Manufacturers Sound Off on ONVIF

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Sep 16, 2014

ONVIF has achieved massive adoption amidst significant criticism. The most vocal critics are typically from manufacturers who deal with ONVIF most directly.

Do those critics represent manufacturers overall? In this IPVM survey, we asked manufacturers:

  • "Has ONVIF helped or hurt your company?"
  • "How would you like to see ONVIF improve? What problem(s) do you want them to solve?"

The results surprised us:

***** *** ******** ******* ******** ****** *********** *********. *** **** ***** critics *** ********* **** ************* *** **** **** ***** **** directly.

** ***** ******* ********* ************* *******? ** **** **** ******, we ***** *************:

  • "*** ***** ****** ** **** **** *******?"
  • "*** ***** *** **** ** *** ***** *******? **** *******(*) do *** **** **** ** *****?"

*** ******* ********* **:

[***************]

********

*******, **** ************* *** ******** ***** *****. ******, ***** ******** show ****, ** * ********** ****** **** ************, ***** *** become * ****** **** ** ****** **** ****, **** ********, more*******.

Camera ************ *********

*** ************, ****** *************, ********** ******* ****, *** ************** ******** about *****, **** ******** *********:

  • "***** *** * ********** ********, *** *** ******* * ***** path *** *********** ** * ***."
  • "***** *** ****** *** ******* ***** *** ************ ******** ********** low ****** *******. *** **** ***** *** *******, ** ****** the ***** *********** ** ***** ******* **** ******* *********** **** the ******* *** *********."
  • "***** *** ******. *********** **** *** **** ********* ***** - mid **** ** *********. **** **** ********* *** ****** *****. Thus***** *** ****** **."
  • "**** *** ************** ** ***** *.*/******* *, ** **** **** a ****** ******** ** ****************, **** **** *** ****** *** partners *** **** *****'* ****** ****** ** *********** *** ****** SDK."
  • "******* *** * ***** ************ ***** ** **** ********* **** our ******** ** *** ** ******* ** ******."

**** **** ***** *** ************, ***** ** ******* ***** ******* camera ************* ****** ****** ****** * ******* ******* ** *** company.

VMS Companies *******

******* ******** ************, ***** ***** *** ***** *** *** ** frequently *********, **** *** ********* ***** ***** ** ** ***** helpful *** ****:

  • "** *** ****** ** **** *** ********* *********, ** ****** the *** ***** ******* ** *** *******."
  • "* ***** ****. ** ** *** ********* *** ******* *** SDK *** **** *** **** ********* *****."
  • "** ****** *** **** **** *** ***** ** *** ***** unknown ******* ******* **** *** ***."
  • "** **** **** ********* *** **** ************ **** ***** ******* that ** **** ***** ***** **. **** ********** ** *** goal."
  • "****** *********** ********* ** ***** ***** ******* ** ***** ************."
  • "******. ** *** ******* ******** * **** ******* ** ********* their *******."

****** *** **** ************

*******, ****** ***** ****** **** ************ ******* ***** *****, **** two ************** ******** *********: 

"***** ******* ********* **** **** *% ** ***** ****** ***********, but **** **% ** ******* ********** *** **** ******* *********. On *** ********, **'* * ********** ********* *** ** *** low ****** ****** ******* **** *****'** ********* ******** *********** ** a *** ****** ******."

"***** * *** ** **** *************** ****** ** *** ************ hasn't *********** ***** *******."

******* ***** *** *** ** *********** ******** ** ***** ***** to **** ***** ****** ******** *** *******, **** ****** ************:

"** ******* ******* *********** ********** **** *** ** *** *********** ONVIF ******** ****** ** **** ***** *** ************* *******. ** also ******* ****** ******** ***** ****** **** **** **** *******"

#1 ******* - ***** ******** 

* *********** ******** ** ************ ********** ****** ***** ************ ** *** clear #* *******:

  • "**** - ****** *******  *********** ****** ** *** ***** **** with *** ***** ***** *** **** ****. ********* ** *** wreck ** ****** ****"
  • "** *** **** * ******* *******, ***** * *** ** **** ONVIF ** *** *****. **** *** ************ *** **********, ******** *****."
  • "***** ***** ** ** *** ********* ******* ***** *************: *) Only ********* * ******* ** ** *) ***'* **** ** with *** *********" 
  • "**** **** ****** ***** ******** **** *** *** ***** **********. The ***** ********* **** ****** **** ******* ** *****"
  • "**** *** * ***** ****** ** *** ***********, **** **** mainstream ***** ***** **** ** ***** *** **** *******"
  • "*** ** ******* *** **** *** ****** ***** **** ***** and *** ********* ******* * ********* *** *** ******* ********** fail ** ***** **** ******* ***** ** ****** ******* ** qualification ** *********."

#2 ******* - ******* ********

*** ****** ******* ******* ********* *** ******* ********, ** ***** does *** ******* ******** ******** ** ** ********:

  • "**** ******** ** *** ******** **** **** ***** ** ********, however, ******* **** *** *******, *****, *** **** *** ******** uses ******* ******** ****`* **** *** ******* **** *****."
  • "*** ****** *********** **** ********* *** ******** * ***** ******* from ********* ********* ** *** **** ****, *** ** ********** the ******** ******."
  • "** **** **** ** *** **** ** ******* *** ************ results *** ********* **** ******** ** ***** *** ****** ****** language."

Comments (7)

Before Profile S, a few black eyes, since Profile S been very successful. Would still recommend getting a copy of VMS and a demo/loaner camera to test. Overall, happy with ONVIF Profile S, waiting to see how other Profiles work out with Access Control integrations and edge storage, etc.

Disclosure: I am a manufacturer's rep, so I know the headache of "will my recorder/software work with this camera?" And vice versa...all while holding my lucky rabbit's foot, BEFORE Profile S, that is

At least in my experience, ONVIF device compatibility is still hit or miss, even with major manufacturers' cameras. Problems range from cameras' inability to Multicast via ONVIF to cameras unable to sync to our time server to problems controlling PTZs.

Carl, what VMSes are you using?

IndigoVision. But at least two of the three issues I pointed out are not VMS-specific.

The issue with time sync of the cameras is an incompatibility between the cameras and our Time Server, a Spectracom NetClock 9489. That is something both manufacturers whose cameras we're having problems with appear to agree on (Bosch and Vivotek). Other third party cameras we've tried synced fine.

The issues with PTZ control are that with most third party IP PTZs, control is "flaky". By that I mean that PTZ movements are jerky and not smooth. Also, the PTZs often "overshoot" when the joystick is released. It is my understanding that problem is common with many VMS' and PTZs.

Finally, the Multicast issue. I would assign equal blame to the camera(s), IndigoVision and our need to be able to access multiple simultaneous streams. Granted, at least some VMS' can internally redistribute a single stream to multiple clients without the need for a Proxy Server that IV requires but I am not aware if that is common with ONVIF streams or not.

Isn't it possible that your "overshoot" problem is due to input lag?

B,

I don't think so. Sony, Bosch and Pelco IP PTZs exhibited the "run-on" while JVC does not. In fact, the JVC PTZ had the best functionality we observed, next to IndigoVision's own cameras.

Great report!

Your survey results suggest that standardization is welcome, which implies that ONVIF standards, tools, and certifications might benefit from further refinement.

In our experience, early standards can only be as good as whatever the designers were able to imagine, so it is not uncommon for initial specifications to have unforeseen incompatibilities across implementations. Does anyone remember early Windows plug and play, or early wifi? Forward thinking organizations improve their early standards and tools until it is relatively straightforward for vendors to achieve compatibility. Ethernet seems to be a good example of very robust implementation of a complex standard, with mechanisms for improvement which don't break prior implementations.

For organizations that don't focus on compatibility, the "standard" is whatever it is, warts and all.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Verkada Salesman: IPVM "Stuck In A The Stone Age" on Apr 25, 2019
Verkada is 'tackling dinosaurs' and battling those, like IPVM, who are 'stuck in a the stone age'. Verkada's recent sales recruiting promotion...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada on Apr 17, 2019
Verkada has the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever. In less than 2 years, they already have more salespeople in the US...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...
Axis Supports HD Analog on Apr 15, 2019
In 2017, Axis declared 'Everything is IP': Now, in 2019, Axis has released support for HD analog, with their new encoders.  Why the change?...
ISC West 2019 Report on Apr 12, 2019
The IPVM team has finished at the Sands looking at what companies are offering and how they are changing their positioning. See below for 50+...
Spring 2019 50+ New Products Directory on Apr 08, 2019
We are compiling a list of new products for Spring 2019 and have over 50 already. Contrast to Fall 2018 New Products Directory and Spring 2018...
Airship VMS Profile on Apr 03, 2019
Airship has been developing VMS software for over 10 years, however, with no outside investment, and minimal marketing, the company is not well...
Dahua Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 01, 2019
Dahua favorability declined, in IPVM's 2019 integrator favorability series, driven by their backdoors, resulting in mass hacking and US government...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada Salesman: IPVM "Stuck In A The Stone Age" on Apr 25, 2019
Verkada is 'tackling dinosaurs' and battling those, like IPVM, who are 'stuck in a the stone age'. Verkada's recent sales recruiting promotion...
The HIVIDEO $31 Face Detection DVR Tested on Apr 25, 2019
Face detection in a $31 DVR? That is what "HIVIDEO" (not to be confused with Hikvision, even if the company intends to do that) was promoting at...
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact