Lessons Learned from the 1st IPVM Seminar

Author: John Honovich, Published on Sep 22, 2011

On Wednesday, September 21st, we successfully held our 1st ever IPVM Seminar with over 80 Pro Members attending throughout the day, exceeding our target/limit of 75 attendees. I was quite happy with the turnout and even more pleased with the high quality ongoing discussion among the attendees.

Here are key lessons I learned from the event on better sharing information and educating.

Participants vs Panelists

The standard event format is to have a small number of panelists on stage that talk 95% of the time. These panelists are generally sponsors of the event or partners of the sponsors (e.g., a sponsoring manufacturer will pick an end user who they know will tout their products/approach). This is an incredibly boring and corrupt way to run an event (though certainly financially profitable for the ethically oblivious).

By contrast, we did not have any panelists. I acted as moderator/presenter leading a structured discussion with the attendees themselves. I would speak for a few minutes on a specific topic then we would open up the discussion to the group and speak for an equal or greater amount of time talking through the issues involved.

Throughout the day, at least 40 people spoke making more than a hundred comments. It was far more lively hearing many voices rather than me going on and on.

Ongoing Discussion

Not only did the ongoing discussion make the event more interesting, the range of comments helped us all learn more:

  • Sharing Experiences: Many attendees shared their experiences of products and configurations that worked and did not work.
  • Asking About their own Problems: Attendees brought up specific issues they were having in the field. One good example was an exchange we had about blurry license plates during our exposure setting discussion.
  • Asking About Other Options: Quite a number of people asked other approaches and products. For instance, in our 'best of' IP camera session, we ran through the pros and cons of a number of manufacturers. This provided a broader perspective.
  • Disagreeing: From time to time, attendees disagreed with me or each other. This helped flush out issues and highlight complexities involved.

Lastly, and equally importantly, attendees get more value when their personal questions or concerns are addressed. Otherwise, they could simply read content in a book or on a website, etc.


Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

We ran about a dozen live polls throughout the day. These polls allowed attendees to text responses (using polleverywhere, a useful service). We had two types of polls - open ended and multiple choice. The multiple choice worked great but the open ended ones had very few responses.

One of the best benefits of multiple choice polls was the ability to learn what the attendee's beliefs were on certain topics. For instance, one poll asked 'A 5MP camera is equivalent to how many analog cameras?' Now, according to manufacturer marketing departments, the answer is ~15. However, over 60% of our attendees voted that a 5MP camera can replace only 3 or less analog cameras. Now, are marketing departments full of bull or is our group ignorant? :)

Audience Size

To encourage discussion, the audience size cannot be too big. One, it can be hard for people to hear each other if there are too many people. Second, too much competition would exist for speaking and many people would not get a change to talk.

Around 75 turned out to be pretty good. I think 60 might be even better. I definitely would not want to exceed 100 as it would clearly get too big and likely diminish the overall interaction.

Topic Depth

Attendees seemed to prefer talking about things in greater depth rather than skimming topics. I think part of this is a function of the attendees themselves. This group was very sophisticated with many members leading surveillance experts themselves.

Additionally, good discussions with back and forth take more time. However, the upside is that people generally learn more, retain more and find it more engaging.


We are definitely going to do more seminars. The next one will be in Las Vegas March 28th and 29th (during ISC West 2012 week but, of course, not affiliated with them). We will have 4 in depth sessions and members can pick and choose which ones they want to attend. More information and discussion on this in the next few months. Save the date!

Most Recent Industry Reports

Top 4 Biggest Problems Selling Access Control on Mar 23, 2018
We received 150+ responses from integrators when we asked them "What is the biggest problem you face when selling electronic access control?...
US / China Tariffs Impact on Video Surveillance on Mar 23, 2018
On March 22, 2018, the US issued a Presidential Memorandum on the Actions by the United States Related to the Section 301 Investigation, with 3...
Final Day - Save $50 - April 2018 IP Networking Course on Mar 22, 2018
Today, March 22nd is the last day to save $50. Register now and save. NEW - 2 sessions per class, 'day' and 'night' to give you double the chance...
Favorite Access Control Credentials 2018 on Mar 22, 2018
In this 2018 access integrator statistics result, which credential type holds the favored spot to unlock access doors? More than 150 integrators...
ISC West Bans Booth Babes on Mar 22, 2018
Booth babes, goodbye. Technically, ISC West banned them 2 years ago with a 'staffing attire' requirement but it looks like ISC West is going to...
Network Racks For Surveillance Guide on Mar 21, 2018
In this guide, we look at network rack infrastructure, one of the fundamentals of IP video surveillance. Inside, we cover: What is a rack unit...
Security Robot Sales Struggle on Mar 21, 2018
2 year ago, PSA Security CEO Bill Bozeman called security robots one of “the biggest game changers” in decades for security integrators. Just over...
Dahua Global Launch LeChange on Mar 20, 2018
Dahua is getting into the consumer video surveillance market globally, with "LeChange", an offering long available inside of China is now being...
Axis Z-Wave IP Camera Tested Poorly on Mar 20, 2018
Z-Wave is drawing notable interest for video surveillance use. In IPVM's initial coverage, 84% expressed interest in it, with nearly half being...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact