Should Manufacturers Write A&E Specs?

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on May 08, 2012

Users depend on architects and engineers (A&Es) to design buildings that best meet their needs. However, many A&Es use specifications from door hardware manufacturers that give away specification writing 'services' for free, raising concerns about unfair influence by manufacturers. In this report, we examine these concerns and evaluate their impact on end users.

Role of Architects, Engineers, and Manufacturer 'Consultants'

While A&Es have broad responsibilities when designing buildings, they often lack skills and expertise in niche areas. For example, in a typical project, an A&E firm will design or specify various details including dirtwork, structural building design, plumbing and electrical plans, down to minutiae like placement of soap dispensers and finish paint color. The scope of knowledge demanded is very broad. As a result, many A&Es form relationships with consultants who specialize in particular building aspects.

In our market, a section named "Doors and Door Hardware" within CSI 'MasterFormat' Division 8: Openings is one such area where A&Es hire design specialists. A&Es welcome outside help here because the subject is technical and specialized. When door hardware manufacturers volunteer to write this spec, it becomes an opportunity for that manufacturer to fill out a hardware schedule with their own products, regardless if those products represent the best option available for the end user.

As on security consultant noted to us:

"The practice of manufacturers writing specifications for architects and engineers is very commonplace in the building construction industry. Most 'hardware consultants' that write door and lock hardware specs for A&Es are employees of manufacturers or commissioned manufacturer's reps. They come to the architect's office, review the drawings, and prepare a complete hardware schedule and hardware specifications - all for free. Most will also provide construction detail drawings at no charge that can be directly inserted into the architect's drawings."

What Do You Think?

Manufacturer Motivation

Manufacturers are motivated to provide this service for free because it allows them to specify their own products without engaging in a competitive sale. Since building plans and specification sets represent legal contracts, changes or deviations from the listed products are often not accepted. A manufacturer can easily write this specification with 'no substitutions' clauses unless specifically instructed not to do so by the A&E. Even if a specification permits alternatives, detailed specifications may be included by the manufacturer that can only be met with that manufacturer's products.

For example, this sample hardware specification from Sargent provides an example of how a 'manufacturer written specification' affects final project cost. In the specification, a 'Sargent 80 Series' exit device is the only accepted device listed. However, independent alternative products exist that conform to the same performance specification. Look at the pricing between Sargent and an equivalent offset product below:

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

If the specification were written in the 'best interest' of the customer, simple performance criteria of acceptable hardware would be given, e.g: "48 inch, ANSI Grade 1 rated, UL Fire Rated, Non-handed, US32D finish rim exit device". However, condensing that specification to a single sourced product costs this customer a significant premium.

Manufacturer Writing Specs

For decades, the largest manufacturers in door hardware have directly hired 'subject matter experts' in door hardware (AHCs) to write specifications. Today, it is difficult to find someone with the authorization to write these types of specifications who is not directly employed by a manufacturer, or who otherwise is not incentivized by a manufacturer to write manufacturer exclusive specifications.

One such program that is publicly promoted is from leading door hardware manufacturer, Ingersoll Rand, called "Write a Spec". Depending on project size, latitude to include IR product, and relationship value of A&E, IRCO writes spec at no cost or charges a nominal fee only to deliver a completed specification. IRCO is not alone in the strategy - Ingersoll Rand's largest competitor, ASSA ABLOY, also has a comprehensive 'Specification Writing Service' that seeks to 'compete' for market share in the same way.

The benefit for the manufacturer in the case is that they become the trusted consultant, and the result of their work is nominally reviewed by the A&E who is generally not an expert in this niche.

Ethical Concerns

We solicited the thoughts of independent consultants to gauge the depth of the problem. Their feedback was direct and pointed, stating "...A&Es and consultants who use manufacturers to write their specs are abdicating their responsibilities as design professionals", and "There are a few independent hardware consultants out there, but they have a tough time competing with the factory guys who will do the same work for free. Most architects are operating under a tight schedule and budget, and are happy to take advantage of any shortcuts that the manufacturer can provide."

The matter of 'fair compensation' also comes into play: When the customer enters into contract with an A&E firm to design a building, the cost of developing a Division 8 section is charged to the customer regardless if the A&E has this portion written for free by the manufacturer or not.


However, manufacturers might point out that:

  • Even so called 'independents' often have relationships with manufacturers and may be compensated, including fees that essentially become commissions. To the extent this happens, it might be even worse as the practice is hidden.
  • If A&Es attempt to do it themselves, given their frequent lack of expertise in this domain, they might deliver a bad design that actually hurts their end user.
  • Manufacturer consultants may be incented to specific competitor's products to keep the relationship up with an A&E and to ensure future specification work.

Big Manufacturers Conflict

When the A&E's elect to 'outsource' specification writing to Manufacturers, end user's best interests can be compromised. In an effort to manage workload, A&Es can simply find who among the large manufacturers is most willing to write the spec at the lowest price. The A&E becomes a 'middleman' in sharing end user requirements with the spec writers, and they may unwittingly poorly engineer or specify equipment because the manufacturer sees an opportunity to sell product.

Ultimately, if end users are fully aware that their A&E is subcontracting out parts of their design to bidders, so be it. However, we suspect that this often is not the case. At the very least, we hope this post helps expose end users to this potential risk.

2 reports cite this report:

The New $2 Billion Access Giant: dorma+kaba on May 01, 2015
The plan to merge two second-tier door hardware and access control companies may give birth to a new giant. Europe-based Dorma and Kaba plan to...
Allegion Releases Engage, Assa Aperio Competitor on Oct 29, 2014
Wireless locks are one of the fastest growing segments of access control. The biggest player in this market today is Assa Abbloy with their Aperio...

Related Reports

The Xiongmai Botnet 'Recall' Will Not Work on Oct 25, 2016
The Xiongmai 'recall' has been the topic of global news, following the unprecedented bot net attacks that use their equipment, among...
Get End User Leads for Just $997 A Month on Aug 31, 2016
Scam or opportunity? As trade mags continue to suffer from the decline of print media, they are scrounging for new ways to make money. Rather than...
Integrators Vs Manufacturers Direct To End Users on Aug 31, 2016
Many manufacturers have increasingly large and hungry sales forces that call on more and more end users. One recent example is Axis ~$20 Billion...
US Government Entities Hard Spec Hikvision on May 26, 2016
The US and Chinese governments are working together. Now, US government entities are not only buying video surveillance products from the Chinese...
Poorly Written College Town Camera RFP Examined on May 25, 2016
State College, PA issued an RFP for a neighborhood surveillance system that leaves out many key details required to invite qualified bids. We...
Videofield Launches Dealer / DIY Service Dragonfly on Jan 21, 2016
RSI Technologies, the company behind Videofied, has launched a new DIY offering called DragonFly. There are many DIY security / intrusion offerings...
Large Video Surveillance Systems Guide on Oct 29, 2015
This 14 page guide explains the key uses, design factors, and players in the large system surveillance market. A global group of 80...
Mega-OEMs vs Micro-Relabelers on Aug 04, 2015
Manufacturers like Dahua are sold under dozens, if not hundreds, of aliases in the United States alone. Companies doing it range from two stoners...
Arecont Pulls End User Marketing Claims on Jul 28, 2015
Manufacturers, you have to get explicit permission from end users and only state factually true claims about them. Arecont struggles to understand...
Milestone 'CARES' About End Users on Jun 16, 2015
Milestone has announced CARE which they tout cryptically as "Service Offerings for Continuous Return on Investment." If you are familiar with...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The Xiongmai Botnet 'Recall' Will Not Work on Oct 25, 2016
The Xiongmai 'recall' has been the topic of global news, following the unprecedented bot net attacks that use their equipment, among...
Hikvision Partners With Intel Movidius For Artificial intelligence Cameras on Oct 25, 2016
The world's largest camera manufacturer is partnering with the worlds largest semiconductor company to create a series of intelligent...
Intel Movidius Targets Video Surveillance Market on Oct 25, 2016
The most commonly used chips in IP cameras come from Ambarella, Hisilicon or TI. Now, Movidius, who Intel announced acquiring in September, is...
Favorite Access Control 2016 on Oct 25, 2016
Integrators told us "What is your favorite access control management software/system? Why?", and the responses are interesting indeed. While no...
Video Surveillance Manufacturers Risk Lawsuits For Botnet Attacks on Oct 24, 2016
The unprecedented scale of internet outages on October 21st from botnet attacks risk triggering lawsuits against video surveillance manufacturers,...
Mobile VMS Top Integrator Problems on Oct 24, 2016
In an IPVM survey, integrators report 4 problems most consistently with using mobile VMS applications: Network setup / cybersecurity...
Chinese Company Xiongmai Threatens Legal Action Against Western Accusers on Oct 24, 2016
The Chinese video surveillance manufacturer, Xiongmai, whose equipment numerous sources blame for driving massive Internet attacks over the past...
"WTF?!?!? Who is Brian Karas?!?" Exclaims Knightscope on Oct 21, 2016
Knightscope co-founder Stacy Stephens emailed us: He may not have intended to send it to us and he probably can figure out who Brian Karas is,...
Security Consultants Speak Episode 1 - Protus3 on Oct 21, 2016
This is a first of a series of conversations with security consultants. If you are a security consultant that wants to talk and can share frank...
Sony and Samsung Breaking VBR on Oct 21, 2016
For years, users have known variable bitrate (VBR) as one thing only: bandwidth varies, compression stays the same. This is not an accident but an...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact