Axis Low Cost HD Cameras

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Apr 24, 2012

A critical weakness of Axis' recently announced Camera Companion was the lack of low-cost cameras with on-board storage support. Even if the 'DVR' is free, expensive cameras can eliminate any overall financial benefit. Now, Axis has announced two new models with MicroSD card support, including their lowest-priced HD camera to date, which aim to make ACC more competitive. In this note, we overview these new models comparing to low-cost VMSes, analog DVRs and VSaaS to determine if the competitive positioning really does change.

Overview

The M1013 and M1014 are most similar in featureset to the existing M1011 cube camera, with some additions:

  • Increased resolution - SVGA and 720p, vs. VGA for the M1011
  • MicroSDHC slot on board vs none before
  • H.264 Main profile encoding (previous models were Baseline profile only), which may provide modest bandwidth savings.

At release, the M1013 and M1014 will not support third-party Axis Camera Application Platform plugins. Axis plans to add support for these in a future firmware update.

The M1013 and M1014 will be available in Q2 2012, with MSRPs of $179 and $229 USD, respectively. Based on available Axis products, we expect street pricing of approximately $165 for the M1013 and $210 for the M1014.

Comparison to Existing Models

These prices set new low points among Axis's line for the offered feature sets. The M1013 has the same pricing as the existing M1011, though increases resolution to SVGA. The M1014, on the other hand, is priced well under the 720p M1054 ($399 MSRP/$375 online), previously the least expensive HD model. 

However, compared to Axis's existing HD cube camera, the M1054, important limitations exist. The M1054 supports a number of more advanced features including PoE, audio, I/O, and contains a PIR and white light illuminator. None of these are available in the new models. Most important for day to day use is the lack of PoE.

ACC Comparisons

Previously, the least expensive HD Axis Camera Companion system used M1054s with a NAS, totaling about $1,700 ($375 per camera, $200 for NAS). Now, using M1014s, this pricing is significantly lower - ~$960 ($210 per each camera, plus $30 for 32GB SDHC card). [Contrast to our original ACC price comparisons in our Axis Camera Companion Overview.] This reduction in pricing dramatically alters comparisons to competitive technologies, as well.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Comparison to Milestone and Exacq

Previously, pricing was essentially the same between a four-camera ACC system and a low-cost VMS platform with budget cameras, around $1,700. However, with the M1014's lower pricing, ACC becomes more attractive, pricing out significantly less while eliminating the need for a recording PC, further reducing costs and complexity.

ACC vs. Four-Camera VMS System

  • 4 x VMS licenses, $50 each: $200
  • Recording PC: $800
  • 4 x Low Cost HD camera - Vivotek IP8132, ~$185 each online: $740
  • Total: ~$1,740 for 3rd Party VMS vs. ~$960 for ACC System with M1014s

The gap narrows somewhat as camera counts increase, due to the lower cost of the Vivotek cameras in this case, however ACC still prices out substantially lower than using a VMS, at sixteen cameras:

ACC vs. Sixteen-Camera VMS System

  • 16 x VMS licenses, $50 each: $800
  • Recording PC: $1.200
  • 16 x Low Cost HD camera - Vivotek IP8132, ~$185 each online: $2,960
  • Total: ~$4,960 for 3rd Party VMS vs. ~$3840 for ACC System with M1014s

Comparison to Analog DVR

Previously, ACC using M1054s was substantially more expensive than using analog cameras and a DVR, regardless of camera count. However, due to the M1014's much lower pricing, Axis becomes more attractive in four-camera systems, within a few hundred dollars. We suspect that many users will find this a small price to pay for the increase to 720p resolution.

ACC vs. Four-Channel Analog DVR

  • 4-Channel DVR, 1TB HDD: ~$400 online
  • 4 x Analog cameras, ~$75 each online: $300
  • Total: ~$700 vs. ~$960 for ACC Systems with M1014s

At sixteen cameras, analog remains much less expensive than using M1014s with ACC, though the gap is narrowed significantly ($3,840 vs. $6,385 previously):

ACC vs. Sixteen-Channel Analog DVR

  • 16-Channel DVR, 2TB HDD: ~$800 online
  • 16 x Analog cameras, ~$75 each online: $1,200
  • Total: ~$2,000 vs. ~$3,840 for ACC System with M1014s

VSaaS

While ACC already hurt VSaaS, the introduction of these new cameras makes this fair more painful. Now, ACC deployments do not need a NAS and provide a no recurring cost solution with a straightforward install of cameras only.

Other HD Cube Cameras

All this stated, without ACC, this camera release is not big news nor novel for the market. Many IP camera vendors already offer HD cube camera for less than $200. For instance, Axis's new HD cube camera is 40% more expensive than Panasonic's new HD cube camera. To that end, the cameras themselves are more catch up for Axis than innovation (again save for ACC integration).

Conclusion

The combination of lower cost HD cameras and ACC makes the overall ACC solution much more disruptive - clearly against VSaaS and VMS solutions and increasingly against analog.

Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

IronYun AI Analytics Tested on Feb 17, 2020
Taiwan / US startup IronYun has raised tens of millions for its "mission to...
New Axis M30 Cameras Tested on Mar 26, 2020
Axis has released a new generation of, for them, relatively low cost M30...
TVT / InVid White Light Camera Tested Vs Hikvision ColorVu on Mar 18, 2020
With mega China manufacturers Dahua and Hikvision facing both bans and human...
YOLOv5 Released Amidst Controversy on Jul 27, 2020
YOLO has gained significant attention within video surveillance for its...
Uniview Deep Learning Camera Tested on Jul 14, 2020
Uniview's intrusion analytics have performed poorly in our shootouts. Now,...
Mobotix 7 Line Camera Tested on Mar 12, 2020
Mobotix is attempting a turn-around, struggling for years, then releasing the...
Mobotix Thermal Detection Camera Tested on Jun 09, 2020
For years Mobotix has struggled but now sales are surging driven by Mobotix's...
Video Analytics 101 on Mar 16, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals of video surveillance...
HID Presents Signo on Apr 23, 2020
HID Global presented their new Signo readers they claim read farther and...
Tiandy Super Starlight Cameras Tested on Apr 30, 2020
Tiandy is taking aim at China competitors Dahua and Hikvision, with a new...
HID Releases Lower-Cost Signo Readers on Mar 06, 2020
HID Global is releasing a new line of readers called Signo they claim read...
Access Credential Form Factor Tutorial on Feb 10, 2020
Deciding which access control credential to use and distribute, including...
Dahua, Hikvision, ZKTeco Face Mask Detection Shootout on Jun 19, 2020
Temperature tablets with face mask detection are one of the hottest trends in...
Sunell Panda Cam Body Temperature Measurement Camera Tested on May 14, 2020
Sunell is far less well known than its gargantuan domestic competitors Dahua...
Hikvision and Uniview Entry Level Thermal Handheld Cameras Tested on Jun 05, 2020
While most screening systems cost $10,000 or more, manufacturers such as...

Recent Reports

Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...