Lifespan of Video Surveillance Systems

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Jul 24, 2012

How long it takes for a surveillance system to be replaced has a huge impact on adopting new products or technologies. Like cars, security users do not buy a new surveillance system every month or even every year. Indeed, systems are clearly only purchased every few years - but is it every 3, 5, 7 years or more? The longer it is, the harder it is for new technologies - whether it is IP cameras, HD SDI cameras, VMS, video analytics - to break it as they typically need to wait for the big new replacement purchase. In this note, we provide the first end user survey results to answer that question.

Poll Question

In the chart below, here are the results from a survey of 60 end users:

This result indicates that surveillance end users overwhelmingly wait more than 5 years before upgrading with a median term of 7 years. Despite the impression that technology is volatile and pressures to stay current, these results clearly demonstrate that change only happens when several factors coincide. Very few responses provided only one criteria for updating, and several mentioned all the key takeaways listed below:

Key Takeaways

Three themes emerge as the common drivers describing when end users 'pull the trigger' and upgrade:

  • Money: Not surprisingly, available funding have a huge impact on upgrade frequency.
  • Functionality: Perception of 'technology improvements' over previous technology plays a huge role. In other words, if the 'latest and greatest' is not a significant improvement over current, end users delay upgrade.
  • Need: Otherwise stated, end users upgrade when it becomes too costly to maintain legacy systems, replacement equipment becomes unavailable, or end user surveillance demand exceeds what current system is able to provide.

Money

When it comes to upgrading surveillance equipment, available funding dictates when and where upgrades take place:

  • "Budget is the major decision factor in what can be replaced and when."
  • "Money has been the major driving factor in waiting so long for the current replacement, though poor long range planning factored into it. We were planning a complete replacement, cameras and all, in 2009 when the recession hit and we lost half our budget."
  • "Budget is the major decision factor in what can be replaced and when."
  • "Cost of new IP mega-pixel cameras are going down and advantages of have IT be part of supporting IP camera system instead of relying on contractors"
  • "Mostly cost."
  • "Cost and functionality."
  • "Budget. That is the one and only factor."
  • "I am currently considering changing my VMS to a more moderately priced platform that doesn't require me to attend training to get tech support."
  • "Cost. Need. Budget."

Even if compelling rationale and need exist for new surveillance equipment, unless that activity has been budgeted or planned for, nothing happens. Many of the responses indicated that lack of funding has prolonged existing equipment service life and that trend is expected to continue.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

Functionality

A number of responders adamantly suggested that unless new functionality or advanced features provide incentive to change, the question is a moot point:

  • "In 5-7 years I am expecting much better, more sophisticated and easy-to-use products to be available."
  • "Effectiveness of the system. Our current system hasn't helped us identify thieves in the recent past."
  • "Technology difficult to use...we replaced a 15 year old VHS recording system with digital."
  • "Industry change or major improvements in the system/components."
  • "Better equipment keeps coming on the market. I actually replace pieces every year as new things become available."
  • "Improvements in the underlying technology to deliver a better product -- meaning something that would dramatically improve the captured video product -- with fewer false positives and better image quality."
  • "operability"
  • "Improvements in the underlying technology to deliver a better product -- meaning something that would dramatically improve the captured video product -- with fewer false positives and better image quality. If no major improvements in that time AND if the old equipment is still plugging along then I would just leave it alone."

Many of these users are also current adopters of megapixel cameras, which strongly suggests that they are not simply fickle, but do not see tangible value pushing technology beyond proven platforms.

Need

Answers in the final group expressed satisfaction in the current performance of surveillance systems, and that only spending for repairs and maintenance is to be expected.

  • "I suppose when our current solution no longer meets our needs or that new functionality has been introduced in other products."
  • "We repair more than replace our recorders and cameras. I would say the average life of may PTZs is currently running at 10+ years."
  • "If no major improvements in that time AND if the old equipment is still plugging along then I would just leave it alone.."
  • "If I could keep the analog equipment that I have now working forever I would never replace it. The images are get are better than I NEED (not better than I want, but need) so why replace? "
  • "We are not yet at that point."
  • "Equipment age and operation."
  • "The majority of my cameras are PTZs so they don't last forever. So right now as a PTZ fails we have our integrator repair it or replace it with a like model."
  • "This is a guess as we have not had to replace any servers yet. We have had to replace a few cameras (probably between 1 and 2 %) that have failed."

Impact

While many like to cite the nice round number of 5 years as the industry average, these survey results show that it is notably longer and often significantly longer, with systems going nearly a decade before a replacement is deployed.

Appreciating a long system life-cycle is important to understanding key strategic elements to the surveillance business:

  • In any given year, less than 15% of users will replace their surveillance systems.
  • Even if you get half of those users to choose your technology or product - an incredible feat - it would take nearly 7 years to get to 50% of the market and that assumes that the rollouts are done instantly - which is unrealistic for most large users.
  • Because of this, regardless of the value proposition of a technology, it will easily take a decade after the technology is fully mature to win over the mass market.

2 reports cite this report:

Verkada False Allegations Against Avigilon Exposed on May 08, 2019
Verkada has leveled false allegations against Avigilon, as part of their aggressive marketing tactics against the 'dinosaurs' in the 'ancient'...
Lifespan of Electronic Access Control Systems on Jul 01, 2014
Just how long do end users hang on to access systems before they look to change? The answer may surprise you. Unlike video surveillance systems...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Aegis AI Gun Detection Video Analytics Startup on May 07, 2019
Gun detection analytic startups are increasing as the promise of AI and the threats of active shooters grow.  One company, Aegis AI, is being led...
Restaurant Security Manager Interview on May 06, 2019
Wright’s Gourmet House in Tampa, Florida has been around for over 50 years. During most of that time, there were no security measures in place. Now...
Ranking Manufacturer Favorability 2019 on May 06, 2019
24 manufacturer's favorability was ranked based on 170+ integrators feedback. Voting plus in-depth comments revealed insights on which brands were...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on May 02, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
Bastille Cell Phone Tracking Profile on Apr 30, 2019
Is tracking someone by their cellphone the next generation of surveillance? Bastille is a US startup which tracks people by their cellphone or...
Verkada Gets Half Billion Dollar Valuation on Apr 26, 2019
Last week, when we profiled Verkada (The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada), we predicted they would raise $40...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
Strong ISC West 2019 For Manufacturers But Concerns For 2020 March Move on Apr 16, 2019
ISC West 2019 was strong for manufacturers, according to new IPVM survey results of 100+ manufacturers, consistent with 2018 results. However,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Inside Look Into Scam Market Research on May 17, 2019
Scam market research has exploded over the last few years becoming the most commonly cited 'statistics' for most industries, despite there clearly...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Trump Signs 'Huawei Ban' - Executive Order Targeting Foreign Adversary Technology on May 16, 2019
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order targeting technology provided by 'foreign adversaries', in what is widely being called a...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
San Francisco Face Recognition Ban And Surveillance Regulation Details Examined on May 14, 2019
San Francisco passed the legislation 8-1 today. While the face recognition 'ban' has already received significant attention over the past few...
Security Fail: ASISNYC Auto Emails Passwords In Plain Text on May 14, 2019
ASIS NYC automatically emails a user with the password the user just entered, in plain text, when one registers for the site / event, as the...
Hikvision VP On Muslim Oppression on May 14, 2019
Hikvision has won tens of millions of dollars, at least, in direct contracts with the Chinese government that oppresses Muslims, including a forced...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact