Hikvision 2013 IP Cameras Tested

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Dec 02, 2013

Hikvision claims to be the #1 surveillance manufacturer in the world. That's, well, debatable.

What's not in dispute is that they have become huge, fueled by the massive Chinese market, with revenue rocketing over $1 billion USD last year (by contrast Axis is the in $750 million range and Avigilon ~$150 million).

But how good are they?

In this report, we share test findings of 4 of their cameras:

Including (and yes, the naming convention is crazy):

We tested them against Axis, Dahua and Sony to see how Hikvision would perform in even, WDR and low light scenes.

*************** ** ** *** #1 ************ ************ ** the *****. ****'*, ****,*********.

****'* *** ** ******* is **** **** **** become ****, ****** ** the ******* ******* ******, with ******* ********* **** $1 ******* *** **** year (** ******** **** is *** ** $*** million ***** *** ******** ~$150 *******).

*** *** **** *** they?

** **** ******, ** share **** ******** ** 4 ** ***** *******:

********* (*** ***, *** naming ********** ** *****):

** ****** **** ***********,************** *** ***************** ******* ** ****, WDR *** *** ***** scenes.

[***************]

****: ******* *** *** additional ********* ***** ***** publication, ********* ********* *** ********** ** dome, *** **-*******, ************* ** ********* ******.

Key ********

*****, ******** ** ********** cameras:

**-*********-* *** ******

  • *********** ************ ** *** light *** *** *********** in*** ********, ******** ******** ******** **** ** this ******.
  • ********* *** ***** ***********, better **** ************ ****, ****** **** more ***** *** **** detail **** *** **** Q1604.
  • *** *********** *** ********* against ****** **** *****, among *** *** ********** in **** ****. ** darker *****, *********** *** average, ******* ****** **** Axis *** ****.
  • ******* *** ******* ** 50 ******** *** **** balance ** ********* ********** without *********** ******* *****. Increasing ** ******* (***) results ** ********* ***** in ****** *****, ***** the ******* ******* (*) drastically ******** ***********.

**-*******-* ********

  • *** ***** *********** (~* lux *** *****) *** better **** **** ***** (which ******** ** ****** image) *** ******** ****** than************, **** *** ******* to **** *** **** further ** **** *****.
  • **** *********** ******* **** edges ** ******* ** full *****, **** ** our ******* *** *****, though ** *** **** or **** **** ***** cameras ** **** ****. Artifacting *** *** ****** subject *********** ** ***** legibility.

********** ** *******

  • **** ******* ******** ~*** illumination *****. **** *** only **% ** *** 2232's ********* *** *****, but ****** *** ****'* claimed *** ********.
  • ** ************ ** **** cameras *** ******* **** toward *** ****** ** the *****, **** *********** fading ** *** ***** of *** ***, ********** in *** ****.
  • *** **** ******** **** overexposure ** ******* ** the ****** ** *** field ** **** ** about **' *** *****. The **** *** *** suffer **** **** ************ at *** *****. ** found **** ** ** more **** ******** ** illumination **** ***** ** functionality.
  • ******* *** ** ** both ********** ** ******* modestly ********* ******** *** brightened ***** *** ****-******* by *** ** ***********.

*******

  • ****** *** *********, **** most ******** ******** ******** on *** *****.
  • ********** ****** ********** ******* plugin, ********* *** ******* in ******** ********, ***** times *** ******* ** ******.
  • ******* ******* ** ******** bitrate **** * ***, "medium" *******, ***** ** verified ** ** ************* ******* **.
  • *** *** ****** ******* did *** ******* ** slow *******, ******* ***** 1/30s *** ********. *******, the **** ******** ********* to */* ******.

*****

*** ********* ******* ****** priced *** ********* ******* most *********** ** *** categories, **** *** ********* of*****, ****** ****** *** board.

*** *******:

*****:

*******:

***************

**** ** **** ***** with **************************, *********'* ******* ***** quality *** ****** ******** to **** ****** ****** offerings **** **** *** Sony. *** ***** ******* for * *** **** alternative ** *** ****** brands, ********* *** *********.

************, ** *** * form ******* ******, *** Hikvision ** ******* **** the ***** **********, ***** the ****** ** ******** and *** **** ***** hot ******** ****.

Physical *********

******** ******** ********:

 

********** ** ******** ********:

*************

**** ********** ******* *** web ********* ** *** current*************:

***

** ******** *** *** running ******* ******** ******* Dahua's ******* *** ******, as **** ** *** Axis ***** *** **** VB600, **** ******** *** light *** *** **********.

****** ***********

** **** *****, ~*****, colors ** *** *** are ********** *********** ******** to *** **** *****, but ********* ****.

******** ***** ** *-* lux, ******* ***** *** artifacting ******** ** *** 864, ****** *** ******* remains *************** *** ***** ******* down ** **** */*. Note **** *** ***, as **** ************** *** **** ***** turn *** *** ** night ****. ** *** Axis *****, ** ******** turned *** *** *** set ******* ** * max ** */***.

***** * ***, *** 864 ** *** ** the **** ********** ** this ****, ****** **** the *****. *** *******'* face ** ******** ** noise, *** **** * of *** ***** ** fully ******* ***** **** 2 *** ** ********* made ***. **** *** VB600 *** ******* ***** too ***** ** ******* details ** ******.

*** ***********

** **** ****** *** 864's *** *********** ** an ********* ***** ******* a ******** ******* ******** door:

******* *** ****** ************, the *** ******** ****, with ******* *** ***** clearly *******, ****** *** as ***** ********** ****. ** *** ****** section ****** *** ****, performance ** *** ** strong, **** ***** ******* details **** ** *** Q1604 *** *****, ****** better **** *** *******.

*** ********* ********** ***** the ******* ** *** levels *, ** (*******), and ***. ** *, performance ** ****, **** details **** ********* ** see, *** ******* ** the ****** **** ******* more ********* ** ***. At ***, ******* *** modestly ********, *** ******* noise ** ********** ** dark *****, ******** ********. 

****

** ******** *** **** against *** **** **** models *********(*******) *** **** (*****-*). Indoors, ** **** *****, the **** ******** **** noise *** *********** **** others, **** **** ******.

** *-* ***, *** 7164 *********** *** ***** two ******* ** **** test, **** *** ******* still ****** ******* *** the ***** ******* ** line *. 

*******, ***** * ***, the **** ** ***** out ** ***************, ***** ******** ******** better ********* ** *** subject. *** **** ***** is *********** *****.

**

*******, ** ****** *** of *********'* ******* ********** IR *******, *** ******** 2032, *** "****" ****.

*****, ** ****** *** subject ** ************* ***, the ******* ******* ***** of *** ****. ** this *****, ** ** not ******* ** ****** camera, ****** ****** *** IR ***********'* *****.

** ***** ***, *** subject ** ******* ** both *** **** *** 2032. **** ** ************* 80% ** *** ****'* claimed *** *****, *** exceeds *** ****'* *** specs.

************ ***********

******* ******'* ** ************ pattern ***** *** ****** FOV, ** **** *****. Illumination ** **** ******** in *** ******, **** our ******* ****** ************ at *** ***** ** the *****.

*******, *** **** ******** from ************************ ***** ******, ***** 12' *** *****. *** 2232 *** *** ****** from ***** ******* ***** much ****** ** *** camera, ***** *', **** he *** ******* *** of ****.

*********

***** *** ********* ************ of ******* **** ** this ****. ** ************ the ******* ** */** exposure, ***** *.*** *****, at ******* ************ *** each ******.

Test **********

*** ********* ******** ******** were **** *** **** test:

  • ********* **-*******-* - **.*.*
  • ********* **-*********-* - **.*.*
  • ********* **-*******-** - **.*.*
  • ********* **-*******-* - **.*.*
  • ******** *.**-**-***-** - *.*.**.*
  • **** ***** - *.**.*.*
  • **** ***** - *.**.*.*
  • ***** ***-******** - *.***.******* 01.0.R
  • ***** ***-********* - *.***.******* **.*.*
  • ***** ***-******* - *.***.******* **.*.*
  • **** ***-****** - *.*.*
  • ******* ******* - *****

Comments (26)

I have found the following dome with IR from HikVision. The unit looks great, especially for home use. Too bad you didn't have a chance to test that one. But, I bet it is as bad as their bullets.

As for Dahua, I've asked Tri-Ed and ADI, but neither one carry it.

Hi, we were aware of the IR domes' availability, we chose to test the IR bullets instead because we see them used more frequently. The specs on the dome are quite similar to the bullet, though with only one illuminator.

And you're right. Dahua doesn't sell under their own brand in North America. You can find at least some of the line available from OEMs under other names, like Q-See and IC Realtime, as well as some smaller ones. You can also buy it online fairly easily, but you won't get any support or firmware updates, typically. This is one advantage integrators may find to using Hikvision, as they have a North American presence.

It would be great if you could test the x55 series from Hikvision, very good low light 1080P camera. I think this camera will suprise you.

All they need do now is change the name. I just cringe when I show one to a customer and he says "Hick Vision?" with that suppressed grin...

I go out of my way to make sure I say H-I-K Vision, but it doesn't seem to catch on with anyone else. Always Hick, haha.

It is actually pronounced "Hike"Vision. I don't think anyone cares what you call us as long as you call us :)

Will they OEM and let people put their own name to it?

it would be great to see comparison graphs

Comparison graphs of what, specifically?

Is there any reason to be concerned about drivers or compatibility? We use systems from several different VMS houses, but our cameras have typically been Bosch or Axis. Is there any good measure to ensure that there are no support issues from a s/w standpoint?

Yes, you should be concerned about drivers and compatibility. As a practical matter, Axis is typically the lowest risk since they are the most widely used IP camera in 3rd party systems.

That said, there is no fool proof way to ensure support. Step #1 is always to verify directly with the VMS manufacturer that they have tested the integration (simply saying it should work is not good enough).

If using ONVIF, look for Profile S, not 1.x. Beware of manufacturers overclaims on camera support.

Responding for Hikvision, you can get the VMS integration list from our website. We supprot integrations via ONVIF, PSIA, our HIK-CGI and others. We have a dedicated team that keeps on top of this, with a dedicated resource in the US office to faciliate communication with the team at HQ. They maintain good relationships with the major VMS partners.

Specifically, we were looking at the Genetec Web site for compatibility information.

There seemed to be tiers of compatibility. I believe there was “tested by vendor”, “tested” and “certified”. We translated that into, probably works, works and really really works…

It gave way to a curiosity we had about the relationship between camera vendors and VMS vendors. Theoretically, wouldn’t a VMS vendor want cameras to be at the lowest possible price? I mean wouldn’t that naturally translate to increased sales of s/w channels?

We ask, because that isn’t necessarily the reception we get from our VMS vendors. We were encouraged to use extreme caution.

In theory, lower prices may lead to slightly increased camera counts, which increases software channel sales. However, there is a limit to how many cameras are actually necessary at a site, and users won't simply add more because they're cheaper. They'd be more likely to pocket the extra money.

Secondly, storage and infrastructure costs will increase with added camera counts, as those things don't come for free.

Third, the cost to support inexpensive cameras which are more known for buggy firmware and weird performance quirks may be much greater than supporting Axis or Bosch or other mainstream manufacturers. When motion detection doesn't work as expected, for example, the VMS company is going to get the support call, not the camera manufacturer.

Last, the more mainstream manufacturers often have reps which will represent a camera line as well as a VMS line, making it more likely they'll ignore lower cost cameras, many of which don't seem to have rep firms (at least around me). The larger sales organizations of major camera manufacturers also likely drive leads to VMS sales, as well. So it's further incentive for the VMS provider to stick with them.

It's a shame that the report, good though it was, didn't include bandwidth comparisons.

Teza, you could simply ask for bandwidth comparisons and we can add them. Ethan, please do.

Teza, we'll put them together and add them to the report. Just going to take a little bit of time to compile everything due to the number of cameras involved.

Teza, we have included a bandwidth comparison for each of the cameras tested inside our conference room at full light (~160lx) and dark (<1lx) environments. We broke the cameras up by form factor to reduce possible confusion.

I have also included the bandwidth table in this comment for your convenience. The bandwidth section of this report can be found near the bottom of the report, just above the "Test Parameters" section of the report.

Also suggest to test DS-2CD855F-E. Low light performance and 3D DNR is very good.

Wondering why Sony G6 looks so poor in you test results. Personally I found them as the best among tested by me IP cams in low light enviroment.

David,

Sony looks "poor" to you in our test results? This comparison:

Sony is pretty close here to the 'top'.

We have heard reports that HIK and Dahau cameras motion detection performance (probability of detection, false alarms and nuisance alarms) are far inferior to that of better known brands such as Sony, Bosch and Axis etc. Have these lower cost Chinese brands been included in any of your motion detection tests?

Hi Andrew, we haven't yet tested their motion detection against the other brands, but we'll put it on the list for this winter.

I agree, the Hivision DS-2CD3332-I (or DS-2CD2332-I, don't know the difference) eyeball with a single IR illuminator has better IR coverage than their traditional domes/bullets with a ring of lights. I personally use the DS-2CD2732F-IS, very nice vandal dome, full featured, 3MP, nice crisp image at night.

We put up a Hikvision 3MP DS-2CD2132-I off our back alley to test and it's motion detection is a mess at night. The camera records constantly from 9:30pm to 6:00am which is basically sunset to sunrise because of the noise. Even playing with ROIs in Milestone hasn't helped, we've played with the motion and sensitivity settings in milestone and if we want to have detection at 150ft, we have to have all the false positives too. I'll try and get a lux reading sometime at night, but i can see down the alleyway no problem at night so it can't be that low. I would bet the samsung SNV-6084 doesn't even go out of colour mode with the amount of light we have there.

It does look pretty nice in the daytime but it doesn't really compare to the Axis P33xx or the Samsung SNV-6084. Now it is half the price of the Axis, but not that much cheaper than the Samsung

I'll order up a DS-2CD2732F-IS and try it out.

On the positive side it did give me a nice video of some excellent citizen spray painting our building wall at 5:40 in the afternoon. The picture was good enough when croped to 30% of the frame and blown up the police knew exactly who the guy was.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
Axis 4K Camera Shootout 2019 on Aug 14, 2019
Axis' 4K Q3518-LVE claims the "best video quality possible", with Lightfinder super low light performance, Axis' high end Forensic WDR, and...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Axis Door Station A8207-VE Tested on Aug 07, 2019
Axis newest door station, the A8207-VE, claims to deliver "video surveillance, two-way communication, and access control" in a single device. But...
Hikvision 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 02, 2019
With their latest Smart Series 5 cameras, Hikvision is claiming cameras "fully loaded" with "state-of-the-art technology for high performance and...
Hanwha 4K Wisenet P Camera Tested on Jul 30, 2019
Hanwha claims "premium performance" and to "deliver the best in high resolution performance and efficiency" with their Wisenet P series 4K models,...
Bosch Starlight 8000i Cameras Tested on Jul 23, 2019
Bosch has released their new Flexidome IP Starlight 8000i cameras, claiming "exceptional detail even in extreme low-light situations." To see...
Avigilon ACC7 VMS Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Avigilon's Control Center 7 boldly claims it will "transform live video monitoring" with the new Focus of Attention "AI-enabled" interface. We...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to ab emerging AI cloud era.  The goal of this history is to...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Uniview Beats Intel In Trademark Lawsuit on Aug 19, 2019
Uniview has won a long-running trademark lawsuit brought by Intel, with Beijing's highest court reversing an earlier Intel win, centered on...
Verkada People And Face Analytics Tested on Aug 16, 2019
This week, Verkada released "People Analytics", including face analytics that they describe is a "game-changing feature" that "pushes the...
Dahua OEM Directory 2019 on Aug 16, 2019
US Government banned Dahua OEMs for dozens of companies. The following directory includes 40+ of those companies with a graphic and links to...
Installation Course - Register Now on Aug 15, 2019
Register Now for the September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. This is a unique installation course in a market where little practical...
Axis Suffers Outage, Provides Postmortem on Aug 15, 2019
This week, Axis suffered an outage impacting their website and cloud services. Inside this note, we examined what happened, what was impacted...
Hikvision Scrutinized In The Netherlands on Aug 15, 2019
Hikvision is facing unprecedented scrutiny in the Netherlands, at the same time the US government ban has taken effect. This week, a Dutch...
Axis 4K Camera Shootout 2019 on Aug 14, 2019
Axis' 4K Q3518-LVE claims the "best video quality possible", with Lightfinder super low light performance, Axis' high end Forensic WDR, and...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact