Low Quality Surveillance RFPs

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 22, 2012

In our international integrator survey, respondents raised numerous concerns about low quality surveillance RFPs. In this report, we explain and examine their specific concerns.

Overview

Request for Proposals (i.e., RFPs) are a common method of purchase solicitation, favored by government, institutional, and municipal entities looking to buy large or complex systems. When a lot of money is spent on systems, more often than not, RFPs are issued. The goal, at least theoretically, is to find the best possible solution at the lowest available price.

For background, see our series of reviews on RFPs, examining good and bad aspects of them.

Concerns

We frequently hear industry professionals raise concern about the effectiveness and fairness of RFPs, and by extension, the security consultants and specifiers you create those proposals. Indeed, this has been a major element in heated discussions we have had about security consultant conflict of interest and the Axis Corruption Cruise.

The Question

Given the interest in this topic, we asked 100 integrators the following question:

In the extensive commentary provided, 4 common themes emerged regarding RFP quality problems: problems of RFPs being cut n pasted, incompetent specifiers, rigged proposals and slanted RFPs

** *** ************* ********** ******, *********** ****** ******** ******** ***** low ******* ************ ****. ** **** ******, ** ******* *** examine ***** ******** ********.

********

******* *** ********* (*.*., ****) *** * ****** ****** ** purchase ************, ******* ** **********, *************, *** ********* ******** ******* to *** ***** ** ******* *******. **** * *** ** money ** ***** ** *******, **** ***** **** ***, **** are ******. *** ****, ** ***** *************, ** ** **** the **** ******** ******** ** *** ****** ********* *****.

*** **********, *** *** ****** ** ******* ** ****, ********* **** *** *** ******* ** ****.

********

** ********** **** ******** ************* ***** ******* ***** *** ************* and ******** ** ****, *** ** *********, *** ******** *********** and ********** *** ****** ***** *********. ******, **** *** **** a ***** ******* ** ****** *********** ** **** *** ************* ********** ******** ** *********** ******* ********** ******.

The ********

***** *** ******** ** **** *****, ** ***** *** *********** the ********* ********:

** *** ********* ********** ********, * ****** ****** ******* ********* RFP ******* ********: ******** ** **** ***** *** * ******, *********** specifiers, ****** ********* *** ******* ****

[***************]

********

**** *** *** *** ******** **** *** *******:

  • * ** **** * *********** **** **** **** *** ******** enough **** **** ** *******.
  • ** *** **%+ *********** **** **********, * ***** ******** (**%) voted **** **** **** *** **** *********.

****'* **** ** ***** **** *********** ***** *** *********** *** were ******** **** ****:

********* *** ****** *******, * ****** '********' ****** ******

  • *** '* *****:*** "*** '* *****" ** "***********" ******* ** ******* ***** packages *** *** *********.
  • ***********:***** ******** *** ***** ******* ** ****** *** ** *** fully ********** ******* ***** *********.
  • ******:*** ***** ******* ** *** ******* *** **** ********** **********.
  • *******:**** *** ******* *** ******** ******** **** **** * *** vendors *** *******.

Cut '* *****

*** ******* ** *** ************** *** ******** ****** ** ****, due ** *** **-***** *** **** ******* **** *** ************* to *** ****. ****** * ************* '*** *** *****' *** then ********* ****** ******** ** **** ******** ***** ******* ** a ************* ****:

  • ** *********** ********** ** *******
  • ************* ******** **** *** ******** ** ****** ***
  • **** *** ********* ******* ************

**** *********** ********* *************** **** **** ********.  **** *** * selection ** ***** ********:

  • "********* **** *** *** ***** ** **** ** ****** *********** cost, ** *** ** ********* ** *** ** **** ** really ******."
  • "**** *** *** *** ****** **** * *** **** *** are *** ***** *** *** ***"
  • "**** ** *** ****** **** ****** ** *********** *** * lazy *** *** ***** **** ******** ************** *** ****** ******* info."
  • "********* ** *** ****** **** **** *** **** *** & paste **** **** ******* ** ******* ********** **** **** ****** actual *********** ** ******* ** ****** ******* **********."
  • "**** ***'* *** ******* ****** ** **** *** ********** ***** from * ****** ***** **** ****'* **** **** * ******* times ** *** ****. ********* **** *** *** ******* ******** and ***** ******* ** *** *** ** **********."
  • "**** *** * ** ******* ** ** ******** **** **** has **** ****** ** *** ***** ** ****. ** *** ever **-****** *****, **** **** ***** **** ****."

** ****, ******* ************** *** ** ****** ** ****** *** do *** *********** *********** **** *****. ** *****, ***** ************** are * ****** ** ********* ************ **** *** *** *************.

***********

*********** ********* *********** ** *** **** ** ******* ********* ********* in *** ************* *******.  **** **** ** ********* *** ****** in ** '********** *************' ** **** ** ***** ** ****** costs *** ** ******** ***********.

  • "*** ******* ******* ******** ************** **** ** **** ** ***** access *** ********* ***** *** **** *********. ** **** ** HD ******* **** * ******* ********** ** ******."
  • "**** ***'* * *** *** * ******** ****. **% ** the ******** *********** * **** ****** *** *** ****** ******** guys *** **** ** ************* ** ** ************** *** *** afraid ** ******* *** ** *******. **** ** *** ******* challenge ** *** ******** ** ** **** *** *** * dont *** ***** **** *** ***** **** ****."
  • "**** *** ******* ** *********** *** **** ***** ********* * camera ** ****** ******. ** * ******, **** *** *** things **** ******** ****, ***. **** ***** ********* ******** *** service ***********."
  • "**** ****/**** **** ** ******* *** ******* *********** ********* ******. We ** * **** **** *** ** ********* * ******** to ******* *** ******** **** *** *** *** ** *******." "That ****, ** ***** ***'* *** ***** **** */* *** price ** ****** *** ** *** ***** **. ******* *** client ** **** ****** ****** *****."
  • "***** ******* ** *********** *** *** ******** ****-***** ** ******* their ******** *** ***'* **** **** **** *** ******** ******* about."
  • "******* **** *** ****** ******* ** ****** *** ***'* **** enough ***** *** ******* ** ******* **** *** *******."
  • "***** *** *** **** *********** **** ****** ** ** ***** or ****** ******* **** ***'* ********** *** **********. ****** ******* documents ****** ** ****** ****** ******* ******* *** *** **** loopholes. ** *** ***, * ***** ********** **** **** ** thinks ** *** *** **** **** *** **** ****** ****** the ***** *** *** *********** ********."

*** *** ******* ** ******** ** ******* '******-**-******' *********, *** permit * **** ***** ***********. **** *** ************* ** ****** *******, some ********** **** '************' ************* ** *** ****** *** ****** those ***** ** **** ** *** *** *********. ***** ********** **** choose *** ** ******** ******* ****** ******** '** *****', *** will **** ***** *** ******* *********** ***** ** ******* **** via '****** *****'. ** **** ****, *** *** ************* *** not ********* *** ******* ** ******* ******** *** ******** *******.

The ***** ******* ** *** ******* *** **** ********** **********.

**** *********** ********* **** *** *** ******* ** ** ******** in *********, ****** * ****** ** ****** ******* ** ******* 'someone ****'* ****'.  

  • "******** *** ********* ******* **** ***'* ** ** *** *** government **********...**** **** *** *** ****** ** ******* ******* ** the *********."
  • "** **** **** **** ***'* ** **** *** **** **** effort/low ****** ***** *** ******* **** **** *** ******* ** a **** **** **** ****** *** **** *** ******."
  • "...****** ** **** ****** ***** *** **** ** ******* **** bid ******** ******* **** *** * ***** ** **** *** usually ***** *** *-* ****** ***********"
  • "**** *** ****** ****** ** * ******** ****** ** ** not ******* ****** *********** ** ******* * ****** ********..."
  • "*** *** ********* ******* ** ********* **** ** ****** **** the ***** ** ***** ** ****** ******* * ********** ***** making ** ********** ** ***."

*********** *** ***** *********** ******* ********* *********, *** **** ********* require *** *******. *** **** **** ** ********* ** ** RFP *** ** ***********.  **** *********** *** ***** ** ****** in * ******* ***** *** ******* *** ******* **** **********, it ********** *** *********** ** *********** ** ***** **********. 

RFPs *** ******* *** ******** ******** **** **** * *** ******* *** *******.

*********** ********* *************** **** *** ******** ** **** ** '*****-**' specific ********* **** ** ************. **** ****** *********** *** **** in ***** ** *******, *** **** **** *** ***** ** potential ***********.

  • "*************, **** ***** **** *** ***'* ** **** **** *** very ****** ***** "**********" ********** ******** ******* *********** **** ** name."  
  • "***'* *** ********* ***'* **** *** ***** *****... *** **** RFP's **** ****** *** ******** ******** *** *** ******* ** solicit *********** ********."
  • "**** ** **** *** ******** *** ******* *******/******** *** ****** impossible ** ******* *********** *******. *** *******: ****** **** **** MxPEG ***********..."
  • "...***** **** **** *** ******* *** **** ******** ********* ** are *** **** **********."

**** ********* ** ********* *** ****** **** ***** ********** ********** to ************ ****, *** ** ***** ***** ** * ******* disadvatange ** *** ****** ** *** ***********.  

The **** *********

* ******* *****, **% (*/**) ** ***********, **** **** *** 'very ************' *********** **** ****. *** ******** ** ***** *********** *** typically ** ********** *** ******* *** *********** ****** *** *** rather **** ******** ** **** ********* **** *** ************** ** the ********. **** ******** **** **** ********** * ********'* ****** *** a *** ******, *** **** ******* *** ******** ** ******* response, ***** *********** *** **** ** **** * ************ ***** relationship **** *** **********.

 

**********

*****, **** ****** ** '***** *** ******* *****' ** *********** performance **********, *** *********** **** *** ****** ******* *** **** often ** **********, ********** ********, ** ********* **** ** ********** the **** ******** ****** ** *** ********, ***** ****** *** process ******* ** *******.

**** *********** ****** *** ** ******* ** **** ** ***, instead ****** *** '************ *****' ***** ** ** **-***** ***** of ******** *****. *** *** ********, **** ******** ***** ****** competition, *** ******* ** * **** **** *******-*** ******** ******.  Unfortunately, **** **** *********** **** *********** *** ***** ************, *** these '****** ******' ************* ****** ********** ** *********.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Camera Multi-Streaming Usage on Nov 22, 2017
IP cameras typically support multiple streams, allowing a single camera to transmit multiple streams at different resolutions, frame rates and even...
Law Breaking Longse Enters USA on Nov 22, 2017
Longse has established itself as world class, at least in spamming the industry, ripping off Milestone and Video Insight as well as Hikvision. But...
Panasonic Unified Surveillance Strategy Analyzed on Nov 17, 2017
Panasonic is now a "Unified Surveillance" offering, as their ASIS 2017 booth proclaimed: Looking to make a comeback in the security industry,...
Axis Commits To Long-Term Firmware Support on Nov 15, 2017
With the rise of cyber security awareness, and a general increase in hardware reliability, "software warranties" may prove more valuable than...
Dahua Launches Electric Cars on Nov 13, 2017
Embattled mega video surveillance manufacturer Dahua is now electric car manufacturer Dahua. Let the jokes begin: But is the joke on Dahua's...
Top 2017 Trends - Cyber and Analytics on Nov 09, 2017
The 2 clear top 2017 trends, according to IPVM integrator statistics are: Cyber Security Video Analytics This is a change from 2016...
Average IP Camera Cable Run Distance on Nov 07, 2017
Estimating cable lengths can be tricky, seemingly either all guess work or requiring each and every run to be measured, a time consuming task.  To...
ZoneMinder Open Source Profile on Nov 06, 2017
The first, oldest and probably the best known open source VMS is ZoneMinder. But where has it gone and is it still relevant today in a world of...
Top Manufacturers Gaining and Losing 2017 on Nov 03, 2017
3 years ago, IPVM statistics accurately and early identified the rise of Hikvision usage across Western markets (see Top Manufacturers Gaining and...
Avigilon Access Control 2017 Examined on Nov 01, 2017
For more than 4 years, Avigilon has been in the access control business, since their May 2013 acquisition of RedCloud. Since then, Avigilon has...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Camera Multi-Streaming Usage on Nov 22, 2017
IP cameras typically support multiple streams, allowing a single camera to transmit multiple streams at different resolutions, frame rates and even...
Law Breaking Longse Enters USA on Nov 22, 2017
Longse has established itself as world class, at least in spamming the industry, ripping off Milestone and Video Insight as well as Hikvision. But...
Amazon Key In-Home Package Delivery Examined on Nov 21, 2017
Interesting idea or invitation for criminals to rob you? Amazon's recent announcement of Key, a service that will help manage visitors, welcoming...
Top Maglock Provider Warns Against Using Maglocks on Nov 21, 2017
Do not buy my company's product. It sounds strange indeed, but a senior Allegion consultant stated that maglocks should not be used in common...
CBR vs VBR vs MBR - Surveillance Streaming on Nov 21, 2017
How you stream video has a major impact on quality and bandwidth. And it is not simply CODEC choice (e.g., H.264 vs H.265). Regardless of the...
Hikvision Chinese Government Owner CETHIK Exposed on Nov 20, 2017
Hikvision deceives about its Chinese government ownership. Contrary to their claims about 'independence' and simply having 'shareholders' that are...
Dahua Hard-Coded Credentials Vulnerability on Nov 20, 2017
A newly discovered Dahua backdoor is described by the researcher discovering it as: not the result of an accidental logic error or poor...
Panasonic Unified Surveillance Strategy Analyzed on Nov 17, 2017
Panasonic is now a "Unified Surveillance" offering, as their ASIS 2017 booth proclaimed: Looking to make a comeback in the security industry,...
Amazon Cloud Cam Is Poor (Tested) on Nov 17, 2017
Retail behemoth Amazon has entered the surveillance market with the Amazon Cloud Cam, the eyes of its just-announced Amazon Key delivery...
Nest Secure Alarm System Tested on Nov 16, 2017
Google's expansion continues, this time into home security with their Nest subsidiary's move into alarm systems. They paid more than a...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact