports?

On the other hand, if a manufacturer is declining in the marketplace, life is very tough for reps. I mean, just ask Pelco's :-O

That said, manufacturers generally have the upper hand with their rep firms. Most are heavily dependent on 2 to 3 manufacturers for their company's financial fortune. Plus, rep agreements can typically be cancelled very quickly (in a matter of months). So the rep firm always face the risk of losing 20 - 50% of their company's revenue if the manufacturer is unhappy. It's one reason why I think being a rep firm is a hard life.

Rep firms get fired all the time, it's not really all that uncommon.

It can happen because they aren't performing well, because an employee of theirs that was considered the expert on a particular product left the company (so then the manufacturer decides the firm might not be able to do them justice), because another firm hired a key employee and the manufacturer wants to switch firms, or because the manufacturer hired or fired key sales people that have extremely good or bad relations with particular firms.

A good rep firm will submit some kind of report outlining their efforts and productivity on a weekly or monthly basis. You can also tell how good a firm is doing by how many meetings they set for your sales people (and the quality of those meetings), or how often their sales people contact your inside sales or tech support people for information or questions.

In many cases the reps are given quotas, where you would expect them to generate and close a certain amount of business on their own, without requiring heavy involvement from your direct sales force.

I have some experience in this area, having reppped for Dvtel, FLIR, and AD and Kantech to name a few. I think the business model is somewhat flawed because the manufacturer typically 'holds the keys' with a short term contract and high expectations. John is right, the Man Rep life is a tough one.

The question whether this is good or bad for Milestone is clearly 'yes' that it is. It will give them exposure to smaller projects and more sophisticated dealers. (more...sophisticated, not more sophisticated) It is the other manufacturers in the stable of the Rep Firm who will suffer because of the shifted 'mind share' of the reps. Milestone does not care, but it feeds the proliferation of a well worn path that the Rep Firm will eventually lose on one end while he succeeds on another.

The rep firm will have a hard time succeeding long term as long as this strategy continues, with the Manufacturer and the Rep Firm always chasing the greener grass.

Interestingly I was until recently the country manager for Milestone UK and Ireland. One if the key directors asked me if I could consider hiring a manufactuers rep for the UK to cut costs.This is not a usual approach in the UK.

When I spoke to a manufacturers rep and asked him what life was like. He said that its very tough and that he hates it. Only planning to do this before he gets a proper paid salary with a company that can look after him and offer job security.

So if this is the normal attitude of manufacturers reps then continuity of staff will change and installers stil buy from partners who they have a relationshiop with. So I think it is a poor idea.

Interestingly I was laid off by Milestone shortly afterwards. (after 7 years) so I guess it is a new global strategy they are working on. Also I guess it highlights that it is not necessarily any more secure being full time employed.

This is an interesting report. Though the information is outdated, it is telling of the psychology within the companies and within the industry. It's clear that camera and VMS manufacturers/developers are seeking a competitive and profitable balance of product development, meeting market demands, effective and profitable marketing, and establishing regular business for their target demographics. It's not been uncommon to see companies test the waters before diving in.

Later that year, they reversed the decision by terminating market reps. The interesting thing is that IPVM polls showed that a plurality of those polled saw the hiring of market reps as a good move for the manufacturer, while a plurality (later that same year) also agreed that firing the manufacturer reps was a "bad idea."


Consumers don't seem reluctant for their two cents, and their demands/opinions seem to be somewhat consistent.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Sales

Rare Video Surveillance Fundraising - Verkada $15 Million on Apr 19, 2018
Fundraising in video surveillance (and the broader physical security market) has been poor recently. Highlights are few and far in between...
Worst Access Control 2018 on Apr 18, 2018
Three access control providers stood out as providing the most problems for integrators. In this report, we analyze the answers to: "In the...
Eocortex / Macroscop VMS Company Profile on Apr 09, 2018
Eocortex is the international brand of Russian VMS manufacturer Macroscop. Macroscop was founded in 2008, and the Eocortex name created in 2013. We...
Top 4 Biggest Problems Selling Access Control 2018 on Mar 23, 2018
We received 150+ responses from integrators when we asked them "What is the biggest problem you face when selling electronic access control?...
Security Robot Sales Struggle on Mar 21, 2018
2 year ago, PSA Security CEO Bill Bozeman called security robots one of “the biggest game changers” in decades for security integrators. Just over...
Free Manufacturer Trip To China - CCTV.Net / Univew on Mar 15, 2018
Pack your bags? 'Closer than you think'? Well, a non-stop flight from NYC to Shanghai is 15 hours plus another 100 miles to Hangzhou...
Panasonic Selling Off Security Camera Factory on Mar 14, 2018
Panasonic is OEMing cameras from Dahua, as IPVM testing confirmed in 2017. Now, Panasonic is selling their security camera factory, according to...
Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2018 on Mar 12, 2018
A number of major moves in integrator's favorite camera rankings for 2018: Two manufacturers make major moves up One major manufacturer moves...
Avigilon Breaks $400 Million Revenue, Quadruples Profit, Weakens Competitiveness on Mar 07, 2018
The last annual Avigilon financials are here. With the imminent Motorola acquisition completion, Avigilon will cease to be an independent publicly...
Hanwha Techwin Spins Out Security Business on Mar 06, 2018
In an era of security acquisitions and mergers, with most recently Avigilon being acquired by Motorola and Bosch merging its security businesses,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Last Chance - April 2018 IP Networking Course on Apr 19, 2018
Today is the last day to register for our IP Networking course. Register now. NEW - 2 sessions per class, 'day' and 'night' to give you double...
Rare Video Surveillance Fundraising - Verkada $15 Million on Apr 19, 2018
Fundraising in video surveillance (and the broader physical security market) has been poor recently. Highlights are few and far in between...
'Best In Show' Fails on Apr 19, 2018
ISC West's "Best In Show" has failed. For more than a decade, it has become increasingly irrelevant as the selections exhibit a cartoon level...
Security Camera Cleaning Frequency Statistics on Apr 18, 2018
150+ integrators told IPVM how often they clean cameras on customer's sites and why.  Inside we examine their answers and break down feedback...
Worst Access Control 2018 on Apr 18, 2018
Three access control providers stood out as providing the most problems for integrators. In this report, we analyze the answers to: "In the...
Axis VMD4 Analytics Tested on Apr 17, 2018
Axis is now on its 4th generation of video motion detection (VMD), which Axis calls "a free video analytics application." In this generation, Axis...
Arecont CEO And President Resign on Apr 17, 2018
This is good news for Arecont. Arecont's problems have been well known for years (e.g., most recently Worst Camera Manufacturers 2018 and starting...
Strong ISC West 2018, Says Manufacturers, GSX / ASIS Expected Weaker on Apr 17, 2018
Manufacturers say ISC West 2018 was strong, continuing the trend we have seen in 2017 results and 2016 results. However, those same 100...
Key Control For Access Control Tutorial on Apr 16, 2018
End users spend thousands on advanced systems to keep themselves secure, but regularly neglect one of the lest expensive yet most important aspects...
Best and Worst ISC West 2018 on Apr 16, 2018
ISC West 2018 had strong attendance, modest overall new products, and a surge in Artificial Intelligence marketing. First, here are 20+...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact