Little Brother is Watching Too

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Mar 20, 2014

The concept of Little Brother is a play off George Orwell’s Big Brother in the book 1984, the all seeing eye of the government watching over the population from a single vantage point. Little Brother however, refers to the increase in private surveillance cameras and the capability to record video anywhere using portable devices or phones.

Interview with the ACLU

We talked to ACLU senior policy analyst Jay Stanley about the rise of private cameras and what that means for privacy.

*** ******* ** ****** ******* ** * **** *** ****** Orwell’s *** ******* ** *** **** ****, *** *** ****** eye ** *** ********** ******** **** *** ********** **** * single ******* *****. ****** ******* *******, ****** ** *** ******** in ******* ************ ******* *** *** ********** ** ****** ***** anywhere ***** ******** ******* ** ******.

Interview **** *** ****

** ****** ** **** ****** ****** ******* *** ******* ***** *** **** ** ******* ******* *** **** **** ***** for *******.

[***************]

More ****** *** ********

*** ** *** **** *********** ** ****** * *********** ****** that ** ******* ** ****** *** * ************* “******” **** up ** ******** ****** ** **** ** **** **** ********* in *** *** *** ******.

**** **** ** *** ******* *** ***** ** ******* ********* throughout * ****, “** ********* ****** *** ******* *** *** take *** *** ******* *** ******** * ************* ******* ** what ******** ***, *** *** ****’* ****** ** ** **** without **** ****** *** * **** ****** ** ****. **’* a ********** ******* *** **** ** ***** ** *** *** too ***** **** ** ***** ** ***** ************,” ** ****. Abuse ** * ******* ******* ** ******* ***** ******* **** people ** ** ********, ********* **** ****** ** ** ******* and **** ****** *** ******* ** **** *** ****.

“**** ****** **'* ***** *** ***** ** **** *** ** our ****** ****** ********* ** *******, **’* * *** ****** from **** ***** ** ****,” ** ****.

** **** ***** ** * **** ***** ***** **** ** public ******** ************ ** * **** ********* ******* **** ***** ** *** hands ** * ****** ************ *** ********* *********.

The ******** ** ******* ******* ** ***********

** ******* ** ********* ***** *** ******* *** **** ******** “the ***** **** **** **********,” ******* ** * **** *********** **** ****.

“********* ********* ******* * ***** ****** ** ***** ****** **** them ********** **** **,” ** ****.

******* ****** ************ ** ******** ** **** *** ****** **** ************ ***** that *** ***** ** **** ** ****** ****** ** ********* by *** ***** ********* *** ***** **** “****** ******* *** ************ ********* ******* ********* *****.”

“** *** *** ** ******** ** *** ****** **** *********** take *********** **** ****’** ******* **** *** ********, *** * don’t ***** **** ***** ** ********* ** ******. ***** ******* play * ***** **** ** *** ******* ****** *** ****** and **** ***** ** ****** ********* ** ** **** ** start ********** ******* *******, ” ** ****.

Private ******* ****** ********* *** ********** *******

** ******* ******* ***********, ********** *** **** *** ************* **** ********* *******, ****'* ******* ****.

*** ****, **** ** ******** **** ****** **** *** ******* that ********** *** ********* ** ******* *******, *** ******* ***** ***** ***************** ******* *********, **** ** ***** ******, *** ****.

“**’* ****** **** * ************ ***,” ******* ****. “***’** ******* businesses ** ** **** **** ******’* ********* **. **** **** businesses **** *** ***** ** ** ******** *** *** **** who ******’* **** * ****** ** **** *** ****’* *****.”

***** **** ******, ****** ***** ** ******* ** **** ** their ************ *******, *** *** *** ** ***** ****** ********************** **** ****** ****** ** *** ******* **** *********.

“* ***** **** * ******* **** * *** ********* **** to **** ***** ****** ********* ** *** ******. ** *** business ***** ****** ** ** *** ** ***** **** ********, the ****** ****** **** ** *** * ******* **** **** would *** *** ***** ******* ***********,” ** ****.

****

******* **** ******* **** ********* *** * ***** *****. ** the ********** ** ********** ******* ***** ****, ***** ****** ** strict *********** ********* *** *** ** *** **********. *********** ** ***** ** ********* ***** **, * *** ***** **** ********** ****** *** *** ****** photos ** ****** ******.

“******* *** ** * **** ****** ***** ********. *** ******** it ***** **** ** ** *** *********** * ******’* ***** to ******* ** ******** ** *** *******’* *********. *** ******* photos **** ** * **** ***** ******* *** **** *********** as * ****** ******** ** *** ****** **** ***** ******** camera,” ** ****.

Comments (6)

I agree that there is a big difference in the regulation of govt (specifically LE) vs private data collection - but private company regulation (which I also agree is troublesome) is only required because govt agencies make their license plate database available 'publicly', no?

Private companies can take pictures of plates all day.... it doesn't mean anything until they can translate that plate number/letter sequence into identifiable personal data.

So, regulate govt collection parameters, and regulate govt release of personal data (plate 'info') like we do for every other type of personal data - and then regulation of 'taking pictures in public' is a moot point.

What you say? :)

Borderline apropos of nothing, I was just idly wondering whether the ACLU has surveillance in any of their offices, or their staff in any of their homes...

You're wondering if the parent agency of the guy who just told Carlton that surveillance in the hands of non state actors is a good thing uses surveillance? I hope the answer to that question is 'yes'.

Nicely done Carlton, very informative!

Marty, what license plate data do you think law enforcement is making public? Other than when someone files a freedom of information actrequest, I don't know of any agencies that provide any plate information to the public or to private industry. And even under this filing, the only information released would be a plate number, location and date/time. Any motor vehicle registration information is/ should not be associated with ALPR data and would probably violate a number of laws if provided.

Some agencies do share information with other law enforcement agencies through fusion centers but I don't know of any data sharing to private businesses. Vigilant will allow law enforcement access to the privately collected data from mobile ALPR but the law enforcement data is retained within the respective agencies.

Mark,

The Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994 (DPPA) restricts who has access to DMV databases - and as you note, these DMV databases are not public record.

However, anyone can pay a licensed private investigator to obtain this information - as long as they assert that the request is for a 'DPPA Permissable Purpose'.

Below is copied from a licensed PI firm named Docusearch

http://www.docusearch.com/dppa-permissible-purpose.html

========================================================

Pursuant to the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act of 1994 (DPPA), you may only access vehicle registration information for any of the following permitted uses:

1) Litigation/Pre-litigation: For use in connection with any civil, criminal, administrative, or arbitral proceeding in any federal, state, or local court or agency or before any self-regulatory body, including the service of process, investigation in anticipation of litigation, and the execution or enforcement of judgments and orders, or pursuant to an order of a federal, state, or local court.

2) Debt Recovery/Fraud Investigation: For use in the normal course of business by a legitimate business or its agents, employees, or contractors, but only—
(a) to verify the accuracy of personal information submitted by the individual to the business or its agents, employees, or contractors; and
(b) if such information as so submitted is not correct or is no longer correct, to obtain the correct information, but only for the purposes of preventing fraud by, pursuing legal remedies against, or recovering on a debt or security interest against, the individual.

3) Government Agency: Use by a government agency, but only in carrying out its functions.

4) On Government Behalf: Use by any person acting on behalf of a government or law enforcement agency, but only in carrying out the agency’s functions.

5) Insurer/Claims Investigation: Use by an insurer or insured in connection with insurance claims, claims investigation, or anti-fraud activities.

6) Motor Vehicle Safety: In connection with motor vehicle safety or theft, or driver safety (except by or for a motor vehicle manufacturer).

7) Employment: Use by an employer or its agents or insurer to obtain or verify information relating to a holder of a commercial driver’s license that is required under Chapter 313 of Title 49 of the United States Code.

8) Towing/Impounded Vehicle: For use in providing notice to the owners of towed or impounded vehicles.

9) Private Investigator: Use by a licensed private investigative agency or licensed security service for a purpose permitted in one of the items listed above.

10) Consumer Authority: Written consent of individual. (Copy of signed consent must be faxed to Docusearch prior to the request being filled.)

You will be required to select a DPPA Permissible Purpose when placing your order. By inputting your response, you are certifying to Docusearch.com that you are in, and assume full responsibility for, compliance with the DPPA and you agree to indemnify, defend and hold Docusearch harmless from any breach of the DPPA by you, your agents or contractors and any damages, fees and costs associated therewith. Information from this file may not be used to determine a consumer’s eligibility for credit, insurance or employment, pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, (15 U.S.C. Sec 1681).

If you are in compliance with the DPPA, then you can order a license plate lookup from Docusearch. As licensed private investigators, we have access to current vehicle registration information on file at your state’s DMV, so you can be confident that the results are up-to-date and accurate.

DPPA Q & A

Q- How does Docusearch verify that the DPPA Permissible Purpose I select is valid?

A- We don’t. By selecting your response, you are certifying to Docusearch that you are in, and assume full responsibility for, compliance with the DPPA and you agree to indemnify, defend and hold Docusearch harmless from any breach of the DPPA by you, your agents or contractors and any damages, fees and costs associated therewith.

Q- Who sees my DPPA Permissible Purpose selection?

A- Only Docusearch. However, if we are audited by any governmental authority or if any criminal or civil litigation arises as a result of your search, we are compelled to provide your identifiable information, including the DPPA Permissible Purpose you selected.

Q- Can I get into trouble for selecting an invalid DPPA Permissible Purpose?

A- Yes. If, as a result of any criminal or civil litigation, it is determined that you obtained protected DPPA information under false pretenses, you could be held criminally and/or civilly liable.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...
How China's Pay By Facial Recognition Works on Apr 02, 2019
Many social media posts have variously celebrated or warned about the growing use of facial recognition for payments in China. An example of one...
Bezos-Funded Deep Sentinel Tested on Mar 28, 2019
Backed by Jeff Bezos, the Silicon Valley startup, Deep Sentinel, has declared: No One Does Home Security Like We Do Our Surveillance Team has...
IBM / Genetec Surveillance System Investigated Over Philippines Human Rights Abuses on Mar 22, 2019
A lengthy investigation into an IBM video surveillance project in the Philippines, raising concerns IBM helped local police conduct a bloody...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
City Physical Security Manager Interview on Mar 14, 2019
This physical security pro is the Physical Security Manager for the City of Calgary. He is a criminologist by training with an ASIS CPP credential....
US City Sued For Hiding Surveillance Camera Map on Mar 08, 2019
Should maps of public surveillance camera locations be kept a secret? That is what one US city is trying to do. Though the city admits the...
Church Technology Director Security Interview on Mar 07, 2019
With 40+ years of experience in IT from a wide array of verticals, including US and foreign military, and large corporate and industrial settings,...
Verified Response Discontinued in Silicon Valley San Jose on Feb 28, 2019
Almost all security alarms are false. This has driven some municipalities to require verified response before dispatching police. However, now San...
Police Department Surveillance Manager Interview on Feb 28, 2019
Former Memphis PD Surveillance Manager, Lt. Joseph Patty retired months ago, but kept busy during his decades on the force, working to build up...

Most Recent Industry Reports

19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
 Register for the Spring 2019 Access Control Course----Closed IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Verint Victimized By Ransomware on Apr 18, 2019
Verint, which is best known in the physical security industry for video surveillance but has built a sizeable cybersecurity business as well, was...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact