Lifespan of Video Surveillance Systems

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Jul 24, 2012

How long it takes for a surveillance system to be replaced has a huge impact on adopting new products or technologies. Like cars, security users do not buy a new surveillance system every month or even every year. Indeed, systems are clearly only purchased every few years - but is it every 3, 5, 7 years or more? The longer it is, the harder it is for new technologies - whether it is IP cameras, HD SDI cameras, VMS, video analytics - to break it as they typically need to wait for the big new replacement purchase. In this note, we provide the first end user survey results to answer that question.

Poll Question

In the chart below, here are the results from a survey of 60 end users:

This result indicates that surveillance end users overwhelmingly wait more than 5 years before upgrading with a median term of 7 years. Despite the impression that technology is volatile and pressures to stay current, these results clearly demonstrate that change only happens when several factors coincide. Very few responses provided only one criteria for updating, and several mentioned all the key takeaways listed below:

Key Takeaways

Three themes emerge as the common drivers describing when end users 'pull the trigger' and upgrade:

  • Money: Not surprisingly, available funding have a huge impact on upgrade frequency.
  • Functionality: Perception of 'technology improvements' over previous technology plays a huge role. In other words, if the 'latest and greatest' is not a significant improvement over current, end users delay upgrade.
  • Need: Otherwise stated, end users upgrade when it becomes too costly to maintain legacy systems, replacement equipment becomes unavailable, or end user surveillance demand exceeds what current system is able to provide.

Money

When it comes to upgrading surveillance equipment, available funding dictates when and where upgrades take place:

  • "Budget is the major decision factor in what can be replaced and when."
  • "Money has been the major driving factor in waiting so long for the current replacement, though poor long range planning factored into it. We were planning a complete replacement, cameras and all, in 2009 when the recession hit and we lost half our budget."
  • "Budget is the major decision factor in what can be replaced and when."
  • "Cost of new IP mega-pixel cameras are going down and advantages of have IT be part of supporting IP camera system instead of relying on contractors"
  • "Mostly cost."
  • "Cost and functionality."
  • "Budget. That is the one and only factor."
  • "I am currently considering changing my VMS to a more moderately priced platform that doesn't require me to attend training to get tech support."
  • "Cost. Need. Budget."

Even if compelling rationale and need exist for new surveillance equipment, unless that activity has been budgeted or planned for, nothing happens. Many of the responses indicated that lack of funding has prolonged existing equipment service life and that trend is expected to continue.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

Functionality

A number of responders adamantly suggested that unless new functionality or advanced features provide incentive to change, the question is a moot point:

  • "In 5-7 years I am expecting much better, more sophisticated and easy-to-use products to be available."
  • "Effectiveness of the system. Our current system hasn't helped us identify thieves in the recent past."
  • "Technology difficult to use...we replaced a 15 year old VHS recording system with digital."
  • "Industry change or major improvements in the system/components."
  • "Better equipment keeps coming on the market. I actually replace pieces every year as new things become available."
  • "Improvements in the underlying technology to deliver a better product -- meaning something that would dramatically improve the captured video product -- with fewer false positives and better image quality."
  • "operability"
  • "Improvements in the underlying technology to deliver a better product -- meaning something that would dramatically improve the captured video product -- with fewer false positives and better image quality. If no major improvements in that time AND if the old equipment is still plugging along then I would just leave it alone."

Many of these users are also current adopters of megapixel cameras, which strongly suggests that they are not simply fickle, but do not see tangible value pushing technology beyond proven platforms.

Need

Answers in the final group expressed satisfaction in the current performance of surveillance systems, and that only spending for repairs and maintenance is to be expected.

  • "I suppose when our current solution no longer meets our needs or that new functionality has been introduced in other products."
  • "We repair more than replace our recorders and cameras. I would say the average life of may PTZs is currently running at 10+ years."
  • "If no major improvements in that time AND if the old equipment is still plugging along then I would just leave it alone.."
  • "If I could keep the analog equipment that I have now working forever I would never replace it. The images are get are better than I NEED (not better than I want, but need) so why replace? "
  • "We are not yet at that point."
  • "Equipment age and operation."
  • "The majority of my cameras are PTZs so they don't last forever. So right now as a PTZ fails we have our integrator repair it or replace it with a like model."
  • "This is a guess as we have not had to replace any servers yet. We have had to replace a few cameras (probably between 1 and 2 %) that have failed."

Impact

While many like to cite the nice round number of 5 years as the industry average, these survey results show that it is notably longer and often significantly longer, with systems going nearly a decade before a replacement is deployed.

Appreciating a long system life-cycle is important to understanding key strategic elements to the surveillance business:

  • In any given year, less than 15% of users will replace their surveillance systems.
  • Even if you get half of those users to choose your technology or product - an incredible feat - it would take nearly 7 years to get to 50% of the market and that assumes that the rollouts are done instantly - which is unrealistic for most large users.
  • Because of this, regardless of the value proposition of a technology, it will easily take a decade after the technology is fully mature to win over the mass market.

1 report cite this report:

Lifespan of Electronic Access Control Systems on Jul 01, 2014
Just how long do end users hang on to access systems before they look to change? The answer may surprise you. Unlike video surveillance systems...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
Wavelynx Access Control Manufacturer Profile on Jan 10, 2019
Denver-based WaveLynx is not well known as an access reader manufacturer, but OEMs for big industry brands including Amag, Isonas (Allegion),...
Motorola Acquires VaaS / Vigilant LPR on Jan 08, 2019
Less than a year after Motorola Solutions spent a billion to acquire Avigilon, the company has made another major acquisition spending nearly a...
European Startup Ajax Profile - They "Stand Against Evil" on Jan 03, 2019
European intrusion detection startup Ajax Systems proclaims: How are they standing against evil? And what are the differentiators and potential...
The Battle For The VSaaS Market Begins 2019 - Alarm.com, Arcules, Eagle Eye, OpenEye, Qumulex, Verkada, More on Jan 02, 2019
2019 will be the year that VSaaS finally becomes a real factor for professional video surveillance. While Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS)...
Combating Vaping Epidemic - Halo Smart Sensor Profile on Dec 21, 2018
Youth vaping has become an epidemic, according to the US Surgeon General, while the market leader, Juul, just received a $12.8 billion investment...
SS&Si Claims To Be "The New Face of Security Distribution" on Dec 03, 2018
Can 27-year-old Jake Voll disrupt the security distribution giants? He has positioned his company SS&Si as the 'NEW FACE' of...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact