Man to Pay $20,000 Legal Fees For Inappropriate Surveillance Camera

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Feb 07, 2014

This man has been court ordered to pay $20,000 in legal fees over inappropriate surveillance camera use. Was it his fault? Or was it bad advice from the integrator who assisted him? Or is this simply a case of the courts being unreasonable?

In this note, we examine a court case where a regular person with a camera on his house resulted in years of legal fighting and a sizeable financial fee.

The ****

*** ******** ******* **** **** ***** *** ** * *** on *** ********. *** ********* *** *** ****** ***** *** common ***** ** *** ***********, *** **** **** ******’* *****. Neighbors **** “******* *** ********* ******* **** **** ***** ******* activities **** ***** *******,” ********* ** ***** *********. *** ***** Ranch *****’* *********** ** ******** ******, ********** *** ********* ***** a ********* ******* ***** ***** *** ********* ***** **** **** to * ********** *********.

** * ****-**** ******* ** **** **, ****, *** ******* agreed **** *****’* ****** ***** ** “************ ********** *** ******** so **** ** ***** **** *** ***** **** ******* ** [Toler's] ******** *** ****** **** *** ** *** *********' ********* [sic]." *** ********* **** *** ** **** ** *** *** problem.

* ***** *****, ********* *** ***** *** *** ***** *** steps ** ****** *** ******. ******** ******* ******** *** ***** photos **** ********* ***** ** *** ****** ******* ********* ** it.

*****, *******, *** **** *** ****** ** ******** *** ******’* field ** ****. ** ******** *** ***** **** * ******* from *** ***** **********, ***** ********, ***. ********** ********* **** on *** ****** ** “******* *** ****** ****** ******* ** south **** ****** ** ********. ********** ******** ** ****** ****** from ***°—***° *********** *** **** ** *** *****-****** ******** ****."

******* ****, *** ***** ***** **** *** ************ *** *** constitute “*********” *** **** ***** *** ******** *** ***** ** the **********. ** *** ******* ** *** ********’* ****.

Why *** ** ****?

***** ***** *** ****** ** ** ****’* ******* ** *** neighbors *******, *** *** ***** ***** ********** ** ******** *** settlement ** *** ********* *** ***** *******. *** ********** **** the ******’* ***** ** **** *** ** ** **********,***** *** ** ** ********. **'* ************ *** **** ********* the ****** ***** **** **** ** ******** *** ***** ** view.

** ******** ****, ** ***** * ****** ** ********** **** testimony **** *** **********. *** ********** **** ***** *** ********* a ******, *** ** **** *** **** **** *** ****** on * **** ****, *** **** ******* ******* * ****** would ********* **** *** ********* *******. *** ********** ********* **** instead **** **** *** **** ** ***** *** ***** ** view ** *** ******. **’* *** ***** ******* *** ********** knew *** **** ** *** ***** *** **** ** * court **********, *** ****’* ******** ********* **** ****** **** **** disclosed.

********* ******* ****** ************ “**** ** *** ***** ** *** face ** *** ********** **** *** ****** *** ** ** both ************ ********** *** ********.”

***** **** **** *** ****** ********** *** *** ** **** in *** ****** "***** ** *** ***** *******." *** ***** attorney’s **** ***** *** ******* ** ***: $**,***.

Comments (16)

***** ****** ** ****** *** *********. ** ** *** ************* to ******** ********* *** ***** *** ************.

** **, *******, **** ** *** *** ********** *** *** where **** ****.

**** ****....

** *** ***** *** ********** ** ** *****? * ***'* see *** ** **********/*********/***********, ***. ** *********** *** ******** * technical **** ***** * ***** *********.

** ** ********* ** ***********, ***** ** *** ** *** do ***** ** ***'* **** ******** *******, **'* ****** ** to * **** ** ********* ** *** ****** *** ********** may **, ***** ** * ***** **** ** ********** *** not ****** ******* ** ******** ***. *** ***** **** *** integrator ** **** ****** *** *** ********** *** *** ********** did **** ** *** ******** ** **? ** **, * can't *** * *** ** ********* ** ****. *** ** he ******** *** ********** ** *** ******* ** *** *********, and *** ********** **** ********* **** "***'* ***** ***** *********, we'll ** **** ******* *** ** **** ** ******", **** one ***** ***** **** **** *** ********** **** ** * certain ****** ** ************** ** ****** ********** *** ** ********** to **** ******, ** ***** ** ***** * ****** ** what ***** **** ***, *** ** ***** ***** *** ***'* need "****** * ********** *****".

* ***** **** ***** *** *** ****. ****** ** *** a ***** **** ******. ******* ******.

* ***** **** ** **'* **** *********** **** *****'* ***** the ****** ** **** **** * ******* *****, **** *** not **** ****** *** *********** **** *** **** **** ******* into **** *********' *******? **'* *** **** *****'* * ****** of *********** ******* ** *** ***, ***** ***.

*****. ** ** *****, ******, *** ** ****** * *** against *** ***? :)

**********, **** ** ******* **** **** ** *** *********'* ***********? yes/no? ****** **** ** **** ** ******?

* ***'* ***** *** **** ************, *** **** ** ******, because ** ******* ****, ***** *************** ** ****** ***** ******** ** *** ******** **** ******* two **********.

***, **** ******* ************ ** ***** ***** ******* *** *****, but *'* **** *** ***** ***** **** * *** *******'* be ********* ** * *** **** ** ***** *** * direct **** **** * ********'* ********, *** *** **** *****'* zoom ********** ***** ******** **** ** ** **** ** ***** have ** ** **** ******* ****, *** ******** ********** ******** from **** **********.

****: *,* ****** ** ************* * ****.

** ***** *** ************* ***** ******** ********** ** ********** ** a ********'* ******* ******** ** **********?

**** ***** ******** ***** ** **** **** ** ****.

**** *** *********:

*** **** *** ****** ** * **** ***** ** **** in *** ****

** ****** ** ** *** *** *** *** ********* ** the *** ** * ***** ** *"**" *** ** *** open? ** **** ************?

***** *** ********* **** ** *** ** ******* ******* *********, with ** ******* *** ****** *********?

*** **** ****** *** ******** ***** * ****** ** *** street ***** *** ** **** ** ***?

** ******* ******* *** **** *** *****, **** *** ****** that ** ****** **** ******* **** * ******, **** **** should ****** ******* **** ********.

***** *** ****** *** ********* ** * *** **** **** it * ****** ***, *** **** **** ***** **** *** local *********** ******* ******* **** **** *****?

"**** ***** **** *** ***** *********** ******* ******* **** **** poles?"

**********,******* ***** *** ************ *** ****** ** ***** *** ******* **** ******* / private *****.

"**********".

***********.

*** ******** ** **? **% ** ****** *********** ***** ** USA, *** *******?

****** ****** *****, **** ******* ** **********'* ***** **** ***** probably ***** ** **** ********** ****:

******** & ************ ********* ** ******* - ********** ***** **** section ****.*

(*) * ****** ** ****** *** ************ ******** ** ******* when *** ********* ******** ** *******, ** * ****** **** is ********* ** * ********** ******, *** **** ** ****** image, ***** *********, ** ***** ******** ********** ** *** ********* engaging ** * ******** ** ******** ******** ***** ************* ** which *** ********* *** * ********** *********** ** *******, ******* the *** ** * ****** ** ******** ********* ******, ********** of ******* ***** ** * ******** ********, ** **** *****, sound *********, ** ***** ******** ********** ***** *** **** **** achieved ******* * ******** ****** *** ****** ** ******** ********* device *** ****.

*** *** ******** **, ****** *** ********* **** **** ***** of ****, ******** *** ******, *** ******** ***** ** *** in ******* **** *** *** *** ***** *********, ** ***** Major ******* *** ** ******* ******? *** *** **?

**** **** ** *** ** *********** **** ** ** ** the ******* ** ******* ******** **** *** ****** ********...

** **** ** ** ****.

** **** ** ***'** *** ******* ****** **** * *** at *** *** ** * **** ******** ** * ****** enabling *** ** **** **** **** *********' *** **** ** higher ****** *** ***** ******, *** ****** ** ****. ;)

*** *'* *'*". * *** **** **** ****** ***** ******!

** ****'* *** ****, ***'* **** ****** **** * *** strapped ** **** ********. ** ********** ***** ** **** ****. Otherwise, *** ***** ** ** ****. ;)

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Legal

Manufacturers Shipping Unlicensed H.265 Products on Jun 22, 2017
While H.265 support in video surveillance is growing, IPVM's research shows that most surveillance manufacturers are shipping H.265 products with...
No Hack, Still Liable, Court Finds ADT on Jun 20, 2017
Recently, ADT has been in the news for a $16 million settlement for a cyber security vulnerability class action suit. One of the most important...
Non-Competes Divide Integrators on Jun 12, 2017
Non-competes are controversial legal agreements that prohibit parties (typically employees) from working in a similar role or trade of their...
Simplisafe Warns Customers About Alarm Fines on Mar 17, 2017
Simplisafe markets themselves as a 'better way' than traditional professional alarm companies. However, in one key way, Simplisafe hides the...
Avigilon Stock Surges 40% On Strong Growth (Q3 2016) on Nov 15, 2016
The roller coaster continues. After a brutal Q2 heading down, Avigilon's Q3 growth is strongly up. Inside this note, we examine what powered...
'Legal Protection' From Eagle Eye Contract Vault Examined on Nov 02, 2016
"I was promised the high-end model for the entry level price." "Nobody said there would be a monthly service fee when I signed...
Dahua Says They Are Botnet Attack 'Victims' on Oct 26, 2016
'Victim' or 'accomplice'? Dahua has issued a new press release, referring to their products as 'victims' of the massive botnet attacks hitting the...
Chinese Company Xiongmai Threatens Legal Action Against Western Accusers on Oct 24, 2016
The Chinese video surveillance manufacturer, Xiongmai, whose equipment numerous sources blame for driving massive Internet attacks over the past...
Milestone / OnSSI OEM Agreement Analyzed and Legal Move on May 17, 2016
OnSSI has withdrawn its lawsuit from US courts, but the fight is far from done. In this note, we examine what is happening, digging into the 2009...
Hikvision Rejects Responsibility for Hacked Hikvision Cameras on May 10, 2016
After a massive number of Hikvision cameras were hacked, Hikvision has added new, and questionable legal language, declaring that Hikvision will...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Importance of Sales To Integrators - Statistics on Jun 23, 2017
One of the top trends in the industry over the past few years has been the rise of across-the-board sales (e.g.: Hikvision Sales, Dahua Sale,...
Deep Learning Surveillance Startups Deep Problem on Jun 23, 2017
The undeniably good news for the video surveillance market is that we are seeing the rise of more startups than in many years. The cause of this...
Avigilon Announces RADAR-Based Presence Detector on Jun 22, 2017
RADAR is gaining momentum within physical security. Two months after Axis announced a network radar detector, Avigilon has announced a RADAR-Based...
Covert Cloud Camera Service Launching (KJB) on Jun 22, 2017
Cloud IP cameras, for consumers, has become increasingly commonplace. However, covert cameras, lag there, with few options. Now, North America's...
Manufacturers Shipping Unlicensed H.265 Products on Jun 22, 2017
While H.265 support in video surveillance is growing, IPVM's research shows that most surveillance manufacturers are shipping H.265 products with...
Uniview Low-Cost Bullet PTZ Tested on Jun 21, 2017
Uniview is offering a HD zoom bullet camera, the IPC742SR9-PZ30-32G, with an integrated pan / tilt positioner, for the price of a low-cost...
QSR Video Surveillance Best Practices on Jun 21, 2017
Fast food restaurants or QSRs (quick service restaurants), are frequent victims of crime and fraud. Because they are open late, deal with cash, and...
45 Drives 'Lowest Cost' Enterprise Storage Company Profile on Jun 21, 2017
45 Drives claims the "lowest cost per Hard Drive Slot in the industry." But who or what is '45 Drives'? What started as a product design to...
No Hack, Still Liable, Court Finds ADT on Jun 20, 2017
Recently, ADT has been in the news for a $16 million settlement for a cyber security vulnerability class action suit. One of the most important...
Resolver / PPM 2000 Incident Management Platform Profile on Jun 20, 2017
You might have seen the company whose employees wear hockey jerseys at trade shows and wondered "what do they do?" PPM 2000 has been active in...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact