Manufacturers Sound Off on ONVIF

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Sep 16, 2014

ONVIF has achieved massive adoption amidst significant criticism. The most vocal critics are typically from manufacturers who deal with ONVIF most directly.

Do those critics represent manufacturers overall? In this IPVM survey, we asked manufacturers:

  • "Has ONVIF helped or hurt your company?"
  • "How would you like to see ONVIF improve? What problem(s) do you want them to solve?"

The results surprised us:

***** *** ******** ******* adoption ****** *********** *********. *** most ***** ******* *** typically **** ************* *** deal **** ***** **** directly.

** ***** ******* ********* manufacturers *******? ** **** IPVM ******, ** ***** manufacturers:

  • "*** ***** ****** ** hurt **** *******?"
  • "*** ***** *** **** to *** ***** *******? What *******(*) ** *** want **** ** *****?"

*** ******* ********* **:

[***************]

********

*******, **** ************* *** positive ***** *****. ******, their ******** **** ****, in * ********** ****** like ************, ***** *** become * ****** **** to ****** **** ****, more ********, ***********.

Camera ************ *********

*** ************, ****** *************, especially ******* ****, *** overwhelmingly ******** ***** *****, with ******** *********:

  • "***** *** * ********** baseline, *** *** ******* a ***** **** *** integration ** * ***."
  • "***** *** ****** *** company ***** *** ************ produced ********** *** ****** cameras. *** **** ***** has *******, ** ****** the ***** *********** ** these ******* **** ******* involvement **** *** ******* VMS *********."
  • "***** *** ******. *********** with *** **** ********* small - *** **** is *********. **** **** integrate *** ****** *****. Thus***** *** ****** **."
  • "**** *** ************** ** ONVIF *.*/******* *, ** have **** * ****** increase ** ****************, **** with *** ****** *** partners *** **** *****'* gotten ****** ** *********** our ****** ***."
  • "******* *** * ***** manufacturer ***** ** **** advantage **** *** ******** is *** ** ******* as ******."

**** **** ***** *** perspectives, ***** ** ******* those ******* ****** ************* become ****** ****** * broader ******* ** *** company.

VMS Companies *******

******* ******** ************, ***** VMSes *** ***** *** not ** ********** *********, most *** ********* ***** ONVIF ** ** ***** helpful *** ****:

  • "** *** ****** ** with *** ********* *********, to ****** *** *** party ******* ** *** support."
  • "* ***** ****. ** do *** ********* *** cameras *** *** *** more *** **** ********* ONVIF."
  • "** ****** *** **** some *** ***** ** get ***** ******* ******* cameras **** *** ***."
  • "** **** **** ********* who **** ************ **** other ******* **** ** have ***** ***** **. This ********** ** *** goal."
  • "****** *********** ********* ** added ***** ******* ** basic ************."
  • "******. ** *** ******* partners * **** ******* to ********* ***** *******."

****** *** **** ************

*******, ****** ***** ****** less ************ ******* ***** ONVIF, **** *** ************** comments *********: 

"***** ******* ********* **** than *% ** ***** camera ***********, *** **** 25% ** ******* ********** and **** ******* *********. On *** ********, **'* a ********** ********* *** to *** *** ****** camera ******* **** *****'** otherwise ******** *********** ** a *** ****** ******."

"***** * *** ** time *************** ****** ** the ************ ****'* *********** ONVIF *******."

******* ***** *** *** an *********** ******** ** using ***** ** **** their ****** ******** *** quicker, **** ****** ************:

"** ******* ******* *********** submission **** *** ** our *********** ***** ******** before ** **** ***** the ************* *******. ** also ******* ****** ******** ONVIF ****** **** **** test *******"

#1 ******* - ***** ******** 

* *********** ******** ** ************ emphasized ****** ***** ************ as *** ***** #* problem:

  • "**** - ****** *******  integrators ****** ** *** cheap **** **** *** ONVIF ***** *** **** fail. ********* ** *** wreck ** ****** ****"
  • "** *** **** * ******* painful, ***** * *** of **** ***** ** not *****. **** *** VMSs******** *** **********, ******** ONVIF."
  • "***** ***** ** ** its ********* ******* ***** manufacturers: *) **** ********* a ******* ** ** 2) ***'* **** ** with *** *********" 
  • "**** **** ****** ***** versions **** *** *** fully **********. *** ***** revisions **** ****** **** hurdles ** *****"
  • "**** *** * ***** number ** *** ***********, even **** ********** ***** names **** ** ***** and **** *******"
  • "*** ** ******* *** pass *** ****** ***** test ***** *** *** certified ******* * ********* yet *** ******* ********** fail ** ***** **** because ***** ** ****** control ** ************* ** recorders."

#2 ******* - ******* ********

*** ****** ******* ******* expressed *** ******* ********, as ***** **** *** require ******** ******** ** be ********:

  • "**** ******** ** *** customer **** **** ***** is ********, *******, ******* like *** *******, *****, etc **** *** ******** uses ******* ******** ****`* when *** ******* **** stars."
  • "*** ****** *********** **** customers *** ******** * ONVIF ******* **** ********* companies ** *** **** work, *** ** ********** the ******** ******."
  • "** **** **** ** has **** ** ******* the ************ ******* *** sometimes **** ******** ** using *** ****** ****** language."

Comments (7)

Before Profile S, a few black eyes, since Profile S been very successful. Would still recommend getting a copy of VMS and a demo/loaner camera to test. Overall, happy with ONVIF Profile S, waiting to see how other Profiles work out with Access Control integrations and edge storage, etc.

Disclosure: I am a manufacturer's rep, so I know the headache of "will my recorder/software work with this camera?" And vice versa...all while holding my lucky rabbit's foot, BEFORE Profile S, that is

At least in my experience, ONVIF device compatibility is still hit or miss, even with major manufacturers' cameras. Problems range from cameras' inability to Multicast via ONVIF to cameras unable to sync to our time server to problems controlling PTZs.

Carl, what VMSes are you using?

IndigoVision. But at least two of the three issues I pointed out are not VMS-specific.

The issue with time sync of the cameras is an incompatibility between the cameras and our Time Server, a Spectracom NetClock 9489. That is something both manufacturers whose cameras we're having problems with appear to agree on (Bosch and Vivotek). Other third party cameras we've tried synced fine.

The issues with PTZ control are that with most third party IP PTZs, control is "flaky". By that I mean that PTZ movements are jerky and not smooth. Also, the PTZs often "overshoot" when the joystick is released. It is my understanding that problem is common with many VMS' and PTZs.

Finally, the Multicast issue. I would assign equal blame to the camera(s), IndigoVision and our need to be able to access multiple simultaneous streams. Granted, at least some VMS' can internally redistribute a single stream to multiple clients without the need for a Proxy Server that IV requires but I am not aware if that is common with ONVIF streams or not.

Isn't it possible that your "overshoot" problem is due to input lag?

B,

I don't think so. Sony, Bosch and Pelco IP PTZs exhibited the "run-on" while JVC does not. In fact, the JVC PTZ had the best functionality we observed, next to IndigoVision's own cameras.

Great report!

Your survey results suggest that standardization is welcome, which implies that ONVIF standards, tools, and certifications might benefit from further refinement.

In our experience, early standards can only be as good as whatever the designers were able to imagine, so it is not uncommon for initial specifications to have unforeseen incompatibilities across implementations. Does anyone remember early Windows plug and play, or early wifi? Forward thinking organizations improve their early standards and tools until it is relatively straightforward for vendors to achieve compatibility. Ethernet seems to be a good example of very robust implementation of a complex standard, with mechanisms for improvement which don't break prior implementations.

For organizations that don't focus on compatibility, the "standard" is whatever it is, warts and all.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

FLIR Saros Visible / Thermal Analytic Camera Tested on Jun 26, 2019
FLIR's Saros claims "accurate, actionable alerts" with a combination of 1080p visible and dual thermal sensors along with IR and white light...
Axis Live Privacy Shield Analytics Tested on Jun 25, 2019
Privacy is becoming a bigger factor in video surveillance, driven both by increased public awareness and by GDPR. Now, Axis has released Live...
Directory of 55 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Genetec Beats Milestone For IHS #1 on Jun 21, 2019
For years, Milestone has touted that they are the #1 VMS. Now, Genetec has beaten them in IHS rankings. But what is this? Even other manufacturers...
Exacq Remote Cloud Access Tested on Jun 20, 2019
Remote cloud access has been missing from most VMSes (including Exacq and Milestone). Now, Exacq, after releasing Cloud Drive Storage earlier in...
IFSEC 2019 Show Report on Jun 19, 2019
The UK's largest trade show, IFSEC, is underway and IPVM has been examining what is new and happening at the show. Inside, we cover: Huawei...
Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Startup Vaion Launching End-to-End AI Solution Backed with $20 Million Funding on Jun 17, 2019
An EU / USA video surveillance startup, Vaion, founded by ex-Cisco Senior Directors is launching an end-to-end VSaaS platform with $20 million in...
Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider Profile on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...
Embattled $400 Million China Funded Philippines Surveillance System Proceeds on Jun 13, 2019
An embattled 12,000 camera surveillance system project that will cost ~$400 million will proceed.  The project contract was awarded, had its...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Security Dealer 'Social Media Contractor' Program on Jun 25, 2019
A $20,000 video surveillance system can be yours for free if you are willing to post on social media about the security dealer. Good deal, bad...
Axis Live Privacy Shield Analytics Tested on Jun 25, 2019
Privacy is becoming a bigger factor in video surveillance, driven both by increased public awareness and by GDPR. Now, Axis has released Live...
Directory of 55 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Hikvision ColorVu Camera Tested on Jun 24, 2019
Hikvision says their new ColorVu line captures "vivid chromatic images in darkness", with unconventional white light illuminations whereas most...
China Subway Facial Recognition System Examined on Jun 24, 2019
A China city of 6+ million people has installed facial recognition-enabled gates in subways, allowing commuters to enter stations by simply showing...
HID Mobile Tested on Jun 21, 2019
HID Global is one of the largest access brands, but their mobile access has had challenges. Indeed, the company has already restructured their...
Genetec Beats Milestone For IHS #1 on Jun 21, 2019
For years, Milestone has touted that they are the #1 VMS. Now, Genetec has beaten them in IHS rankings. But what is this? Even other manufacturers...
Risk of Amazon Alexa Guard: No Battery Or Cell Backup on Jun 20, 2019
Amazon positions its Alexa Guard Service as a "smart home security system" and says it can help you "keep your home safe". However, the...
Exacq Remote Cloud Access Tested on Jun 20, 2019
Remote cloud access has been missing from most VMSes (including Exacq and Milestone). Now, Exacq, after releasing Cloud Drive Storage earlier in...
Briefcam Buys Frost Award* on Jun 20, 2019
Frost 'awards' are well-known and widely disrespected. Now Briefcam is touting their win. The way it has worked for many years is that Frost...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact