Little Brother is Watching Too

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Mar 20, 2014

The concept of Little Brother is a play off George Orwell’s Big Brother in the book 1984, the all seeing eye of the government watching over the population from a single vantage point. Little Brother however, refers to the increase in private surveillance cameras and the capability to record video anywhere using portable devices or phones.

Interview with the ACLU

We talked to ACLU senior policy analyst Jay Stanley about the rise of private cameras and what that means for privacy.

*** ******* ** ****** Brother ** * **** off ****** ******’* *** Brother ** *** **** 1984, *** *** ****** eye ** *** ********** watching **** *** ********** from * ****** ******* point. ****** ******* *******, refers ** *** ******** in ******* ************ ******* and *** ********** ** record ***** ******** ***** portable ******* ** ******.

Interview **** *** ****

** ****** ** **** ****** ****** ******* Jay ******* ***** *** **** ** private ******* *** **** that ***** *** *******.

[***************]

More ****** *** ********

*** ** *** **** differences ** ****** * centralized ****** **** ** managed ** ****** *** a ************* “******” **** up ** ******** ****** is **** ** **** more ********* ** *** way *** ******.

**** **** ** *** cameras *** ***** ** private ********* ********** * city, “** ********* ****** bad ******* *** *** take *** *** ******* and ******** * ************* picture ** **** ******** did, *** *** ****’* likely ** ** **** without **** ****** *** a **** ****** ** work. **’* * ********** against *** **** ** abuse ** *** *** too ***** **** ** comes ** ***** ************,” he ****. ***** ** a ******* ******* ** cameras ***** ******* **** people ** ** ********, therefore **** ****** ** be ******* *** **** likely *** ******* ** take *** ****.

“**** ****** **'* ***** not ***** ** **** all ** *** ****** spaces ********* ** *******, it’s * *** ****** from **** ***** ** view,” ** ****.

** **** ***** ** a **** ***** ***** used ** ****** ******** usually***** ** * **** different ******* **** ***** in *** ***** ** a ****** ************ *** ********* *********.

The ******** ** ******* ******* ** ***********

** ******* ** ********* video *** ******* *** more ******** “*** ***** will **** **********,” ******* ** * **** post******* **** ****.

“********* ********* ******* * video ****** ** ***** pocket **** **** ********** they **,” ** ****.

******* ****** ************ ** ******** ** that *** ****** **** consistently ***** **** *** right ** **** ** public ****** ** ********* by *** ***** ********* and ***** **** “****** ******* *** ************ cameras** ******* ********* *****.”

“** *** *** ** regulate ** *** ****** that *********** **** *********** when ****’** ******* **** the ********, *** * don’t ***** **** ***** be ********* ** ******. These ******* **** * large **** ** *** citizen ****** *** ****** and **** ***** ** thrown ********* ** ** were ** ***** ********** private *******, ” ** said.

Private ******* ****** ********* *** ********** *******

** ******* ******* ***********, they****** *** **** *** governments** **** ********* *******, ACLU's ******* ****.

*** ****, **** ** problems **** ****** **** New ******* **** ********** *** ********* ** private *******, *** ******* ***** cases ***************** ******* *********, **** ** ***** Plains, *** ****.

“**’* ****** **** * surveillance ***,” ******* ****. “You’re ******* ********** ** do **** **** ******’* otherwise **. **** **** businesses **** *** ***** to ** ******** *** the **** *** ******’* have * ****** ** this *** ****’* *****.”

***** **** ******, ****** would ** ******* ** give ** ***** ************ footage, *** *** *** in ***** ****** ********************** **** ****** ****** to *** ******* **** requested.

“* ***** **** * problem **** * *** requiring **** ** **** video ****** ********* ** the ******. ** *** business ***** ****** ** is *** ** ***** best ********, *** ****** should **** ** *** a ******* **** **** would *** *** ***** private ***********,” ** ****.

****

******* **** ******* **** databases *** * ***** issue. ** *** ********** is ********** ******* ***** data, ***** ****** ** strict *********** ********* *** use ** *** **********. However**** ** ***** ** companies ***** **, * *** ***** mean ********** ****** *** are ****** ****** ** public ******.

“******* *** ** * very ****** ***** ********. The ******** ** ***** down ** ** *** significant * ******’* ***** to ******* ** ******** to *** *******’* *********. And ******* ****** **** on * **** ***** deserve *** **** *********** as * ****** ******** on *** ****** **** their ******** ******,” ** said.

Comments (6)

I agree that there is a big difference in the regulation of govt (specifically LE) vs private data collection - but private company regulation (which I also agree is troublesome) is only required because govt agencies make their license plate database available 'publicly', no?

Private companies can take pictures of plates all day.... it doesn't mean anything until they can translate that plate number/letter sequence into identifiable personal data.

So, regulate govt collection parameters, and regulate govt release of personal data (plate 'info') like we do for every other type of personal data - and then regulation of 'taking pictures in public' is a moot point.

What you say? :)

Borderline apropos of nothing, I was just idly wondering whether the ACLU has surveillance in any of their offices, or their staff in any of their homes... 

You're wondering if the parent agency of the guy who just told Carlton that surveillance in the hands of non state actors is a good thing uses surveillance? I hope the answer to that question is 'yes'.

Nicely done Carlton, very informative!

Marty, what license plate data do you think law enforcement is making public? Other than when someone files a freedom of information actrequest, I don't know of any agencies that provide any plate information to the public or to private industry. And even under this filing, the only information released would be a plate number, location and date/time. Any motor vehicle registration information is/ should not be associated with ALPR data and would probably violate a number of laws if provided.

Some agencies do share information with other law enforcement agencies through fusion centers but I don't know of any data sharing to private businesses. Vigilant will allow law enforcement access to the privately collected data from mobile ALPR but the law enforcement data is retained within the respective agencies.

Mark,

The Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994 (DPPA) restricts who has access to DMV databases - and as you note, these DMV databases are not public record.

However, anyone can pay a licensed private investigator to obtain this information - as long as they assert that the request is for a 'DPPA Permissable Purpose'.

Below is copied from a licensed PI firm named Docusearch

http://www.docusearch.com/dppa-permissible-purpose.html

========================================================

Pursuant to the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act of 1994 (DPPA), you may only access vehicle registration information for any of the following permitted uses:

1) Litigation/Pre-litigation: For use in connection with any civil, criminal, administrative, or arbitral proceeding in any federal, state, or local court or agency or before any self-regulatory body, including the service of process, investigation in anticipation of litigation, and the execution or enforcement of judgments and orders, or pursuant to an order of a federal, state, or local court.

2) Debt Recovery/Fraud Investigation: For use in the normal course of business by a legitimate business or its agents, employees, or contractors, but only—
(a) to verify the accuracy of personal information submitted by the individual to the business or its agents, employees, or contractors; and
(b) if such information as so submitted is not correct or is no longer correct, to obtain the correct information, but only for the purposes of preventing fraud by, pursuing legal remedies against, or recovering on a debt or security interest against, the individual.

3) Government Agency: Use by a government agency, but only in carrying out its functions.

4) On Government Behalf: Use by any person acting on behalf of a government or law enforcement agency, but only in carrying out the agency’s functions.

5) Insurer/Claims Investigation: Use by an insurer or insured in connection with insurance claims, claims investigation, or anti-fraud activities.

6) Motor Vehicle Safety: In connection with motor vehicle safety or theft, or driver safety (except by or for a motor vehicle manufacturer).

7) Employment: Use by an employer or its agents or insurer to obtain or verify information relating to a holder of a commercial driver’s license that is required under Chapter 313 of Title 49 of the United States Code.

8) Towing/Impounded Vehicle: For use in providing notice to the owners of towed or impounded vehicles.

9) Private Investigator: Use by a licensed private investigative agency or licensed security service for a purpose permitted in one of the items listed above.

10) Consumer Authority: Written consent of individual. (Copy of signed consent must be faxed to Docusearch prior to the request being filled.)

You will be required to select a DPPA Permissible Purpose when placing your order. By inputting your response, you are certifying to Docusearch.com that you are in, and assume full responsibility for, compliance with the DPPA and you agree to indemnify, defend and hold Docusearch harmless from any breach of the DPPA by you, your agents or contractors and any damages, fees and costs associated therewith. Information from this file may not be used to determine a consumer’s eligibility for credit, insurance or employment, pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, (15 U.S.C. Sec 1681).

If you are in compliance with the DPPA, then you can order a license plate lookup from Docusearch. As licensed private investigators, we have access to current vehicle registration information on file at your state’s DMV, so you can be confident that the results are up-to-date and accurate.

DPPA Q & A

Q- How does Docusearch verify that the DPPA Permissible Purpose I select is valid?

A- We don’t. By selecting your response, you are certifying to Docusearch that you are in, and assume full responsibility for, compliance with the DPPA and you agree to indemnify, defend and hold Docusearch harmless from any breach of the DPPA by you, your agents or contractors and any damages, fees and costs associated therewith.

Q- Who sees my DPPA Permissible Purpose selection?

A- Only Docusearch. However, if we are audited by any governmental authority or if any criminal or civil litigation arises as a result of your search, we are compelled to provide your identifiable information, including the DPPA Permissible Purpose you selected.

Q- Can I get into trouble for selecting an invalid DPPA Permissible Purpose?

A- Yes. If, as a result of any criminal or civil litigation, it is determined that you obtained protected DPPA information under false pretenses, you could be held criminally and/or civilly liable.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Ireland National Children's Hospital Chooses Hikvision End-to-End With Facial Recognition on Dec 05, 2019
The world's most expensive hospital project ever, the New Children's Hospital in Ireland, has chosen an all-Hikvision surveillance system including...
Arcules CEO Retracts False GDPR Claim + Dahua and Milestone Claims Examined on Dec 03, 2019
Arcules CEO has retracted a false claim about his organization being a "fully compliant GDPR company" after IPVM reporting (Arcules CEO Threatens...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Dec 02, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
China Uyghur Analytic Projects Require Intel And NVIDIA, Intel Condemns, NVIDIA Silent on Dec 02, 2019
At least 8 PRC China police projects require NVIDIA and Intel chips to power their Uyghur-detecting analytics, according to procurement documents...
China Government Spreads Uyghur Analytics Across China on Nov 25, 2019
IPVM has found 12 recent government projects across China (PRC) that require Uyghur analytics and a general government guideline requiring such...
France Declares School Facial Recognition Illegal Due to GDPR on Oct 31, 2019
France is the latest European country to effectively prohibit facial recognition as a school access control solution, even with the consent of...
Dahua Co-Founder Says Human Rights Sanctions Shows Strong Dahua Technology on Oct 29, 2019
Despite Dahua doing nearly a billion dollars of projects in Xinjiang, including building and operating police stations, Dahua not only denies 'any...
Remote Access (DDNS vs P2P vs VPN) Usage Statistics on Oct 25, 2019
Remote access can make systems more usable but also more vulnerable. How are integrators delivring remote access in 2019? How many are using...
Covert Elevator Face Recognition on Oct 24, 2019
Covert elevator facial recognition has the potential to solve the cost and complexity of elevator surveillance while engendering immense privacy...
Critiquing Carnegie's AI Surveillance Paper on Sep 25, 2019
The Carnegie Endowment has issued an ambitious paper on the Global Expansion of AI Surveillance. While its aim is applaudable, the paper has...

Most Recent Industry Reports

IP Camera Browser Support: Who's Broken / Who Works on Dec 10, 2019
For many years, IP cameras depended on ActiveX control, whose secure flaws have been known for more than a decade. The good news is that this is...
Acquisitions - Winner and Losers on Dec 10, 2019
Most major manufacturers have been acquired over the last decade. But which have been good deals or not? In this report, we analyze the...
IP Camera Installability Shootout 2019 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Dec 09, 2019
What are the best and worst cameras to install? Which manufacturers make it the hardest or easiest to install their cameras? We tested 35 total...
Viisights Raises $10 Million, Behavior Analytics Company Profile on Dec 09, 2019
Viisights, an Israeli AI analytics startup marketing "Behavioral Understanding Systems", announced $10 million Series A funding. We spoke to...
Disruptor Wyze Releases Undisruptive Smartlock on Dec 06, 2019
While Wyze has disrupted the consumer IP camera market with ~$20 cameras, its entrance into smart locks is entirely undisruptive. We have...
Bosch Budget 3000i Cameras Tested on Dec 05, 2019
Bosch has long had a hole in its lineup for, as it describes, "competitively-priced cameras". Now, Bosch has released its 3000i series cameras...
Anixter Resisting Takeover From Competitor on Dec 05, 2019
Mega distributor Anixter is going to be acquired but by whom? Initially, Anixter planned to go private, being bought by a private equity firm....
Security Sales Course 2020 - Last Chance Save $50 on Dec 05, 2019
This sales course is customized for the current needs and challenges specific to professionals selling video surveillance and access control...
Ireland National Children's Hospital Chooses Hikvision End-to-End With Facial Recognition on Dec 05, 2019
The world's most expensive hospital project ever, the New Children's Hospital in Ireland, has chosen an all-Hikvision surveillance system including...
AVTech ~$70 IP Cameras Tested Vs Dahua and Hikvision on Dec 04, 2019
Taiwanese manufacturer Avtech is taking direct aim at low cost leaders Dahua and Hikvision with ~$70 starlight and white light illuminator...