LenelS2 and Genetec Critical Vulnerability

By bashis mcw, Updated Dec 01, 2022, 03:43pm EST (Research)

*******, *** ****** ******* ** *******, and ******* **** ************ * ******** vulnerability, **** * *.* **** *****, impacting ******** ********* **** ** *********** and *********** ********.

IPVM Image

****** **** ******** ****, ** ******* what *** ************* **, *** ** impacts ***** *** *******, *** ***** each ****, *** *** ***** ******** fixes ********, **** *** ***** ******** and *** ***** *********** *** ************* risks.

Executive *******

**** ** * ******** ************* **** enables ** ************** ****** ******* * bug **********'*************** ** *** *** ********. **** concerning ** **** **** ************* ****** for ****** *******, ** ** ** a ****** ************** ******.

********, * ******* ******, ** ******* to **** ************* *** ** ****** used ****** *******/******* *** *******, ** any **** ** ******** ***** ******* risks.

*******'* ******** ******** ** ** **** off *** ************ ** *** ***********. However, **** ********** *** *****, **** as ***-**-***-****** (****) *******.

*******, *******, ********* ********* ** ********* and **** *** *******, ******** * temporary ******** - * ******** ******** for ********** **** *************.

Carrier / ******* ********** *** ******** ********

** ******** **, ****, ******* ******** a******* ******** ***************** * ****** ************** ****** ** the ******** *****-***** *********** **** ** the ******* ******* ******** ****** ******* 7.6 ****** *.

******* ******** *** ********* ******* ** the********.********** **** *** ******** ********:

IPVM Image

**** *** ******** ****** *** ********* the ******** *************, ** ***** **** Carrier ******** ************ *** ** ****** peer ************.

IPVM Image

*** ***************** ************* ********** ***** **** ************ ** "****** recommended" *** ********* ** ****** ** done **** "******* *************":

IPVM Image

**** ****** **** **** ******* ** new ***************, ********** *** *********** ** performing ************** ****** ** **** ******* with ***** ******** *******.

Genetec ********** *** ******** ********

** ******** **, ****, ******* ******** a******* ******** ***************** * ****** ************** ****** ** the ******** *****-***** *********** **** ** some ** *** ********:

******* ******** *** ********* **** ********** and **************:

IPVM Image

**** ***** *** ******* ******** ******** to ** ******* *** *****, ***** does *** ***** *** ******* *********.

CVE-2022-37026 ********

***-****-***** ** * ******** *********** *************, filed ** ******** ************** (***-***), **** a **** **** ***** ** *.*, so ** ** ********** ** ********.

**** ************-****-***** ** ********* **, ********* ****** ******** ***************** *** ***** ** ********* **, 2022

**** ******** *** **** *********** ********* CVE-2022-37026 ** ******** ****** *** ***** the ********* ********** ********* *** *************, where *** ********** ***** **** *** bug ********** ** ********'* ******** **************:

***, *** *** *** ******* ******* that ***** *** *************. (The ***** ****** **** ****** *** ******* *******) The ************* **** ***** ** ***-** *** ******** *** ******** *** ******** ***** **** **** ****. I do not believe it was introduced by any special commit it *** * ******* ***** ** ******** ** ***** ********** ** *** *** ***** ******* *** *** **** ** *** ******** **************. The really old release will probably require a custom solution as we changed the OTP behavior used to implement the state machine. So I would recommend upgrading OTP if possible. [emphasis added]

*** ***** ******:*******(******* ******** ** ********** ********)

IPVM Image******:*****://******.***/******/***/******/****

***** ** **** ***********, **** ******** there ** ******** ******** **** ********** message(s) ****** *** *** *********** ******* peer *** ****** **** *** ****** in ************** ******.

***** ********, ********* ***/***, ******* ******** handling ** ** ********* ** * certain *****. ** *** ***** ******** from **** ** ********, ** ****** return ** ***** *** * ***** or ****.

** **** ****, ** ******* * bug ****** *** *** ***** ******* caused *** ************** ** ******* **** the ***** ******** **** **** *** expected, ***** ****** **** ** ************* or *******.

RabbitMQ - ***** **** ****** ******* / *******

******** ** * ******* ****-****** ******* broker. ******* ******* ****** ************ ** exchange *********** **** **** *****.

******** ************* *** **** **** ** the **** ** *********, ********* ***** enterprise *********:

**** **** ** ********* ** *****, RabbitMQ ** *** ** *** **** popular **** ****** ******* *******. **** T-Mobile ** *********, ******** ** **** worldwide ** ***** ******** *** ***** enterprises.

**** *** ****** ********** ******* *** patched *** ********** ******** ** ******** known, ** ** ******** ** **** out ** *** *** ** ******* the *************. *** ***** ****** ****** map ***** ***,*** ******* *** ********:

IPVM Image

***** ********'* **** *** *** *** severity ** **** *************, **** ***** to ****** ** ***** ******** ******** companies *** **** ** ****.

************

**** **** ** ************* ** ********* extremely **********, ********** **** ** ** used *** ************** ********.

*******, ** ** ****** ******* ** instruct ********* *** ** ****** **** certificates, ** **** **** ***** *** RabbitMQ ******* **********.

*** *******: ** ***-*** ************* ******* server *** ****, ***** ***** *** peer *** *** *** **** ** certificate *** ********** ** *** ******** server, ***** **** ********* *** *********** of **** *******.

Genetec ********* ******** ***

**** ***** ******* *** ****** *** not ********* * ********* ******** **** LenelS2/Carrier, **** ** *** ********* ************.

******* ***** ** **** **** ********* authentication ********** **** *** "************* ******* protection":

** ** * ***** *****. ********* we ** ******* * ********** ******* detailing **** *** ** **** ** you ***’* ******* *** ***** ** a ****** *******.

** *** ****** ** ** ****** add **** ******* ** *** ******** but ** *** *** ******* *** do **.Disabling ************** ** * ****** *** (****) ******** **** ********* ***** ***** *** ************* ******* **********. A system would still be protected against a passive attacker only listening on the wire but it introduces the risk of an active attacker conducting a man in the middle attack. [emphasis added]

******* **** ****** **** ********* ********* sometimes "****** ********* ****.":

****, ** ***** *** **** *** years **** ***** **** **temporary ********* ********* *** ********* *** ****** ********* ****. We also tried to assess the Exploit code Maturity (as per the CVSS temporal score metrics definition) and in that instance there weren’t much technical details available on the exploitation aspect of the vulnerability so we couldn’t find any PoC or if the vulnerability is actually exploitable. [emphasis added]

******* **** ****** ** ******* *** vulnerability ** ******* *** ********* *** patches "** ******* ** ********" ***** proactively ******** *** ** ******** *********:

**** ** ******* ** ** ******* is **** ** ********* ***test *** *** ******* ** *** ******** ******** *** ******* *** ******** ** ******* ** ********.

****, ** **** *** ********* **** enough ** ********* ***** **** **** a ******* ** * ********** *******so ** ******* *** ** **** and sent the advisory directly to the potentially affected customers to increase the chance that they apply the patches. [emphasis added]

Feedback ********* - ** ******** **** *******

**** ***** *******:

  1. *** ** ************** **** **** ********? username/password, ***********, ** ****?
  2. **** ** *******'* **** ** **** attacks *** ******** ***-********* *******?

[******** *** ******:] ******* *** *** answered ***** *********. *** ******* *** said **** *** ************ * ******** but *** *** ********* *******. **** will ****** **** ****** ** ********* are ********.

Genetec ********** ** *******/*******

******** *******/******* *** ******* **** ******* challenges, **** ***** *******'* ******** ** commit ********* *** ****** ** * rapid ************ ******* ** *** ******* version ** ******** ** ** ******** to ************ * ********* ******** **** Carrier/Lenel. ***********, *** ********* ******** *********** by *******/***** ********** *** *****, *** often, ***** ********* ********* *** ********* and ****** *********.

Supply ***** **** / **** *******

**** ******** ******** ************* ** * good ******* ** ***** * ******** Bill ** ********* (****) ***** **** a *** ********** ** * ******'* vulnerability **********, *** **** **** ******* CVE ***********, *** *** ************ *** remediation ** ********** ********. *** ** which ***** **** * ******** ****** on *** *****.

** **** **** ** ***-****-*****, ** was ********* ** ********* **, ****, with *******/******* *** ******* ********* ***** security ********** ** ******** **, **** and ******** **, ****, ************. **** was ************* *** ****** **** *** publication ** ***-****-*****, ***** ** * long **** *** * ******** *************.

** **** ********* **** ** ******** third-party ******** ** ******** ***** ****** reduce *** **** ********* ***** **** to *********, **** *** ******* *****. With **** * **** ** *****, LenelS2/Carrier *** **** **** * ********* assessment **** **** **** *********** ** their ******** ********.

********

** ** ****** *********** ** ***** time ******* *** ************* **** ******** security ******* **** *** *** ****** the ***********. ************, ******** ************* *** then ********* ****** ******* ** *** the ******** ******* *** *** ***** thing ** **. ** *** **** of *******/******* *** *******, ********* ****** have ************ *** ** ************* ** security *****-**** ****** ************ *******.

Comments (1)

[**** ****:] ******* *** ***** *** answered *** ******-** *********. *** ******* has **** **** *** ************ * response *** *** *** ********* *******.**** **** ****** **** ****** ** responses *** ********.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 3
Unhelpful
Funny
Subscribe to IPVM Research to read the full report.
Why do I need to subscribe?
The IPVM Research Service includes products tests and shootouts plus competitive and financial analysis, helping decision-makers better evaluate purchasing, partnering, developing, and/or competing against companies in physical security.
Already have an account?
Loading Related Reports