S2 Founder Touts Mercury Board To Replace Software House

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Sep 08, 2016

Access control is a stoic market typically devoid of glitzy, flashy product releases. But one new product is notable because of who is touting it and what it aims to do. 

One of the most well-known access control leaders, S2 Security's John Moss [link no longer available] said:

Will this help replace Software House? In this note, we examine the offering.

****** ******* ** * stoic ****** ********* ****** ** glitzy, ****** ******* ********. But *** *** ******* is ******* ******* ** who ** ******* ** and **** ** **** to **. 

*** ** *** **** well-known ****** ******* *******, ** Security's **** **** [**** no ****** *********] ****:

**** **** **** ******* Software *****? ** **** note, ** ******* *** offering.

[***************]

Software ***** *******

*** ****/************ ** ********** interesting ******* ** *** made ****** ****, *** ******* *** former *** ** ******** House, *** ** *** largest ****** ****** ******* brands. ***** ******* *** company ** ****, **** started ******* ******** ****** control *******, ** ********.

***********, ***** ******** ***** uses **** **************** **** ***********,** ******** *** ********* with ******* ******** ***********.

New ******** *************

** *******, *** ******** post ** ******* * new ****** *** ****' current ** ******* ** take **** ******** ***** systems, *** ******** *******. 

*** ** ****** ***** that ******* **** (********* John ****' **) *** better chase *** '*** ***' of ******** *****'* ********* base *** ***** ************ **** ** ********* ******** changeover.

New ******* ** ****** ********

* ***** ****** ** a ****-** **** ******* why ******* *** ******** this *** *******:

**** **** *** ***** and *********** ** ********** between **** ******** ** nearly *********. *** *****/****** connections *** **** *** same, ** *** ***** they ***** *** *********** **********, *** ******* ****** exchanging *** ****** *** each ***** *** ** quickly **** ******* *****.

*** *** '**' ****** hardware ** ******* ** scope *********'* '**' ******** ** ******** ** take **** ***-******* ****-***** systems.  *** ***** ********** is **** ****** *** old *********** ** ******** Commander ** ******* ******* systems, ******* *** ******* can ****** *** ***** actively *********** *** ****** deployed ******** ***** *-**** platform.

*** ** ****** ******** several **** *******, **** resembling ***** ******** *** using ******* ****** *** firmware *******. *** *** parts *******:

  • **-*** [**** ** ****** available], * ******* ********** replacement *** *** *-**** iStar *** ***
  • **-*** [**** ** ****** available], * *********** ****** interface ****** *** *** iStar *** ***
  • **-*** [**** ** ****** available], ** * ************ output ***** *** ********* the ***** *** **
  • **-*** [**** ** ****** available], ** * ************ input ***** *** ********* the ***** *** **

** ***********, ***** **** ****** *** the *********** ********** **** ** Software *****'* *-**** ********, regardless ** *******.

Same *****, *** *** ******

*** ******** ***** ******** those ******* ** ****** from ******** ***** ** buy *** ******* ********** boards. *** *** ******** Software ***** ********** *** component *********** *** ** reused. ******* ******** ** Series **:

*** ** ****** ********** *** iStar ****** ******* ******** form ****** *** **** “***************” change **** *** **** migration ** ******** ***** ****** infrastructure ** *** ********* ******* software ******* *********.

** ***** ******* ** Mercury *** ********* *** still ****** ** ** expensive, ******* ** ********* per **** ** *** Mercury ****** *** ******* software, *** ******** ********* equipment *** ** ********* disturbed **** ***** *** MS ****** ******** ** standard ******* *** *****.

Labor ******* **********

*** **** ******* ** using ***** *********** ****** could ***** *********** ** a **********, ** *** order ** ******** ** dollars *** *********, *** perhaps **** ****.  

******* **** ****** ********* recommend, *** ********** *** 'neat' ******, ********* ****** is ***** *** ***** to ***** *********** ****** before ********* **** * connector.  ****** * ********** point **** ********* ******, even ** ** **** or ***, *** **** wires *** *** **** enough ** ***** *** warrant ********* ****** ******* of *** ***** ** reach, ** ********* ********* splices.

*** '**** **' ************* of *** ** ****** means ************ ***** ** only * *** ******* per *****, ****** ***** if ************ ******** *** used.

More ** *********** **** ***********

*******, *** ***** **** of ******** **** **** a ******** ***** ****** could ***** ***** **** steep.

**** ** *** **** of ********** ******** ******** boards *** ** ******** by ***** ** ******, there ** ** ********* that * *** ******* based ******** ******** *** same ***** ** ************ that ******** ***** ********* does. ******* ********* *********** with ***** **** ****** like ******** ******** *** Exacq, *** ***** *********** and ******* ** ***** systems *** *** ** available ** * ******* OEM

Comments (28)

Been hearing about this board for about a year now and I thought I was chasing a unicorn. This is going to be very useful!

Are there other platforms in sight with this Mercury Bridge?

Maybe AMAG?

"In sight"?

You mean potential takeover targets with MS series?

In the case of AMAG; no. They use an altogether different board system than iStar.

Yes, meaning this strategy of creating drop-in replacements for other propritiery systems. Like an MA bridge.

Sure, I think Mercury could design other 'bridges' in the same way. But there needs to be a substantial installed base to justify it.

I don't think AMAG would make the cut. Nor would DSX. So once C-Cure is addressed by the MS Bridge, I'm not sure which other platform would be a target?

How about Lenel?

Lenel already uses Mercury, no?

Lenel primarily uses stock Mercury hardware. No special parts needed. See: Axis vs HID vs Mercury Access Controllers for more.

That's interesting, good find.

RS2 is supporting this MS bridge, not iStar. Their notation might confuse some.

The Vanderbilt support is due to the gradual migration of Vanderbilt access to Mercury Security firmware/hardware designs. Vanderbilt and Mercury are both owned by ACRE, who told us:

"All of Vanderbilt's platforms (including Bright Blue, SMS, ACT, Siemens, among others) will migrate to Mercury over time."

So since RS2 supports Mercury, it isn't too surprising to see them support Vanderbilt's hardware now running Mercury firmware.

Lenel has this same iStar takeover board. I think this more of a Mercury brain child than an S2.

Now if S2 would only remove the commitment to $75000 in annual sales, two technicians classroom certified and the purchase of a demo system. This could help smaller companies compete and grow. As a startup I am by myself until I can bring on employees, and would prefer to offer S2 over other PACS.

If I were a dealer offering Softwarehouse or any Mercury supported products I would look toward an access control partner that offers proprietary hardware to protect my company and my customers.

I would look toward an access control partner that offers proprietary hardware to protect my company and my customers.

Let me guess, you sell proprietary access control hardware? ;)

I definitely see how it could protect your dealer 'customers' but not sure why it protects the end user?

Within my current position at a large integrator, I have a number of customers that would love to leave. They are tied to this integrator because they are the only integrator that is a Dealer\Partner of 2 proprietary systems being used.

Still working on my exit strategy

Sell and own a Privately held access control manufacturer that does provide it's own hardware and software.

The current trend of the Mercury based systems is the fact that take overs are becoming more common. This places the end user in a position of power over the integrator. They decide to not pay the annual software support agreement they can simply bring in another provider to "Flash" the system and provide a new UI. Mercury itself admits that their hardware sales are not growing at the pace of their partners sales...This is a direct result of the above mentioned practice.

I think I would try to lock in the customer with great customer service, fair pricing and the correct product for their application.

Software House IS proprietary. The rub there is significant enough that a non-proprietary 3rd party has built retrofit hardware to fit existing installs.

So a 'proprietary' strategy is not absolute 'protection'.

S2 is also proprietary.

No. While they do offer their own controllers, S2 supports Mercury Hardware.

At the end of the day they are still proprietary. Yes you can use the Mercury controller, but what good is it when you not a dealer. You still cannot replace a SWH system with S2.

Genetec and Mercury promoting the Bridge product for takeovers:

Anyone know if these boards talk to RM-4 field modules?

Why aren't we talking about iStar Ultra vs. Mercury EP4502?  If we're going to make panel comparisons shouldn't we at least use the two modern panel designs?

 

Please share your recommendations for "two modern panel designs?"

Excellent article, I will work on this ASAP to rid my corner of the world of Software House and Lenel.

I would love to pickup S2 to take over Swh customers, but as a start-up I can not commit to S2 requirements. It's impossible as a 1 man start-up.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,367 reports, 855 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Milestone Presents XProtect On AWS on May 04, 2020
Milestone presented its XProtect on AWS offering at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video from...
Camio Presents Coronavirus Social Distancing Analytics on Apr 20, 2020
Camio presented its social distancing analytics for responding to coronavirus at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A...
OpenALPR Acquired By Mysterious Novume on Mar 13, 2019
Startup OpenALPR has been acquired by Novume, a company virtually unknown in the industry. While there are many LPR providers (see our directory),...
Wavelynx Access Control Manufacturer Profile on Jan 10, 2019
Denver-based WaveLynx is not well known as an access reader manufacturer, but OEMs for big industry brands including Amag, Isonas (Allegion),...
Openpath Access Control Tested on Nov 20, 2018
Big investment in access startups is uncommon, but Openpath has recently attracted $20 million doing just that. The company has limited security...
Milestone Disrupts Milestone With Arcules on Nov 19, 2018
Milestone is now competing against... Milestone's own spinout Arcules. New IPVM testing shows that Arcules has incorporated a substantial amount...
S2 Access Control / 'Unified Security Management' Profile on May 08, 2018
In our 13th access control company profile, we examine S2 Security's Netbox platform: Unified Security Management Platform positioning Core...
Shinobi: Moe Is Building His Own VMS on Jan 29, 2018
Building a new VMS may seem to be a thing of a bygone era. But one developer, Moinul "Moe" Alam [link no longer available], is doing just that and...
ZoneMinder Open Source Profile on Nov 06, 2017
The first, oldest and probably the best known open source VMS is ZoneMinder. But where has it gone and is it still relevant today in a world of...
Milestone / Canon Announces Cloud Spinoff Arcus Global, Now Arcules on Jun 27, 2017
Milestone has spun off a business, Arcus Global [link no longer available], funded by their parent company Canon. The new company aims to transform...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Hikvision Illicitly Uses Back To The Future In Marketing on Jul 03, 2020
NBCUniversal told IPVM that Hikvision UK's ongoing coronavirus marketing campaign using NBCUniversal's assets was not allowed. Hikvision mass...
Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM is 'not a good look' and that 'IPVM should never be your source of...
Vintra Presents FulcrumAI Face Recognition on Jul 02, 2020
Vintra presented its FulcrumAI face recognition and mask detection offering at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A...
Uniview Wrist Temperature Reader Tested on Jul 02, 2020
Uniview is promoting measuring wrist temperatures whereas most others are just offering forehead or inner canthus measurements. But how well does...
Dahua USA Admits Thermal Solutions "Qualify As Medical Devices" on Jul 02, 2020
Dahua USA has issued a press release admitting a controversial point in the industry but an obvious one to the US FDA, that the thermal temperature...
Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...