Manufacturers Sound Off on ONVIF

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Sep 16, 2014

ONVIF has achieved massive adoption amidst significant criticism. The most vocal critics are typically from manufacturers who deal with ONVIF most directly.

Do those critics represent manufacturers overall? In this IPVM survey, we asked manufacturers:

  • "Has ONVIF helped or hurt your company?"
  • "How would you like to see ONVIF improve? What problem(s) do you want them to solve?"

The results surprised us:

***** *** ******** ******* adoption ****** *********** *********. *** most ***** ******* *** typically **** ************* *** deal **** ***** **** directly.

** ***** ******* ********* manufacturers *******? ** **** IPVM ******, ** ***** manufacturers:

  • "*** ***** ****** ** hurt **** *******?"
  • "*** ***** *** **** to *** ***** *******? What *******(*) ** *** want **** ** *****?"

*** ******* ********* **:

[***************]

********

*******, **** ************* *** positive ***** *****. ******, their ******** **** ****, in * ********** ****** like ************, ***** *** become * ****** **** to ****** **** ****, more ********, ***********.

Camera ************ *********

*** ************, ****** *************, especially ******* ****, *** overwhelmingly ******** ***** *****, with ******** *********:

  • "***** *** * ********** baseline, *** *** ******* a ***** **** *** integration ** * ***."
  • "***** *** ****** *** company ***** *** ************ produced ********** *** ****** cameras. *** **** ***** has *******, ** ****** the ***** *********** ** these ******* **** ******* involvement **** *** ******* VMS *********."
  • "***** *** ******. *********** with *** **** ********* small - *** **** is *********. **** **** integrate *** ****** *****. Thus***** *** ****** **."
  • "**** *** ************** ** ONVIF *.*/******* *, ** have **** * ****** increase ** ****************, **** with *** ****** *** partners *** **** *****'* gotten ****** ** *********** our ****** ***."
  • "******* *** * ***** manufacturer ***** ** **** advantage **** *** ******** is *** ** ******* as ******."

**** **** ***** *** perspectives, ***** ** ******* those ******* ****** ************* become ****** ****** * broader ******* ** *** company.

VMS Companies *******

******* ******** ************, ***** VMSes *** ***** *** not ** ********** *********, most *** ********* ***** ONVIF ** ** ***** helpful *** ****:

  • "** *** ****** ** with *** ********* *********, to ****** *** *** party ******* ** *** support."
  • "* ***** ****. ** do *** ********* *** cameras *** *** *** more *** **** ********* ONVIF."
  • "** ****** *** **** some *** ***** ** get ***** ******* ******* cameras **** *** ***."
  • "** **** **** ********* who **** ************ **** other ******* **** ** have ***** ***** **. This ********** ** *** goal."
  • "****** *********** ********* ** added ***** ******* ** basic ************."
  • "******. ** *** ******* partners * **** ******* to ********* ***** *******."

****** *** **** ************

*******, ****** ***** ****** less ************ ******* ***** ONVIF, **** *** ************** comments *********: 

"***** ******* ********* **** than *% ** ***** camera ***********, *** **** 25% ** ******* ********** and **** ******* *********. On *** ********, **'* a ********** ********* *** to *** *** ****** camera ******* **** *****'** otherwise ******** *********** ** a *** ****** ******."

"***** * *** ** time *************** ****** ** the ************ ****'* *********** ONVIF *******."

******* ***** *** *** an *********** ******** ** using ***** ** **** their ****** ******** *** quicker, **** ****** ************:

"** ******* ******* *********** submission **** *** ** our *********** ***** ******** before ** **** ***** the ************* *******. ** also ******* ****** ******** ONVIF ****** **** **** test *******"

#1 ******* - ***** ******** 

* *********** ******** ** ************ emphasized ****** ***** ************ as *** ***** #* problem:

  • "**** - ****** *******  integrators ****** ** *** cheap **** **** *** ONVIF ***** *** **** fail. ********* ** *** wreck ** ****** ****"
  • "** *** **** * ******* painful, ***** * *** of **** ***** ** not *****. **** *** VMSs******** *** **********, ******** ONVIF."
  • "***** ***** ** ** its ********* ******* ***** manufacturers: *) **** ********* a ******* ** ** 2) ***'* **** ** with *** *********" 
  • "**** **** ****** ***** versions **** *** *** fully **********. *** ***** revisions **** ****** **** hurdles ** *****"
  • "**** *** * ***** number ** *** ***********, even **** ********** ***** names **** ** ***** and **** *******"
  • "*** ** ******* *** pass *** ****** ***** test ***** *** *** certified ******* * ********* yet *** ******* ********** fail ** ***** **** because ***** ** ****** control ** ************* ** recorders."

#2 ******* - ******* ********

*** ****** ******* ******* expressed *** ******* ********, as ***** **** *** require ******** ******** ** be ********:

  • "**** ******** ** *** customer **** **** ***** is ********, *******, ******* like *** *******, *****, etc **** *** ******** uses ******* ******** ****`* when *** ******* **** stars."
  • "*** ****** *********** **** customers *** ******** * ONVIF ******* **** ********* companies ** *** **** work, *** ** ********** the ******** ******."
  • "** **** **** ** has **** ** ******* the ************ ******* *** sometimes **** ******** ** using *** ****** ****** language."

Comments (7)

Before Profile S, a few black eyes, since Profile S been very successful. Would still recommend getting a copy of VMS and a demo/loaner camera to test. Overall, happy with ONVIF Profile S, waiting to see how other Profiles work out with Access Control integrations and edge storage, etc.

Disclosure: I am a manufacturer's rep, so I know the headache of "will my recorder/software work with this camera?" And vice versa...all while holding my lucky rabbit's foot, BEFORE Profile S, that is

At least in my experience, ONVIF device compatibility is still hit or miss, even with major manufacturers' cameras. Problems range from cameras' inability to Multicast via ONVIF to cameras unable to sync to our time server to problems controlling PTZs.

Carl, what VMSes are you using?

IndigoVision. But at least two of the three issues I pointed out are not VMS-specific.

The issue with time sync of the cameras is an incompatibility between the cameras and our Time Server, a Spectracom NetClock 9489. That is something both manufacturers whose cameras we're having problems with appear to agree on (Bosch and Vivotek). Other third party cameras we've tried synced fine.

The issues with PTZ control are that with most third party IP PTZs, control is "flaky". By that I mean that PTZ movements are jerky and not smooth. Also, the PTZs often "overshoot" when the joystick is released. It is my understanding that problem is common with many VMS' and PTZs.

Finally, the Multicast issue. I would assign equal blame to the camera(s), IndigoVision and our need to be able to access multiple simultaneous streams. Granted, at least some VMS' can internally redistribute a single stream to multiple clients without the need for a Proxy Server that IV requires but I am not aware if that is common with ONVIF streams or not.

Isn't it possible that your "overshoot" problem is due to input lag?

B,

I don't think so. Sony, Bosch and Pelco IP PTZs exhibited the "run-on" while JVC does not. In fact, the JVC PTZ had the best functionality we observed, next to IndigoVision's own cameras.

Great report!

Your survey results suggest that standardization is welcome, which implies that ONVIF standards, tools, and certifications might benefit from further refinement.

In our experience, early standards can only be as good as whatever the designers were able to imagine, so it is not uncommon for initial specifications to have unforeseen incompatibilities across implementations. Does anyone remember early Windows plug and play, or early wifi? Forward thinking organizations improve their early standards and tools until it is relatively straightforward for vendors to achieve compatibility. Ethernet seems to be a good example of very robust implementation of a complex standard, with mechanisms for improvement which don't break prior implementations.

For organizations that don't focus on compatibility, the "standard" is whatever it is, warts and all.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,367 reports, 855 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Coronavirus Hits Manufacturers, Standing Now, Worse To Come on Apr 06, 2020
Coronavirus is hitting security manufacturers, though overall modestly for now, with worse expected to come, new IPVM survey results...
Strong ISC West 2019 For Manufacturers But Concerns For 2020 March Move on Apr 16, 2019
ISC West 2019 was strong for manufacturers, according to new IPVM survey results of 100+ manufacturers, consistent with 2018 results. However,...
Lenel Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 26, 2019
The positive news for Lenel is that integrators do not dislike them as much as they used to.  The negative news for Lenel is that integrators...
Uniview Intrusion Analytics and VMD Tested on Aug 13, 2018
IPVM's IP Camera Analytics Shootout featuring Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision created some ill will with a Uniview distributor who...
Strong ISC West 2018, Says Manufacturers, GSX / ASIS Expected Weaker on Apr 17, 2018
Manufacturers say ISC West 2018 was strong, continuing the trend we have seen in 2017 results and 2016 results. However, those same 100...
Manufacturers Cheer ISC West 2017 Performance on Apr 11, 2017
ISC West 2017 showed strong satisfaction results from manufacturers, similar to 2016's ISC West. 100 manufacturers rated their impressions of ISC...
Positive Video Surveillance Outlook - 2017 Statistics on Mar 07, 2017
376 manufacturers and integrators revealed their outlook on the future of the video surveillance industry in a recent IPVM survey. Both groups are...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2017 on Feb 27, 2017
One of the fastest growing companies has turned into one of the rockiest, as cooling growth, management turnover and a roller coaster stock price...
Axis Favorability Results 2017 on Feb 03, 2017
For many years, Axis sold the most IP cameras but, with the rise of Hikvision and Dahua, that has changed. How would that impact Axis...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2017 on Jan 11, 2017
ONVIF has been one of the most debated aspects of the video surveillance industry. On the one hand, its aim to increase interoperability has been...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Hikvision Illicitly Uses Back To The Future In Marketing on Jul 03, 2020
NBCUniversal told IPVM that Hikvision UK's ongoing coronavirus marketing campaign using NBCUniversal's assets was not allowed. Hikvision mass...
Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM is 'not a good look' and that 'IPVM should never be your source of...
Vintra Presents FulcrumAI Face Recognition on Jul 02, 2020
Vintra presented its FulcrumAI face recognition and mask detection offering at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A...
Uniview Wrist Temperature Reader Tested on Jul 02, 2020
Uniview is promoting measuring wrist temperatures whereas most others are just offering forehead or inner canthus measurements. But how well does...
Dahua USA Admits Thermal Solutions "Qualify As Medical Devices" on Jul 02, 2020
Dahua USA has issued a press release admitting a controversial point in the industry but an obvious one to the US FDA, that the thermal temperature...
Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...