Most Needed Improvement: Access Control Software

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 16, 2015

100 integrators answered IPVM's question:

"Which aspect/element of access control system technology (ie: credentials, locks, controllers, management software, system openness, etc) most needs to improve? Why?"

Software and openness were the clear top 2 responses.

Here's an overview of their answers:

 

In this note, we break down each of these themes, sharing detailed commentary from integrators about these problems.

*** *********** ******** ****'* question:

"***** ******/******* ** ****** control ****** ********** (**: credentials, *****, ***********, ********** software, ****** ********, ***) most ***** ** *******? Why?"

******** *** ******** **** the ***** *** * responses.

****'* ** ******** ** their *******:

 

** **** ****, ** break **** **** ** these ******, ******* ******** commentary **** *********** ***** these ********.

[***************]

Key ******

*** ******* ******* **** four ******* **********

  • ********:********* ** **** ******** centered ****** *** **********, features *** ********* ** the ******* **** *********.
  • ******** & ***********:***** ******* ********* *** difficulty ** ************* ** tying ******** ****** ******* with ******.
  • *****:**** *********** ********* *** needless ********** ** **********, installing, *** ********* ******** locksets.
  • ******:**** ******** *********** *******, that ***** *** ******** cited ***** ********* *********** and *********** **** ********** like ***********, ******* ********, or ********* *******.

** ******* **** ** these ******** ******* **** survey ******** ** *** sections **** ******.

********

**** **** **** **% of *** *****, *** strongest ********* *** **** access ******* ******** ***** to *******.  ********* ********** mentioned *** ***** **********, awkward ********, *** ******* features ** ******** ****** systems:

  • "********** ******** *** *** user. ** * ******** all **** ******* ** to ** **** ** view ***** *****, *** and ****** *****. **** our ********** **** *** overwhelmed ** *******."
  • "******** ***** ** ** behind ***** *** ******** up ** ****** ****** (mobile ****, **** ** use ***)."
  • "********. *** *** **** software ******** ** *** are ***** ****** ** what *** *********** ******** the **** ***** ***/** needs. *** ************* **** to ****** ****** *** take ** ***** **** an **** **** ** the ******** ** ***-***** and **********."
  • "********** ****** ******* ********, (i.e., ***-*****, **-*****, ***.) still ***** **** ******* 95."
  • "* ******* ** ******* the ********** ********, *** reason ** ** ******* credential ********** & ****** generation ***** ** ***** challenging ** *** **** of *** ********* ****** control ****** ************'*. ****, system ********, *** ****** is ** ******* *********** to *** ********* ******** system."
  • "***** ** ****** ********** on ****** ******* ********. Commoditization ** ********* ******* of **** ** **********."
  • "****** ********* *** *** kept ** ** **** and **** *** *** cumbersome. ** ***** ***** to *** *** ********. Graphical ******* *** ****** designed *** ********* ******** with *** *********."
  • "***** ****, *** ********** software. *** ******* ******* in ****** ******* ** user *****. **** ******** is ***********, ********** *** overly ***********, *** ****** for ******** ********* ************."

********** ** *** ********* or ***** ** ****** brand *** **, ********* about *** **** *** software *** ************ ******.  

Openness & ***********

******* ****** *********: ***** other ******* ******** **** access ** ********* ** impossible. ******* ********* ******** the **** **************** ******* different ******* *** ******* is ** ****** *** than ** **** *** been:

  • "****** ********. ***** *** clients **** ******** ****** control ********. ***** ** try ** ****** *** compatibility ******* *** *** and *** ****** **** a *** ********* ** implementation. ***** **** ** some **** ******** ** that ** *** ******* and *** ******** *******."
  • "*********** **** ***** *** VMS. *** *** ********* (such ** *****) *** the ****** ********* (**** as *********)**** *** ***** party ** ***** *** issues. ******* ***** **** take **************."
  • "*** ********** ****** ****** include ******** */* (**** and **********) / ******* system ** *********** ** SAP/other *** ***** ******* systems. ********* **** ** use *** ****** ******* system ** ******** ***** work **** ******* ***** / ******* ***** ** working ***** ************."
  • "*******. ***** *********** **** third ***** *******. **** to ** **** **** rather **** ***** **'* own ********."
  • "****** ******** ** ***** a *******, **** ******* use ********** ******** *** comms *********."
  • "** **** ******** ******** similar ** ********* **** are ****** ** ** with ***** ***** **** these ******* ***** *********** but **** ***** ******* those ***** ******* ** follow **** ** ****. So **** ***** ** nice *** * ***'* see **** ********* ******* soon."
  • "****** ******** *** ********** software ****** ****** ************ with ******* *****, ******* management ***** *** **** other ********* *****."

******, ** ***** *** pitiful ***** ** ****** openness ******* ** *** ****** ****************: ***** ******* ****. 

*****

************, **** ******** *************** was * '*** *' complaint. ****** ******** ********* the ********** ** ******* the ***** **** ********* in *** ******* ***, and **** ********* ******* variations ** ***** *** openings ** ****** **** locks * ***** *********

  • "******* ******** **'* *** door ********, ********** ** construction ********. **** ** the ******** ** ********* have ** ** **** the **** ******** *** its ************."
  • "* ***** **** ** see **** *************** ** locking ********. ***** ************* door ********* ****** ** able ** **** **** on * ******** ********, **** security standard **** ** ********* intrusive, ** ******* ********* objections. ******* **** ***** be **** **** ** vertically ******** ********* ******* of * ***, ** **** ********* on ******** ****** *******, we **** ** *** away **** ***** **** require ******* *******."
  • "** *** ***** ******* for * **** **** allows **** **********. ** our **********, *** *********** of *** ****** ******* system *** **** ******** and ******** ********* **% of *** **** ****** the ********* ** *** door ** ****. *** to ** **** ** need **** ******** **** the ****."
  • "**** ******** ********* ** be *** **** ******* and ********* ***** ** encounter **** *** ***********. You *** ****** * rock ***** ****** *** everything **** ** **** if *** **** *****'* operate ******** ** ***** properly. *'* *** **** how **** *** ** improved **** ** ******** perspective."
  • "*****: **** **** * lot ** ***** ** everyday ***. *'* ********* specifically ** *** ** locks *.*. *******, ***-***** and *******. ** * door *****'* *** **** then *** **** *****'* do *** *** ****. My ********** **** ******* electrified ***** *** **** much ******."
  • "******* ******** *** ****** door ****** ******** ** be *** ******* **** item **** *** **** variability. ******** ***** ** continue ** **** *** more *************** ** ******** and *********."

***** *** ***** ** lock ******* *** ******** is ****, **** *** a ****** ** ********* that ***** **** **** the **** *** **** specification. ***** ***** ******* for ****:

******

**** '*****-***' ******** ****'* not ***** ****** *********, but ** **** ***** voiced ****** *************** ***********.  **** credentials *** **** ********, to *** ******** ** mobile-based ***********, ******* **** the **** *** ******* to ******* ** ****** but ********* *****:

  • "**** ********. ** **** installed ******** ****** *** find **** **** ******** are *************, ******* ******** service *** ******** *** expensive."
  • "*********** *** **** ******** actually. **** ** *** hardware ** ****** ****, but *** ***** *** the ***** **** ** the ****."
  • "**** ********* ** *** door ****** **** ** DPS **** *******, *** sensors ** ****** ***** door ****** ******."
  • "*********** ******, **** *********."
  • "*'* ***** ** *** remote ****** **** * smartphone. * **** *** systems *** **** **** messages *** ***** ************* but ******** ***** ** app. *** ** **** to ***** ***** *** security ***** *********** ** someone's ***** ** ******."
  • "* ***** **** ** see * ****** ** faster **** *** ****** phone ***********. ***** *** HID **** ** *** only ********** *'* ***** of *** *** ********* fees *** ***** ** set ** ** ** mind *******. *'* **** it **** ******* *** with **** *****'* ******* of *** *** **** should **** **** ***** years *** **** ******* released ***."

Comments (8)

So true re the software.

This is a really good topic. Even though I agree with the comments on the first two issues (software&openess), in my world it's the lock hardware. There are dozens of manufactures that have different software and integration capabilites, but the lock hardware is basicly the same across all manufacturers. If you install the door hardware yourself, it's a much more managable experience. If you are in a construction project, it's a complete nightmare, especailly if it's a union job. The door hardware is spec'd by one company, the security controls by another, and the installation could be by the carpenter, electrician, door installer or others. Every construction project I have been involved in has been a nightmare from a door hardware standpoint. There are too many people involved, and everybody loses. The last project we installed was a high rise in Philly. The door company spec'd a separate power supply for every door. That's over 100 power supplies, with 120VAC power, for every door. We tried to value engineer it, but it was a loud "NO". Hardware specifying needs be fixed at the design and bid process; it is costing the owner s thousands of dollars in wasted expense. Extra power supplies, too many fire alarm releases, along with unqualified installers and specifiers equals disaster. The construction industry does amazing work, but this is an area that needs major improvements.

Agreed Eric - In our little part of the world a retro-fit is even more troublesome. Making it -work good + look good + stay good are the key differences between us and our competitors. Throw in the odd historic building and the cost to acheive the above might be higher than the cost of the hardware itself.

The company that I worked for has access control software, it already have an mobile app function. I wonder if this is something that most of the access control software brand don't have? Also I would like to know if what does user want to see on the mobile app, other than push alert for access/door/alarm event?

To answer your question, no they don't have mobile software (most). The chief complaint from my CUSTOMERS? It is to hard and cumbersome. We don't think we should have to go to school everytime we want to use the Access System. Too many levels, too many this, too much that....stop the madness!

I agree with integration.

Manufacturers do not listen, or they don't hear. I am not sure which, but there is a difference.

You hear comparisons made about the lack of open standards in Access compared to video, like this article. In these comparisons, people generally equate cameras with door controllers (and VMS's to access hosts).

This analogy is flawed: Cameras are much more like card readers. Door controllers are more akin to VMS's, where more functional value is added. Yes, ONVIF has seen widespread adoption in the VMS-to-Camera link....but use of ONVIF to connect from the VMS to layers above is practically non-existent.

In this light, OSDP is indeed finding traction in the controller-to-reader link, just as ONVIF has found success in the VMS-to-Camera link.

What ONVIF C is attempting to do is something that has not yet seen analogous success in video: An open standard from the VMS and above. Any differentiating feature Axis adds to the controller level has to be added to ONVIF C, and ONVIF C indirectly constrains a controller's operating logic to be set up a certain way, which may complicate adoption.

I support standards and I am certainly not advocating against them. In fact, I think peer-to-peer standards to share information between devices will make inroads Access. However, until there is a standard that allows an entire VMS to just drop right in to another system, I wouldn't expect to see it elsewhere.

Lock hardware will likely continue to be a significant issue, IMO. Besides having to deal with contractors, there's also the issue of dealing with building codes and fire marshalls (usually the Authority Having Jurisdiction - AHJ). We just completed a project where the FM had pre-authorized the use of regular locks (i.e. non-exit devices) for 2 pairs of doors, but, at final inspection he changed his mind. Besides the additional cost, there was lots of scrambling to get these doors re-fitted with new hardware. What a pain -- and nothing you can do about it, except comply.

Eric mentioned, on one of his projects, that the door supplier spec'd a separate power supply each for over 100 doors. I'm not surprised. Many major lock manufacturers (Von Duprin, Yale, etc) state clearly in their product specs that the locks must be used with their own power supplies otherwise they won't honor their warranty. And most of those require such high current power supplies that you can only connect up to 2 locks per PS -- and those have to be very short cable runs.

Sometimes architects can be difficult since they may be more concerned about the appearance of the door hardware (and code compliance) than ease of installation and connection.

There are some products from Schlage & Yale that integrate the lock, reader, wireless data-comm & power completely into the lock. (Locks are low power running entirely off everyday alkaline batteries -- and for respectible periods of time.) Pretty slick actually, but there is some maintenance required -- i.e. replacing batteries every 6 months or so. But sadly, distribution of that category of locks is limited to the college and university segment -- kinda like the hotel market. It's pretty hard for a "regular" integrator to be able to buy that stuff.

But sadly, distribution of that category of locks is limited to the college and university segment -- kinda like the hotel market. It's pretty hard for a "regular" integrator to be able to buy that stuff.

Hello Howard:

I think most of the Schlage AD-400 wireless series (and even certain Assa stuff) is available through ADI, Anixter, and other distributors.

I'm not sure that discounts will be lowest for integrators buying through national distribution vs. being a dealer themselves, but I think those products are generally available for 'regular' integrators to buy.

Does that sound right, or am I misunderstanding what you wrote?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Verkada Attacks ONVIF on Jun 27, 2019
Verkada has now gone after ONVIF, expanding its attacks against the 'dinosaurs' of the 'ancient' video surveillance industry. In a recent...
FLIR Saros Visible / Thermal Analytic Camera Tested on Jun 26, 2019
FLIR's Saros claims "accurate, actionable alerts" with a combination of 1080p visible and dual thermal sensors along with IR and white light...
Directory of 59 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
HID Mobile Tested on Jun 21, 2019
HID Global is one of the largest access brands, but their mobile access has had challenges. Indeed, the company has already restructured their...
IFSEC 2019 Show Report on Jun 19, 2019
The UK's largest trade show, IFSEC, is underway and IPVM has been examining what is new and happening at the show. Inside, we cover: Huawei...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...

Most Recent Industry Reports

HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Beware African 50,000 IP Camera Contract Scam on Jul 12, 2019
A “Nigerian Prince” scam for the video surveillance market is going around. You, or at least we, could be lucky enough to be the single bidder for...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact