Manufacturers Sound Off on ONVIF

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Sep 16, 2014

ONVIF has achieved massive adoption amidst significant criticism. The most vocal critics are typically from manufacturers who deal with ONVIF most directly.

Do those critics represent manufacturers overall? In this IPVM survey, we asked manufacturers:

  • "Has ONVIF helped or hurt your company?"
  • "How would you like to see ONVIF improve? What problem(s) do you want them to solve?"

The results surprised us:

***** *** ******** ******* ******** ****** *********** *********. *** **** ***** critics *** ********* **** ************* *** **** **** ***** **** directly.

** ***** ******* ********* ************* *******? ** **** **** ******, we ***** *************:

  • "*** ***** ****** ** **** **** *******?"
  • "*** ***** *** **** ** *** ***** *******? **** *******(*) do *** **** **** ** *****?"

*** ******* ********* **:

[***************]

********

*******, **** ************* *** ******** ***** *****. ******, ***** ******** show ****, ** * ********** ****** **** ************, ***** *** become * ****** **** ** ****** **** ****, **** ********, more*******.

Camera ************ *********

*** ************, ****** *************, ********** ******* ****, *** ************** ******** about *****, **** ******** *********:

  • "***** *** * ********** ********, *** *** ******* * ***** path *** *********** ** * ***."
  • "***** *** ****** *** ******* ***** *** ************ ******** ********** low ****** *******. *** **** ***** *** *******, ** ****** the ***** *********** ** ***** ******* **** ******* *********** **** the ******* *** *********."
  • "***** *** ******. *********** **** *** **** ********* ***** - mid **** ** *********. **** **** ********* *** ****** *****. Thus***** *** ****** **."
  • "**** *** ************** ** ***** *.*/******* *, ** **** **** a ****** ******** ** ****************, **** **** *** ****** *** partners *** **** *****'* ****** ****** ** *********** *** ****** SDK."
  • "******* *** * ***** ************ ***** ** **** ********* **** our ******** ** *** ** ******* ** ******."

**** **** ***** *** ************, ***** ** ******* ***** ******* camera ************* ****** ****** ****** * ******* ******* ** *** company.

VMS Companies *******

******* ******** ************, ***** ***** *** ***** *** *** ** frequently *********, **** *** ********* ***** ***** ** ** ***** helpful *** ****:

  • "** *** ****** ** **** *** ********* *********, ** ****** the *** ***** ******* ** *** *******."
  • "* ***** ****. ** ** *** ********* *** ******* *** SDK *** **** *** **** ********* *****."
  • "** ****** *** **** **** *** ***** ** *** ***** unknown ******* ******* **** *** ***."
  • "** **** **** ********* *** **** ************ **** ***** ******* that ** **** ***** ***** **. **** ********** ** *** goal."
  • "****** *********** ********* ** ***** ***** ******* ** ***** ************."
  • "******. ** *** ******* ******** * **** ******* ** ********* their *******."

****** *** **** ************

*******, ****** ***** ****** **** ************ ******* ***** *****, **** two ************** ******** *********: 

"***** ******* ********* **** **** *% ** ***** ****** ***********, but **** **% ** ******* ********** *** **** ******* *********. On *** ********, **'* * ********** ********* *** ** *** low ****** ****** ******* **** *****'** ********* ******** *********** ** a *** ****** ******."

"***** * *** ** **** *************** ****** ** *** ************ hasn't *********** ***** *******."

******* ***** *** *** ** *********** ******** ** ***** ***** to **** ***** ****** ******** *** *******, **** ****** ************:

"** ******* ******* *********** ********** **** *** ** *** *********** ONVIF ******** ****** ** **** ***** *** ************* *******. ** also ******* ****** ******** ***** ****** **** **** **** *******"

#1 ******* - ***** ******** 

* *********** ******** ** ************ ********** ****** ***** ************ ** *** clear #* *******:

  • "**** - ****** *******  *********** ****** ** *** ***** **** with *** ***** ***** *** **** ****. ********* ** *** wreck ** ****** ****"
  • "** *** **** * ******* *******, ***** * *** ** **** ONVIF ** *** *****. **** *** ************ *** **********, ******** *****."
  • "***** ***** ** ** *** ********* ******* ***** *************: *) Only ********* * ******* ** ** *) ***'* **** ** with *** *********" 
  • "**** **** ****** ***** ******** **** *** *** ***** **********. The ***** ********* **** ****** **** ******* ** *****"
  • "**** *** * ***** ****** ** *** ***********, **** **** mainstream ***** ***** **** ** ***** *** **** *******"
  • "*** ** ******* *** **** *** ****** ***** **** ***** and *** ********* ******* * ********* *** *** ******* ********** fail ** ***** **** ******* ***** ** ****** ******* ** qualification ** *********."

#2 ******* - ******* ********

*** ****** ******* ******* ********* *** ******* ********, ** ***** does *** ******* ******** ******** ** ** ********:

  • "**** ******** ** *** ******** **** **** ***** ** ********, however, ******* **** *** *******, *****, *** **** *** ******** uses ******* ******** ****`* **** *** ******* **** *****."
  • "*** ****** *********** **** ********* *** ******** * ***** ******* from ********* ********* ** *** **** ****, *** ** ********** the ******** ******."
  • "** **** **** ** *** **** ** ******* *** ************ results *** ********* **** ******** ** ***** *** ****** ****** language."

Comments (7)

Before Profile S, a few black eyes, since Profile S been very successful. Would still recommend getting a copy of VMS and a demo/loaner camera to test. Overall, happy with ONVIF Profile S, waiting to see how other Profiles work out with Access Control integrations and edge storage, etc.

Disclosure: I am a manufacturer's rep, so I know the headache of "will my recorder/software work with this camera?" And vice versa...all while holding my lucky rabbit's foot, BEFORE Profile S, that is

At least in my experience, ONVIF device compatibility is still hit or miss, even with major manufacturers' cameras. Problems range from cameras' inability to Multicast via ONVIF to cameras unable to sync to our time server to problems controlling PTZs.

Carl, what VMSes are you using?

IndigoVision. But at least two of the three issues I pointed out are not VMS-specific.

The issue with time sync of the cameras is an incompatibility between the cameras and our Time Server, a Spectracom NetClock 9489. That is something both manufacturers whose cameras we're having problems with appear to agree on (Bosch and Vivotek). Other third party cameras we've tried synced fine.

The issues with PTZ control are that with most third party IP PTZs, control is "flaky". By that I mean that PTZ movements are jerky and not smooth. Also, the PTZs often "overshoot" when the joystick is released. It is my understanding that problem is common with many VMS' and PTZs.

Finally, the Multicast issue. I would assign equal blame to the camera(s), IndigoVision and our need to be able to access multiple simultaneous streams. Granted, at least some VMS' can internally redistribute a single stream to multiple clients without the need for a Proxy Server that IV requires but I am not aware if that is common with ONVIF streams or not.

Isn't it possible that your "overshoot" problem is due to input lag?

B,

I don't think so. Sony, Bosch and Pelco IP PTZs exhibited the "run-on" while JVC does not. In fact, the JVC PTZ had the best functionality we observed, next to IndigoVision's own cameras.

Great report!

Your survey results suggest that standardization is welcome, which implies that ONVIF standards, tools, and certifications might benefit from further refinement.

In our experience, early standards can only be as good as whatever the designers were able to imagine, so it is not uncommon for initial specifications to have unforeseen incompatibilities across implementations. Does anyone remember early Windows plug and play, or early wifi? Forward thinking organizations improve their early standards and tools until it is relatively straightforward for vendors to achieve compatibility. Ethernet seems to be a good example of very robust implementation of a complex standard, with mechanisms for improvement which don't break prior implementations.

For organizations that don't focus on compatibility, the "standard" is whatever it is, warts and all.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Most Wanted Improvements In Manufacturer Technical Support (Statistics) on Jun 21, 2018
5 key areas of improvement and 1 clear wanted support feature were voiced by 140+ integrator responses to: What improvement in manufacturer...
Axis Guardian - Cloud VMS And Alarm Monitoring - Released on Jun 19, 2018
Axis has struggled to deliver a cloud-based managed service video platform. Video service providers have utilized AVHS for over a decade, and have...
Axis Releases First New Access Controller In 5 Years (A1601) on Jun 15, 2018
It has been 5 years since Axis 2013 entry in the physical access control market, with the A1001 (IPVM test). Now, Axis has released its second...
ReconaSense - The AI / Access Control / Analytics / IoT / Video Company Profile on Jun 12, 2018
One company's ISC West booth stood out for displaying a light-up tower of buzzwords. The company, ReconaSense, pledged to be 'making sense of it...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jun 07, 2018
H.265 support has improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and more manufacturers...
Bosch IVA Video Analytics And Motion+ VMD Tested on Jun 06, 2018
Bosch's video analytics now ship on nearly every model, from indoor domes to high-end 5MP starlight cameras.  In this test, we evaluate Bosch's...
Hikvision PanoVu 20MP Flexible Camera Tested on Jun 01, 2018
Hikvision has released their first repositionable multi imager cameras with integrated IR included, atypical in competitors. We bought and tested...
Oncam 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested on May 29, 2018
Oncam has made their name since the early 2000s as a fisheye specialist, focusing only on panoramic cameras. To see how this specialist stacks up...
VMS Server Sizing on May 25, 2018
Specifying the right sized PC/server for VMS software is one of the most important yet difficult decisions in IP video surveillance. In the past...
Hanwha Wisenet X Analytics and VMD Test on May 24, 2018
Continuing our updated testing of camera analytics, we tested Hanwha's Wisenet X analytics for over two weeks in multiple scenes, indoors and out,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jun 22, 2018
  This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals. Register now. Lots of network training exists...
Installation Hardware for Video Surveillance - Indoor Fasteners on Jun 22, 2018
As part of our Installation for Video Surveillance series, in this note, we cover drywall anchors. A key part of installing security hardware is...
Hikvision ColorVu Integrated Visible Light Cameras Examined on Jun 22, 2018
When it comes to low light, infrared light has become the defacto standard in surveillance. But IR is limited to monochrome images, making colors...
'Secure Channel' OSDP Access Control Examined on Jun 21, 2018
Despite claiming to be better than Wiegand, OSDP's initial releases did not address the lack of encryption between reader and controller, leaving...
Most Wanted Improvements In Manufacturer Technical Support (Statistics) on Jun 21, 2018
5 key areas of improvement and 1 clear wanted support feature were voiced by 140+ integrator responses to: What improvement in manufacturer...
GDPR / ICO Complaint Filed Against IFSEC Show Facial Recognition on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM has filed a complaint against IFSEC’s parent company UBM based on our concern that the conference violates core GDPR principles on...
IFSEC 2018 Final Show Report on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM attended the IFSEC show for the first time this year. The Chinese took over the show, centered on Hikvision, flanked by Dahua, Huawei and a...
Mobotix Releases 'Move' Into 21st Century on Jun 20, 2018
For years, Mobotix stood resolutely against, well, every other manufacturer, selling it as a virtue: MOBOTIX equipment is designed with no...
Cybersecurity Startup VDOO Disclosing 10 Manufacturer Vulnerabilities Starting With Axis And Foscam on Jun 20, 2018
Cybersecurity startup VDOO has uncovered significant vulnerabilities in Axis cameras along with many others not yet disclosed. In this report, we...
Axis Guardian - Cloud VMS And Alarm Monitoring - Released on Jun 19, 2018
Axis has struggled to deliver a cloud-based managed service video platform. Video service providers have utilized AVHS for over a decade, and have...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact