Testing HID Edge Solo

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Oct 03, 2013

HID is the biggest name in IP door controllers, especially for single or dual door controllers, with their Edge line. Now, as surveillance companies, like Axis and Milestone, target the access control market, competition may heat up.

HID offers a very interesting turnkey solution, "Solo", for single doors. While nearly identical in appearance and construction to HID Edge controllers, "Solo" is limited to managing a single door. It comes loaded with firmware that enables basic access control functions such as managing door locks and readers, as well as storing cardholder information, credential details, and access schedules onboard the controller. 

Key deficiencies or weaknesses include:

  • Laggy: Even in a simple network, updating settings and logs can take several seconds. While 'carding in' from a directly attached reader is instantaneous, pushing lock/unlock commands and clearing alarms from the web interface takes between 5 - 10 seconds even when the controller is on its own subnet.
  • Coarse Reports: While the controller stores up to 10000 records, manipulating, filtering, and sorting that data must take place in a 3rd party software (like Excel). Reports cannot be viewed online, but first must be downloaded as .csv files to local workstations.
  • No Integrations: The Edge Solo is a 'closed' system, and integrating the controller to video surveillance or intrusion alarm platforms is not possible using API or SDK. 
  • Limited Card Formats/Reader Types: Edge Solo only support four HID-specific card formats and three basic types of readers: contactless cards, magstripes, and keypads. Other formats may be partially read (ie: the unique hex identifier), but stored or encrypted data cannot be decoded, even for ISO formats.
  • No Badging/Picture ID: Many facilities use access cards as photo ID badges, and many access platforms include a 'card creator' and storage of User Photos for use in validation. Edge Solo does not include any provision for this feature, nor is the option to upload/use picture IDs available anywhere in the system.

While two versions of HID Edge "Solo" have been announced (an EVO and older 'non EVO' version) and combo units including a contactless reader or those without. Our test below reviews the non EVO, non reader/ integrated variant available in distribution and online for ~$275.

IP Based

HID Edge Solo is a browser based access system. Once given a static IP address, the device is accessible from any browser connected to the same LAN. We tested functionality with IE10, Chrome, and Safari and were able to see the interface on all three browsers. However, IE was the most reliable application, as the Solo interface often hung during loading with the other browsers and often took several reloads to bring up. Remote accessibility outside the LAN is possible via VPN or external router configuration, but Solo offers no preconfigured or automated method for outside access.

Live Status View

The 'live status view' is a pane on the displaying recent activity and with manual override controls that remains visible regardless of which other tabs or functions are used in the interface. Aside from displaying recent card reads and door events, options to manually lock/unlock the door and clear alarms are given three prominent buttons. The video below gives a good overview of this screen:

Adding Cards/Users

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

The process of either adding a card or a user is possible from several screens. The Solo stores a maximum of 1000 users or cards. For example, if a single user has four assigned cards, then four of the one thousand records are used. However, considering that only one door falls in the scope of the controller, this is not likely a significant limitation. The easier method of enrolling a new person and associating a credential card to them is shown in the overview video below:

Configuring Door Parameters

A central aspect of any controller is tweaking default settings to match the specific opening it controls. The Solo interface offers a surprising number of adjustable individual settings; everything from Door Unlock Times, to REX hardware configuration, and which reader types are used. While limited on choices (only non-iClass HID card formats and keypad readers are supported), the controller should be able to control most swinging doors without issue. However, more complicated opening involving multiple doors (ie: mantraps) or gates may experience logical timing or credential limitation issues. The video below expands on these details:

Reports and Alerts

Edge Solo offers rudimentary reporting features that requires additional applications to make much use of. The data stored on the controller is grouped into coarse categories (ie: Card Holders, Door Events, Door Schedules) that are downloaded to a workstation into a .csv formatted file. From there, advanced queries (ie: "When did Card Holder 3 scan into the door last week?") must be filtered or sorted in another offline program. Our clip below demonstrates Solo's "Report" feature:

In addition, Solo supports a basic number of 'alerts' that are configurable to execute a number of actions ranging from 'local door alarm' - making the reader beep and flash - to sending alarm notification to a URL or email address. While the range of alerts is fixed and cannot be expanded, and the alerting options are basic, most single door access applications will be sufficiently covered by the types available. The video below describes this in detail:

Wiring and Installation

Finally, in terms of installability, Solo can be inexpensively mounted on standard 4"x4" electrical boxes or tucked away in small metal enclosures. The controller itself has the option for PoE power, and only cabling leading to door components and to the network is needed for operation. The controller's size and standard mounting configuration is show in the video below:

Ideal Applications

The biggest limitation of Solo is that it only controls one door. By default, this limits use of the platform to very small applications that control individual areas like storage areas or exercise rooms, individual offices, or single-lane vehicle gates. 

 

8 reports cite this report:

ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Door Position Switches (DPS) For Access Control Tutorial on Mar 05, 2018
Door position switches do not get enough respect. They solve a major problem of access control systems yet are frequently ignored or...
Access Controller Software Guide on Dec 11, 2017
Properly configuring access controllers software is key to a professional access system. These devices have fundamental settings that must be...
HID Edge EVO Tested on Jun 07, 2017
HID Edge controllers have been one of most common offerings in IP door controllers for years. The new generation is called Edge EVO. We tested...
Chinese Spam Access Control Is Here on Aug 04, 2016
Notorious spammers like Longse, Cantonk, and Wodsee have flooded the video market with nuisance emails touting ultra low cost cameras for years,...
Axis Admits Access Control Expectations Low on Oct 17, 2014
Axis entrance into access control had been anticipated for years. Last year, Axis access control launch was the biggest news of the season. What...
Access Control Server Guide on Sep 09, 2014
Electronic access control systems need to be managed. The 'server' though can range across: Panel based / 'serverless' systems Combo...
The $100 Fingerprint Reader Tested on Jun 11, 2014
Want to add biometrics but avoid spending nearly $1,000 per door for it? When it comes to fingerprint readers, there are lots of options that all...
Comments (19) : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Most Recent Industry Reports

ADT CEO Not Worried About DIY: "2 Discrete Markets" on Dec 13, 2019
ADT's CEO is not worried about DIY, characterizing DIY and ADT's DIFY as "2 discrete markets" at the Imperial Capital Security Investor's...
Hikvision CEO Alleged Illegal Activities Investigated on Dec 13, 2019
Hikvision's CEO Hu Yangzhong is under investigation for suspected illegal activities, according to the PRC's securities regulator. This has become...
Video Surveillance 101 Course Opened on Dec 12, 2019
IPVM is adding a Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the most important terms,...
Verkada Notification Outage on Dec 12, 2019
Verkada is suffering an event notification outage and analytic search failures. Inside, we examine what the issues are, what Verkada told IPVM...
Hikvision DS 2nd Gen Intercom Tested on Dec 12, 2019
With its newest IP intercom, Hikvision proclaims users can 'get full control over an entrance' regardless of where it is installed, home or office...
Honeywell 30 Series Cameras Tested Vs Dahua and Hikvision on Dec 11, 2019
Honeywell has infamously OEMed Dahua and Hikvision for years, but now they have introduced an NDAA-compliant line, the 30 Series, claiming "lower...
"Good Market, Bad Business Models" - Residential Security on Dec 11, 2019
Industry banker John Mack, at his company's annual event, took aim squarely at the problems in the residential security...
IP Camera Browser Support: Who's Broken / Who Works on Dec 10, 2019
For many years, IP cameras depended on ActiveX control, whose security flaws have been known for more than a decade. The good news is that this is...
Acquisitions - Winners and Losers on Dec 10, 2019
Most major manufacturers have been acquired over the last decade. But which have been good deals or not? In this report, we analyze the...
IP Camera Installability Shootout 2019 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Dec 09, 2019
What are the best and worst cameras to install? Which manufacturers make it the hardest or easiest to install their cameras? We tested 35 total...