"The Most Secure Door Contacts Available" Claims Magnaspehere

By: Ethan Ace, Published on May 23, 2016

Magnasphere says they are "the most secure door contacts available", claiming that typical door contacts can be defeated with only a cheap magnet, an "EXPLOITABLE operational flaw and construction weakness."

Magnasphere claims their proprietary design eliminates these flaws and makes high security available to any alarm system.

In this note, we take a look at the problem, Magnasphere's claims and product line, and 3 key disadvantages.

*************** **** *** "*** most ****** **** ******** available", claiming **** ******* **** contacts *** ** ******** with **** * ***** magnet, ** "*********** *********** flaw *** ************ ********."

*********** ****** ***** *********** design ********** ***** ***** and ***** **** ******** available ** *** ***** ******.

** **** ****, ** take * **** ** the *******, ***********'* ****** and ******* ****, *** 3 *** *************.

[***************]

The *******: ******** ****** ********

*** ****** *****, ******** reed ****** ******** ******** used ** **** ***** systems *** ****** ******** using * ******* *** a **** ***** ******. Intruders *** *** ******* to ****** *** ******* on/in *** ****/******, *** keep place *** ****** ** that *****. **** ***** the ******* ****** ***** opening *** ****, ******* users ******* *** ************ that ** ********* *** occurred.

*********** ************ **** ******* in **** *****:

**** **** **** ****** does *** **** ** every ****, ********* ** which ****** ** **** as **** ** ****/***** construction, *** *** ***** be **** ******* ****** or **** ***** **** frames. 

Magnasphere **. **** ********

******* ******** ******** ****** ******* of *** ********* "*****" of *****, ***** ***** when * ****** ** near, ********** *** ****, allowing ** ******** ** bypass *** *****:

*********** ****** ** ********* this ************* ** ***** a ********* ****** ***** rolls ****** ****** *** contact, ****** ******* **** a ******* *** **** the **** ** ******. 

 

****** ********** 

** * *********** *******, the ********* ****** ** the ******* ** ****** up/to *** **** **** a ****** ****** ** introduced ** ********* ***** normally *******, ******* *** switch *** ******* ** alarm (**** *****). **** differs **** ******* **** switch ******** ***** *** simply **** ******.

**** **** *********** ******** may ***** ** ******** if * **** ****** *** be ******* ******* *** contact *** *** ****. However, ******* **** ****** into ***** ******* ********** *** Magnasphere ******* *** ** difficult.

Product *********

*********** ****** ******* ****** of ********, ********* ************** ***** *** ******** models, ** **** ** overhead ****/**** ******** [**** no ****** *********], ******** models [**** ** ****** available], ***********-****** **** ******** ********.

******* *** * ******* *********** recessed **** ******* (***-****) is ~$* *** (********* street *****), ***** ******* contacts *** ** ***** online *** ** ****** as $*-*.

3 *** ***********

*********** *** ***** *** disadvantages ******** ** ******* magnetic ********:

  • **** ** ******** ********:** ***** ** ******** properly, *********** ******** **** be ********** ** *** sphere ***** ********. ******** ******** sideways ** ****** **** may ****** ** **** simply *** ******* (******* always **** ** ******. By ********, **** ******** can ** ****** ** any ***********, ******** **** to ** ****** **********, horizontally, ** *** ***** on *** ***** ** doors ** ****** ********, etc.
  • **** *********:*********** ******** *** ********* 2-3x the ***** ** ******** contacts. ***** **** **** not ****** ** **** in ***** *******, *********** placing ***** ****** *** contacts (**** ** ********** or ******** ********** ** high ****** ********* *******) **** find ** ******* **** expensive.
  • *** ***********:*********** **** *** ***** wired *********** ******** *** use **** *********** ******* (e.g., *********/******, ***, **, etc.), ***** **** ** these ************* ***** * variety ** ******** ******** in *********** ********. **** means **** ** ********** module **** ** **** to **** *** *********** contact *********** (******** ***** ID) ***** **** ******* and **********.

What ** *** *****?

**** ** *** ****:

**** *** **** ***********? Let ** **** ** the ******** *****.

Comments (12)

Grade 3 contacts in the uk use two reeds, one is the open close of the door. The other is to detect masking in this way.

Deployed them on a government project and they worked very well. Customer felt the added security was worth the additional cost, which was a minuscule part of the entire system cost.

In many systems, I mount door contacts on the side jambs especially when using wireless sensors, so I wouldn't be using this contact as much. And the person trying to defeat the door contact would have a few obstacles to overcome such as not knowing whether the second magnet was actually holding the switch closed. Then trying to secure the second magnet to the structure might be difficult. I've not heard of many intruders carrying magnets, a compass and tape for the purpose of defeating a contact. But well prepared burglars may use these techniques.

In my own home, I have the traditional magnet contacts, backed up by exterior and interior motion detection, glass break detectors and sensors on closet doors. So, I don't feel insecure with the traditional magnetic contacts. And, I always push for added detection zones.

I suppose, if someone is worried about this type of defeat, they can install additional magnets in doors and window channels as decoys and let the burglar wonder.

In many commercial projects, particularly at warehouses where high-value merchandise is stored, I have seen many attempts to defeat alarm devices in preparation for a later burglary. This has included the removal of surface mounted magnets from the door and taping them to the contact switch, the opening of a junction box and twisting of the wires to closed-loop contact switches together, and the covering of a motion detector with tape or by placing a box on top of it. In almost every case, these acts appeared to have been committed by an insider - an employee or contractor who had daytime access to the facility.

As a result, I now specify high-security contacts such as the Magnasphere on most projects of this type, as well as make sure that alarm devices and all associated wiring are protected against tampering.

(It's amazing how few installers (maybe 25% at best) use the tamper switches provided on detection devices or provide tamper switches on junction boxes that contain connections - but I'll save that rant for another day....)

NOTICE: This comment has been moved to its own discussion: Why Don't Installers Use Tamper Switches?

Good points!

I think the default thought is that these incidents are always outsiders. I've seen contacts taped together or with a magnet sandwiched in, as well. I've seen a PIR taken off the wall and just sitting on a shelf, too. Insiders can do as much or more damage as intruders.

It's amazing how few installers (maybe 25% at best) use the tamper switches provided on detection devices or provide tamper switches on junction boxes that contain connections

I agree! And I think 25% is generous. I moved that point to another thread here... so the day for your rant is today!

Out of interest in the US is there a grading standard for the installation of Alarms? So low risk grade 1, home / small business grade 2, grade 3 commercial grade 4 banks? And the same for signalling systems? Just interested really :)

Kind of, but not really.

We have UL listings for High Security Levels 1 and 2, but that only specifies requirements devices must meet, not what a given facility needs. And they're really only used for government projects. And not even all of them, at that.

To my knowledge, there's no true overarching standards for what's required for various levels of security overall.

Does the same defeat principal hold true for the more expensive "balanced contacts" that are required on most government installations?

In short, yes:

That's a Magnasphere demo video, but there others on Youtube as well. It's more difficult and prone to error, but an insider with time who wants to leave a door unsecured can do it fairly easily.

We have been installing Magnasphere contacts on all new installations and repairs the cost is slightly more for a better device in my opinion. We also use the wireless contacts which I feel are of better quality that some manufacturers brand. These products are also made in the USA for those of us who prefer to buy American made.

We have used Magnasphere contacts with success. In addition, as many others noted, we use tamper switches. A bit of an upgraded cost, but worth it for many of our customers.

In a some cases, we use a combination of an LBM strike and door contact which provides status of both doors and locks. Seeing this more and more in healthcare facilities.

Magnasphere contacts may be installed in any orientation.  The magnetic ball is attracted to the ferrous metal ring and held in place when the door is open.  When the door is closed, the stronger magnetic field pulls the ball into place and closes (or opens) the circuit).

In short, Magnasphere contacts may be installed in the header or in the locking side frame.

Mike Keegan

VP - Security Products

Magnasphere

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Door Operators Access Control Tutorial on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex. The mechanisms needed to...
Access Control Turnstiles Guide on Jan 28, 2019
Turnstiles control pedestrian access to secured areas, essentially becoming moving portions of fences, walls, or barricades for physically stop...
Door Closers Access Control Tutorial on May 02, 2019
Door Closers have an important job: automatically shut doors when they are opened, because an open door cannot control access. In this note, we...
Access Control Request to Exit (RTE) Tutorial on May 13, 2019
For access controlled doors, especially those with maglocks, 'Request to Exit', or 'RTE' devices are required to override electrified locks to...
Securing Access Control Installations Tutorial on Oct 17, 2019
The physical security of access control components is critical to ensuring that a facility is truly secure. Otherwise, the entire system can be...
Lock Status Monitoring Tutorial on Oct 28, 2019
Just because access doors are closed does not mean they are locked. Unless access systems are using lock status monitoring, the doors and areas...
Tailgating: Access Control Tutorial on Oct 31, 2019
Nearly all access control systems are vulnerable to an easy exploit called 'tailgating'. Indeed, a friendly gesture in holding doors for others...
Disruptor Wyze Releases Undisruptive Smartlock on Dec 06, 2019
While Wyze has disrupted the consumer IP camera market with ~$20 cameras, its entrance into smart locks is entirely undisruptive. We have...
Propped Doors Access Control Tutorial on Jan 07, 2020
Doors should keep 'bad guys' out, but a common access control problem is people propping doors open, preventing them from being secure. Even...
Wyze Smart Door Lock Test on Jan 14, 2020
Wyze's inexpensive cameras have grabbed the attention of many in the consumer market, but can the company's new smart lock get similar...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Milestone Launches Multiple Cloud Solutions on Feb 18, 2020
Milestone is going to the cloud, becoming one of the last prominent VMSes to do so. Milestone is clearly late but how competitive do these new...
Video Surveillance 101 Course - Last Chance Thursday on Feb 18, 2020
IPVM's first Video Surveillance 101 course starts this month, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the most important...
Video Surveillance Architecture 101 on Feb 18, 2020
Video surveillance can be designed and deployed in a number of ways. This 101 examines the most common options and architectures used in...
UK Stands Behind Hikvision But Controversy Continues on Feb 18, 2020
Hikvision is exhibiting at a UK government conference for law enforcement, provoking controversy from the press, politicians, and activists due to...
IronYun AI Analytics Tested on Feb 17, 2020
Taiwan startup IronYun has raised tens of millions for its "mission to be the leading Artificial Intelligence, big data video software as a service...
Access Control ADA and Disability Laws Tutorial on Feb 17, 2020
Safe access control is paramount, especially for those with disabilities. Most countries have codes to mandate safe building access for those...
ISC West 2020 Removes China Pavilion, No Plans To Cancel Or Postpone on Feb 17, 2020
ISC West plans to go on next month, amidst concerns over coronavirus. However, the Asia / China Pavilion has been removed, show organizers...
Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming the "modular design allows for easy installation". We bought and...
PRC Warns Against China Video Surveillance Hacks, Hikvision Targeted on Feb 14, 2020
Hackers are targeting China video surveillance manufacturers and systems, according to the PRC's main cyber threat monitoring body. The hackers...
IPVM Conference 2020 on Feb 13, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our 2020 conference. This is the first and only industry event that will be 100% sponsor-free. Like IPVM online, the...