Man to Pay $20,000 Legal Fees For Inappropriate Surveillance Camera

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Feb 07, 2014

This man has been court ordered to pay $20,000 in legal fees over inappropriate surveillance camera use. Was it his fault? Or was it bad advice from the integrator who assisted him? Or is this simply a case of the courts being unreasonable?

In this note, we examine a court case where a regular person with a camera on his house resulted in years of legal fighting and a sizeable financial fee.

The ****

*** ******** ******* **** **** ***** *** ** * *** on *** ********. *** ********* *** *** ****** ***** *** common ***** ** *** ***********, *** **** **** ******’* *****. Neighbors **** “******* *** ********* ******* **** **** ***** ******* activities **** ***** *******,” ********* ** ***** *********. *** ***** Ranch *****’* *********** ** ******** ******, ********** *** ********* ***** a ********* ******* ***** ***** *** ********* ***** **** **** to * ********** *********.

** * ****-**** ******* ** **** **, ****, *** ******* agreed **** *****’* ****** ***** ** “************ ********** *** ******** so **** ** ***** **** *** ***** **** ******* ** [Toler's] ******** *** ****** **** *** ** *** *********' ********* [sic]." *** ********* **** *** ** **** ** *** *** problem.

* ***** *****, ********* *** ***** *** *** ***** *** steps ** ****** *** ******. ******** ******* ******** *** ***** photos **** ********* ***** ** *** ****** ******* ********* ** it.

*****, *******, *** **** *** ****** ** ******** *** ******’* field ** ****. ** ******** *** ***** **** * ******* from *** ***** **********, ***** ********, ***. ********** ********* **** on *** ****** ** “******* *** ****** ****** ******* ** south **** ****** ** ********. ********** ******** ** ****** ****** from ***°—***° *********** *** **** ** *** *****-****** ******** ****."

******* ****, *** ***** ***** **** *** ************ *** *** constitute “*********” *** **** ***** *** ******** *** ***** ** the **********. ** *** ******* ** *** ********’* ****.

Why *** ** ****?

***** ***** *** ****** ** ** ****’* ******* ** *** neighbors *******, *** *** ***** ***** ********** ** ******** *** settlement ** *** ********* *** ***** *******. *** ********** **** the ******’* ***** ** **** *** ** ** **********,***** *** ** ** ********. **'* ************ *** **** ********* the ****** ***** **** **** ** ******** *** ***** ** view.

** ******** ****, ** ***** * ****** ** ********** **** testimony **** *** **********. *** ********** **** ***** *** ********* a ******, *** ** **** *** **** **** *** ****** on * **** ****, *** **** ******* ******* * ****** would ********* **** *** ********* *******. *** ********** ********* **** instead **** **** *** **** ** ***** *** ***** ** view ** *** ******. **’* *** ***** ******* *** ********** knew *** **** ** *** ***** *** **** ** * court **********, *** ****’* ******** ********* **** ****** **** **** disclosed.

********* ******* ****** ************ “**** ** *** ***** ** *** face ** *** ********** **** *** ****** *** ** ** both ************ ********** *** ********.”

***** **** **** *** ****** ********** *** *** ** **** in *** ****** "***** ** *** ***** *******." *** ***** attorney’s **** ***** *** ******* ** ***: $**,***.

Comments (16)

***** ****** ** ****** *** *********. ** ** *** ************* to ******** ********* *** ***** *** ************.

** **, *******, **** ** *** *** ********** *** *** where **** ****.

**** ****....

** *** ***** *** ********** ** ** *****? * ***'* see *** ** **********/*********/***********, ***. ** *********** *** ******** * technical **** ***** * ***** *********.

** ** ********* ** ***********, ***** ** *** ** *** do ***** ** ***'* **** ******** *******, **'* ****** ** to * **** ** ********* ** *** ****** *** ********** may **, ***** ** * ***** **** ** ********** *** not ****** ******* ** ******** ***. *** ***** **** *** integrator ** **** ****** *** *** ********** *** *** ********** did **** ** *** ******** ** **? ** **, * can't *** * *** ** ********* ** ****. *** ** he ******** *** ********** ** *** ******* ** *** *********, and *** ********** **** ********* **** "***'* ***** ***** *********, we'll ** **** ******* *** ** **** ** ******", **** one ***** ***** **** **** *** ********** **** ** * certain ****** ** ************** ** ****** ********** *** ** ********** to **** ******, ** ***** ** ***** * ****** ** what ***** **** ***, *** ** ***** ***** *** ***'* need "****** * ********** *****".

* ***** **** ***** *** *** ****. ****** ** *** a ***** **** ******. ******* ******.

* ***** **** ** **'* **** *********** **** *****'* ***** the ****** ** **** **** * ******* *****, **** *** not **** ****** *** *********** **** *** **** **** ******* into **** *********' *******? **'* *** **** *****'* * ****** of *********** ******* ** *** ***, ***** ***.

*****. ** ** *****, ******, *** ** ****** * *** against *** ***? :)

**********, **** ** ******* **** **** ** *** *********'* ***********? yes/no? ****** **** ** **** ** ******?

* ***'* ***** *** **** ************, *** **** ** ******, because ** ******* ****, ***** *************** ** ****** ***** ******** ** *** ******** **** ******* two **********.

***, **** ******* ************ ** ***** ***** ******* *** *****, but *'* **** *** ***** ***** **** * *** *******'* be ********* ** * *** **** ** ***** *** * direct **** **** * ********'* ********, *** *** **** *****'* zoom ********** ***** ******** **** ** ** **** ** ***** have ** ** **** ******* ****, *** ******** ********** ******** from **** **********.

****: *,* ****** ** ************* * ****.

** ***** *** ************* ***** ******** ********** ** ********** ** a ********'* ******* ******** ** **********?

**** ***** ******** ***** ** **** **** ** ****.

**** *** *********:

*** **** *** ****** ** * **** ***** ** **** in *** ****

** ****** ** ** *** *** *** *** ********* ** the *** ** * ***** ** *"**" *** ** *** open? ** **** ************?

***** *** ********* **** ** *** ** ******* ******* *********, with ** ******* *** ****** *********?

*** **** ****** *** ******** ***** * ****** ** *** street ***** *** ** **** ** ***?

** ******* ******* *** **** *** *****, **** *** ****** that ** ****** **** ******* **** * ******, **** **** should ****** ******* **** ********.

***** *** ****** *** ********* ** * *** **** **** it * ****** ***, *** **** **** ***** **** *** local *********** ******* ******* **** **** *****?

"**** ***** **** *** ***** *********** ******* ******* **** **** poles?"

**********,******* ***** *** ************ *** ****** ** ***** *** ******* **** ******* / private *****.

"**********".

***********.

*** ******** ** **? **% ** ****** *********** ***** ** USA, *** *******?

****** ****** *****, **** ******* ** **********'* ***** **** ***** probably ***** ** **** ********** ****:

******** & ************ ********* ** ******* - ********** ***** **** section ****.*

(*) * ****** ** ****** *** ************ ******** ** ******* when *** ********* ******** ** *******, ** * ****** **** is ********* ** * ********** ******, *** **** ** ****** image, ***** *********, ** ***** ******** ********** ** *** ********* engaging ** * ******** ** ******** ******** ***** ************* ** which *** ********* *** * ********** *********** ** *******, ******* the *** ** * ****** ** ******** ********* ******, ********** of ******* ***** ** * ******** ********, ** **** *****, sound *********, ** ***** ******** ********** ***** *** **** **** achieved ******* * ******** ****** *** ****** ** ******** ********* device *** ****.

*** *** ******** **, ****** *** ********* **** **** ***** of ****, ******** *** ******, *** ******** ***** ** *** in ******* **** *** *** *** ***** *********, ** ***** Major ******* *** ** ******* ******? *** *** **?

**** **** ** *** ** *********** **** ** ** ** the ******* ** ******* ******** **** *** ****** ********...

** **** ** ** ****.

** **** ** ***'** *** ******* ****** **** * *** at *** *** ** * **** ******** ** * ****** enabling *** ** **** **** **** *********' *** **** ** higher ****** *** ***** ******, *** ****** ** ****. ;)

*** *'* *'*". * *** **** **** ****** ***** ******!

** ****'* *** ****, ***'* **** ****** **** * *** strapped ** **** ********. ** ********** ***** ** **** ****. Otherwise, *** ***** ** ** ****. ;)

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Legal

Avigilon Stock Surges 40% On Strong Growth (Q3 2016) on Nov 15, 2016
The roller coaster continues. After a brutal Q2 heading down, Avigilon's Q3 growth is strongly up. Inside this note, we examine what powered...
'Legal Protection' From Eagle Eye Contract Vault Examined on Nov 02, 2016
"I was promised the high-end model for the entry level price." "Nobody said there would be a monthly service fee when I signed...
Dahua Says They Are Botnet Attack 'Victims' on Oct 26, 2016
'Victim' or 'accomplice'? Dahua has issued a new press release, referring to their products as 'victims' of the massive botnet attacks hitting the...
Chinese Company Xiongmai Threatens Legal Action Against Western Accusers on Oct 24, 2016
The Chinese video surveillance manufacturer, Xiongmai, whose equipment numerous sources blame for driving massive Internet attacks over the past...
Milestone / OnSSI OEM Agreement Analyzed and Legal Move on May 17, 2016
OnSSI has withdrawn its lawsuit from US courts, but the fight is far from done. In this note, we examine what is happening, digging into the 2009...
Hikvision Rejects Responsibility for Hacked Hikvision Cameras on May 10, 2016
After a massive number of Hikvision cameras were hacked, Hikvision has added new, and questionable legal language, declaring that Hikvision will...
Legal Attack on MSRP - Impact on Hikvision, Sony, Pelco, More on Mar 09, 2016
MSRP? Make Suckers Really Pay? Many video surveillance manufacturers set their Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) to far higher levels...
Hospital Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 28, 2015
This 16-page guide explains the key uses, design factors, and players in the Hospital Surveillance market.   A global group of 50 integrators and...
Security As A Profit Center: Extorting Shoplifters? on Mar 10, 2015
If you can't beat 'em, join em. Many lament that security is a cost center. Now, a tech startup and major retailers have partnered to make money...
Dahua Attacks Hikvision on Dec 26, 2014
Things are getting ugly between the two biggest surveillance manufacturers in the world. Both companies have skyrocketed largely driven by monster...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Artificial Intelligence Robot Assistant (ACTi) on Feb 23, 2017
Has artificial intelligence come to the video surveillance industry? ACTi has released 'SARA' which it bills as an 'AI assistant that brings...
Cutting Costs 70% Using Milestone With HD Analog on Feb 23, 2017
HD analog and enterprise VMSes are often thought of as being on opposite sides of the spectrum, with HD analog best for small jobs due to its low...
Dahua 4K HD Analog Cameras Announced on Feb 23, 2017
HD analog has been gaining popularity (even if Axis hopes otherwise). Last year, HD analog's max resolution doubled from 1080p to 4MP (see our 4MP...
Uniview (UNV) IP Cameras Tested on Feb 22, 2017
"We're #3," in China says Uniview (UNV). While the company significantly trails Hikvision and Dahua in total sales, one notable difference is that...
Glass Doors and Access Control Tutorial on Feb 22, 2017
The biggest challenge for many access control systems are glass doors. Here's what happens when a maglock is improperly installed to an existing...
Exacq Favorability Results on Feb 22, 2017
For years, Exacq has been one of the most frequently favored VMSes in IPVM integrator statistics (e.g., see Favorite VMS Manufacturers...
The Hot RMR Company - Electric Guard Dog on Feb 22, 2017
The financiers at the Barnes Buchanan conference praised a company named 'Electric Guard Dog'. While the name sounds fairly low tech, the money and...
Hikvision Leads Multi-Manufacturer Sales Promo on Feb 21, 2017
Earlier this month, Hikvision launched new 'super value' kits, with 40% discounts, and now Hikvision is offering another promo, but this time they...
Washington DC MPD's Surveillance Equipment on Feb 21, 2017
The Washington DC Metropolitan Police Department's surveillance system was hacked in January 2017. Two immediate questions were: Whose...
Hikvision Ezviz Mini 360 Plus - $80 Autotracking Camera Tested on Feb 21, 2017
Autotracking, integrated IR, local storage, full HD, cloud access: $80. That is the claim of Hikvision EZVIZ's new Mini 360 Plus. But for this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact