Top 5 Access Control Problems

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Jul 21, 2014

Here's what integrators say are their 5 top problems with electronic access control:

  • High cost
  • End-user knowledge
  • Lowball Competition
  • Complex Doors/Hardware
  • Low System Turnover

Inside, integrators explain in-depth about what these issues here, how it impacts them and what they do to handle this.

****'* **** *********** *** are ***** * *** problems **** ********** ****** control:

  • **** ****
  • ***-**** *********
  • ******* ***********
  • ******* *****/********
  • *** ****** ********

******, *********** ******* **-***** about **** ***** ****** here, *** ** ******* them *** **** **** do ** ****** ****.

[***************]

Open ***** *********

** ******* *********** ** share ******** ******** **** desired, ****** **** ***** them ** ******** ****** / *** *******. *********** wrote ***** **** ***** of ******** ** ***** problems.

*********

*** *** ***** ***** for *** *** ******** shared ** *** *******:

** *** ******** **** follow, ** ***** *** color ******** *** ******** they ******* *** ******* with:

**** ****

**** **** **% ** total *****, *** ******* obstacle cited ** *** ***** ** controlling * ****. ********** for ***-***** *** **** never ********* ** ******** access ******* ******, *** sheer ****** ** ******* required, *** ***** ****** to ******* ****, *** the ********** **** ********** to ********** ***** *** keys ******* **** ** surprise. ************* *** *** integrators **********, **** ***** not ******* *** ***:

  • "** **** **** *** cost *** * ****** is ****** **** **** people ******* ** **** be ** ***** ** some ******* *****. ******* just * ****** ** the **** ***** ** the **** ** *** server, ********, *****, ********** locks, **** ********, ***. So ********** ******** ****** up *** ****. ** the ******** **** **** it **** ** *** them **** ******* *** the ***** ** **."
  • "**** ** *** ****."
  • "****. ****** ****** ***'* want ** *** *** it. **** **** ***** cutting *** *** *** contacts, ***** **** ***** me *** **** ** sell *** ******** ** all. ***, *** ******** simply *****'* ****, **** just **** ** *** the ****** ******."
  • "********* **** * ******** and **** **** ** pay *** * *********. When * ****** ***** of *** ********* **** for * ******* ****, they ******* ******."
  • "*** ** ** ** fitting *** ***** *** of ******** * ******** wants **** * ***** they *** ******."
  • "*** ****. **** *** residential **** ****** ***** selling *** $*** ** so *** **** ***** that ** *** **** is ** **. *** required ******** **********, ******, etc. *** ************ ** the **** *** ********* there ** ******* *****. Once **** *** **** hurdle *** **** ***** using ** **** *** the ***** ** *** system."
  • "**** *** ****. **** to **** **** *** lock ** ****** **** another, ********* ******* **** at **** ************* *** *** ***'* understand *** **** ****** making *** ** ***** systems ******** **** **** want ** **."
  • "********** *** ******** *** cost ** **********. ******** does *** ******** ******* for *** ********. ***** is ******* ******** ***** it *** *** *********, often * ******** ** them. ********** ********* ** they **** **** ****** in *** ****."

** * ******-**, ** asked *** **** **** of *********** "**** ** your ******* ****** ** Access *******?" ** *** how **** ***** *********** typically ****** ** **** on *** *******. ****** those ******* ** ** released ** *** **** ahead.

***-**** *********

*** **** ****** ******* is ******* ********* ** properly ********** *** ********, operation, *** ********* ** access *******. **** ********* have ** ********** ******* of *** *** ****** can ** ****, ** is **** ********* ********* solutions ***** ** *********, not ****. ********* ***-***** means **** *** **** to ****** ********* ***** features *** *********:

  • "*** ******** ********* ** the ******** - *** convincing (**********) ***** **** that ** *** *** the ********** ******* ******* levels ** ********."
  • "******* **** *** *********** thinking ** **** *** locks. ****** **** ** thick ** *** ** having * **** ******* rate."
  • "**** ** ******* [*********] on **** *** ********** can ** ***'* ** based ** *** *****'* expectations."
  • "********* ***** ***'* **** what **** ****, ** need."
  • "******* *** ******** ** see *** ***** ***** and ******* *** ******** to ********** **** *** cost ** *** *********** can ** * ******** of *** **** ** the ****/ ****** ********."
  • "*** # * ** ********* the *** *****."
  • "******* ** * ****** about * ************* ******** plan [*** ***] *** access ****** ****."
  • "** **** ******* ********* out *****. *** **** your ******** ****** ***** one **** ****?"
  • "******* ******* ** ******** expectations & ***-***** ***** able ** ********** & manage **** **** ****. There's * *** ** hand-holding **** *** *** most ***** *****."

Low-Priced ***********

** *** **** **** of **** **** *********, are *** ****** ** low **** *********** *** cheap ******** **** **** expectations. ** **** *** findings ** *** ******** ********** *********** ****** 2014, ******* ******** ******* from **** ********* *********** and ***** ******* ** do *** **** ******* but ***** *** ******** behind:

  • "***** ******* ******* ** low ******."
  • "***** *** ********* ** my **** **** *** cheap, *** ********."
  • "********** ********* *** ******* providers ******* **** *** business ********** *** ****** with ******** *** ********."
  • "***** *** * *** of ******* **** ***** ******** **** ** it ** **** ** compete ******* **** *** most ********* *** *** knowledgeable ****** ** *** beyond * ****** ********** system ** **** **** access *******."
  • "*********** **** ******* *********. We *****'* **** **** at ******** * ******** owner **** *** ******** *** *****."
  • "***** *********** **** ******* products."
  • "***** ******** ******* ***** systems."
  • "*** **** ********* *********** (OEM **** *****)"

Door ************

***** **** ******, *** they *** ** ******* to ******* ******** *** safely. *********** ****** ***** interfacing **** ******* ********** like ***** **** *** be *********** *********** *** costly ** *** ********. Furthermore, ****** ************* *** maintaining **** ****** ** workmanship *** ** * challenge *** **** *********** installers:

  • "************ ******** *****. **** difficult ** ** ** right *** ****."
  • "*********** **** **** ******** that ** ********* ** lazy ********** *** ********* by ******** ******** **********."
  • "******* **** **** ******** would **** **** *** their *****. *** ***** a *********, **** ******** is ** **** *****."
  • "**** ************ ** *** next ******* ******, *** typically *** * ** not *** * ****."
  • "********** *** ********** **** hardware ********* ** ****** the ********."
  • "*********** **** ***-******* ******** and ****** *****."

 ** ******* **** ***** and ********** ******** ** a **** ***** *** you, ***** ***** **** Guides *** ********* *** help:

Low ****** ********

** ** ***** ** our ******** ** ********** ****** Control ******* ****, ****** ******* *** typically **** *** * decade ** ****** ****** being ********. **** ***** that **** *** ******* sale ** ******, ********* existing ********* ** *** platforms **** ** *** often ******:

  • "******* ***** **** *** much **** ****** ** change *** ******** *** to *** ****** ** money ** *** ******* investment **** *** * lifespan ** ** ***** 8 ***** *** **** what * *** ***, usually **** ******."
  • "****** ** ****** ******** proprietary ***/*******/*** ****** *******."
  • "*** ****** **** *** there ******** ** ****** jobs."
  • "********* ****** **** **** obsolete ******** *******, ****** new ***** **** ** sell."
  • "**** ***** ** *** systems ****** ******* ******** to ******. ** ***'** spent * ***** ** money ** *********** ******** ***** *******, you **** **** ** reuse **** **********. ** you've ***** * ***** of ***** ** * stack ** ******* *** client ***, *** ***'* want ** ** **** to **** **** *** tell **** **** ***** machines *****'* ********* ***** all. ** ***'** ****** used ** **** ****** a ***-******* (*********** *********) interface ** ********** ** whatever, ***'** ******** ***** to ** * ****** uncomfortable **** ** **** API **** **** *** you ***** **** *** for ****."

*** **** ** ********* an ********* ******** *********, customers ***** **** ** keep ******* ********* *********** until ***** ********* ** the ****** *** *** cost ** *********** ** just *** **** ** bear.

Comments (11)

If high cost and low priced competition are 2 of the biggest problems, then who are the budget vendors in the access control that are being used? Is there an equivalent to Dahua / Hikvision and their re-labelers in access control?

I feel like companies like Keyscan/Paxton are the Dahua/Hikvision to the Access control market. I don't know if the others on here would agree, but that is my opinion.

I do not agree.

There is not a corresponding Dahua or Hikvision for access, but if there were it would be someone substantially involved in the OEM business like Mercury Security or ZKTeco.

ZK is different from Mercury because IMHO ZK has its own ZK-branded product selling on the market while Mercury is purely an OEM vendor

I am really surprised that some integrators actually entertain the idea of removing the DPS and REX devices from access control systems in order to reduce cost.

If you are not monitoring the status of a door, you no longer know if that door has been forced open, left open or compromised any other way allowing for anyone to access the space. By removing those devices you effectively have lost control over that door; therefore, you no longer have an "access control " system. All you have is a card reader and credentials that tell you who "unlocked" the door, not if the space is secured.

IMHO there are alternative methods to reduce cost without compromising the primordial function of a system.

Educating end user administrators has long been a thorn in the side of access control integrators. ActivAdmin introduced professionally designed and produced online video tutorials for Lenel and AMAG. These tutorials are available via a subscription price of $500 per site with unlimited training for unlimited people. Both Lenel and AMAG manufacturers actively support the purchase and sale of these tutorials. Integrators can resell the training or have customers buy direct. ActivAdmin will configure the training to be available from integrator's web site with the integrator's logo prominently displayed.

Visit try.stevethesecuritygeek.com to see a sample and to register for a trial.

Joel, thanks for sharing that.

Here's a video from that Lenel training:

I agree there is value in having this, I am just confused why Lenel doesn't just give this away for free? Why place barriers to get end users effective on their product?

This reminds me of the Roktain guy telling me that you had to buy the 'testing' manual separately from the Roktain dummy for an extra $499.

John, thanks for your comments. There is a way to understand why Lenel is NOT a good source for end user training of their product. Here are some insights and thoughts I believe shed light on this matter:

-Microsoft has never produced good training or help documents for end users. The culture inside a software company is too different from the end user community for them to communicate well enough to prepare effective instruction for the non-technical person

-Lenel has excellent training for integrators and technical administrators

-Lenel has a responsibility to be complete and accurate in explicity detail

-None of the above insights will help Lenel people to develop or manage appropriate end user training for 80% of the their end user community, who are substantially non-technical, have little or no interest in anything beyond "doing the tasks required of them"

-In developing end user training for software, we consider: a) The tasks that 80% of the administrators perform 80% of the time; b) One single method to perform that task that is both readily teachable and does cause problems elsewhere; c) Organizing the instruction to develop the specific skills using the fewest words in the shortest time; d) Enabling repetition when needed on demand

-We see your #2 concern for integrators as an opportunity across all software-driven building controls that are sold by integrators (a.k.a. value added resellers). Access control happens to be the lowest hanging fruit among all building control systems.

Does any have a link to this that's mentioned in the article?

"What is your average markup on Access Control?"

Thanks!

Thanks!

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Access Control Course Spring 2020 - Register Now - Last Chance on Apr 21, 2020
IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Thursday, April 23rd is the last day to register, as the course will...
Open vs End-to-End Systems: Integrator Statistics 2019 on Nov 11, 2019
Preference for open systems is on the decline, according to new IPVM statistics. We asked integrators: For video surveillance systems, do you...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
Responsibility Split Selecting Locks - Statistics on Jul 22, 2019
A heated access debate surrounds who should pick and install the locks. While responsible for selecting the control systems, integrators often...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...
"New" Arecont Fixes Failures "Without A Fight" on Jun 05, 2019
The "old" Arecont was infamous not only for its camera failures but for making their "partners" fight to get them fixed. IPVM drew the ire of...
Verkada Favorability Results 2019 on May 29, 2019
Verkada has taken the industry by storm with the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever and a half billion dollar valuation....
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
Lenel Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 26, 2019
The positive news for Lenel is that integrators do not dislike them as much as they used to.  The negative news for Lenel is that integrators...

Most Recent Industry Reports

"Fever Camera" Show Starts Tuesday on May 31, 2020
IPVM is excited for the world's first "Fever Camera" show, to be held this Tuesday, June 2nd and Wednesday the 3rd from 11am to 3pm EDT, giving you...
Proxy Presents Mobile Credentials For BLE Devices and Access on May 29, 2020
Proxy presented Mobile Credentials For BLE Devices and Access at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video...
ISC West 2020 Moves To The Basement on May 29, 2020
The twice cancelled/postponed show will now not only be held in a different month (October) but on a different floor, moving down to the...
Integrators Avoiding Coronavirus Air Travel on May 29, 2020
IPVM asked integrators if air travel is part of their 2020 plans to see how significantly Coronavirus will impact future...
Viakoo Presents Cyber Hygiene for Cameras on May 28, 2020
Viakoo presented its 'Cyber Hygiene' and 'Service Assurance' products at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A...
Seek Scan Thermal Temperature Screening System ReTested on May 28, 2020
Now that IPVM has tested Dahua, Hikvision, and Sunell, we are returning to Seek, the first blackbody system we tested and retested it with our...
Directory of 110 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on May 28, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers to help you see and research what options are available. There are...
Fever Cameras Are Medical Devices, Per The FDA, Dahua, Feevr, Hikvision, InVid Contrary Claims Are False on May 28, 2020
Fever cameras are medical devices, despite what euphemisms various sellers use. The US FDA clearly categorizes them as medical devices and...
Wyze Raises $10 Million And Seeks Services Expansion on May 27, 2020
Wyze has raised $10 million, the company's first disclosed raise since the $20 million announced at the beginning of 2019. Inside this note,...
Startup Videoloft Presents Cloud Storage on May 27, 2020
Videoloft presented offsite cloud storage at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from Videoloft including IPVM...