Lifespan of Electronic Access Control Systems
Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Jul 01, 2014
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.
Related Reports
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance
on Apr 19, 2019
This is the last chance to register for the Spring Access Control Course.
IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the...
Door Operators Access Control Tutorial
on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex.
The mechanisms needed to...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019
on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial.
In their first entry in...
ISC West 2019 Report
on Apr 12, 2019
The IPVM team has finished at the Sands looking at what companies are offering and how they are changing their positioning.
See below for 50+...
Spring 2019 50+ New Products Directory
on Apr 08, 2019
We are compiling a list of new products for Spring 2019 and have over 50 already.
Contrast to Fall 2018 New Products Directory and Spring 2018...
Startup GateKeeper Aims For Unified Physical / Logical Access Token
on Apr 04, 2019
This startup's product claims to 'Kill the Password' you use to keep your computers safe.
They have already released their Gatekeeper Halberd...
Airship VMS Profile
on Apr 03, 2019
Airship has been developing VMS software for over 10 years, however, with no outside investment, and minimal marketing, the company is not well...
Silicon Valley Access Startup Proxy Raises $13.6 Million
on Mar 28, 2019
This mobile-credential based access startup just raised $13.6 million in funding.
Further, they claim that their technology can free businesses...
Casino Security Consultant Carl Lindgren Interview
on Mar 26, 2019
For more than 20 years, Carl Lindgren worked as a casino surveillance pro, while being active (and sometimes outspoken) on various online video...
Lenel Favorability Results 2019
on Mar 26, 2019
The positive news for Lenel is that integrators do not dislike them as much as they used to.
The negative news for Lenel is that integrators...
Most Recent Industry Reports
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance
on Apr 19, 2019
This is the last chance to register for the Spring Access Control Course.
IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained
on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Verint Victimized By Ransomware
on Apr 18, 2019
Verint, which is best known in the physical security industry for video surveillance but has built a sizeable cybersecurity business as well, was...
Milestone Drops IFSEC
on Apr 18, 2019
Milestone has dropped out of Europe's largest annual security trade show (IFSEC 2019), telling IPVM that they "have found that IFSEC in EMEA no...
The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada
on Apr 17, 2019
Verkada has the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever.
In less than 2 years, they already have more salespeople in the US...
Door Operators Access Control Tutorial
on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex.
The mechanisms needed to...
Securadyne CEO: IPVM 'Entertaining For An Ignorant Few'
on Apr 16, 2019
Securadyne's CEO Carey Boethel is unhappy with IPVM's report - Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied.
Indeed, he...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested
on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...
Strong ISC West 2019 For Manufacturers But Concerns For 2020 March Move
on Apr 16, 2019
ISC West 2019 was strong for manufacturers, according to new IPVM survey results of 100+ manufacturers, consistent with 2018 results.
However,...
Axis Supports HD Analog
on Apr 15, 2019
In 2017, Axis declared 'Everything is IP':
Now, in 2019, Axis has released support for HD analog, with their new encoders.
Why the change?...
The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.
Comments (8)
Luis Carmona
Two main factors:
(1.) Being built on mostly solid state hardware, alarm panels and ACS equipment will usually have a longer life span than systems dependant on spinning hard drives, or tapes and tape heads for predecessor systems. When I worked at a newspaper company we had dumb terminals still way into Windows 2000 systems and servers.
(2.) What better has the industry offered? ACS systems are 10 years or more behind mainstream technology and alarm panels almost 20 years. So what really has the industry offered up in the way of improvements besides the most begrudingly given babysteps of progress?
Create New Topic
Robert Benness
Our experiance in the Perth CBD market has been that generally a building owner will retain their access control technology for at least ten years before considering a change to a new platform. With the advent of IP connectivity to controllers and the abilty to "flash" new firmware upgrades in some systems to card reader level we foresee newer systems will be in place even longer. The change in elevator technology to destination control has forced many building owners to replace their access control systems over the past three years since older systems generally do not have the intelligence to interface to these systems at a high level.
Create New Topic
Jonathan Lawry
Years ago, through a strange twist of fate, I found myself part of a small development crew which created the product now known as Honeywell Pro-Watch. One of the things we marketed (and I believe they still do) was the broad ability to support about a half-dozen other manufacturer's panels, not just Honeywell's Mercury-powered panels. We would go into sites supporting non-Honeywell boards for existing construction, with the premise that new construction would use Honeywell/Mercury panels, and older construction would be gradually replaced. While that generally proved true for greenfield work, the existing installations remained. To this day I am aware of hybrid sites where nearly all the system is on Honeywell/Mercury, but the orginal non-Honeywell panels, existing when PW was installed more than a decade prior, remain in place.
There are some truths in this industry:
First, access control is, at its best, invisible. At its worst, it is extremely disruptive. Workers don't necessarily know if a camera is down, a camera retains some deterent value even if it's down, and certainly workers don't need to be rebadged if you change out cameras, but everyone knows if a door isn't working.
Second, many door controllers are slaved to a host system or appliance, at which a "top-box" integration is usually implemented, extending usable life of older boards. I know of installations of 1980's-era panels, which nonetheless participate in modern IT integrations, due to logic implemented at the head-end.
Full disclosure: I now work at Mercury and of course our partners find value in our compelling features like SNMP, Zeroconf, TLS, biometrics, etc. That said, I know of end-user sites with 100 Mercury panels, and maybe 5 Thorn/Grinnel boards from the 1980's, but will not replace those 5 until they fail.
Create New Topic
Chris Hammond
I think this trend is about to change dramatically. With smarter devices, such as smart cards and readers, and the "internet of things" being deployed, technology obsolecense is introduced into the equation. The legacy of these devices that do not do much and just work allows for the long term use. With advanced technologies comes the much shorter life cycle of the components. In this world it is all about power of the processor and how long can you continue to support the old ones. Readers might work for 20 years but the software integration and smarts of the devices won't keep up with expectations. So, I think the trend will be cut to 5 years. Certainly under 10. The base system might not change but the world of "refresh" will become a part of the access control industry and a new life cycle will emerge.
The challenge is the mindset of the end user. "We just installed that system" - yeah 7 years ago. Companies must adjust to the life cycle change and begin to think about access control like any other technology based platforms they buy. This could mean many more subscription service models in lieu of capital investments.
Create New Topic