How Exposure Impacts Low Light Video Surveillance

Author: IPVM Team, Published on Dec 07, 2009

Exposure, and the tricks manufacturers play with exposure, are key to accurately and fairly assessing low light performance of cameras.

For instance, take these two images:

The images capture the same scene but look substantially different. However, which one is better?

No doubt, the image of the right (Camera B) is much brighter and the vehicle in the background is much easier to see. However, these two images are from the same camera - simply with a change to the maximum exposure setting.

Keep in mind that:

  • Using still images as 'proof' of video surveillance quality can easily be used to mislead
  • The 'hidden' problem is that long exposure times blur moving objects to the point of being unusable.

To be clear, the answer in our poll above has to be Option C. Not enough information can be determined from a still image. It is not a fair assessment to say that Camera B is a superior product because of it's image quality. In fact, both images are from the exact same camera. The key differentiator between the two shots is that they were captured at different exposure settings - the 'dark' Camera A at 1/30s and the 'bright' Camera B at 1 second.

Exposure Sample Videos

Download the sample video clips that demonstrate a moving subject [56 MBs] with the exposure configurations at 1/60 s, 1/30 s, 1/15 s, 1/8 s, 1/2 s, and 1 s. This should give you a starting point to determine for yourself what trade off between discernible subjects and motion blur is acceptable for your security application.

Exposure Comparison

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

View the screencast to see the actual video clips compared under different exposure configurations. Note that the subject on the 1 second exposure setting is distorted by a significant amount of motion blur. Is the subject running or walking? If the subject ran fast enough, he would look like a ghost across the screen: that is not an acceptable configuration for monitoring people.

Camera Exposure Settings

In this screencast, we examine the issues and process of adjusting maximum exposure time settings in 5 cameras.

  • The defaults for maximum exposure time varies by camera. The Axis Q175, Stardot and Sanyo have 1/30s default for maximum exposure. The Basler has 1s default for maximum exposure (though they report planning to change this to 1/8s in a future release). The Pelco has 1/30s max during day mode operation and 1/8s during night mode. Going from 1/30s to 1s is a 30x difference in the amount of light captured - a significant variance that will have dramatic performance impact.
  • These settings generally can only be changed from the camera's web interface as VMS generally do not support adjusting these settings in their administration tools.
  • The naming, location and options for each camera's maximum exposure time settings vary. For instance, Axis and Basler provide options in a range of fractional seconds while Sanyo's options are a multiple relative to the capture rate. See the video below for more details.

Risk of "Sleight of Hand" Marketing

Referring back to the poll question example images, it is a trend for some manufacturers to market their camera's night time quality in this fashion. It is important that you factor in the specific settings used to capture the video.

Recommendations

Providing users options for maximum exposure time is a good thing. Marketing great image quality through the use of very long exposure times is a dangerous practice, specifically because of manufacturer's omitting to disclose the problems with motion blur.

Here are our recommendations for maximum exposure time settings:

  • For applications requiring a strict 30fps, then the maximum exposure should be no more than 1/30s. Otherwise, the longer exposure makes it impossible to generate a unique image for each frame. That being said, for night time, low light viewing, 30fps is likely to be unnecessary.
  • For moving people (running or walking), 1/8s maximum exposure setting should be fine to eliminate motion blur and provide usable images throughout the entire video. While many manufacturers set their maximum at 1/30s, we believe that 1/8s will significantly increase visible details (because of more light) while not introducing new defects.
  • For moving vehicles, more than 1/8s and perhaps up to 1/30s maximum exposure settings may be needed (this, of course, depends on the speed of the vehicles).
  • If you are willing to sacrifice images of moving objects with the understanding that when they stop you should capture a clear image, than 1/2s or 1s maximum exposure time makes sense. However, this tradeoff needs to be clearly appreciated by the users prior to commissioning the system.

10 reports cite this report:

New Surveillance Products Directory Fall 2011 on Sep 21, 2011
This report provides a summary of key announcements and news being made related to or around the ASIS 2011 show.For each product or change, where...
New Surveillance Products Review June 2011 on Jun 14, 2011
In this report, we provide in depth coverage of new surveillance product releases announced in May and June 2011. Below are the products we are...
Axis Lightfinder / Q1602 Examined on May 24, 2011
In this note, we examine the features, competitive positioning and pricing of the Axis Q1602. This camera's announcement has generated a...
Overviewing Absolutron's Megapixel Cameras on Nov 28, 2010
In this note, we overview Absolutron, a startup megapixel camera manufacturer based in California, USA. The company specializes in high frame rate...
Video Surveillance RFPs Reviewed - Vol 1 on Nov 08, 2010
In this report, we review 4 recent real-world video surveillance Request for Proposals (RFPs). RFPs provide a good look into the needs, challenges...
How Critical Should We Be of Video Surveillance Products? on Feb 07, 2010
IP Video Market Info is definitely critical of video surveillance products - routinely looking for hidden problems or over-hyped claims. Many love...
Examining Basler's Market Acceptance on Feb 01, 2010
Recently, SecurityInfoWatch ran a 'fluff' piece on Basler, regurgitating their marketing claims with no analysis. Key claims made: The small...
Testing Axis's Q1755 HD Surveillance Camera v. 2 on Jan 04, 2010
This report shares extensive test results, video clips and training screencasts on the Axis Q1755 HD camera. The goal is to educate on how the...
Normalize Exposure Settings for IP Camera Comparisons on Dec 22, 2009
We recommend all surveillance camera comparisons be performed with normalized exposure settings to ensure fairness and eliminate 'games'. Starting...
Guidelines for Testing IP Cameras on May 25, 2009
What is the best way to test an IP cameras? We have established guidelines for our tests. These guidelines are listed below for your review and...

Related Reports

Genetec Privacy Protector Tested on Nov 12, 2018
Genetec has built Kiwi Security's Privacy Protector into Security Center, an analytic which anonymizes individuals in cameras' fields of view...
Dahua Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (HDBW4231FN-E2-M) on Nov 07, 2018
Dahua has introduced a dual-imager dome model, the HDBW4231FN-E2-M, with two independently positionable sensors including integrated IR, not found...
Axxon Face Search Tested on Oct 26, 2018
AxxonSoft has brought facial recognition to their Axxon Next VMS for free with the simply named Face Search, claiming to allow users to find...
Hanwha Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (PNM-7000VD) on Oct 18, 2018
Hanwha has introduced their first dual-imager model, the PNM-7000VD, a twin 1080p model featuring independently positionable sensors and a snap-in...
Dahua Face Recognition Camera Tested on Oct 15, 2018
Dahua has been one of the industry's most vocal proponents of the value that AI creates: As part of this, Dahua has released a facial...
Last Chance - October 2018 Camera Course on Oct 04, 2018
Today is the last day to register for the October 2018 Camera Course, register now. This is the only independent surveillance camera course,...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...
Axis First IR PTZ Tested (Q6125-LE) on Aug 21, 2018
Axis is very late in releasing IR PTZs. While competitors such as Hikvision and Dahua have offered them for years, Axis has just released their...
Hikvision PanoVu Mini Tested (Multi-imager + PTZ For ~$500) on Aug 07, 2018
Hikvision has released their first PanoVu Mini multi imager, the PanoVu DS-2PT3326IZ-DE3, with four 1080p imagers, including a PTZ and integrated...
Panasonic 9MP Panoramic Fisheye Tested (WV-X4571L) on Aug 02, 2018
Panasonic has released their latest fisheye camera, the WV-X4571L, with 12MP sensor and 9MP resolution, claiming "extreme image quality" under...

Most Recent Industry Reports

'Sticker' Surveillance Camera Developed (CSEM Witness) on Nov 16, 2018
The Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM) has announced what it calls the: world’s first fully autonomous camera that can be...
ISC East 2018 Mini-Show Final Report on Nov 16, 2018
This is our second (updated) and final show report from ISC East. ISC East, by its own admission, is not a national or international show, billed...
Facial Detection Tested on Nov 16, 2018
Facial detection and recognition are increasingly offered by video surveillance manufacturers. Facial detection detects faces in an image/video...
Throughtek P2P/Cloud Solution Profile on Nov 15, 2018
Many IoT manufacturers either do not have the capabilities or the interest to develop their own cloud management software for their devices....
ASIS Offering Custom Research For Manufacturers on Nov 15, 2018
Manufacturers often want to know what industry people think about trends and, in particular, the segments and product they offer.  ASIS and its...
Hikvision Silent on "Bad Architectural Practices" Cybersecurity Report on Nov 14, 2018
A 'significant vulnerability was found in Hikvision cameras' by VDOO, a startup cybersecurity specialist. Hikvision has fixed the specific...
French Government Threatens School with $1.7M Fine For “Excessive Video Surveillance” on Nov 14, 2018
The French government has notified a high-profile Paris coding academy that it risks a fine of up to 1.5 million euros (about $1.7m) if it...
Integrator Credit Card Alternative Divvy on Nov 13, 2018
Most security integrators are small businesses but large enough that they have various employees that need to be able to expense various charges as...
Directory of Video Intercoms on Nov 13, 2018
Video Intercoms, also known as Video Door-Phones or Video Entry Systems, have been growing in the past decade as more and more IP camera...
Beware Amazon Go Store Hype (Tested) on Nov 13, 2018
IPVM's trip to and testing of Amazon Go's San Francisco store shows a number of significant operational and economic issues that undermine the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact