Only *** ******, *** *** ***** ** *********
***** *** **** ***** 5 ******* *************, ****** is **** ******* ** overturn ***** ********** “******* as **** ***** ** Huawei”, ******* ******* *** ** *********/********** ******* ********** ** the ****’* *******, ** the ******* ***** *****:

*******, ** ****** ****, the **** ***** ********* the *** *** *** a ********* *** ********* and ***** ** **** their *** *****. ***** was **** ****** ** the ****, **** ****** it *** ** ****** public ******* ********** **** – ****** ****** ****** ** ********* ******** to *********, ***** *********** ****** ** ***** that **’* * *****-***** company******** **** ** ********* it*********************** *** ******* *****.
** *** ***** ****, the **** ** ******* are ****** ** ** low *** *** **** of ****** **** *****, both ** ******* *** reputational ****, *** **** higher *** ***** *** Hikvision, ** **** *** both **** **** */**** the **** ** ******.
********* ******** ** ******* to **** ** ******* it ********* ******’* **** or ******* ** **** its *** ***** ****** against *** ****.
Hisilicon ***** ***** ** *******
*** *******’* ********* ****** on ********* ** **** clearer. ** ****** ****, surveillance ******* **** ********* SoCs – ***** *******’* ******** ******** “*******” equipment– ***** ** ***** the ***-*****.
**** ***** ** * boon ** *********** ******* primarily ***-*** *******,* *********** ********** ** which *** ********* *****. **** **, **** integrators ***** ** **** to ******** ******* *** US ********** ******** ********** of ***** *** ** cameras **** ********* *****. Moreover, ** ***** ****** pressure *** ************* ** eliminate ********* **** *****, which ** * ******** concern ***** *** ********* need ** ******** *** somehow ****** **** ** government ****** ** *** inadvertently *** ****** **** Hisilicon *****, ***** ****** no ************* ******** ******** Hisilicon **** ***** *****.
5 ****** ** **** ***
*** **** *** ****** on ****** **, ****, roughly * ****** **** today *** * **** after ** *** ****** into ***. ** ****, the ******* **** *** have *** ********* ********* effect. *******, ** ***, depending ** *** *** suit ********** ****** **** time.
Huawei ****** **** ******** ************
*** ****** ******* ************** *** ** *** NDAA, ***** *********** **** the ** ******* ********** and ******* *********** **** using ****** ********* ** any ********. *** ******* government *** **** ********* ** ****** ** of **** ****, ***** *** *** for *********** **** ** enacted *** **** ***** (i.e. ****** **, ****). The **** *** ***** on ********* ** *****’ Eastern ******** ***** ***** Huawei ***, *** *********, is ************* ** *****, TX.
****** ** * *******, unlisted ******* **** ******** ********* ************* *** ** ***** government ***********. ** *** suit, ****** ****** **** Section *** ******** ***** bedrock ************** ********** ** singling ** *** *** punishment ***** “************” ** as * “**** ** the ******* **********”.
** ******** *** **** of ********* ****** ** singling *** ****** *** punishment—blacklisting **, ********* **** its ******* ********** *** its ******** ********** ** honoring *** **** ** the ****** ******, *** denying ** *** ********* through ***** ** *** clear *** **** *** escape ********.
******* *** **** ******** the *** ******* ****** by *********** ********* ****** of *** *******—******** ********** its ******* ** ** business,stigmatizing ** ** *********** ******** ** * **** ** *** ******* ********** *** * **** ** *.*. ********, and denying it any pre-deprivation legal process to confront the congressional charges against it.
*** ******* *** ******** the ******* ******* *** the ********* ********** ** powers **legislatively ************ ****** ** ** “******” ** ** ******* ********** ** *** ******* **********, *** ** *********** * ****** ** *.*. ********, rather than leaving it to the Executive and the courts to make and adjudicate any such charges.
Part ** ******* ****** *********
******’* ******* ** **** of * ****-******* ****** response ** ******* ** *************** *** **** ************** ******** ******* ***** espionage. **** ********, ****** has:
Lawsuit *******
********* ** *** ********* for ****** ******* *** suit; ******* ******** ********************* * ******* **** against *** ********** **** its *** **** ****** ****.************, *** ********* ************ ****** ************* ** ******* ************* detail ***** *** ************ to *** ******* **********.**** *********** ******* ************** ********* ** ********* ****** ****'* "***** *** lawsuit **** *** **** far," *** ** ** government ******** **** ******.
Other *******
*** ******* ** ***** at ** *********** ****. March ** – **** than * **** **** now –** *** ******** *** **** ******** the ******* *********** ********** (FAR) ************ *** **** is *** ** **** in *** ***** ******. It’s ******** **** *** Huawei ******* ***** ******* delay *** ******* ** the **** ** *** public.
**********
**’* *** **** ******* whether ****** **** ******* in **** ****-******* ***** action. ************, ** ****** does *******, ** ***** have ** ********* ****** on *** ****** ** the **** ** ******** of ******* **** ********* chips, *** ** ***** have ** ******** ****** on *** ***** ** the **** *** ** Hikvision *** ***** ********* as ****.
Poll / ****

Comments (12)
John Honovich
One important theme to consider with Huawei's lawsuit against the US goverment is the opposite of that, a US company suing the Chinese government is impossible.
The point has been made by various people and this Bloomberg opinion piece is a good summary of it:
Western companies are understandably terrified of upsetting the PRC government because they know the retribution that PRC will measure.
Even tiny things, e.g., this week, a US makeup company posted an ad that did not show Taiwan as part of the PRC (which it obviously is not):
This resulted in a fairly typical uproar inside the PRC and the US company scrambled to apologize:
Ironically, MAC left out Hawaii and Alaska from the US map but no apologies were given since none were needed as the US is not so thin-skinned.
The whole map incident, from a typical Western perspective, may seem comical, but Western companies can be banned from China from such 'offenses'.
An important contrast to keep in mind.
Will anyone stand up for the Western video surveillance manufacturers that have effectively been banned inside of China for years?
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Distributor #4
I personal think Huawei has taken the position any publicity is Good for marketing. Rumors circling in other Asian groups are saying Huawei has increased cellphone market share in China and other parts of the world, physiological people who had never believed in Huawei products will simply think if US is banning them it means their have better skills.
Create New Topic
John Honovich
Update: Huawei and the US have agreed on a timetable for the lawsuit over the summer with arguments occurring in September:
The law is still scheduled to go into effect in August.
Create New Topic
John Honovich
Update: US government filed a response / counter to Huawei's suit.
Create New Topic
John Honovich
Update: Huawei lost, final judgement May 2020.
The Court explains its ruling in this 57-page memorandum.
A few excerpts on the Court's logic here:
Create New Topic