Fake Fingerprints - Liveness Detection Solutions

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Oct 19, 2015

One of the biggest concerns with fingerprint readers is how easy they can be fooled. While biometrics are typically more difficult to steal or fake, headlines still break news of fake fingers or stolen prints being used to fool sensors.

For this reason, many access control fingerprint readers include live finger or liveness detection that checks the finger being scanned is authentic.

In this note, we examine the four common methods (tissue reflection, heartbeat detection, dermal electric resistance, unnaturalness analysis), what HID, Morpho and Suprema use and why you need to beware of ambiguous claims.

*** ** *** ******* ******** **** *********** ******* ** *** easy **** *** ** ******. ***** ********** *** ********* **** difficult ** ***** ** ****, ********* ***** ***** **** ** fake ******* ** ****** ****** ***** **** ** **** *******.

*** **** ******, **** ****** ******* *********** ******* ******* **** finger ** ******** ********* **** ****** *** ****** ***** ******* is *********.

** **** ****, ** ******* *** **** ****** ******* (****** **********, heartbeat *********, ****** ******** **********, ************* ********), **** ***, ****** *** Suprema *** *** *** *** **** ** ****** ** ********* claims.

[***************]

Stealing ************ ** ***** **********

*** **** ***** ** *** ******* ** **** ***** ************ are ******, **** *** ** ****** ** **** ******* **********. Throughout *** *****, ******* ******* ** ******** ******, ** ***************** ******** ** ****** ****, ********** **** ***** *********,*****-**** ******* ** ****** ******, ** **** ***** ******* ******* **** **** ********.

***** *** ****** ** ********* ******* ****'* ***** ***** **** effort **** ******** * ****, ***, ** ***, *** **** is *** **** - ************ ****** **** **** ****** ** sensitive ***** **** ** *** ******.  

Four Common *******

***** *********** ****** ************* ********** *** ******** ********* *******, **** do *** ****** ******* **** **** *** ** *** **** work. ** *******, *** ****** *** **** ** ******* * manufacturer ******* **** *** ********* **** **** **** ********* **********:

  • ****** **********:*** **** ****** ****** (********* ****** ************* *******) ********* **** IR ***** ** ******* *** ********* ******** ** * ******'* skin. **** ****** ****** ** *** **** **** ******, ****** skin ******** ** ***** ** * ********** *** **** ***** different ** **** ** ******* ** ********* ********. ********** *** optical ***** *******, **** ***** ** **** ** *** **** time ** *** *********** ** '****', ** ***** ** ** delay ****** *** ****. 
  • ********* *********: *** ** *** ********* ******* **** * **** ******* sampling **** ** ****** *** *********, ******** ******** ** *********** coursing **** *****. **** ******* *********** ** * ******* *****, and ******* ** ******* *** ******** ******* ** *******.  ***** both ******* ** ******** *** ******** ***** **** ********** ****** one ** *** **** ********* ******* *** ************* ** ***.
  • ****** ******** **********:*** ********** **** ** *******, ******* ***** **** ******* * small *** ********** ********** **********. ** * ****** ** ********* and *** ****** ** ****** ** ******* ******* **** **********, it ** ***********. **** ** *** **** ********** ***** ******, this ******** ***** ** ******, *** ** *** *** ** reliable ** *** ** **** ************ **** ****** *** ******* of **** *** ***** ** ******.
  • ************* ********: **** ****** ***** ** *** *******, ** ** ****** ** software ****** ***** ** ********* ************. **** ****** ******** * print ******* ******* *************** ** ***** ** ******* *******. ***** ** ****** ****** **** *******, ****** ** ***** edges, ***** ***** *****, ** ******** ******* ** *** *****, if *** ******* ** *** **** ***** ******* * ******* 'authentic' *****, *** ***** ** *********** ** ****.

***** *** **** ****** ** ******* ** *** ******, * unit ******* ******** ********* ******* $***, ***** * **** **** ****** ******* ******* *** **** *** more.  *** ******** ** ******** ********* ** **** *** ****** of ***** ***** **** ***** ***** ******, ***** **** ****** type, *********** *******, *** ************* *********** ** *** ******.

Liveness ******* ****

** ****** *** **** ** **** ** ******* ******, **** commercial *********** ******** *** ******* *** ****** ** ******* **** are real.  ***** ** * **** ** '******** *********' ** '**** finger *********' ** ****** *********** ******* **********:

  • ********/*** ******: **** ********* ********* *** ****** ********** ** ******** ******* are ****.
  • ******: ********* ** *** ******, ****** **** ****** **********, ****** resistance, ******* ** **** ************* ********.
  • *******: **** * ****** ** ************* ********** ** ********* ** prints *** ***** ** *********** ** **** *** ******.

** *******, ***** ********* ********* **** **** * ****** ****** at **** ** *******- * *** ***** ** ******** *** wide ***** ** ********* ****/******* ***** ********.  

Beware ******** ******

*** *** '******** *********' ******* *** ******* *********. *** ******* *****'* ***** ** *** ****** *********** ****** (**** *******) ** * ****** ********** *****. Apple ******* *** ****** **** '******** ********* ******** *** **********' (unnaturalness ********) ** ********** ******. *******, ******* ***** ****** ****** ********* *****, **** ***** ***** *******. ** *** **** ** *****'* fingerprint ******, ******* ** ***** ****** *** ***** * **** with ******** ******* *****.

** *******, ********* ******* **** *** ******** *** ******** **** are ****** ********** (**: *********, ****** **********, *** ****** **********). Take **** ** ***** ******* ************* **** **** ***, *** if ********-**** (**** ************* ********) ** *******, ** ****.

Comments (6)

Thanks, Brian, for a really informative article.

It would be interesting to hear about hyperspectral's robustness to skin color variations. It seems reasonable that natural variation has been considered and accommodated, without substantially reducing ability to discriminate false presentations. In fact, it would be interesting (and probably more secure) if hyperspectral skin tones added another dimension to the fingerprint signature.

There must be a reasonably wide variation in acceptable conductivity to accommodate routinely varying conditions. Knowing that skin conductivity is relevant, how hard could it be to replicate a static resistance within a dummy finger, or even on a dummy image? Naively, considering that many laserjet inks are conductive, could you print a target resistance by varying print darkness? Who knows what is possible?

For heartbeat, one could print onto a flexible substrate (something like acetate), then glue it onto a bladder such as a balloon. While presenting that image to the reader, one could gently squeeze the bladder slightly more frequently than once per second.

If hyperspectral IR has a reasonable resolution, it seems as if it could be the most difficult to faithfully replicate, and that fingerprint augmentation with hyperspectral signature could even enhance security.

IMHO, one could obtain, at the expense of authorization delay, a higher level of confidence by using a challenge and response mechanism.

Something where the reader would display randomly changing "challenge", like a gesture, that would one mimic in response.

Of course, this is easier said than done, but could be useful since all static biometrics are, if someone is willing to spend enough $, vulnerable to the attack vector of 'fool the sensor'.

IMHO, it is too expensive (and usually affects accuracy) and can be solved by employing other methods. For instance, a couple of possible options:

  • enroll all fingers and request a different one each time or a combination
  • in the same price range it is more efficient (accurate, robust) to use palm vein or iris verification
  • the easiest (and probably the best) way is to use multi-factor authentication (PIN / Card / Fingerprint / Voice / Face)

[Request for Update (Suprema)]

Hi John / Brian,

Check this out: https://www.supremainc.com/en/AccessControl-TimeandAttendance/Biometric/BioStation-A2

Not all fingeprint devices from Suprema are using that advanced feature thought:

BioStation A2 is implementing advanced Live Finger Detection based on:

- Dynamic Pattern Analysis

- Unnaturalness Analysis

- Dual Source Light Imaging

BioStation A2 was tested and compared to nop notch fingerprint vendors as below:

#pushingthelimits

Best regards,

baud

Who would dig up grandma just to look at a bunch of military floppy discs?

Some people just need a hobby...

once again it seems like it comes down to adding layers to decrease risk. all about the how much the customer is willing to spend to protect their assets.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

Ladders For Installers Guide on Sep 25, 2018
Ladders are one of the most important pieces of worksite equipment for the surveillance technician. Too often, however, even highly experienced...
Favorite Access Control Reader Manufacturer 2018 on Sep 25, 2018
Favorite reader votes are in, and it is not close. A global access giant ran away with the votes in a one-sided contest. But for many, the...
Genetec Takes Aim At 'Untrustworthy' 'Foreign Government-Owned Vendors' on Sep 24, 2018
Genetec is taking aim at 'untrustworthy' 'foreign government-owned vendors'. This is not a new theme for Genetec as nearly 2 years ago, Genetec...
4MP Camera Shootout - Axis, Dahua, DW, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Sep 24, 2018
4MP usage continues to climb, especially for low cost fixed lens models. To see who was best, we bought and tested seven 4MP models from Axis,...
Alexa Guard Expands Amazon's Security Offerings, Boosts ADT's Stock on Sep 21, 2018
Amazon is expanding their security offerings yet again, this time with Alexa Guard that delivers security audio analytics and a virtual "Fake...
UTC, Owner of Lenel, Acquires S2 on Sep 20, 2018
UTC now owns two of the biggest access control providers, one of integrator's most hated access control platforms, Lenel, and one of their...
BluePoint Aims To Bring Life-Safety Mind-Set To Police Pull Stations on Sep 20, 2018
Fire alarm pull stations are commonplace but police ones are not. A self-funded startup, BluePoint Alert Solutions is aiming to make police pull...
SIA Plays Dumb On OEMs And Hikua Ban on Sep 20, 2018
OEMs widely pretend to be 'manufacturers', deceiving their customers and putting them at risk for cybersecurity attacks and, soon, violation of US...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...
Avigilon Announces AI-Powered H5 Camera Development on Sep 19, 2018
Avigilon will be showcasing "next-generation AI" at next week's ASIS GSX. In an atypical move, the company is not actually releasing these...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact