Manufacturers Sound Off on ONVIF

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Sep 16, 2014

ONVIF has achieved massive adoption amidst significant criticism. The most vocal critics are typically from manufacturers who deal with ONVIF most directly.

Do those critics represent manufacturers overall? In this IPVM survey, we asked manufacturers:

  • "Has ONVIF helped or hurt your company?"
  • "How would you like to see ONVIF improve? What problem(s) do you want them to solve?"

The results surprised us:

***** *** ******** ******* adoption ****** *********** *********. *** most ***** ******* *** typically **** ************* *** deal **** ***** **** directly.

** ***** ******* ********* manufacturers *******? ** **** IPVM ******, ** ***** manufacturers:

  • "*** ***** ****** ** hurt **** *******?"
  • "*** ***** *** **** to *** ***** *******? What *******(*) ** *** want **** ** *****?"

*** ******* ********* **:

[***************]

********

*******, **** ************* *** positive ***** *****. ******, their ******** **** ****, in * ********** ****** like ************, ***** *** become * ****** **** to ****** **** ****, more ********, ***********.

Camera ************ *********

*** ************, ****** *************, especially ******* ****, *** overwhelmingly ******** ***** *****, with ******** *********:

  • "***** *** * ********** baseline, *** *** ******* a ***** **** *** integration ** * ***."
  • "***** *** ****** *** company ***** *** ************ produced ********** *** ****** cameras. *** **** ***** has *******, ** ****** the ***** *********** ** these ******* **** ******* involvement **** *** ******* VMS *********."
  • "***** *** ******. *********** with *** **** ********* small - *** **** is *********. **** **** integrate *** ****** *****. Thus***** *** ****** **."
  • "**** *** ************** ** ONVIF *.*/******* *, ** have **** * ****** increase ** ****************, **** with *** ****** *** partners *** **** *****'* gotten ****** ** *********** our ****** ***."
  • "******* *** * ***** manufacturer ***** ** **** advantage **** *** ******** is *** ** ******* as ******."

**** **** ***** *** perspectives, ***** ** ******* those ******* ****** ************* become ****** ****** * broader ******* ** *** company.

VMS Companies *******

******* ******** ************, ***** VMSes *** ***** *** not ** ********** *********, most *** ********* ***** ONVIF ** ** ***** helpful *** ****:

  • "** *** ****** ** with *** ********* *********, to ****** *** *** party ******* ** *** support."
  • "* ***** ****. ** do *** ********* *** cameras *** *** *** more *** **** ********* ONVIF."
  • "** ****** *** **** some *** ***** ** get ***** ******* ******* cameras **** *** ***."
  • "** **** **** ********* who **** ************ **** other ******* **** ** have ***** ***** **. This ********** ** *** goal."
  • "****** *********** ********* ** added ***** ******* ** basic ************."
  • "******. ** *** ******* partners * **** ******* to ********* ***** *******."

****** *** **** ************

*******, ****** ***** ****** less ************ ******* ***** ONVIF, **** *** ************** comments *********: 

"***** ******* ********* **** than *% ** ***** camera ***********, *** **** 25% ** ******* ********** and **** ******* *********. On *** ********, **'* a ********** ********* *** to *** *** ****** camera ******* **** *****'** otherwise ******** *********** ** a *** ****** ******."

"***** * *** ** time *************** ****** ** the ************ ****'* *********** ONVIF *******."

******* ***** *** *** an *********** ******** ** using ***** ** **** their ****** ******** *** quicker, **** ****** ************:

"** ******* ******* *********** submission **** *** ** our *********** ***** ******** before ** **** ***** the ************* *******. ** also ******* ****** ******** ONVIF ****** **** **** test *******"

#1 ******* - ***** ******** 

* *********** ******** ** ************ emphasized ****** ***** ************ as *** ***** #* problem:

  • "**** - ****** *******  integrators ****** ** *** cheap **** **** *** ONVIF ***** *** **** fail. ********* ** *** wreck ** ****** ****"
  • "** *** **** * ******* painful, ***** * *** of **** ***** ** not *****. **** *** VMSs******** *** **********, ******** ONVIF."
  • "***** ***** ** ** its ********* ******* ***** manufacturers: *) **** ********* a ******* ** ** 2) ***'* **** ** with *** *********" 
  • "**** **** ****** ***** versions **** *** *** fully **********. *** ***** revisions **** ****** **** hurdles ** *****"
  • "**** *** * ***** number ** *** ***********, even **** ********** ***** names **** ** ***** and **** *******"
  • "*** ** ******* *** pass *** ****** ***** test ***** *** *** certified ******* * ********* yet *** ******* ********** fail ** ***** **** because ***** ** ****** control ** ************* ** recorders."

#2 ******* - ******* ********

*** ****** ******* ******* expressed *** ******* ********, as ***** **** *** require ******** ******** ** be ********:

  • "**** ******** ** *** customer **** **** ***** is ********, *******, ******* like *** *******, *****, etc **** *** ******** uses ******* ******** ****`* when *** ******* **** stars."
  • "*** ****** *********** **** customers *** ******** * ONVIF ******* **** ********* companies ** *** **** work, *** ** ********** the ******** ******."
  • "** **** **** ** has **** ** ******* the ************ ******* *** sometimes **** ******** ** using *** ****** ****** language."

Comments (7)

Before Profile S, a few black eyes, since Profile S been very successful. Would still recommend getting a copy of VMS and a demo/loaner camera to test. Overall, happy with ONVIF Profile S, waiting to see how other Profiles work out with Access Control integrations and edge storage, etc.

Disclosure: I am a manufacturer's rep, so I know the headache of "will my recorder/software work with this camera?" And vice versa...all while holding my lucky rabbit's foot, BEFORE Profile S, that is

At least in my experience, ONVIF device compatibility is still hit or miss, even with major manufacturers' cameras. Problems range from cameras' inability to Multicast via ONVIF to cameras unable to sync to our time server to problems controlling PTZs.

Carl, what VMSes are you using?

IndigoVision. But at least two of the three issues I pointed out are not VMS-specific.

The issue with time sync of the cameras is an incompatibility between the cameras and our Time Server, a Spectracom NetClock 9489. That is something both manufacturers whose cameras we're having problems with appear to agree on (Bosch and Vivotek). Other third party cameras we've tried synced fine.

The issues with PTZ control are that with most third party IP PTZs, control is "flaky". By that I mean that PTZ movements are jerky and not smooth. Also, the PTZs often "overshoot" when the joystick is released. It is my understanding that problem is common with many VMS' and PTZs.

Finally, the Multicast issue. I would assign equal blame to the camera(s), IndigoVision and our need to be able to access multiple simultaneous streams. Granted, at least some VMS' can internally redistribute a single stream to multiple clients without the need for a Proxy Server that IV requires but I am not aware if that is common with ONVIF streams or not.

Isn't it possible that your "overshoot" problem is due to input lag?

B,

I don't think so. Sony, Bosch and Pelco IP PTZs exhibited the "run-on" while JVC does not. In fact, the JVC PTZ had the best functionality we observed, next to IndigoVision's own cameras.

Great report!

Your survey results suggest that standardization is welcome, which implies that ONVIF standards, tools, and certifications might benefit from further refinement.

In our experience, early standards can only be as good as whatever the designers were able to imagine, so it is not uncommon for initial specifications to have unforeseen incompatibilities across implementations. Does anyone remember early Windows plug and play, or early wifi? Forward thinking organizations improve their early standards and tools until it is relatively straightforward for vendors to achieve compatibility. Ethernet seems to be a good example of very robust implementation of a complex standard, with mechanisms for improvement which don't break prior implementations.

For organizations that don't focus on compatibility, the "standard" is whatever it is, warts and all.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
Commend ID5 Intercom Tested on Sep 12, 2019
Commend touts the new ID5 intercom as 'timelessly elegant' and the slim body, glass front touchscreen indeed looks better than common, but ugly,...
ONVIF Exposure To "Devastating DDoS Attacks" Examined on Sep 06, 2019
ZDnet reported "Protocol used by 630,000 devices can be abused for devastating DDoS attacks", citing exposure of ONVIF devices. And after an...
Genetec Stratocast VSaaS Tested on Sep 05, 2019
The VSaaS market is rapidly expanding in 2019, with Verkada, Meraki, Eagle Eye, Avigilon and numerous startups growing their market share. When we...
Scylla AI Video Analytics Company Profile on Aug 29, 2019
Scylla, an AI analytics startup, says they are targeting 1 Billion dollar valuation in 5 years and it "is not rocket science" to detect weapons and...
Uniview 4K Camera Tested on Aug 29, 2019
In our 8MP / 4K Fixed Lens Camera Shootout, Uniview's low end 8MP was firmly in the middle of the pack. Does their higher end Pro Series 4K camera...
Warning: Windows 7 Update Crashing NVRs on Aug 26, 2019
Windows 7 updates are causing VMS servers to fail to boot. After running the update, impacted systems do not boot as normal, instead display this...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...

Most Recent Industry Reports

US Army Base To Buy Banned Honeywell Surveillance on Sep 17, 2019
The U.S. Army's Fort Gordon, home to their Cyber Center of Excellence, has issued a solicitation to purchase Honeywell products that are US...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Schmode is Back, Aims To Turn Boulder AI Into Giant on Sep 16, 2019
One of the most influential and controversial executives in the past decade is back. Bryan Schmode ascended and drove the hypergrowth of Avigilon...
Manufacturers Unhappy With Weak ASIS GSX 2019 And 2020 Shift on Sep 16, 2019
Manufacturers were generally unhappy with ASIS GSX, both for weak 2019 booth traffic and a scheduling shift for the 2020 show, according to a new...
How Cobalt Robotics May Disrupt Security on Sep 13, 2019
While security robots have largely become a joke over the last few years, one organization, Cobalt Robotics, has raised $50+ million from top US...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
ASIS GSX 2019 Final Show Report on Sep 12, 2019
IPVM went to Chicago for ASIS GSX 2019, with many exhibitors disappointed about traffic and the exhibitor schedule changing next year. However,...
Installation Course - Last Chance - Register Now on Sep 12, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. Thursday, September 12th is your last chance to register for the...
Commend ID5 Intercom Tested on Sep 12, 2019
Commend touts the new ID5 intercom as 'timelessly elegant' and the slim body, glass front touchscreen indeed looks better than common, but ugly,...
US State Department: "Chinese Tech Giants" "Tools of the Chinese Communist Party" on Sep 12, 2019
The US State Department has called out "Chinese tech giants" for being "tools of the Chinese Communist Party" in a blunt new speech that makes...