Top 5 Access Control Problems

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Jul 21, 2014

Here's what integrators say are their 5 top problems with electronic access control:

  • High cost
  • End-user knowledge
  • Lowball Competition
  • Complex Doors/Hardware
  • Low System Turnover

Inside, integrators explain in-depth about what these issues here, how it impacts them and what they do to handle this.

****'* **** *********** *** *** ***** * *** ******** **** electronic ****** *******:

  • **** ****
  • ***-**** *********
  • ******* ***********
  • ******* *****/********
  • *** ****** ********

******, *********** ******* **-***** ***** **** ***** ****** ****, *** it ******* **** *** **** **** ** ** ****** ****.

[***************]

Open ***** *********

** ******* *********** ** ***** ******** ******** **** *******, ****** than ***** **** ** ******** ****** / *** *******. *********** wrote ***** **** ***** ** ******** ** ***** ********.

*********

*** *** ***** ***** *** *** *** ******** ****** ** our *******:

** *** ******** **** ******, ** ***** *** ***** ******** and ******** **** ******* *** ******* ****:

**** ****

**** **** **% ** ***** *****, *** ******* ******** ***** ** the ***** ** *********** * ****. ********** *** ***-***** *** **** never ********* ** ******** ****** ******* ******, *** ***** ****** of ******* ********, *** ***** ****** ** ******* ****, *** the ********** **** ********** ** ********** ***** *** **** ******* them ** ********. ************* *** *** *********** **********, **** ***** not ******* *** ***:

  • "** **** **** *** **** *** * ****** ** ****** than **** ****** ******* ** **** ** ** ***** ** some ******* *****. ******* **** * ****** ** *** **** there ** *** **** ** *** ******, ********, *****, ********** locks, **** ********, ***. ** ********** ******** ****** ** *** cost. ** *** ******** **** **** ** **** ** *** them **** ******* *** *** ***** ** **."
  • "**** ** *** ****."
  • "****. ****** ****** ***'* **** ** *** *** **. **** then ***** ******* *** *** *** ********, ***** **** ***** me *** **** ** **** *** ******** ** ***. ***, the ******** ****** *****'* ****, **** **** **** ** *** the ****** ******."
  • "********* **** * ******** *** **** **** ** *** *** a *********. **** * ****** ***** ** *** ********* **** for * ******* ****, **** ******* ******."
  • "*** ** ** ** ******* *** ***** *** ** ******** a ******** ***** **** * ***** **** *** ******."
  • "*** ****. **** *** *********** **** ****** ***** ******* *** $100 ** ** *** **** ***** **** ** *** **** is ** **. *** ******** ******** **********, ******, ***. *** considerably ** *** **** *** ********* ***** ** ******* *****. Once **** *** **** ****** *** **** ***** ***** ** they *** *** ***** ** *** ******."
  • "**** *** ****. **** ** **** **** *** **** ** better **** *******, ********* ******* **** ** **** ************* *** *** ***'* ********** *** **** ****** ****** *** of ***** ******* ******** **** **** **** ** **."
  • "********** *** ******** *** **** ** **********. ******** **** *** generate ******* *** *** ********. ***** ** ******* ******** ***** it *** *** *********, ***** * ******** ** ****. ********** difficult ** **** **** **** ****** ** *** ****."

** * ******-**, ** ***** *** **** **** ** *********** "What ** **** ******* ****** ** ****** *******?" ** *** how **** ***** *********** ********* ****** ** **** ** *** systems. ****** ***** ******* ** ** ******** ** *** **** ahead.

***-**** *********

*** **** ****** ******* ** ******* ********* ** ******** ********** the ********, *********, *** ********* ** ****** *******. **** ********* have ** ********** ******* ** *** *** ****** *** ** used, ** ** **** ********* ********* ********* ***** ** *********, not ****. ********* ***-***** ***** **** *** **** ** ****** establish ***** ******** *** *********:

  • "*** ******** ********* ** *** ******** - *** ********** (**********) sales **** **** ** *** *** *** ********** ******* ******* levels ** ********."
  • "******* **** *** *********** ******** ** **** *** *****. ****** tend ** ***** ** *** ** ****** * **** ******* rate."
  • "**** ** ******* [*********] ** **** *** ********** *** ** can't ** ***** ** *** *****'* ************."
  • "********* ***** ***'* **** **** **** ****, ** ****."
  • "******* *** ******** ** *** *** ***** ***** *** ******* the ******** ** ********** **** *** **** ** *** *********** can ** * ******** ** *** **** ** *** ****/ strike ********."
  • "*** # * ** ********* *** *** *****."
  • "******* ** * ****** ***** * ************* ******** **** [*** how] *** ****** ****** ****."
  • "** **** ******* ********* *** *****. *** **** **** ******** decide ***** *** **** ****?"
  • "******* ******* ** ******** ************ & ***-***** ***** **** ** understand & ****** **** **** ****. *****'* * *** ** hand-holding **** *** *** **** ***** *****."

Low-Priced ***********

** *** **** **** ** **** **** *********, *** *** threat ** *** **** *********** *** ***** ******** **** **** expectations. ** **** *** ******** ** *** ******** ********** *********** ****** ****, ******* ******** ******* **** **** ********* *********** *** ***** willing ** ** *** **** ******* *** ***** *** ******** behind:

  • "***** ******* ******* ** *** ******."
  • "***** *** ********* ** ** **** **** *** *****, *** horrible."
  • "********** ********* *** ******* ********* ******* **** *** ******** ********** the ****** **** ******** *** ********."
  • "***** *** * *** ** ******* **** ***** ******** **** ** ** ** **** ** ******* ******* that *** **** ********* *** *** ************* ****** ** *** beyond * ****** ********** ****** ** **** **** ****** *******."
  • "*********** **** ******* *********. ** *****'* **** **** ** ******** a ******** ***** **** *** ******** *** *****."
  • "***** *********** **** ******* ********."
  • "***** ******** ******* ***** *******."
  • "*** **** ********* *********** (*** **** *****)"

Door ************

***** **** ******, *** **** *** ** ******* ** ******* properly *** ******. *********** ****** ***** *********** **** ******* ********** like ***** **** *** ** *********** *********** *** ****** ** not ********. ***********, ****** ************* *** *********** **** ****** ** workmanship *** ** * ********* *** **** *********** **********:

  • "************ ******** *****. **** ********* ** ** ** ***** *** neat."
  • "*********** **** **** ******** **** ** ********* ** **** ********** and ********* ** ******** ******** **********."
  • "******* **** **** ******** ***** **** **** *** ***** *****. Not ***** * *********, **** ******** ** ** **** *****."
  • "**** ************ ** *** **** ******* ******, *** ********* *** I ** *** *** * ****."
  • "********** *** ********** **** ******** ********* ** ****** *** ********."
  • "*********** **** ***-******* ******** *** ****** *****."

 ** ******* **** ***** *** ********** ******** ** * **** point *** ***, ***** ***** **** ****** *** ********* *** help:

Low ****** ********

** ** ***** ** *** ******** ** ********** ****** ******* ******* ****, ****** ******* *** ********* **** *** * ****** ** longer ****** ***** ********. **** ***** **** **** *** ******* sale ** ******, ********* ******** ********* ** *** ********* **** do *** ***** ******:

  • "******* ***** **** *** **** **** ****** ** ****** *** platform *** ** *** ****** ** ***** ** *** ******* investment **** *** * ******** ** ** ***** * ***** and **** **** * *** ***, ******* **** ******."
  • "****** ** ****** ******** *********** ***/*******/*** ****** *******."
  • "*** ****** **** *** ***** ******** ** ****** ****."
  • "********* ****** **** **** ******** ******** *******, ****** *** ***** hard ** ****."
  • "**** ***** ** *** ******* ****** ******* ******** ** ******. If ***'** ***** * ***** ** ***** ** *********** ******** ***** *******, *** **** **** ** ***** **** investment. ** ***'** ***** * ***** ** ***** ** * stack ** ******* *** ****** ***, *** ***'* **** ** go **** ** **** **** *** **** **** **** ***** machines *****'* ********* ***** ***. ** ***'** ****** **** ** just ****** * ***-******* (*********** *********) ********* ** ********** ** whatever, ***'** ******** ***** ** ** * ****** ************* **** an **** *** **** **** *** *** ***** **** *** for ****."

*** **** ** ********* ** ********* ******** *********, ********* ***** seek ** **** ******* ********* *********** ***** ***** ********* ** the ****** *** *** **** ** *********** ** **** *** high ** ****.

Comments (11)

If high cost and low priced competition are 2 of the biggest problems, then who are the budget vendors in the access control that are being used? Is there an equivalent to Dahua / Hikvision and their re-labelers in access control?

I feel like companies like Keyscan/Paxton are the Dahua/Hikvision to the Access control market. I don't know if the others on here would agree, but that is my opinion.

I do not agree.

There is not a corresponding Dahua or Hikvision for access, but if there were it would be someone substantially involved in the OEM business like Mercury Security or ZKTeco.

ZK is different from Mercury because IMHO ZK has its own ZK-branded product selling on the market while Mercury is purely an OEM vendor

I am really surprised that some integrators actually entertain the idea of removing the DPS and REX devices from access control systems in order to reduce cost.

If you are not monitoring the status of a door, you no longer know if that door has been forced open, left open or compromised any other way allowing for anyone to access the space. By removing those devices you effectively have lost control over that door; therefore, you no longer have an "access control " system. All you have is a card reader and credentials that tell you who "unlocked" the door, not if the space is secured.

IMHO there are alternative methods to reduce cost without compromising the primordial function of a system.

Educating end user administrators has long been a thorn in the side of access control integrators. ActivAdmin introduced professionally designed and produced online video tutorials for Lenel and AMAG. These tutorials are available via a subscription price of $500 per site with unlimited training for unlimited people. Both Lenel and AMAG manufacturers actively support the purchase and sale of these tutorials. Integrators can resell the training or have customers buy direct. ActivAdmin will configure the training to be available from integrator's web site with the integrator's logo prominently displayed.

Visit try.stevethesecuritygeek.com to see a sample and to register for a trial.

Joel, thanks for sharing that.

Here's a video from that Lenel training:

I agree there is value in having this, I am just confused why Lenel doesn't just give this away for free? Why place barriers to get end users effective on their product?

This reminds me of the Roktain guy telling me that you had to buy the 'testing' manual separately from the Roktain dummy for an extra $499.

John, thanks for your comments. There is a way to understand why Lenel is NOT a good source for end user training of their product. Here are some insights and thoughts I believe shed light on this matter:

-Microsoft has never produced good training or help documents for end users. The culture inside a software company is too different from the end user community for them to communicate well enough to prepare effective instruction for the non-technical person

-Lenel has excellent training for integrators and technical administrators

-Lenel has a responsibility to be complete and accurate in explicity detail

-None of the above insights will help Lenel people to develop or manage appropriate end user training for 80% of the their end user community, who are substantially non-technical, have little or no interest in anything beyond "doing the tasks required of them"

-In developing end user training for software, we consider: a) The tasks that 80% of the administrators perform 80% of the time; b) One single method to perform that task that is both readily teachable and does cause problems elsewhere; c) Organizing the instruction to develop the specific skills using the fewest words in the shortest time; d) Enabling repetition when needed on demand

-We see your #2 concern for integrators as an opportunity across all software-driven building controls that are sold by integrators (a.k.a. value added resellers). Access control happens to be the lowest hanging fruit among all building control systems.

Does any have a link to this that's mentioned in the article?

"What is your average markup on Access Control?"

Thanks!

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Improved Security And Surveillance Bidding - 2018 MasterFormat Divisions Examined) on Jul 19, 2018
Navigating the world of system specifications and bidding work can be complex and confusing, but a standard format exists, and understanding it...
FST Fails on Jul 17, 2018
FST was one of the hottest startups of the decade, selected as the best new product at ISC West 2011 and backed with tens of millions in...
4 Most Difficult Camera Installs (Statistics) on Jul 12, 2018
Heavy housings, cumbersome brackets, heavy ladders required, and tricky field of view requirements will cause difficulties no matter the camera...
Belgium Bans Private Facial Surveillance on Jul 06, 2018
Belgium has effectively banned the use of facial recognition and other biometrics-based video analytics in surveillance cameras for private,...
GDPR For Access Control Guide on Jul 03, 2018
Electronic access control is common in businesses plus organizations are increasingly considering biometrics for access control. With GDPR coming...
Allegion Acquires Isonas on Jun 29, 2018
Isonas failed to 'revolutionize' access control as they regularly claimed. Now, nearly 20 years after their founding, they are being acquired by...
Replacing / Switching Access Control Systems Guide on Jun 28, 2018
Ripping out and replacing access control systems is hard for important reasons. Because users typically hold on to access control systems for as...
Free Online NFPA, IBC, and ADA Codes and Standards on Jun 27, 2018
Finding applicable codes for security work can be a costly task, with printed books and pdf downloads costing hundreds or thousands. However, a...
'Secure Channel' OSDP Access Control Examined on Jun 21, 2018
Despite claiming to be better than Wiegand, OSDP's initial releases did not address the lack of encryption between reader and controller, leaving...
Most Wanted Improvements In Manufacturer Technical Support (Statistics) on Jun 21, 2018
5 key areas of improvement and 1 clear wanted support feature were voiced by 140+ integrator responses to: What improvement in manufacturer...

Most Recent Industry Reports

AI Startup Anyvision Raises $28 Million Led By Bosch on Jul 20, 2018
Anyvision is the most ambitious heavy-spending video surveillance startup in many years. And, now, the startup has raised $28 million led by...
Fail: Dahua "Didn't Check The Lux Levels but It Was Dark" on Jul 20, 2018
Dahua UK has been promoting their camera quality on LinkedIn: I, and others, asked what the lux level of the scene was. (background: Lux Rating...
Free 100+ Manufacturer-Customized Camera Calculator Released on Jul 19, 2018
Now, any manufacturer has a customized IPVM Camera Calculator, free. The goal is to make it easier for companies to help their customers better...
Improved Security And Surveillance Bidding - 2018 MasterFormat Divisions Examined) on Jul 19, 2018
Navigating the world of system specifications and bidding work can be complex and confusing, but a standard format exists, and understanding it...
Last Chance - Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 19, 2018
Today is the last day to register. Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security...
Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Ladder Lockdown and Ladder Levelizer Tested on Jul 18, 2018
Ladders are a daily necessity for surveillance and security installers, but working on an unstable surface can be extremely dangerous. In addition...
FST Fails on Jul 17, 2018
FST was one of the hottest startups of the decade, selected as the best new product at ISC West 2011 and backed with tens of millions in...
Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact