Service Range for Security Integrators

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Sep 02, 2012

"You go where the work is" - an old adage that certainly describes the competitive security integration business. But just how far are most installers willing to travel? We asked nearly 100 integrators, big, small, and from all areas of the globe to explain how they determine their installation boundaries. In this note we share those answers and analyse the results.

Key Answers

The question we posed read "How far will you travel to install a system? (i.e. what's your service range)" and left it up to answerers to define the answer in terms of distance or travel time. In analysing the detailed responses, several interesting themes emerged-

  • Most Installers limit themselves locally, or not at all: Surprisingly, 'territories' are either fairly close to home - within a day's travel- or fairly unrestricted. The integrators limiting themselves locally are typically located in area fairly dense with customers, while those that travel will go to wherever customer service is needed.
  • Installers travel, even for smaller systems: No strong reluctance to travel was apparent, even among installers who average a small number of installed cameras per job.
  • Profits dictate travel distance more than any other factor: The ability to make profit on a job is what constrains travel, not distance. Installers are willing to travel to other states, region, or even other countries... as long as the profits are favorable.

Small vs. Large Territories

Looking at the gross break down of responses, roughly half of installers define their service area is 'local', and the other half suggest 'national' or 'multi-national' boundaries, and that they will travel extensively if required.

Detailed Responses

Our installers represent a wide demographic, covering large 'national' integrators to small 'mom & pop' installers who collectively service a large sampling of the surveillance market from around the world. Within those collected responses, it became clear installers either limit themselves close to home, or otherwise do not limit travel for reasons other than profit:

National or International

Video surveillance installers are willing to travel great distances to perform work, and some do so on a routine basis:

  • "Worldwide. We have an excellent and a highly deployable work force for major international projects."
  • "Up to 2000 miles (we are a federal contractor and therefore will install nationwide)."
  • "We cover the whole country, Venezuela"
  • "We are based in Maryland and have clients in Puerto Rico, so we are good anywhere."
  • "We send technicians on long trips, for example war zones, oil platforms, or military facilities deep in the mountains."
  • "We install security systems for one of Swedens largest hardware retail store chain which means we go where they go. Also we bid on government procurements which could take us anywhere."
  • "A long way! We operate out of Kuwait but would happily install systems in Oman, Dubai Bahrain etc."
  • "Working for a national integrator, if it is a complicated system that requires support (i.e. specific VMS platform), will travel anywhere."

Local Only

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

When installers limit themselves to local jobs, they suggest its because they do not need to travel far to find work. These installers were typically located in larger cities, small countries, or regions where large amounts of work can be found.

  • "I have enough business locally without hunting afar."
  • "The Las Vegas valley is relatively compact."
  • "I have a 150 mile radius, lots of suburbs around."
  • "1 hour. Our operation is focused within big locality."
  • "I service 40 mines within 35 KM of my offices."
  • "15 - 20 Kilometers. I live in a City and there in no reason to go further than that."
  • "1 hour Journey. My company is located in Singapore where our usual deployment is local. Singapore is a small country."
  • "Lithuania is small country, there are no directions you can travel more than 300 km."
  • "There's no need to travel more than 45 minutes or 1 hour. Many good government customers in this area."

System Size Not Important

Surprisingly, the average number of cameras installed per job did not significantly influence the decision. For example, in the group that install an average of "8 cameras or less per project" were these answers:

  • "We travel anywhere. Last year we did business in 42 states."
  • "Regional or national facilities that are willing to pay the extra travel expense, we will go anywhere. Including over seas"
  • "We have Partners across the US."
  • "Our best customer has many remote sites."
  • "If a customer has multiple locations we would go where they needed us."
  • "We have active clients in 25 states."

These answers show that many installers do not mind traveling far distances for small jobs. While they may not do so for only a few sites, if the customer's account represents a numerous locations, the total camera count per site are not an important constraint.

It All Comes Down To Money

Overwhelmingly, installers answers they will travel however far they need to make profits. When installers travel overnight, they expect the travel costs to be rolled into the service invoices. As long as customers are willing to pay those fees, integrators will travel however far they are asked to work projects.

  • "As far as we can remain profitable."
  • "100KM. Any further a customer isn't willing to pay the travel time."
  • "We have generally limited our service area to around 2 to 3 hours. It becomes costly for the end user to pay the travel expense associated with the down-time associated with the trip."
  • "If we are competitive when charging travel and accommodation costs then we will take on the business."
  • "150 miles for new customers, existing local customers that are willing to pay the per diems we go where ever."
  • "Also there are local clients who have other facilities in other states who were so happy with our work here, they wanted us to do the security for their other buildings. We are able to make good money and expand the relationship with the client."
  • "anywhere , any time , any trip as long as they are willing to pay overhead , travel , all expenses"
  • "Continental United States including Alaska. Why? We'll do anything if it's worth the money."
  • 150 miles seems to be the magic number. However, gas prices are rapidly shrinking it. Much over that it begins to be a real issue on ongoing support at a cost the customer can justify paying for."
  • "I will go anywhere as long as I can make money. My customers move so I must move with them."
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports on Integrators

NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Mining Company Security Manager Interview on May 10, 2019
First Quantum Minerals Limited (FQML) is a global enterprise with offices on 4 continents and operations in 7 countries with exploratory operations...
ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times on May 07, 2019
ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal...
Ranking Manufacturer Favorability 2019 on May 06, 2019
24 manufacturer's favorability was ranked based on 170+ integrators feedback. Voting plus in-depth comments revealed insights on which brands were...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
Securadyne CEO: IPVM 'Entertaining For An Ignorant Few' on Apr 16, 2019
Securadyne's CEO Carey Boethel is unhappy with IPVM's report - Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied. Indeed, he...

Most Recent Industry Reports

NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact