Axis Low Cost HD Cameras

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Apr 24, 2012

A critical weakness of Axis' recently announced Camera Companion was the lack of low-cost cameras with on-board storage support. Even if the 'DVR' is free, expensive cameras can eliminate any overall financial benefit. Now, Axis has announced two new models with MicroSD card support, including their lowest-priced HD camera to date, which aim to make ACC more competitive. In this note, we overview these new models comparing to low-cost VMSes, analog DVRs and VSaaS to determine if the competitive positioning really does change.

Overview

The M1013 and M1014 are most similar in featureset to the existing M1011 cube camera, with some additions:

  • Increased resolution - SVGA and 720p, vs. VGA for the M1011
  • MicroSDHC slot on board vs none before
  • H.264 Main profile encoding (previous models were Baseline profile only), which may provide modest bandwidth savings.

At release, the M1013 and M1014 will not support third-party Axis Camera Application Platform plugins. Axis plans to add support for these in a future firmware update.

The M1013 and M1014 will be available in Q2 2012, with MSRPs of $179 and $229 USD, respectively. Based on available Axis products, we expect street pricing of approximately $165 for the M1013 and $210 for the M1014.

Comparison to Existing Models

These prices set new low points among Axis's line for the offered feature sets. The M1013 has the same pricing as the existing M1011, though increases resolution to SVGA. The M1014, on the other hand, is priced well under the 720p M1054 ($399 MSRP/$375 online), previously the least expensive HD model. 

However, compared to Axis's existing HD cube camera, the M1054, important limitations exist. The M1054 supports a number of more advanced features including PoE, audio, I/O, and contains a PIR and white light illuminator. None of these are available in the new models. Most important for day to day use is the lack of PoE.

ACC Comparisons

Previously, the least expensive HD Axis Camera Companion system used M1054s with a NAS, totaling about $1,700 ($375 per camera, $200 for NAS). Now, using M1014s, this pricing is significantly lower - ~$960 ($210 per each camera, plus $30 for 32GB SDHC card). [Contrast to our original ACC price comparisons in our Axis Camera Companion Overview.] This reduction in pricing dramatically alters comparisons to competitive technologies, as well.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

Comparison to Milestone and Exacq

Previously, pricing was essentially the same between a four-camera ACC system and a low-cost VMS platform with budget cameras, around $1,700. However, with the M1014's lower pricing, ACC becomes more attractive, pricing out significantly less while eliminating the need for a recording PC, further reducing costs and complexity.

ACC vs. Four-Camera VMS System

  • 4 x VMS licenses, $50 each: $200
  • Recording PC: $800
  • 4 x Low Cost HD camera - Vivotek IP8132, ~$185 each online: $740
  • Total: ~$1,740 for 3rd Party VMS vs. ~$960 for ACC System with M1014s

The gap narrows somewhat as camera counts increase, due to the lower cost of the Vivotek cameras in this case, however ACC still prices out substantially lower than using a VMS, at sixteen cameras:

ACC vs. Sixteen-Camera VMS System

  • 16 x VMS licenses, $50 each: $800
  • Recording PC: $1.200
  • 16 x Low Cost HD camera - Vivotek IP8132, ~$185 each online: $2,960
  • Total: ~$4,960 for 3rd Party VMS vs. ~$3840 for ACC System with M1014s

Comparison to Analog DVR

Previously, ACC using M1054s was substantially more expensive than using analog cameras and a DVR, regardless of camera count. However, due to the M1014's much lower pricing, Axis becomes more attractive in four-camera systems, within a few hundred dollars. We suspect that many users will find this a small price to pay for the increase to 720p resolution.

ACC vs. Four-Channel Analog DVR

  • 4-Channel DVR, 1TB HDD: ~$400 online
  • 4 x Analog cameras, ~$75 each online: $300
  • Total: ~$700 vs. ~$960 for ACC Systems with M1014s

At sixteen cameras, analog remains much less expensive than using M1014s with ACC, though the gap is narrowed significantly ($3,840 vs. $6,385 previously):

ACC vs. Sixteen-Channel Analog DVR

  • 16-Channel DVR, 2TB HDD: ~$800 online
  • 16 x Analog cameras, ~$75 each online: $1,200
  • Total: ~$2,000 vs. ~$3,840 for ACC System with M1014s

VSaaS

While ACC already hurt VSaaS, the introduction of these new cameras makes this fair more painful. Now, ACC deployments do not need a NAS and provide a no recurring cost solution with a straightforward install of cameras only.

Other HD Cube Cameras

All this stated, without ACC, this camera release is not big news nor novel for the market. Many IP camera vendors already offer HD cube camera for less than $200. For instance, Axis's new HD cube camera is 40% more expensive than Panasonic's new HD cube camera. To that end, the cameras themselves are more catch up for Axis than innovation (again save for ACC integration).

Conclusion

The combination of lower cost HD cameras and ACC makes the overall ACC solution much more disruptive - clearly against VSaaS and VMS solutions and increasingly against analog.

Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Dahua Intrusion Analytics And VMD Tested on May 21, 2018
Dahua ships basic analytics on practically all their cameras, ranging from low cost to high end. To see how these analytics work in real world...
Best Manufacturer Technical Support 2018 on May 21, 2018
While 5 manufacturers made the worst technical support 2018 list, only 3 stood out as providing the best technical support to 190+ integrators in...
Cybersecurity for IP Video Surveillance Guide on May 18, 2018
Keeping surveillance networks secure can be a daunting task, but there are several methods that can greatly reduce risk, especially when used in...
Dahua 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested (NK8BR4) on May 16, 2018
Continuing our coverage of 12MP sensor fisheye cameras, we bought and tested the Dahua NK8BR4, examining: Default vs. Optimized...
Worst Manufacturer Technical Support 2018 on May 16, 2018
5 manufacturers stood out as providing the worst technical support to 190+ integrators in new IPVM results. These integrators answered: In the...
Axis 12MP Stereographic Camera Tested (M3058-LVE) on May 10, 2018
Axis has released the M3058-PLVE, a 12MP sensor, stereographic panoramic camera and Axis' first with integrated IR claiming images "sharp to the...
N3N "Truly Open Visualization Platform For Physical Security" Profile on May 09, 2018
A Cisco-backed startup, N3N, claims to deliver "the world’s first and only truly open visualization platform for physical security." The company...
S2 Access Control / 'Unified Security Management' Profile on May 08, 2018
In our 13th access control company profile, we examine S2 Security's Netbox platform: Unified Security Management Platform positioning Core...
Vivotek 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested (FE9391-EV) on May 08, 2018
Next in our 12MP fisheye camera evaluation, we bought and tested Vivotek's latest generation FE9391-EV, a new model claiming improved smart IR...
Toughest Manufacturer Competitors 2018 on May 07, 2018
150+ integrators answered: Which manufacturer, when offered by rival integrators, is toughest to compete against? Why? The...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Buy Arecont: Top Bid $10 Million Cash on May 22, 2018
Last year, Arecont had a deal for a purchase price of $170 million (see Failed Arecont China Acquisition). This year, Arecont has a deal for a...
Installing Box Cameras Indoors Tutorial on May 22, 2018
This tutorial starts our physical installation for video surveillance series, starting with Box Cameras, one of the oldest and most basic types....
The Hikvision Smart Classroom Behavior Management System on May 22, 2018
Hikvision's rapidly growing offering of analytics, which we most recently examined with Hikvision's ethnic minority analytics, is now going into...
Dahua Intrusion Analytics And VMD Tested on May 21, 2018
Dahua ships basic analytics on practically all their cameras, ranging from low cost to high end. To see how these analytics work in real world...
Exacq Improving Technical Support, Responding To Integrator Complaints on May 21, 2018
Exacq had been a long-term favorite of integrators, but since their 2014 Tyco acquisition, Exacq has fallen in IPVM integrator studies (though...
Best Manufacturer Technical Support 2018 on May 21, 2018
While 5 manufacturers made the worst technical support 2018 list, only 3 stood out as providing the best technical support to 190+ integrators in...
Stealth / UCIT - Remote Video Monitoring Provider Profile on May 18, 2018
Can 2 remote video monitoring companies, Stealth Monitoring from the US and UCIT from Canada combine to impact the market and compete in a changing...
Cybersecurity for IP Video Surveillance Guide on May 18, 2018
Keeping surveillance networks secure can be a daunting task, but there are several methods that can greatly reduce risk, especially when used in...
Forced Entry / Duress Access Tutorial on May 17, 2018
Even though access control normally keeps people safe, tragedies have revealed a significant issue. If users are forced to unlock doors for...
ADT Stock Drops 50% Since IPO on May 17, 2018
It has been a brutal 4 months for ADT. They first expected to IPO at ~$18. They IPOed at $14, dropping immediately to $12.39 And now, not even...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact