How Manufacturers Compete Against Low Cost

By Brian Rhodes, Published Jul 29, 2014, 12:00am EDT (Info+)

"I'll take whatever's cheapest" is perhaps the most hated phrase any salesman could hear.

Yet high cost is the biggest complaint of many security buyers.

So how do manufacturers successfully sell against low cost options? We asked a panel of manufacturers:

"How do you deal with low cost competitors, especially very inexpensive ones? What tactics or countermeasures do you use?"

Manufacturers emphasized 3 key themes in how they counteract low cost options.

  • ****** *******:*** **** ******* ****** ** ******* with ***-**** *********** ** ** *** muscle **** ** ********** *** ********* or ***-***** ********* ***** *********.
  • ********* **** *******: ************* ********** ********* **** ****** their ******* *****, ***********, *** ******** help ** **-********* *** ****** ** specifying ******** **** ** *** ***** of *** *****.
  • ******** *****:*** **** **** ** ********* **** quality ** ********** *** **** ** low ******* ** *********** ** *** price ******* *** **** ** *** the *** ****.

** **** ** *** ******** *****, we ****** ** ***** **** **** manufacturer ********:

Better *******

****** ****** ** *** ****** **** bigger *******, * ***** **** ************* stress **** ********** ***** ******** ***** technical *******, **********, *** ***-***** **********:

  • "** **** ***** *******, ********, ********* support. ******* ******** ************ *** *** depend ** * ***** ****** *** any ** *****. ** **** **** about *********** ********** *** **** ** the ********."
  • "*** ******* ** **** ****** ** a *****- *************, ***********, *** *** users ***** ***** *** **** ********- support. *** ** *** ***** ******* whomever ******** **** **** *** **** support. ************, **** ******** ** ** different **** *** ***** ********, **'* a ************ ********. *** ** *** have *** ************ *** *** ******* / *** *** ********* ***** ** support ** *****'* ****** **** ** costs."
  • "* **** **** ******* ****** **** they *** ********* **** * *** of * ******: **** *******, **** service, ** **** *****."
  • "#* ******** ******** *** *******."
  • "******* ********** ****** *** ***-**** (*.*. 3rd-party *********** ** *********** ********** ******)."
  • "*********** *** ****** ******* ************. *** don't **** ** ** *** *** to **** ** ** **** ** management ***** *-* ***** *** **** them ** *** *** ** ** replaced */* *** ******* ** ***** is *** ** ********."
  • "**** *******, ********, ******** *******, ***."
  • "*********** ********** (* ** * *****) / ** ********* ***** ******** ******** maintenance ********** **** ********** ******** ***** Prompt ********* ** ****** ***** ****** after ***** ******* **** **** * proactive ******** ******** **/* **** ******* service ************ ******** *******"

Emphasise High *******

******* ****** ******** ************* ******** ** drawing ********* ** *** ******** *********** or ******** ******** ** ***** ******** compared ** ***** *******.  ********* ********* may *** ***** ********** *** ********** of ******-****** ******* ****** **** *** explained:

  • "*** ******* ******** *******' **** ***** quality *** ******* ********* **** *** products *** ** *** ****** **** of **** **** ** ***** ** low **** ***********. ***** ***** **** always ** * *** **** ******* video ******** ******, ** ** ****** a ****** **** ** ** *** wish ** ******* **."
  • " ** ****** ****** ******* *** ******** comparing *** ******* ** *** *********** ones."
  • " * ***** ** *** ******** ************, quality, *** ***********."
  • " * ******* **** [*** ****** ****** *****'*] ***** quality, * **** ******** *** ****** performance *** ***********."
  • "** *** ** **** ******** ** product *********** *** *** **** **** there **** ****** ** ******* ** sell ** ******* ** *** ******* any ********. *** *** *********** ****** be ***********, *** **** ** ************ and *** *** ** **** ****** confident **** *** ***** **** ****. Inexpensive **** ***** *** **** *** bad *** ******* *** *** ******* control ** ******* *** ** ****."
  • "***** ******* ******* ** *********, ** is *** *********** ** *** ******."
  • "********* ******* *********** & *******."
  • " *********, ***********, ***********."
  • "** ******** ******* ** ** ********** manufacturer *** *** ************** **** ****** moving *** ***."

Question ***** (** *** *****)

*** **** ****** *** *** ** ***** the ********** ** ******** ********* ****** ******* their ******** ***** *** ** ********* and *** ****** *** *********** ** critically ****:

  • "****** *** *** ****** *** ******** - "***** *** *** **** ******* if **** **** ******** ** **?"
  • "** *** ******** ** **** ******* for *** ***** *** *** *********** then ** ** ******* *** * customer. **** ***********."
  • "********* ********** *** ***** ** ****-*******. Avoid *****-***********."
  • "**** *** **** ******* ** *** at **** ** **** * *** dollars?  **** **** *** ***** ***** cameras to **** ***** ******."
  • "**** ** **** *********** ***** ********* the ***** *** *******."
  • "* ******* **** **** **** *** don't ***** **** *** **** ** a ****** ***** *** ********* ****** is **, *** ** * **** needs ** *** *** **** ** the ***** ** ***** *** ****, the ********** ** ***** ** ****."
  • "** *** *** ******** ** ****** what **** ****** **** ****** **** *** low **** ********** ******. ** ***, I **** ** *****, ******* ***** second. *** **** ******* ** ******* without *** ************."
  • "* **** ***** *** *** ************ of *** *********** ****. ****** **** cheating ** **** ******, ********* ******** lens **********, ***..."
  • "***** *** ***** ** *** *** of *** ******** ***'* **** **** is *** *****. * ***'* *** to ******* ****. ***** *** ***** at *** ***** *** ** *** spectrum *** **** ***** **** *** headaches ** ***** *******. **** *** looking *** ***********, **** ********** (******* tens, ** ********* ** *******), ****** alerts *** ******* **** *** *** of *** ****** ** ********* *** efficacy ** **** ********'* ********** (*.*. Loss **********). ** * *******, ****** competitive, ***** **** ***** ************ *** cannot ******* ** *** ***** ******** and ***** *****, **** ******* **** be **** ******** ** **** ********* than ****** ** *** **** ** survive."

Comments (1)

Another factor an owner should consider, is that the camera cost is what, about a 1/3rd of the cost for a fully installed system? The owner will spend twice again on head end equipment, software, licenses, training, cable, installation and commissioning. This whole investment is highly reliant on the performance of the camera. A degraded camera performance (poor image quality, high failure rate, poor product support) will jeopardize the entire investment. The decision maker should ask themselves if an overall savings of 10 to 15 percent, even 20 percent, is worth acquiring a system that can become a longtime headache. Especially if the total cost of ownership is higher with the cheaper camera from the higher service costs due to the shortened warranty and higher failure rates. It should not be too hard for a sales rep to build a case that higher quality on the initial sale, can be the most cost effective solution.

A missed criminal activity due to a camera outage, will make the sweet music of the low price turn sour, when he or she has to explain to the boss why their expensive system didn’t catch the bad guy!

Agree: 3
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts reporting, tutorials and software funded by subscriber's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.
Loading Related Reports