Fake Fingerprints - Liveness Detection Solutions

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Oct 19, 2015

One of the biggest concerns with fingerprint readers is how easy they can be fooled. While biometrics are typically more difficult to steal or fake, headlines still break news of fake fingers or stolen prints being used to fool sensors.

For this reason, many access control fingerprint readers include live finger or liveness detection that checks the finger being scanned is authentic.

In this note, we examine the four common methods (tissue reflection, heartbeat detection, dermal electric resistance, unnaturalness analysis), what HID, Morpho and Suprema use and why you need to beware of ambiguous claims.

*** ** *** ******* ******** **** *********** ******* ** *** easy **** *** ** ******. ***** ********** *** ********* **** difficult ** ***** ** ****, ********* ***** ***** **** ** fake ******* ** ****** ****** ***** **** ** **** *******.

*** **** ******, **** ****** ******* *********** ******* ******* **** finger ** ******** ********* **** ****** *** ****** ***** ******* is *********.

** **** ****, ** ******* *** **** ****** ******* (****** **********, heartbeat *********, ****** ******** **********, ************* ********), **** ***, ****** *** Suprema *** *** *** *** **** ** ****** ** ********* claims.

[***************]

Stealing ************ ** ***** **********

*** **** ***** ** *** ******* ** **** ***** ************ are ******, **** *** ** ****** ** **** ******* **********. Throughout *** *****, ******* ******* ** ******** ******, ** ***************** ******** ** ****** ****, ********** **** ***** *********,*****-**** ******* ** ****** ******, ** **** ***** ******* ******* **** **** ********.

***** *** ****** ** ********* ******* ****'* ***** ***** **** effort **** ******** * ****, ***, ** ***, *** **** is *** **** - ************ ****** **** **** ****** ** sensitive ***** **** ** *** ******.  

Four Common *******

***** *********** ****** ************* ********** *** ******** ********* *******, **** do *** ****** ******* **** **** *** ** *** **** work. ** *******, *** ****** *** **** ** ******* * manufacturer ******* **** *** ********* **** **** **** ********* **********:

  • ****** **********:*** **** ****** ****** (********* ****** ************* *******) ********* **** IR ***** ** ******* *** ********* ******** ** * ******'* skin. **** ****** ****** ** *** **** **** ******, ****** skin ******** ** ***** ** * ********** *** **** ***** different ** **** ** ******* ** ********* ********. ********** *** optical ***** *******, **** ***** ** **** ** *** **** time ** *** *********** ** '****', ** ***** ** ** delay ****** *** ****. 
  • ********* *********: *** ** *** ********* ******* **** * **** ******* sampling **** ** ****** *** *********, ******** ******** ** *********** coursing **** *****. **** ******* *********** ** * ******* *****, and ******* ** ******* *** ******** ******* ** *******.  ***** both ******* ** ******** *** ******** ***** **** ********** ****** one ** *** **** ********* ******* *** ************* ** ***.
  • ****** ******** **********:*** ********** **** ** *******, ******* ***** **** ******* * small *** ********** ********** **********. ** * ****** ** ********* and *** ****** ** ****** ** ******* ******* **** **********, it ** ***********. **** ** *** **** ********** ***** ******, this ******** ***** ** ******, *** ** *** *** ** reliable ** *** ** **** ************ **** ****** *** ******* of **** *** ***** ** ******.
  • ************* ********: **** ****** ***** ** *** *******, ** ** ****** ** software ****** ***** ** ********* ************. **** ****** ******** * print ******* ******* *************** ** ***** ** ******* *******. ***** ** ****** ****** **** *******, ****** ** ***** edges, ***** ***** *****, ** ******** ******* ** *** *****, if *** ******* ** *** **** ***** ******* * ******* 'authentic' *****, *** ***** ** *********** ** ****.

***** *** **** ****** ** ******* ** *** ******, * unit ******* ******** ********* ******* $***, ***** * **** **** ****** ******* ******* *** **** *** more.  *** ******** ** ******** ********* ** **** *** ****** of ***** ***** **** ***** ***** ******, ***** **** ****** type, *********** *******, *** ************* *********** ** *** ******.

Liveness ******* ****

** ****** *** **** ** **** ** ******* ******, **** commercial *********** ******** *** ******* *** ****** ** ******* **** are real.  ***** ** * **** ** '******** *********' ** '**** finger *********' ** ****** *********** ******* **********:

  • ********/*** ******: **** ********* ********* *** ****** ********** ** ******** ******* are ****.
  • ******: ********* ** *** ******, ****** **** ****** **********, ****** resistance, ******* ** **** ************* ********.
  • *******: **** * ****** ** ************* ********** ** ********* ** prints *** ***** ** *********** ** **** *** ******.

** *******, ***** ********* ********* **** **** * ****** ****** at **** ** *******- * *** ***** ** ******** *** wide ***** ** ********* ****/******* ***** ********.  

Beware ******** ******

*** *** '******** *********' ******* *** ******* *********. *** ******* *****'* ***** ** *** ****** *********** ****** (**** *******) ** * ****** ********** *****. Apple ******* *** ****** **** '******** ********* ******** *** **********' (unnaturalness ********) ** ********** ******. *******, ******* ***** ****** ****** ********* *****, **** ***** ***** *******. ** *** **** ** *****'* fingerprint ******, ******* ** ***** ****** *** ***** * **** with ******** ******* *****.

** *******, ********* ******* **** *** ******** *** ******** **** are ****** ********** (**: *********, ****** **********, *** ****** **********). Take **** ** ***** ******* ************* **** **** ***, *** if ********-**** (**** ************* ********) ** *******, ** ****.

Comments (6)

Thanks, Brian, for a really informative article.

It would be interesting to hear about hyperspectral's robustness to skin color variations. It seems reasonable that natural variation has been considered and accommodated, without substantially reducing ability to discriminate false presentations. In fact, it would be interesting (and probably more secure) if hyperspectral skin tones added another dimension to the fingerprint signature.

There must be a reasonably wide variation in acceptable conductivity to accommodate routinely varying conditions. Knowing that skin conductivity is relevant, how hard could it be to replicate a static resistance within a dummy finger, or even on a dummy image? Naively, considering that many laserjet inks are conductive, could you print a target resistance by varying print darkness? Who knows what is possible?

For heartbeat, one could print onto a flexible substrate (something like acetate), then glue it onto a bladder such as a balloon. While presenting that image to the reader, one could gently squeeze the bladder slightly more frequently than once per second.

If hyperspectral IR has a reasonable resolution, it seems as if it could be the most difficult to faithfully replicate, and that fingerprint augmentation with hyperspectral signature could even enhance security.

IMHO, one could obtain, at the expense of authorization delay, a higher level of confidence by using a challenge and response mechanism.

Something where the reader would display randomly changing "challenge", like a gesture, that would one mimic in response.

Of course, this is easier said than done, but could be useful since all static biometrics are, if someone is willing to spend enough $, vulnerable to the attack vector of 'fool the sensor'.

IMHO, it is too expensive (and usually affects accuracy) and can be solved by employing other methods. For instance, a couple of possible options:

  • enroll all fingers and request a different one each time or a combination
  • in the same price range it is more efficient (accurate, robust) to use palm vein or iris verification
  • the easiest (and probably the best) way is to use multi-factor authentication (PIN / Card / Fingerprint / Voice / Face)

[Request for Update (Suprema)]

Hi John / Brian,

Check this out: https://www.supremainc.com/en/AccessControl-TimeandAttendance/Biometric/BioStation-A2

Not all fingeprint devices from Suprema are using that advanced feature thought:

BioStation A2 is implementing advanced Live Finger Detection based on:

- Dynamic Pattern Analysis

- Unnaturalness Analysis

- Dual Source Light Imaging

BioStation A2 was tested and compared to nop notch fingerprint vendors as below:

#pushingthelimits

Best regards,

baud

Who would dig up grandma just to look at a bunch of military floppy discs?

Some people just need a hobby...

once again it seems like it comes down to adding layers to decrease risk. all about the how much the customer is willing to spend to protect their assets.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

BREAKING: US House Passes Bill Banning Gov Use of Dahua and Hikvision on May 24, 2018
Today, the US House of Representatives has passed H.R. 5515, a bill that includes a ban on the US government's use of Dahua and Hikvision. This...
Hanwha Wisenet X Analytics and VMD Test on May 24, 2018
Continuing our updated testing of camera analytics, we tested Hanwha's Wisenet X analytics for over two weeks in multiple scenes, indoors and out,...
Ambitious Mobile Access Startup: Openpath on May 24, 2018
This team sold their last startup for hundreds of millions of dollars, now they have started Openpath to become a rare access control small...
Amazon's "Dangerous New Face Recognition Technology" Says ACLU on May 23, 2018
The ACLU has caused a stir, with a new report Amazon Teams Up With Law Enforcement to Deploy Dangerous New Face Recognition Technology,...
Software Only VMS vs NVR Appliances on May 23, 2018
Should you buy your own PC/server and load VMS software on it or get a turnkey appliance (both hardware and software, e.g., NVR, Hybrid DVR) from a...
Buy Arecont: Top Bid $10 Million Cash on May 22, 2018
Last year, Arecont had a deal for a purchase price of $170 million (see Failed Arecont China Acquisition). This year, Arecont has a deal for a...
Installing Box Cameras Indoors Tutorial on May 22, 2018
This tutorial starts our physical installation for video surveillance series, starting with Box Cameras, one of the oldest and most basic types....
The Hikvision Smart Classroom Behavior Management System on May 22, 2018
Hikvision's rapidly growing offering of analytics, which we most recently examined with Hikvision's ethnic minority analytics, is now going into...
Dahua Intrusion Analytics And VMD Tested (Poorly) on May 21, 2018
Dahua ships basic analytics on practically all their cameras, ranging from low cost to high end. To see how these analytics work in real world...
Exacq Improving Technical Support, Responding To Integrator Complaints on May 21, 2018
Exacq had been a long-term favorite of integrators, but since their 2014 Tyco acquisition, Exacq has fallen in IPVM integrator studies (though...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact