LenelS2 and Genetec Critical Vulnerability

*******, *** ****** ******* ** *******, and ******* **** ************ * ******** vulnerability, **** * *.* **** *****, impacting ******** ********* **** ** *********** and *********** ********.

****** **** ******** ****, ** ******* what *** ************* **, *** ** impacts ***** *** *******, *** ***** each ****, *** *** ***** ******** fixes ********, **** *** ***** ******** and *** ***** *********** *** ************* risks.

Executive *******

**** ** * ******** ************* **** enables ** ************** ****** ******* * bug **********'*************** ** *** *** ********. **** concerning ** **** **** ************* ****** for ****** *******, ** ** ** a ****** ************** ******.

********, * ******* ******, ** ******* to **** ************* *** ** ****** used ****** *******/******* *** *******, ** any **** ** ******** ***** ******* risks.

*******'* ******** ******** ** ** **** off *** ************ ** *** ***********. However, **** ********** *** *****, **** as ***-**-***-****** (****) *******.

*******, *******, ********* ********* ** ********* and **** *** *******, ******** * temporary ******** - * ******** ******** for ********** **** *************.

Carrier / ******* ********** *** ******** ********

** ******** **, ****, ******* ******** a******* ******** ***************** * ****** ************** ****** ** the ******** *****-***** *********** **** ** the ******* ******* ******** ****** ******* 7.6 ****** *.

******* ******** *** ********* ******* ** the********.********** **** *** ******** ********:

**** *** ******** ****** *** ********* the ******** *************, ** ***** **** Carrier ******** ************ *** ** ****** peer ************.

*** ***************** ************* ********** ***** **** ************ ** "****** recommended" *** ********* ** ****** ** done **** "******* *************":

**** ****** **** **** ******* ** new ***************, ********** *** *********** ** performing ************** ****** ** **** ******* with ***** ******** *******.

Genetec ********** *** ******** ********

** ******** **, ****, ******* ******** a******* ******** ***************** * ****** ************** ****** ** the ******** *****-***** *********** **** ** some ** *** ********:

******* ******** *** ********* **** ********** and **************:

**** ***** *** ******* ******** ******** to ** ******* *** *****, ***** does *** ***** *** ******* *********.

CVE-2022-37026 ********

***-****-***** ** * ******** *********** *************, filed ** ******** ************** (***-***), **** a **** **** ***** ** *.*, so ** ** ********** ** ********.

**** ************-****-***** ** ********* **, ********* ****** ******** ***************** *** ***** ** ********* **, 2022

**** ******** *** **** *********** ********* CVE-2022-37026 ** ******** ****** *** ***** the ********* ********** ********* *** *************, where *** ********** ***** **** *** bug ********** ** ********'* ******** **************:

***, *** *** *** ******* ******* that ***** *** *************. (The ***** ****** **** ****** *** ******* *******) The ************* **** ***** ** ***-** *** ******** *** ******** *** ******** ***** **** **** ****. I do not believe it was introduced by any special commit it *** * ******* ***** ** ******** ** ***** ********** ** *** *** ***** ******* *** *** **** ** *** ******** **************. The really old release will probably require a custom solution as we changed the OTP behavior used to implement the state machine. So I would recommend upgrading OTP if possible. [emphasis added]

*** ***** ******:*******(******* ******** ** ********** ********)

******:*****://******.***/******/***/******/****

***** ** **** ***********, **** ******** there ** ******** ******** **** ********** message(s) ****** *** *** *********** ******* peer *** ****** **** *** ****** in ************** ******.

***** ********, ********* ***/***, ******* ******** handling ** ** ********* ** * certain *****. ** *** ***** ******** from **** ** ********, ** ****** return ** ***** *** * ***** or ****.

** **** ****, ** ******* * bug ****** *** *** ***** ******* caused *** ************** ** ******* **** the ***** ******** **** **** *** expected, ***** ****** **** ** ************* or *******.

RabbitMQ - ***** **** ****** ******* / *******

******** ** * ******* ****-****** ******* broker. ******* ******* ****** ************ ** exchange *********** **** **** *****.

******** ************* *** **** **** ** the **** ** *********, ********* ***** enterprise *********:

**** **** ** ********* ** *****, RabbitMQ ** *** ** *** **** popular **** ****** ******* *******. **** T-Mobile ** *********, ******** ** **** worldwide ** ***** ******** *** ***** enterprises.

**** *** ****** ********** ******* *** patched *** ********** ******** ** ******** known, ** ** ******** ** **** out ** *** *** ** ******* the *************. *** ***** ****** ****** map ***** ***,*** ******* *** ********:

***** ********'* **** *** *** *** severity ** **** *************, **** ***** to ****** ** ***** ******** ******** companies *** **** ** ****.

************

**** **** ** ************* ** ********* extremely **********, ********** **** ** ** used *** ************** ********.

*******, ** ** ****** ******* ** instruct ********* *** ** ****** **** certificates, ** **** **** ***** *** RabbitMQ ******* **********.

*** *******: ** ***-*** ************* ******* server *** ****, ***** ***** *** peer *** *** *** **** ** certificate *** ********** ** *** ******** server, ***** **** ********* *** *********** of **** *******.

Genetec ********* ******** ***

**** ***** ******* *** ****** *** not ********* * ********* ******** **** LenelS2/Carrier, **** ** *** ********* ************.

******* ***** ** **** **** ********* authentication ********** **** *** "************* ******* protection":

** ** * ***** *****. ********* we ** ******* * ********** ******* detailing **** *** ** **** ** you ***’* ******* *** ***** ** a ****** *******.

** *** ****** ** ** ****** add **** ******* ** *** ******** but ** *** *** ******* *** do **.Disabling ************** ** * ****** *** (****) ******** **** ********* ***** ***** *** ************* ******* **********. A system would still be protected against a passive attacker only listening on the wire but it introduces the risk of an active attacker conducting a man in the middle attack. [emphasis added]

******* **** ****** **** ********* ********* sometimes "****** ********* ****.":

****, ** ***** *** **** *** years **** ***** **** **temporary ********* ********* *** ********* *** ****** ********* ****. We also tried to assess the Exploit code Maturity (as per the CVSS temporal score metrics definition) and in that instance there weren’t much technical details available on the exploitation aspect of the vulnerability so we couldn’t find any PoC or if the vulnerability is actually exploitable. [emphasis added]

******* **** ****** ** ******* *** vulnerability ** ******* *** ********* *** patches "** ******* ** ********" ***** proactively ******** *** ** ******** *********:

**** ** ******* ** ** ******* is **** ** ********* ***test *** *** ******* ** *** ******** ******** *** ******* *** ******** ** ******* ** ********.

****, ** **** *** ********* **** enough ** ********* ***** **** **** a ******* ** * ********** *******so ** ******* *** ** **** and sent the advisory directly to the potentially affected customers to increase the chance that they apply the patches. [emphasis added]

Feedback ********* - ** ******** **** *******

**** ***** *******:

1. *** ** ************** **** **** ********? username/password, ***********, ** ****?
2. **** ** *******'* **** ** **** attacks *** ******** ***-********* *******?

[******** *** ******:] ******* *** *** answered ***** *********. *** ******* *** said **** *** ************ * ******** but *** *** ********* *******. **** will ****** **** ****** ** ********* are ********.

Genetec ********** ** *******/*******

******** *******/******* *** ******* **** ******* challenges, **** ***** *******'* ******** ** commit ********* *** ****** ** * rapid ************ ******* ** *** ******* version ** ******** ** ** ******** to ************ * ********* ******** **** Carrier/Lenel. ***********, *** ********* ******** *********** by *******/***** ********** *** *****, *** often, ***** ********* ********* *** ********* and ****** *********.

Supply ***** **** / **** *******

**** ******** ******** ************* ** * good ******* ** ***** * ******** Bill ** ********* (****) ***** **** a *** ********** ** * ******'* vulnerability **********, *** **** **** ******* CVE ***********, *** *** ************ *** remediation ** ********** ********. *** ** which ***** **** * ******** ****** on *** *****.

** **** **** ** ***-****-*****, ** was ********* ** ********* **, ****, with *******/******* *** ******* ********* ***** security ********** ** ******** **, **** and ******** **, ****, ************. **** was ************* *** ****** **** *** publication ** ***-****-*****, ***** ** * long **** *** * ******** *************.

** **** ********* **** ** ******** third-party ******** ** ******** ***** ****** reduce *** **** ********* ***** **** to *********, **** *** ******* *****. With **** * **** ** *****, LenelS2/Carrier *** **** **** * ********* assessment **** **** **** *********** ** their ******** ********.

********

** ** ****** *********** ** ***** time ******* *** ************* **** ******** security ******* **** *** *** ****** the ***********. ************, ******** ************* *** then ********* ****** ******* ** *** the ******** ******* *** *** ***** thing ** **. ** *** **** of *******/******* *** *******, ********* ****** have ************ *** ** ************* ** security *****-**** ****** ************ *******.