Manufacturers Sound Off on ONVIF

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Sep 16, 2014

ONVIF has achieved massive adoption amidst significant criticism. The most vocal critics are typically from manufacturers who deal with ONVIF most directly.

Do those critics represent manufacturers overall? In this IPVM survey, we asked manufacturers:

  • "Has ONVIF helped or hurt your company?"
  • "How would you like to see ONVIF improve? What problem(s) do you want them to solve?"

The results surprised us:

***** *** ******** ******* ******** ****** *********** *********. *** **** ***** critics *** ********* **** ************* *** **** **** ***** **** directly.

** ***** ******* ********* ************* *******? ** **** **** ******, we ***** *************:

  • "*** ***** ****** ** **** **** *******?"
  • "*** ***** *** **** ** *** ***** *******? **** *******(*) do *** **** **** ** *****?"

*** ******* ********* **:

[***************]

********

*******, **** ************* *** ******** ***** *****. ******, ***** ******** show ****, ** * ********** ****** **** ************, ***** *** become * ****** **** ** ****** **** ****, **** ********, more*******.

Camera ************ *********

*** ************, ****** *************, ********** ******* ****, *** ************** ******** about *****, **** ******** *********:

  • "***** *** * ********** ********, *** *** ******* * ***** path *** *********** ** * ***."
  • "***** *** ****** *** ******* ***** *** ************ ******** ********** low ****** *******. *** **** ***** *** *******, ** ****** the ***** *********** ** ***** ******* **** ******* *********** **** the ******* *** *********."
  • "***** *** ******. *********** **** *** **** ********* ***** - mid **** ** *********. **** **** ********* *** ****** *****. Thus***** *** ****** **."
  • "**** *** ************** ** ***** *.*/******* *, ** **** **** a ****** ******** ** ****************, **** **** *** ****** *** partners *** **** *****'* ****** ****** ** *********** *** ****** SDK."
  • "******* *** * ***** ************ ***** ** **** ********* **** our ******** ** *** ** ******* ** ******."

**** **** ***** *** ************, ***** ** ******* ***** ******* camera ************* ****** ****** ****** * ******* ******* ** *** company.

VMS Companies *******

******* ******** ************, ***** ***** *** ***** *** *** ** frequently *********, **** *** ********* ***** ***** ** ** ***** helpful *** ****:

  • "** *** ****** ** **** *** ********* *********, ** ****** the *** ***** ******* ** *** *******."
  • "* ***** ****. ** ** *** ********* *** ******* *** SDK *** **** *** **** ********* *****."
  • "** ****** *** **** **** *** ***** ** *** ***** unknown ******* ******* **** *** ***."
  • "** **** **** ********* *** **** ************ **** ***** ******* that ** **** ***** ***** **. **** ********** ** *** goal."
  • "****** *********** ********* ** ***** ***** ******* ** ***** ************."
  • "******. ** *** ******* ******** * **** ******* ** ********* their *******."

****** *** **** ************

*******, ****** ***** ****** **** ************ ******* ***** *****, **** two ************** ******** *********: 

"***** ******* ********* **** **** *% ** ***** ****** ***********, but **** **% ** ******* ********** *** **** ******* *********. On *** ********, **'* * ********** ********* *** ** *** low ****** ****** ******* **** *****'** ********* ******** *********** ** a *** ****** ******."

"***** * *** ** **** *************** ****** ** *** ************ hasn't *********** ***** *******."

******* ***** *** *** ** *********** ******** ** ***** ***** to **** ***** ****** ******** *** *******, **** ****** ************:

"** ******* ******* *********** ********** **** *** ** *** *********** ONVIF ******** ****** ** **** ***** *** ************* *******. ** also ******* ****** ******** ***** ****** **** **** **** *******"

#1 ******* - ***** ******** 

* *********** ******** ** ************ ********** ****** ***** ************ ** *** clear #* *******:

  • "**** - ****** *******  *********** ****** ** *** ***** **** with *** ***** ***** *** **** ****. ********* ** *** wreck ** ****** ****"
  • "** *** **** * ******* *******, ***** * *** ** **** ONVIF ** *** *****. **** *** ************ *** **********, ******** *****."
  • "***** ***** ** ** *** ********* ******* ***** *************: *) Only ********* * ******* ** ** *) ***'* **** ** with *** *********" 
  • "**** **** ****** ***** ******** **** *** *** ***** **********. The ***** ********* **** ****** **** ******* ** *****"
  • "**** *** * ***** ****** ** *** ***********, **** **** mainstream ***** ***** **** ** ***** *** **** *******"
  • "*** ** ******* *** **** *** ****** ***** **** ***** and *** ********* ******* * ********* *** *** ******* ********** fail ** ***** **** ******* ***** ** ****** ******* ** qualification ** *********."

#2 ******* - ******* ********

*** ****** ******* ******* ********* *** ******* ********, ** ***** does *** ******* ******** ******** ** ** ********:

  • "**** ******** ** *** ******** **** **** ***** ** ********, however, ******* **** *** *******, *****, *** **** *** ******** uses ******* ******** ****`* **** *** ******* **** *****."
  • "*** ****** *********** **** ********* *** ******** * ***** ******* from ********* ********* ** *** **** ****, *** ** ********** the ******** ******."
  • "** **** **** ** *** **** ** ******* *** ************ results *** ********* **** ******** ** ***** *** ****** ****** language."

Comments (7)

Before Profile S, a few black eyes, since Profile S been very successful. Would still recommend getting a copy of VMS and a demo/loaner camera to test. Overall, happy with ONVIF Profile S, waiting to see how other Profiles work out with Access Control integrations and edge storage, etc.

Disclosure: I am a manufacturer's rep, so I know the headache of "will my recorder/software work with this camera?" And vice versa...all while holding my lucky rabbit's foot, BEFORE Profile S, that is

At least in my experience, ONVIF device compatibility is still hit or miss, even with major manufacturers' cameras. Problems range from cameras' inability to Multicast via ONVIF to cameras unable to sync to our time server to problems controlling PTZs.

Carl, what VMSes are you using?

IndigoVision. But at least two of the three issues I pointed out are not VMS-specific.

The issue with time sync of the cameras is an incompatibility between the cameras and our Time Server, a Spectracom NetClock 9489. That is something both manufacturers whose cameras we're having problems with appear to agree on (Bosch and Vivotek). Other third party cameras we've tried synced fine.

The issues with PTZ control are that with most third party IP PTZs, control is "flaky". By that I mean that PTZ movements are jerky and not smooth. Also, the PTZs often "overshoot" when the joystick is released. It is my understanding that problem is common with many VMS' and PTZs.

Finally, the Multicast issue. I would assign equal blame to the camera(s), IndigoVision and our need to be able to access multiple simultaneous streams. Granted, at least some VMS' can internally redistribute a single stream to multiple clients without the need for a Proxy Server that IV requires but I am not aware if that is common with ONVIF streams or not.

Isn't it possible that your "overshoot" problem is due to input lag?

B,

I don't think so. Sony, Bosch and Pelco IP PTZs exhibited the "run-on" while JVC does not. In fact, the JVC PTZ had the best functionality we observed, next to IndigoVision's own cameras.

Great report!

Your survey results suggest that standardization is welcome, which implies that ONVIF standards, tools, and certifications might benefit from further refinement.

In our experience, early standards can only be as good as whatever the designers were able to imagine, so it is not uncommon for initial specifications to have unforeseen incompatibilities across implementations. Does anyone remember early Windows plug and play, or early wifi? Forward thinking organizations improve their early standards and tools until it is relatively straightforward for vendors to achieve compatibility. Ethernet seems to be a good example of very robust implementation of a complex standard, with mechanisms for improvement which don't break prior implementations.

For organizations that don't focus on compatibility, the "standard" is whatever it is, warts and all.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Hanwha Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (PNM-7000VD) on Oct 18, 2018
Hanwha has introduced their first dual-imager model, the PNM-7000VD, a twin 1080p model featuring independently positionable sensors and a snap-in...
Integrator Laptop Guide on Oct 16, 2018
This 18-page guide provides guidance and statistics about integrator laptop use. 150 integrators explained to IPVM in detail about their laptops,...
Mysterious Patent Troll 'Secure Cam' Targets Industry, Sues Hanwha, Hikvison, JCI, Panasonic, More on Oct 11, 2018
A company named "Secure Cam," who is actively hiding their ownership, has acquired a slew of video patents and is systematically suing video...
Security System Health Monitoring Usage Statistics 2018 on Oct 09, 2018
How well and quickly do integrators know if devices are offline or broken? New IPVM statistics show that typically no health monitoring is...
IACP 2018 Police Show Final Report on Oct 08, 2018
IPVM went to Orlando to cover the 2018 IACP conference, the country's largest police show (about as big as ASIS), examining the 700+...
Last Chance - October 2018 Camera Course on Oct 04, 2018
Today is the last day to register for the October 2018 Camera Course, register now. This is the only independent surveillance camera course,...
VMS Mobile App Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone on Oct 01, 2018
Mobile VMS apps are a critical interface for the modern surveillance user. But who does it best and worst? We tested 6 manufacturers - Avigilon,...
Hikvision 4MP Camera Tested (DS-2CD2345FWD-I) on Sep 27, 2018
Hikvision's latest Performance Series / EasyIP 3.0 4MP model, the DS-2CD2345FWD-I, was the top performer in our 4MP shootout, besting rivals from...
ASIS GSX 2018 Show Report on Sep 25, 2018
In the first major US show since the US government ban of Dahua and Hikvision was passed into law, the mega Chinese companies were in retreat and...
4MP Camera Shootout - Axis, Dahua, DW, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Sep 24, 2018
4MP usage continues to climb, especially for low cost fixed lens models. To see who was best, we bought and tested seven 4MP models from Axis,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Startup SafePass Profile on Oct 19, 2018
A major problem with visitor management is that the systems mostly require adhesive printed paper labels and paper logs, creating waste and an...
China Is Not A Security Megatrend, Says SIA on Oct 19, 2018
The US Security Industry Association has released its 10 "Security Megatrends" for 2019. SIA declares that these megatrends, such as "Advanced...
Hanwha Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (PNM-7000VD) on Oct 18, 2018
Hanwha has introduced their first dual-imager model, the PNM-7000VD, a twin 1080p model featuring independently positionable sensors and a snap-in...
Camera Height / Blind Spot Added to IPVM Camera Calculator on Oct 18, 2018
IPVM has added camera height and blind spot estimation to the Camera Calculator. This is especially helpful for those who need to mount cameras up...
Axis Strong US Growth, Flat EMEA - Q3 2018 Financials on Oct 18, 2018
This spring, Axis had its best financials in many years (see Axis Strong Q2 2018 Results). However, over the summer, Axis had many products sold...
Best Alternatives to Banned Dahua and Hikvision on Oct 17, 2018
With the US government ban and a growing number of users banning Dahua and Hikvision, one key question is what to use for low cost? While Dahua and...
Video Quality / Compression Tutorial on Oct 17, 2018
While CODECs, like H.264, H.265, and MJPEG, get a lot of attention, a camera's 'quality' or compression setting has a big impact on overall...
Knightscope Winning Investors, Struggling With Growth on Oct 16, 2018
While Knightscope's new financials show the company only winning 11 new customers in the past 12 months, the company continues to win new...
Integrator Laptop Guide on Oct 16, 2018
This 18-page guide provides guidance and statistics about integrator laptop use. 150 integrators explained to IPVM in detail about their laptops,...
Huawei Admits AI "Bubble" on Oct 16, 2018
A fascinating article from the Chinese government's Global Times: Huawei’s AI ambition to reshape industries. While the Global Times talks about...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact