How Exposure Impacts Low Light Video Surveillance

By: IPVM Team, Published on Dec 07, 2009

Exposure, and the tricks manufacturers play with exposure, are key to accurately and fairly assessing low light performance of cameras.

For instance, take these two images:

The images capture the same scene but look substantially different. However, which one is better?

No doubt, the image of the right (Camera B) is much brighter and the vehicle in the background is much easier to see. However, these two images are from the same camera - simply with a change to the maximum exposure setting.

Keep in mind that:

  • Using still images as 'proof' of video surveillance quality can easily be used to mislead
  • The 'hidden' problem is that long exposure times blur moving objects to the point of being unusable.

To be clear, the answer in our poll above has to be Option C. Not enough information can be determined from a still image. It is not a fair assessment to say that Camera B is a superior product because of it's image quality. In fact, both images are from the exact same camera. The key differentiator between the two shots is that they were captured at different exposure settings - the 'dark' Camera A at 1/30s and the 'bright' Camera B at 1 second.

Exposure Sample Videos

Download the sample video clips that demonstrate a moving subject [56 MBs] with the exposure configurations at 1/60 s, 1/30 s, 1/15 s, 1/8 s, 1/2 s, and 1 s. This should give you a starting point to determine for yourself what trade off between discernible subjects and motion blur is acceptable for your security application.

Exposure Comparison

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

View the screencast to see the actual video clips compared under different exposure configurations. Note that the subject on the 1 second exposure setting is distorted by a significant amount of motion blur. Is the subject running or walking? If the subject ran fast enough, he would look like a ghost across the screen: that is not an acceptable configuration for monitoring people.

Camera Exposure Settings

In this screencast, we examine the issues and process of adjusting maximum exposure time settings in 5 cameras.

  • The defaults for maximum exposure time varies by camera. The Axis Q175, Stardot and Sanyo have 1/30s default for maximum exposure. The Basler has 1s default for maximum exposure (though they report planning to change this to 1/8s in a future release). The Pelco has 1/30s max during day mode operation and 1/8s during night mode. Going from 1/30s to 1s is a 30x difference in the amount of light captured - a significant variance that will have dramatic performance impact.
  • These settings generally can only be changed from the camera's web interface as VMS generally do not support adjusting these settings in their administration tools.
  • The naming, location and options for each camera's maximum exposure time settings vary. For instance, Axis and Basler provide options in a range of fractional seconds while Sanyo's options are a multiple relative to the capture rate. See the video below for more details.

Risk of "Sleight of Hand" Marketing

Referring back to the poll question example images, it is a trend for some manufacturers to market their camera's night time quality in this fashion. It is important that you factor in the specific settings used to capture the video.

Recommendations

Providing users options for maximum exposure time is a good thing. Marketing great image quality through the use of very long exposure times is a dangerous practice, specifically because of manufacturer's omitting to disclose the problems with motion blur.

Here are our recommendations for maximum exposure time settings:

  • For applications requiring a strict 30fps, then the maximum exposure should be no more than 1/30s. Otherwise, the longer exposure makes it impossible to generate a unique image for each frame. That being said, for night time, low light viewing, 30fps is likely to be unnecessary.
  • For moving people (running or walking), 1/8s maximum exposure setting should be fine to eliminate motion blur and provide usable images throughout the entire video. While many manufacturers set their maximum at 1/30s, we believe that 1/8s will significantly increase visible details (because of more light) while not introducing new defects.
  • For moving vehicles, more than 1/8s and perhaps up to 1/30s maximum exposure settings may be needed (this, of course, depends on the speed of the vehicles).
  • If you are willing to sacrifice images of moving objects with the understanding that when they stop you should capture a clear image, than 1/2s or 1s maximum exposure time makes sense. However, this tradeoff needs to be clearly appreciated by the users prior to commissioning the system.

10 reports cite this report:

New Surveillance Products Directory Fall 2011 on Sep 21, 2011
This report provides a summary of key announcements and news being made related to or around the ASIS 2011 show.For each product or change, where...
New Surveillance Products Review June 2011 on Jun 14, 2011
In this report, we provide in depth coverage of new surveillance product releases announced in May and June 2011. Below are the products we are...
Axis Lightfinder / Q1602 Examined on May 24, 2011
In this note, we examine the features, competitive positioning and pricing of the Axis Q1602. This camera's announcement has generated a...
Overviewing Absolutron's Megapixel Cameras on Nov 28, 2010
In this note, we overview Absolutron, a startup megapixel camera manufacturer based in California, USA. The company specializes in high frame rate...
Video Surveillance RFPs Reviewed - Vol 1 on Nov 08, 2010
In this report, we review 4 recent real-world video surveillance Request for Proposals (RFPs). RFPs provide a good look into the needs, challenges...
How Critical Should We Be of Video Surveillance Products? on Feb 07, 2010
IP Video Market Info is definitely critical of video surveillance products - routinely looking for hidden problems or over-hyped claims. Many love...
Examining Basler's Market Acceptance on Feb 01, 2010
Recently, SecurityInfoWatch ran a 'fluff' piece on Basler, regurgitating their marketing claims with no analysis. Key claims made: The small...
Testing Axis's Q1755 HD Surveillance Camera v. 2 on Jan 04, 2010
This report shares extensive test results, video clips and training screencasts on the Axis Q1755 HD camera. The goal is to educate on how the...
Normalize Exposure Settings for IP Camera Comparisons on Dec 22, 2009
We recommend all surveillance camera comparisons be performed with normalized exposure settings to ensure fairness and eliminate 'games'. Starting...
Guidelines for Testing IP Cameras on May 25, 2009
What is the best way to test an IP cameras? We have established guidelines for our tests. These guidelines are listed below for your review and...

Related Reports on Low Light

Hikvision ColorVu Camera Tested on Jun 24, 2019
Hikvision says their new ColorVu line captures "vivid chromatic images in darkness", with unconventional white light illuminations whereas most...
Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
False Verkada 'Unrivaled' Low Light Performance Claim Removed on Jun 12, 2019
Verkada falsely claimed that it delivered 'UNRIVALED LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE' until IPVM questioned. In fact, Verkada's low light performance is...
Camera Course Summer 2019 - Register Now on Jun 12, 2019
Register for the Summer 2019 Camera Course.  This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Avigilon 32MP and 12MP H4 Multisensor Cameras Tested on Jun 11, 2019
Avigilon has released their H4 Multi-Sensor line of cameras claiming "broad scene coverage and high image detail" We bought and tested the...
Vivotek 20MP Multi-Imager Tested on May 30, 2019
Vivotek has released their latest repositionable multi-imager camera, the MA9321-EHTV, a 20 MP model claiming "Supreme Night Visibility", "Optimal...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Hikvision DeepinView Camera Analytics Tested on May 08, 2019
Hikvision is expanding its 'deep learning' offerings with a new camera series called 'DeepinView' claiming false alarm reduction and improved...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Startup Spectral Edge RGB+IR Claims "Unique Low Light Performance Tech" on Apr 03, 2019
This UK startup, born out of university research, is boldly proclaiming that they deliver "Unique low light performance tech for video surveillance...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Security Dealer 'Social Media Contractor' Program on Jun 25, 2019
A $20,000 video surveillance system can be yours for free if you are willing to post on social media about the security dealer. Good deal, bad...
Axis Live Privacy Shield Analytics Tested on Jun 25, 2019
Privacy is becoming a bigger factor in video surveillance, driven both by increased public awareness and by GDPR. Now, Axis has released Live...
Directory of 55 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Hikvision ColorVu Camera Tested on Jun 24, 2019
Hikvision says their new ColorVu line captures "vivid chromatic images in darkness", with unconventional white light illuminations whereas most...
China Subway Facial Recognition System Examined on Jun 24, 2019
A China city of 6+ million people has installed facial recognition-enabled gates in subways, allowing commuters to enter stations by simply showing...
HID Mobile Tested on Jun 21, 2019
HID Global is one of the largest access brands, but their mobile access has had challenges. Indeed, the company has already restructured their...
Genetec Beats Milestone For IHS #1 on Jun 21, 2019
For years, Milestone has touted that they are the #1 VMS. Now, Genetec has beaten them in IHS rankings. But what is this? Even other manufacturers...
Risk of Amazon Alexa Guard: No Battery Or Cell Backup on Jun 20, 2019
Amazon positions its Alexa Guard Service as a "smart home security system" and says it can help you "keep your home safe". However, the...
Exacq Remote Cloud Access Tested on Jun 20, 2019
Remote cloud access has been missing from most VMSes (including Exacq and Milestone). Now, Exacq, after releasing Cloud Drive Storage earlier in...
Briefcam Buys Frost Award* on Jun 20, 2019
Frost 'awards' are well-known and widely disrespected. Now Briefcam is touting their win. The way it has worked for many years is that Frost...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact