Most Needed Improvement: Access Control Software

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 16, 2015

100 integrators answered IPVM's question:

"Which aspect/element of access control system technology (ie: credentials, locks, controllers, management software, system openness, etc) most needs to improve? Why?"

Software and openness were the clear top 2 responses.

Here's an overview of their answers:

 

In this note, we break down each of these themes, sharing detailed commentary from integrators about these problems.

*** *********** ******** ****'* question:

"***** ******/******* ** ****** control ****** ********** (**: credentials, *****, ***********, ********** software, ****** ********, ***) most ***** ** *******? Why?"

******** *** ******** **** the ***** *** * responses.

****'* ** ******** ** their *******:

 

** **** ****, ** break **** **** ** these ******, ******* ******** commentary **** *********** ***** these ********.

[***************]

Key ******

*** ******* ******* **** four ******* **********

  • ********:********* ** **** ******** centered ****** *** **********, features *** ********* ** the ******* **** *********.
  • ******** & ***********:***** ******* ********* *** difficulty ** ************* ** tying ******** ****** ******* with ******.
  • *****:**** *********** ********* *** needless ********** ** **********, installing, *** ********* ******** locksets.
  • ******:**** ******** *********** *******, that ***** *** ******** cited ***** ********* *********** and *********** **** ********** like ***********, ******* ********, or ********* *******.

** ******* **** ** these ******** ******* **** survey ******** ** *** sections **** ******.

********

**** **** **** **% of *** *****, *** strongest ********* *** **** access ******* ******** ***** to *******.  ********* ********** mentioned *** ***** **********, awkward ********, *** ******* features ** ******** ****** systems:

  • "********** ******** *** *** user. ** * ******** all **** ******* ** to ** **** ** view ***** *****, *** and ****** *****. **** our ********** **** *** overwhelmed ** *******."
  • "******** ***** ** ** behind ***** *** ******** up ** ****** ****** (mobile ****, **** ** use ***)."
  • "********. *** *** **** software ******** ** *** are ***** ****** ** what *** *********** ******** the **** ***** ***/** needs. *** ************* **** to ****** ****** *** take ** ***** **** an **** **** ** the ******** ** ***-***** and **********."
  • "********** ****** ******* ********, (i.e., ***-*****, **-*****, ***.) still ***** **** ******* 95."
  • "* ******* ** ******* the ********** ********, *** reason ** ** ******* credential ********** & ****** generation ***** ** ***** challenging ** *** **** of *** ********* ****** control ****** ************'*. ****, system ********, *** ****** is ** ******* *********** to *** ********* ******** system."
  • "***** ** ****** ********** on ****** ******* ********. Commoditization ** ********* ******* of **** ** **********."
  • "****** ********* *** *** kept ** ** **** and **** *** *** cumbersome. ** ***** ***** to *** *** ********. Graphical ******* *** ****** designed *** ********* ******** with *** *********."
  • "***** ****, *** ********** software. *** ******* ******* in ****** ******* ** user *****. **** ******** is ***********, ********** *** overly ***********, *** ****** for ******** ********* ************."

********** ** *** ********* or ***** ** ****** brand *** **, ********* about *** **** *** software *** ************ ******.  

Openness & ***********

******* ****** *********: ***** other ******* ******** **** access ** ********* ** impossible. ******* ********* ******** the **** **************** ******* different ******* *** ******* is ** ****** *** than ** **** *** been:

  • "****** ********. ***** *** clients **** ******** ****** control ********. ***** ** try ** ****** *** compatibility ******* *** *** and *** ****** **** a *** ********* ** implementation. ***** **** ** some **** ******** ** that ** *** ******* and *** ******** *******."
  • "*********** **** ***** *** VMS. *** *** ********* (such ** *****) *** the ****** ********* (**** as *********)**** *** ***** party ** ***** *** issues. ******* ***** **** take **************."
  • "*** ********** ****** ****** include ******** */* (**** and **********) / ******* system ** *********** ** SAP/other *** ***** ******* systems. ********* **** ** use *** ****** ******* system ** ******** ***** work **** ******* ***** / ******* ***** ** working ***** ************."
  • "*******. ***** *********** **** third ***** *******. **** to ** **** **** rather **** ***** **'* own ********."
  • "****** ******** ** ***** a *******, **** ******* use ********** ******** *** comms *********."
  • "** **** ******** ******** similar ** ********* **** are ****** ** ** with ***** ***** **** these ******* ***** *********** but **** ***** ******* those ***** ******* ** follow **** ** ****. So **** ***** ** nice *** * ***'* see **** ********* ******* soon."
  • "****** ******** *** ********** software ****** ****** ************ with ******* *****, ******* management ***** *** **** other ********* *****."

******, ** ***** *** pitiful ***** ** ****** openness ******* ** *** ****** ****************: ***** ******* ****. 

*****

************, **** ******** *************** was * '*** *' complaint. ****** ******** ********* the ********** ** ******* the ***** **** ********* in *** ******* ***, and **** ********* ******* variations ** ***** *** openings ** ****** **** locks * ***** *********

  • "******* ******** **'* *** door ********, ********** ** construction ********. **** ** the ******** ** ********* have ** ** **** the **** ******** *** its ************."
  • "* ***** **** ** see **** *************** ** locking ********. ***** ************* door ********* ****** ** able ** **** **** on * ******** ********, **** security standard **** ** ********* intrusive, ** ******* ********* objections. ******* **** ***** be **** **** ** vertically ******** ********* ******* of * ***, ** **** ********* on ******** ****** *******, we **** ** *** away **** ***** **** require ******* *******."
  • "** *** ***** ******* for * **** **** allows **** **********. ** our **********, *** *********** of *** ****** ******* system *** **** ******** and ******** ********* **% of *** **** ****** the ********* ** *** door ** ****. *** to ** **** ** need **** ******** **** the ****."
  • "**** ******** ********* ** be *** **** ******* and ********* ***** ** encounter **** *** ***********. You *** ****** * rock ***** ****** *** everything **** ** **** if *** **** *****'* operate ******** ** ***** properly. *'* *** **** how **** *** ** improved **** ** ******** perspective."
  • "*****: **** **** * lot ** ***** ** everyday ***. *'* ********* specifically ** *** ** locks *.*. *******, ***-***** and *******. ** * door *****'* *** **** then *** **** *****'* do *** *** ****. My ********** **** ******* electrified ***** *** **** much ******."
  • "******* ******** *** ****** door ****** ******** ** be *** ******* **** item **** *** **** variability. ******** ***** ** continue ** **** *** more *************** ** ******** and *********."

***** *** ***** ** lock ******* *** ******** is ****, **** *** a ****** ** ********* that ***** **** **** the **** *** **** specification. ***** ***** ******* for ****:

******

**** '*****-***' ******** ****'* not ***** ****** *********, but ** **** ***** voiced ****** *************** ***********.  **** credentials *** **** ********, to *** ******** ** mobile-based ***********, ******* **** the **** *** ******* to ******* ** ****** but ********* *****:

  • "**** ********. ** **** installed ******** ****** *** find **** **** ******** are *************, ******* ******** service *** ******** *** expensive."
  • "*********** *** **** ******** actually. **** ** *** hardware ** ****** ****, but *** ***** *** the ***** **** ** the ****."
  • "**** ********* ** *** door ****** **** ** DPS **** *******, *** sensors ** ****** ***** door ****** ******."
  • "*********** ******, **** *********."
  • "*'* ***** ** *** remote ****** **** * smartphone. * **** *** systems *** **** **** messages *** ***** ************* but ******** ***** ** app. *** ** **** to ***** ***** *** security ***** *********** ** someone's ***** ** ******."
  • "* ***** **** ** see * ****** ** faster **** *** ****** phone ***********. ***** *** HID **** ** *** only ********** *'* ***** of *** *** ********* fees *** ***** ** set ** ** ** mind *******. *'* **** it **** ******* *** with **** *****'* ******* of *** *** **** should **** **** ***** years *** **** ******* released ***."

Comments (8)

So true re the software.

This is a really good topic. Even though I agree with the comments on the first two issues (software&openess), in my world it's the lock hardware. There are dozens of manufactures that have different software and integration capabilites, but the lock hardware is basicly the same across all manufacturers. If you install the door hardware yourself, it's a much more managable experience. If you are in a construction project, it's a complete nightmare, especailly if it's a union job. The door hardware is spec'd by one company, the security controls by another, and the installation could be by the carpenter, electrician, door installer or others. Every construction project I have been involved in has been a nightmare from a door hardware standpoint. There are too many people involved, and everybody loses. The last project we installed was a high rise in Philly. The door company spec'd a separate power supply for every door. That's over 100 power supplies, with 120VAC power, for every door. We tried to value engineer it, but it was a loud "NO". Hardware specifying needs be fixed at the design and bid process; it is costing the owner s thousands of dollars in wasted expense. Extra power supplies, too many fire alarm releases, along with unqualified installers and specifiers equals disaster. The construction industry does amazing work, but this is an area that needs major improvements.

Agreed Eric - In our little part of the world a retro-fit is even more troublesome. Making it -work good + look good + stay good are the key differences between us and our competitors. Throw in the odd historic building and the cost to acheive the above might be higher than the cost of the hardware itself.

The company that I worked for has access control software, it already have an mobile app function. I wonder if this is something that most of the access control software brand don't have? Also I would like to know if what does user want to see on the mobile app, other than push alert for access/door/alarm event?

To answer your question, no they don't have mobile software (most). The chief complaint from my CUSTOMERS? It is to hard and cumbersome. We don't think we should have to go to school everytime we want to use the Access System. Too many levels, too many this, too much that....stop the madness!

I agree with integration.

Manufacturers do not listen, or they don't hear. I am not sure which, but there is a difference.

You hear comparisons made about the lack of open standards in Access compared to video, like this article. In these comparisons, people generally equate cameras with door controllers (and VMS's to access hosts).

This analogy is flawed: Cameras are much more like card readers. Door controllers are more akin to VMS's, where more functional value is added. Yes, ONVIF has seen widespread adoption in the VMS-to-Camera link....but use of ONVIF to connect from the VMS to layers above is practically non-existent.

In this light, OSDP is indeed finding traction in the controller-to-reader link, just as ONVIF has found success in the VMS-to-Camera link.

What ONVIF C is attempting to do is something that has not yet seen analogous success in video: An open standard from the VMS and above. Any differentiating feature Axis adds to the controller level has to be added to ONVIF C, and ONVIF C indirectly constrains a controller's operating logic to be set up a certain way, which may complicate adoption.

I support standards and I am certainly not advocating against them. In fact, I think peer-to-peer standards to share information between devices will make inroads Access. However, until there is a standard that allows an entire VMS to just drop right in to another system, I wouldn't expect to see it elsewhere.

Lock hardware will likely continue to be a significant issue, IMO. Besides having to deal with contractors, there's also the issue of dealing with building codes and fire marshalls (usually the Authority Having Jurisdiction - AHJ). We just completed a project where the FM had pre-authorized the use of regular locks (i.e. non-exit devices) for 2 pairs of doors, but, at final inspection he changed his mind. Besides the additional cost, there was lots of scrambling to get these doors re-fitted with new hardware. What a pain -- and nothing you can do about it, except comply.

Eric mentioned, on one of his projects, that the door supplier spec'd a separate power supply each for over 100 doors. I'm not surprised. Many major lock manufacturers (Von Duprin, Yale, etc) state clearly in their product specs that the locks must be used with their own power supplies otherwise they won't honor their warranty. And most of those require such high current power supplies that you can only connect up to 2 locks per PS -- and those have to be very short cable runs.

Sometimes architects can be difficult since they may be more concerned about the appearance of the door hardware (and code compliance) than ease of installation and connection.

There are some products from Schlage & Yale that integrate the lock, reader, wireless data-comm & power completely into the lock. (Locks are low power running entirely off everyday alkaline batteries -- and for respectible periods of time.) Pretty slick actually, but there is some maintenance required -- i.e. replacing batteries every 6 months or so. But sadly, distribution of that category of locks is limited to the college and university segment -- kinda like the hotel market. It's pretty hard for a "regular" integrator to be able to buy that stuff.

But sadly, distribution of that category of locks is limited to the college and university segment -- kinda like the hotel market. It's pretty hard for a "regular" integrator to be able to buy that stuff.

Hello Howard:

I think most of the Schlage AD-400 wireless series (and even certain Assa stuff) is available through ADI, Anixter, and other distributors.

I'm not sure that discounts will be lowest for integrators buying through national distribution vs. being a dealer themselves, but I think those products are generally available for 'regular' integrators to buy.

Does that sound right, or am I misunderstanding what you wrote?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Securing Access Control Installations Tutorial on Oct 17, 2019
The physical security of access control components is critical to ensuring that a facility is truly secure. Otherwise, the entire system can be...
Access Control Course Fall 2019 - Last Chance on Oct 17, 2019
Register Now - Fall 2019 Access Control Course. Thursday, October 17th is the last day to register. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access...
Altronix Claims Tango 'Eliminates Electricians' on Oct 15, 2019
Power supply provider Altronix claims its new Tango power supply 'eliminates the need for an electrician, dedicated conduit and wire runs'. In...
Pelco CEO Out, New CEO Found on Oct 15, 2019
Just 2 months after Pelco was sold, Pelco's CEO is out, with Pelco bringing in an outside President and searching for a new CEO from the industry,...
Camera Focusing Tutorial on Oct 14, 2019
Camera focus is fundamental to quality imaging. Mistakes can significantly reduce details, making cameras less effective. In this guide, we...
Last Chance - Register Now - October 2019 IP Networking Course on Oct 10, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - Fall 2019 IP Networking Course. The course starts next week. This is the only networking course designed...
Network Optix NxWitness 4.0 Tested on Oct 10, 2019
Network Optix released Nx Witness 4.0, proclaiming new features like a deep learning analytics metadata SDK, increased H.265 support, and UX...
HID Fingerprint Reader Tested on Oct 09, 2019
HID has released their first access reader to use Lumidigm optical sensors, that touts it 'works with anyone, anytime, anywhere'. We bought and...
ONVIF Suspends Dahua and Hikvision on Oct 09, 2019
Dahua and Hikvision have been 'suspended', and effectively expelled, from ONVIF, immediately following US sanctions being placed on the 2 mega...
Camera Cable Whip Guide on Oct 02, 2019
Cable whips are one of integrator's least favorite camera features but seem to be unavoidable, now commonplace on dome, turret, and bullet cameras...

Most Recent Industry Reports

US DoD Comments on Huawei, Hikvision, Dahua Cyber Security Concerns on Oct 16, 2019
A senior DoD official said the US is "concerned" with the cybersecurity of Hikvision, Dahua, and Huawei due to "CCP" (China Communist Party)...
Pelco Sarix Pro3 Camera Tested on Oct 16, 2019
Pelco has released their Sarix Professional Series 3 cameras, claiming "more security detail in challenging scenes with excellent low light and...
IPVM Camera Calculator User Manual / Guide on Oct 16, 2019
Learn how to use the IPVM Camera Calculator. The guide below includes instructions, images, gifs, and videos demonstrating and explaining the...
Altronix Claims Tango 'Eliminates Electricians' on Oct 15, 2019
Power supply provider Altronix claims its new Tango power supply 'eliminates the need for an electrician, dedicated conduit and wire runs'. In...
Pelco CEO Out, Seeking New Industry CEO, New CEO Found on Oct 15, 2019
Just 2 months after Pelco was sold, Pelco's CEO is out, with Pelco bringing in an outside President and searching for a new CEO from the industry,...
Hikvision Dissolves North American Business Unit, Splits Canada and USA on Oct 15, 2019
Hikvision has dissolved its North American Business Unit, splitting up US and Canada operations as the PRC-government owned manufacturer faces...
Camera Focusing Tutorial on Oct 14, 2019
Camera focus is fundamental to quality imaging. Mistakes can significantly reduce details, making cameras less effective. In this guide, we...
"UL Has Blood On Their Hands" Alleges The Interceptor / Keith Jentoft on Oct 14, 2019
"UL has blood on their hands" alleges Keith Jentoft of "The Interceptor Project". We examined The Interceptor in-depth last year, see: The...
Access Control Course Fall 2019 - Last Chance on Oct 14, 2019
Register Now - Fall 2019 Access Control Course. Thursday, October 17th is the last day to register. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access...
Axis HD Analog Encoder Tested on Oct 11, 2019
Two years after declaring "Everything is IP", Axis has released their first HD analog encoder, the P7304, with support for AHD, CVI, TVI, and SD...