SD vs. HD PTZ Shootout

By: Benros Emata, Published on Aug 20, 2011

PTZs, like fixed cameras, are moving to megapixel. With PTZs, though, real questions remain about the value of going to megapixel.

Some people say that megapixel eliminates the need for PTZ, regardless of the PTZ's resolution. Our Fixed MP vs SD PTZ camera test results show that such claims are simply false.

Maximum Coverage Area Concerns

However, another major concern exists with Megapixel PTZ cameras: While SD PTZs commonly have optical zoom ranges of 30X - 40X, Megapixel PTZs optical zoom ranges are generally only 10X - 20X. This is not an accident. Today, and for the foreseeable future, technical and cost limitations exist in making MP lenses with the large zoom ranges common for SD PTZs.

While Megapixel PTZs offer more resolution than SD PTZs, their optical zoom range is much smaller. This raises a big concern: Which PTZ - SD or Megapixel - can see the farthest? If SD PTZs have a farther maximum coverage area, going to megapixel PTZs would bring a major drawback as maximum coverage area is a key concern.

Our Test

In this report, we tested an SD PTZ against 2 MP PTZs to better understand the tradeoffs involved.

The cameras included:

We did a series of test in a large parking lot to simulate real world conditions for PTZ deployment. The tests were done both during the day and at night to see how performance varied across lighting conditions.

We tested three scenarios that were likely to differentiate performance:

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

  • Wide Field of View - When the PTZs are zoomed out wide, with the same FoV, what difference between MP and SD can be seen?
  • Moderate Zoom and Tracking Subject - When the PTZs are zoomed in moderately to track a suspect in the middle of the scene, what differences are observable?
  • Maximum Zoom In - When all the PTZs are zoomed in as far as they can go, which PTZ can see the furthest?

Below is an overview image of the location we tested:

Key Findings and Recommendations

Here are the key findings:

  • The SD and HD PTZs delivered about the same level of image details and overall clarity when maximally zoomed into a subject/object ~230ft away
  • For a given level of image details, an SD PTZ tends to require more manual control or operator involvement, and less background/contextual scene coverage relative to an HD PTZ
  • Optical zoom ratios are not a suitable metric for determining how far a PTZ can 'see'
  • The potential for details is based on a combination of two key factors: (1) minimum lens angle and (2) camera resolution. Thus resolution (SD or HD) is insufficient to determine the maximum level of detail that can be delivered for a particular PTZ camera
  • Pricing was fairly close with the HD/MP models being equal or only modestly more expensive than the SD

In light of these findings we recommend that users strongly consider HD PTZs over SD PTZs. They produce the same (or perhaps slightly better) maximum distance range and provide superior contextual awareness as the HD/MP PTZ can deliver the same image details over a wider field of view. Pricing is similar so product cost should not be a problem. Bandwidth and storage are a consideration and more so than with a fixed camera as a moving PTZ will consume 2 to 3x more bandwidth than a fixed camera, all else being equal.

Understanding Optical Zoom Ratios

Do not be mislead that a higher optical zoom ratio, e.g. 40x, is massively better than a lesser one, e.g. 20x. Judging expected performance of a PTZ based on this metric should be avoided as it can be entirely misleading. A 40x PTZ really only has twice the range of a 20x PTZ, not the extra 20x the metric might imply.

Focus first on the minimum lens angle. This can generally be found listed in the specification sheet (e.g., - the Canon MP PTZ lists 2.8 degrees as the minimum lens angle on its specification page while the Canon SD PTZ lists 1.5 degrees as the minimum lens angle on its specification page.

If you cannot find it listed, you can calcuate with two other common metrics: (1) the imager size (e.g. 1/4", 1/3" etc.) and (2) the maximum focal length (e.g. 136mm, 94mm, etc.). Plug these two values into certain lens calculators and they can give you the corresponding minimum lens angle.

For example the SD PTZ (Canon VB-C60) we tested has a 1/4" imager and a 136mm maximum focal length. Based on these two values the minimum lens angle is 1.52 degrees. On the other hand one of the HD PTZs (Canon VB-M40) we tested has a 1/3" imager and a 94mm max focal length. This yields a miminum lens angle of 2.93 degrees. The SD's minimum lens angle is roughly half that of the HD's.

Thus the SD PTZ is able to achieve 1/2 the horizontal FoV when maximally zoomed. If the horizontal resolutions were the same then the 1.52 degree PTZ would provide roughly twice the ppf as the 2.93 degree PTZ. However, this is not the case as the SD provides 640px horizontally and the HD 1280px. Thus the SD has the advantage of a HFoV that is ~2x narrower but with only half the pixels as the HD (640 versus 1280). The HD camera has to deal with a ~2x wider HFoV, but with twice the number of pixels. As such they are roughly equivalent in ppf when fully zoomed despite one being 40x and the other being only 20x.

Download Video Clips

Near Range (Distance ~30ft/HFoV ~30ft)

The PTZs are normalized to ~55 degree lens angle at this relatively short distance of ~30ft. As a result the HD PTZs have twice the pixels per foot in the same FoV width as the SD PTZ.

Daytime

For the same overall coverage area the HD PTZs provide twice the ppf as the SD PTZ, and this results in a more detailed image. At this FoV the HD PTZs provide a high likelihood of identification. The WV-SC385 exhibits a slightly sharper image than the VB-M40.

Nighttime (Max Exposure Normalized to 1/30s)

The relatively lower light dimishes image quality slightly across the board, but overall HD still provides greater ppf and subject/object details than the SD at this normalized FoV.

Mid Range (Distance ~100ft/HFoV ~10ft)

In this scenario PTZs are optically zoomed to ~10ft HFoV at the subject's location ~100ft away. Given that HFoVs are normalized, the HD PTZs provide ~2x more ppf than the SD PTZ.

Daytime

Even though the subject is located ~3x further away versus the previous 'near' scenario, optically zooming into the subject to a tighter HFoV increases the ppf by ~3x across the board. As a result, details are strong in all three PTZ images. However, with twice the ppf resolution, the HD PTZs manage to deliver slightly more details than the SD PTZ.

Nighttime (Max Exposure Normalized to 1/30s)

Again, despite a ~3x increase in distance to subject versus the 'near' scenario, image quality is considerably better across the board due to optically zooming in to a tight ~10ft HFoV versus the ~30ft HFoV of the 'near' scenario. The HD PTZs again deliver twice the ppf at this normalized HFoV over the SD and as such provide slightly better detail and clarity. Identification is fairly likely for SD and HD alike at this fairly narrow FoV. Note the VB-M40 is somewhat under-exposed compared to the SD and WV-SC385 PTZs.

Far Range (Distance ~230ft/HFoV Varies Per Camera)

In this scenario, each PTZ is zoomed in maximally to a subject ~230ft away. The SD PTZ is able to obtain the narrowest HFoV of ~6ft (136mm focal length/1.52 degree lens angle). This is roughly half the HFoV that the HD PTZs are able to obtain. As a result ppf is very close (~100ppf) across all three PTZs.

Daytime

far ptz comparison

Optical zoom allows all PTZs to obtain a fairly narrow HFoV even at this distance of ~230ft. As a result ppf is high across all cameras (~100ppf) and details are strong on the subject/object. Note the SD PTZ needed a HFoV roughly one-half that of the HD PTZs in order to achieve similar results. It accomplished this because of a minimum lens angle (1.52) that is roughly one-half that of the HD PTZs (2.93/VB-M40 and 3.25/WV-SC385).

Nighttime (Max Exposure Normalized to 1/30s)

Light levels are at their lowest in this corner of the parking area, and has a clear negative impact on image quality across the board. Furthermore, results are slightly unexpected as the SD's image, despite similar ppf as the HDs, is slightly less detailed. Note in the analogous daytime scenario its image quality was on par with the HD images. Secondly, the SD is somewhat under-exposed relative to the HD PTZs (especially the Panasonic WV-SC385).

Methodology

Here are the PTZs used in 'HD vs. SD PTZ Shootout':

  • Canon VB-C60 (online $1225) - SD (640x480); 1/4" CCD; 3.4-136mm; 0.7/0.2 lux @1/30s (color/bw)
  • Canon VB-M40 (online $1450) - 1.3MP (1280x960); 1/3" CMOS; 4.7-94mm; 0.03/0.001 lux @1/8s (color/bw)
  • Panasonic WV-SC385 (online $1250) - 1.3MP (1280x960); 1/3" MOS; 4.7-84.6mm; 0.5/0.06 lux @1/30s (color/bw)

Here are the firmware versions used per camera:

  • Canon VB-C60 - Firmware Version 1.1.0.3687
  • Canon VB-M40 - Firmware Version 1.0.0
  • Panasonic WV-SC385 - Firmware Version 1.05

Here are the six (6) key scenarios:

  • Daytime Near Range (Distance ~30ft/HFoV ~30ft)
  • Nighttime Near Range (Distance ~30ft/HFoV ~30ft)
  • Daytime Mid Range (Distance ~100ft/HFoV ~10ft)
  • Nighttime Mid Range (Distance ~100ft/HFoV ~10ft)
  • Daytime Far Range (Distance ~230ft/HFoV Varies Per Camera)
  • Nightime Far Range (Distance ~230ft/HFoV Varies Per Camera)

All PTZs were normalized to a 1/30s max exposure length for any low-light/nighttime test scenarios. For both 'Near' and 'Mid' range scenarios all PTZs were zoomed into the same HFoV (same lens angle). For the 'Far' range scenario each PTZ was maximally zoomed. Thus the 'Far' range images have a unique HFoV for each corresponding PTZ.

1 report cite this report:

Directory of Camera Shootout Series on Dec 27, 2011
The following directory lists all of our camera shootouts. These shootouts pit 4 - 8 different surveillance cameras in simultaneous tests on real...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

China Dahua Replaces Their Software With US Pepper on Aug 22, 2019
What does a US government banned company do to improve its security positioning in the US? Well, Dahua is unveiling a novel solution, partnering...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
JCI Sues Wyze on Aug 21, 2019
The mega manufacturer / integrator JCI has sued the fast-growing $20 camera Seattle startup Wyze. Inside this note: Share the court...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
Verkada People And Face Analytics Tested on Aug 16, 2019
This week, Verkada released "People Analytics", including face analytics that they describe is a "game-changing feature" that "pushes the...
Axis 4K Camera Shootout 2019 on Aug 14, 2019
Axis' 4K Q3518-LVE claims the "best video quality possible", with Lightfinder super low light performance, Axis' high end Forensic WDR, and...
Dahua Analytics+ Tested on Aug 07, 2019
Dahua's analytics have performed poorly in past shootouts. But now, they claim their new Analytics+ "algorithms significantly improve accuracy and...
Bosch Starlight 8000i Cameras Tested on Jul 23, 2019
Bosch has released their new Flexidome IP Starlight 8000i cameras, claiming "exceptional detail even in extreme low-light situations." To see...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...

Most Recent Industry Reports

TMA Apologizes to Amazon / Ring on Aug 23, 2019
Not only is Amazon / Ring making major incursions into the residential security market, the organization representing the biggest incumbents, The...
China Dahua Replaces Their Software With US Pepper on Aug 22, 2019
What does a US government banned company do to improve its security positioning in the US? Well, Dahua is unveiling a novel solution, partnering...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
JCI Sues Wyze on Aug 21, 2019
The mega manufacturer / integrator JCI has sued the fast-growing $20 camera Seattle startup Wyze. Inside this note: Share the court...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Uniview Beats Intel In Trademark Lawsuit on Aug 19, 2019
Uniview has won a long-running trademark lawsuit brought by Intel, with Beijing's highest court reversing an earlier Intel win, centered on...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact