Surveillance Recording Mode Statistics 2011

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Nov 28, 2011

The question of what recording mode to use is an ongoing debate in the surveillance industry. Some maintain that motion based recording is the only way to go, as continuous recording is a waste of hard disk space, and can add significantly to investigation time. Others are skeptical of using motion based recording, because of incidents where motion recording missed important events.

To see how integrators are actually deploying systems, we asked "For recording type, what do you use most often?" Here's the breakdown:

The Responses

A strong majority of integrators (63%) preferred motion-based recording about three times the number choosing continuous recording. The remaining ~15.5% using boost up/speed up recording, recording continously at a low frame rate, and speeding recording on motion. 

Motion-Based Recording

Most integrators record on motion only, with the number one reason by far being storage savings. It is not uncommon for scenes, especially in hallways and stairwells, to only experience motion 30% of the time or less. Recording on motion in these environments has the potential benefits of reducing the number of hard disks required or increasing the retention period for archived video proportionately. Scenes with 50% motion, for example, may theoretically reduce hard disk requirements by half, or double the retention period. Some users may prefer to have this extended retention period, while others prefer to save costs up front, by using fewer drives. This savings may be substantial in systems with large camera counts.

Another advantage of motion-based recording, cited multiple times, was the reduction in the amount of video operators need to review in case of an incident. Unlike continuous recording, operators searching archived video will only see motion events, which may drastically reduce the amount of video they need to review. This assumes that motion detection is set up and working properly, a common concern cited by those using continous recording.

Integrators in favor of motion-based recording had the following to say:

  • "Typically it's a matter of cost of storage. It also depends on the environment. Most applications don't require continuous recording of a stairwell that is rarely used."
  • "Most of our customers deploy numerous cameras and want to store their video for at least 30 days AND have high video quality. Thus, we use motion based recording to help them achieve their goals AND stay within their budget for their data storage."
  • "We feel that it makes more sense to record activity and not open fields with nothing to view."
  • "To save storage and find events quicker"
  • "The majority of our customers are interested in utilizing video for forensic purposes. They are also concerned about storage costs and file sizes. Motion based recording offers a good blend of recording when needed while saving space when not needed."
  • "Storage space efficiency, mostly. Makes searching easier, too, when you don't have to scan through times with nothing going on, especially for sites that are only open 12 hours per day."
  • "Motion Based Recording is the efficient way to optimize video records. It's very important feature when we looking for interesting events records - easy and fast."
  • "Why record an empty room? With a suitable pre and post record setting, it will cover all applications."
  • "Why would you want to waste hard drive space and view a bunch of video where nothing is happening?"

Continuous Recording

Proponents of continuous recording cited customer demand as the most common reason for choosing this recording mode. Many industries, such as gaming, municipal, and critical infrastructure demand 24/7 recording. In some cases, it is due to regulations, and in others simply because these larger systems can make the demand, with the budget to back it up. Additionally, many municipal systems use mostly PTZs, making motion-based recording a moot point, since cameras are constantly in motion.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

  • "Our customers generally require 24x7 recording for evidential purposes"
  • "It varies by customer. We are astarting to use more boost recording, but for airports, water plants, and large municipal accounts, they demand continuous recording."
  • "Storage is cheap, for the most part, and most of our customers specify it that way."
  • "Most clients want that feature of everything that goes on in front of the camera. Some are required by law to have at least 30 days so motion based is not an option. Also since storage has become so cheap, clients don't mind pay a little more for extra storage so they can that extra week of record time."
  • "It varies by customer. We are astarting to use more boost recording, but for airports, water plants, and large municpal accounts, they demand continuous recording."

Unreliability of video motion detection and fear of missed events as the most common reasons for choosing this recording mode. Some of this, we expect, is due to earlier implementations of video motion detection which did not perform well. However, with motion detection often being performed on cameras, now integrators have the added challenge of knowing how well each model of camera performs, which may vary between manufacturers, and even in a manufacturer's own line. Motion detection may also be performed server-side, at the expense of higher CPU utilization.

  • "Don't want to take a chance on missing something at a really low frame rate if activity is not properly detected. Storage is cheaper than ever so storage is not so much of an issue as in the past."
  • "I am afraid that I seem to have a fear of missing an event from motion based recording, although this should not be the case. We have had problems in the past with motion based being done by the VMS and as the PC server was underspeced then the loading on the CPU was very high. By using the motion detection in the cameras the loading was reduced. However at that time the built in motion detection in the cameras was not brilliant, particularly in low light and so it was deemed sensible to do continuous recording at a reduced frame rate."
  • "Because we think it is more reliable."

Boost Up/Speed Up Recording

Lastly, integrators choosing boost up/speed up recording typically saw it as a best of both worlds approach. Low frame rate continuous recording assured that at least some video of an incident is captured if motion detection should not trigger. Yet, motion events are captured at a better frame rate, for better evidence of incidents. Boost up recording does have some challenges, however, as we discussed in our Motion Boost Recording test. Integrators had the following to say about boost up recording:

  • "We generally use a relatively low quality continuously recorded image, ramped up for motion to assure admissable evidence in a potential prosecution or civil matter."
  • "I like to see everything. Even with the Sony's that we are using I notice that we can sometimes miss parts of a recording."
  • "I like 1 IPS plus motion based speed up save space yet still have a time lapse."
  • "It's just the right thing to do. Motion detecftion is never accurate and loses key video or just records constantly anyway."
  • "We've found that it's best to have a baseline of video in case motion doesn't trigger. There was also a law suit because of pure motion recording as there was some arguement about what happened before and after."

Small Systems Continuous Recording

Though these results were generally the same across users of different VMSs, those deploying more megapixel than SD cameras, and other factors, one noticeable difference was evident in those deploying 16 or fewer cameras per site. Among this segment of integrators, those using motion-based recording decreases by 13%, from 63% to 50%, with those using continuous recording increasing by 5.5%, and motion boost by 7.5%. We suspect that this may be due to a tendency to use extra hard drive space in small systems. Larger systems are usually built with slimmer storage margins, normally only equipping systems with the storage that is absolutely required. Small systems, on the other hand, are often deployed using prepackaged NVRs or smaller PC hardware, with standard 1TB or 2TB drives, which may not necessarily be required. Instead of simply not using this extra storage space, integrators may configure the system for continuous recording simply because they can.

2 reports cite this report:

Surveillance Recording Mode Statistics 2016 on Jul 28, 2016
Continuous? Motion? Boost? What recording should be used? What is used? This report compiles data from 90 integrators on storage modes most...
Surveillance Statistics Survey Directory Vol 1 on Jan 03, 2012
In this report, we aggregate and present dozens of statistics about how surveillance is being used in the real world. Recently, we conducted an in...
Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

NetApp Video Surveillance Profile on Mar 09, 2020
NetApp is increasing its efforts in video surveillance and told IPVM surveillance storage is the fastest-growing segment of its $6+ billion...
VMS 101 on Mar 03, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals about video management software. Inside, we cover: NVR vs VMS Viewing Video - What are common client...
Video Surveillance Architecture 101 on Feb 18, 2020
Video surveillance can be designed and deployed in a number of ways. This 101 examines the most common options and architectures used in...
Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. Because video surveillance can consume an immense...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Razberi Technologies Company Profile on Aug 06, 2019
Razberi says they have doubled their revenue in the first half of 2019, citing their proprietary camera hardening and cybersecurity capabilities...
Smart CODEC Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 03, 2019
Smart codecs are now nearly a standard feature in IP cameras, but our statistics show integrator adoption has not increased at the same rate. In...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
Favorite Video Storage / Server Manufacturers 2019 on Mar 25, 2019
189 integrators answered this question: "What is your favorite storage device / server manufacturer for recording video? Why?" In general...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Genetec Drops Support for Dahua and Hikvision on Jun 01, 2020
Genetec has dropped support for Dahua and Hikvision, citing US blacklisting and ONVIF conformance blockage, the company informed partners in an...
Dotty "Hot Or Not" Elevated Body Temperature App Tested on Jun 01, 2020
What if you could take an existing phone or tablet and transform it into "fever camera"? That is what DottyAR is doing with their strangely named...
Optris "Fever Screening Systems" Examined on Jun 01, 2020
German manufacturer Optris has been building temperature measuring instruments for industrial manufacturing for over 15 years, and thermal cameras...
Fever Camera Sales From Integrators Surveyed on Jun 01, 2020
Fever cameras are the hottest trend in video surveillance currently but how much are integrators selling them? 220 integrators answered the...
"Fever Camera" Show Starts Tomorrow on May 31, 2020
IPVM is excited for the world's first "Fever Camera" show, to be held this Tuesday, June 2nd and Wednesday the 3rd from 11am to 3pm EDT, giving you...
Proxy Presents Mobile Credentials For BLE Devices and Access on May 29, 2020
Proxy presented Mobile Credentials For BLE Devices and Access at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video...
ISC West 2020 Moves To The Basement on May 29, 2020
The twice cancelled/postponed show will now not only be held in a different month (October) but on a different floor, moving down to the...
Integrators Avoiding Coronavirus Air Travel on May 29, 2020
IPVM asked integrators if air travel is part of their 2020 plans to see how significantly Coronavirus will impact future...
Viakoo Presents Cyber Hygiene for Cameras on May 28, 2020
Viakoo presented its 'Cyber Hygiene' and 'Service Assurance' products at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A...
Seek Scan Thermal Temperature Screening System ReTested on May 28, 2020
Now that IPVM has tested Dahua, Hikvision, and Sunell, we are returning to Seek, the first blackbody system we tested and retested it with our...