Lessons Learned from the 1st IPVM Seminar

Author: John Honovich, Published on Sep 22, 2011

On Wednesday, September 21st, we successfully held our 1st ever IPVM Seminar with over 80 Pro Members attending throughout the day, exceeding our target/limit of 75 attendees. I was quite happy with the turnout and even more pleased with the high quality ongoing discussion among the attendees.

Here are key lessons I learned from the event on better sharing information and educating.

Participants vs Panelists

The standard event format is to have a small number of panelists on stage that talk 95% of the time. These panelists are generally sponsors of the event or partners of the sponsors (e.g., a sponsoring manufacturer will pick an end user who they know will tout their products/approach). This is an incredibly boring and corrupt way to run an event (though certainly financially profitable for the ethically oblivious).

By contrast, we did not have any panelists. I acted as moderator/presenter leading a structured discussion with the attendees themselves. I would speak for a few minutes on a specific topic then we would open up the discussion to the group and speak for an equal or greater amount of time talking through the issues involved.

Throughout the day, at least 40 people spoke making more than a hundred comments. It was far more lively hearing many voices rather than me going on and on.

Ongoing Discussion

Not only did the ongoing discussion make the event more interesting, the range of comments helped us all learn more:

  • Sharing Experiences: Many attendees shared their experiences of products and configurations that worked and did not work.
  • Asking About their own Problems: Attendees brought up specific issues they were having in the field. One good example was an exchange we had about blurry license plates during our exposure setting discussion.
  • Asking About Other Options: Quite a number of people asked other approaches and products. For instance, in our 'best of' IP camera session, we ran through the pros and cons of a number of manufacturers. This provided a broader perspective.
  • Disagreeing: From time to time, attendees disagreed with me or each other. This helped flush out issues and highlight complexities involved.

Lastly, and equally importantly, attendees get more value when their personal questions or concerns are addressed. Otherwise, they could simply read content in a book or on a website, etc.

Polls

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

We ran about a dozen live polls throughout the day. These polls allowed attendees to text responses (using polleverywhere, a useful service). We had two types of polls - open ended and multiple choice. The multiple choice worked great but the open ended ones had very few responses.

One of the best benefits of multiple choice polls was the ability to learn what the attendee's beliefs were on certain topics. For instance, one poll asked 'A 5MP camera is equivalent to how many analog cameras?' Now, according to manufacturer marketing departments, the answer is ~15. However, over 60% of our attendees voted that a 5MP camera can replace only 3 or less analog cameras. Now, are marketing departments full of bull or is our group ignorant? :)

Audience Size

To encourage discussion, the audience size cannot be too big. One, it can be hard for people to hear each other if there are too many people. Second, too much competition would exist for speaking and many people would not get a change to talk.

Around 75 turned out to be pretty good. I think 60 might be even better. I definitely would not want to exceed 100 as it would clearly get too big and likely diminish the overall interaction.

Topic Depth

Attendees seemed to prefer talking about things in greater depth rather than skimming topics. I think part of this is a function of the attendees themselves. This group was very sophisticated with many members leading surveillance experts themselves.

Additionally, good discussions with back and forth take more time. However, the upside is that people generally learn more, retain more and find it more engaging.

Future

We are definitely going to do more seminars. The next one will be in Las Vegas March 28th and 29th (during ISC West 2012 week but, of course, not affiliated with them). We will have 4 in depth sessions and members can pick and choose which ones they want to attend. More information and discussion on this in the next few months. Save the date!


Most Recent Industry Reports

Buy From B&H, Ship Direct From ADI on Oct 16, 2017
B&H, one of the largest online sellers of video surveillance equipment to end users, regularly purchases their video surveillance equipment...
Competing Against Siemens on Oct 16, 2017
Siemens entered the integration business with 15,000+ customers, through their acquisition of Security Technologies Group in 2001. Since that time,...
Geovision GV-EDR2100 Tested Vs Hikvision on Oct 16, 2017
A number of ADI's top selling IP cameras are, at least surprisingly to us, from Geovision. We recently bought and tested the Geovision EDR2100...
Top Problems Searching Surveillance Video (Statistics) on Oct 13, 2017
When crimes, accidents or incidents happen, the video surveillance system is a key component in finding out and proving what actually...
Exacq M Series Low Cost NVR Tested on Oct 12, 2017
With recent cyber security issues hitting NVRs and cameras from low cost leaders Dahua and Hikvision, users are increasingly seeking alternatives...
Long Time Industry Exec Leads New Security Franchise Offering on Oct 12, 2017
John Nemerofsky previously built and sold a $150 million dollar integration business, and then was VP of Niscayah from its spinout of Securitas,...
PoE Powered Access Control Tutorial on Oct 12, 2017
Powering access control with Power over Ethernet, like for IP cameras, has become increasingly common.  However, the demands for access power are...
Knightscope Rockets To $20 Million Funding on Oct 11, 2017
Knightscope is celebrating. 15 months after running over a child and 3 months after a Knightscope robot drowned, Knightscope is having the last...
Avigilon / Canon New Lawsuits, No Settlement on Oct 11, 2017
In July, Canon sued Avigilon, a notably rare move amongst major players in the industry, including Canon's subsidiaries Axis and Milestone. At...
Surveillance Systems Remote Access Usage Statistics on Oct 11, 2017
Remote access is a major benefit and risk for video surveillance. It is a benefit because it allows users to manage security or review...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact