Service Range for Security Integrators

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Sep 02, 2012

"You go where the work is" - an old adage that certainly describes the competitive security integration business. But just how far are most installers willing to travel? We asked nearly 100 integrators, big, small, and from all areas of the globe to explain how they determine their installation boundaries. In this note we share those answers and analyse the results.

Key Answers

The question we posed read "How far will you travel to install a system? (i.e. what's your service range)" and left it up to answerers to define the answer in terms of distance or travel time. In analysing the detailed responses, several interesting themes emerged-

  • Most Installers limit themselves locally, or not at all: Surprisingly, 'territories' are either fairly close to home - within a day's travel- or fairly unrestricted. The integrators limiting themselves locally are typically located in area fairly dense with customers, while those that travel will go to wherever customer service is needed.
  • Installers travel, even for smaller systems: No strong reluctance to travel was apparent, even among installers who average a small number of installed cameras per job.
  • Profits dictate travel distance more than any other factor: The ability to make profit on a job is what constrains travel, not distance. Installers are willing to travel to other states, region, or even other countries... as long as the profits are favorable.

Small vs. Large Territories

Looking at the gross break down of responses, roughly half of installers define their service area is 'local', and the other half suggest 'national' or 'multi-national' boundaries, and that they will travel extensively if required.

Detailed Responses

Our installers represent a wide demographic, covering large 'national' integrators to small 'mom & pop' installers who collectively service a large sampling of the surveillance market from around the world. Within those collected responses, it became clear installers either limit themselves close to home, or otherwise do not limit travel for reasons other than profit:

National or International

Video surveillance installers are willing to travel great distances to perform work, and some do so on a routine basis:

  • "Worldwide. We have an excellent and a highly deployable work force for major international projects."
  • "Up to 2000 miles (we are a federal contractor and therefore will install nationwide)."
  • "We cover the whole country, Venezuela"
  • "We are based in Maryland and have clients in Puerto Rico, so we are good anywhere."
  • "We send technicians on long trips, for example war zones, oil platforms, or military facilities deep in the mountains."
  • "We install security systems for one of Swedens largest hardware retail store chain which means we go where they go. Also we bid on government procurements which could take us anywhere."
  • "A long way! We operate out of Kuwait but would happily install systems in Oman, Dubai Bahrain etc."
  • "Working for a national integrator, if it is a complicated system that requires support (i.e. specific VMS platform), will travel anywhere."

Local Only

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

When installers limit themselves to local jobs, they suggest its because they do not need to travel far to find work. These installers were typically located in larger cities, small countries, or regions where large amounts of work can be found.

  • "I have enough business locally without hunting afar."
  • "The Las Vegas valley is relatively compact."
  • "I have a 150 mile radius, lots of suburbs around."
  • "1 hour. Our operation is focused within big locality."
  • "I service 40 mines within 35 KM of my offices."
  • "15 - 20 Kilometers. I live in a City and there in no reason to go further than that."
  • "1 hour Journey. My company is located in Singapore where our usual deployment is local. Singapore is a small country."
  • "Lithuania is small country, there are no directions you can travel more than 300 km."
  • "There's no need to travel more than 45 minutes or 1 hour. Many good government customers in this area."

System Size Not Important

Surprisingly, the average number of cameras installed per job did not significantly influence the decision. For example, in the group that install an average of "8 cameras or less per project" were these answers:

  • "We travel anywhere. Last year we did business in 42 states."
  • "Regional or national facilities that are willing to pay the extra travel expense, we will go anywhere. Including over seas"
  • "We have Partners across the US."
  • "Our best customer has many remote sites."
  • "If a customer has multiple locations we would go where they needed us."
  • "We have active clients in 25 states."

These answers show that many installers do not mind traveling far distances for small jobs. While they may not do so for only a few sites, if the customer's account represents a numerous locations, the total camera count per site are not an important constraint.

It All Comes Down To Money

Overwhelmingly, installers answers they will travel however far they need to make profits. When installers travel overnight, they expect the travel costs to be rolled into the service invoices. As long as customers are willing to pay those fees, integrators will travel however far they are asked to work projects.

  • "As far as we can remain profitable."
  • "100KM. Any further a customer isn't willing to pay the travel time."
  • "We have generally limited our service area to around 2 to 3 hours. It becomes costly for the end user to pay the travel expense associated with the down-time associated with the trip."
  • "If we are competitive when charging travel and accommodation costs then we will take on the business."
  • "150 miles for new customers, existing local customers that are willing to pay the per diems we go where ever."
  • "Also there are local clients who have other facilities in other states who were so happy with our work here, they wanted us to do the security for their other buildings. We are able to make good money and expand the relationship with the client."
  • "anywhere , any time , any trip as long as they are willing to pay overhead , travel , all expenses"
  • "Continental United States including Alaska. Why? We'll do anything if it's worth the money."
  • 150 miles seems to be the magic number. However, gas prices are rapidly shrinking it. Much over that it begins to be a real issue on ongoing support at a cost the customer can justify paying for."
  • "I will go anywhere as long as I can make money. My customers move so I must move with them."
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports on Integrators

Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites? 170 integrators answered the question: What is...
Axis Will Not Block Resellers on Jun 10, 2019
While Axis generally has strong favorability amongst integrators, the biggest complaint is their channel model, which results in smaller integrator...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...
"New" Arecont Fixes Failures "Without A Fight" on Jun 05, 2019
The "old" Arecont was infamous not only for its camera failures but for making their "partners" fight to get them fixed. IPVM drew the ire of...
Startup Rhombus Systems Says Twice the Features, Half the Price of Verkada on Jun 04, 2019
Closed cloud systems may be the fastest growing segment of video surveillance with Meraki and Verkada. Now another California company is joining...
China / US Trade War Impact Splits Industry on Jun 04, 2019
As the trade war continues to heat up, 170+ integrators told us "What impact will the US / PRC China conflict have on the industry?" Respondents...
Smart CODEC Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 03, 2019
Smart codecs are now nearly a standard feature in IP cameras, but our statistics show integrator adoption has not increased at the same rate. In...

Most Recent Industry Reports

HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Beware African 50,000 IP Camera Contract Scam on Jul 12, 2019
A “Nigerian Prince” scam for the video surveillance market is going around. You, or at least we, could be lucky enough to be the single bidder for...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact