Hazardous Area Surveillance / Explosion 'Proof' Cameras

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 16, 2012

Placing surveillance cameras in hazardous (highly flammable) environments have far more demanding requirements than typical surveillance use. Liability risks are much higher and the cost of equipment that meets this requirement can be dramatically more expensive. In this note, we discuss these requirements, how they are determined, and the different options available for satisfying them.

How do I know when to consider special rated equipment?

If you are an integrator, security manager, IT manager or manufacturer, you almost never should be deciding yourself whether or not special rated equipment is required.

Typically, the 'AHJ' - 'authority having jurisdiction' - makes this determination. The AHJ might be a Fire Marshal, an operational risk assessment engineer, occupational safety authority, or an insurance underwriter. That individual will classify the hazardous area based on risk criteria. It is with the best interest of the owner/operator of such an environment to realize, control, and mitigate any potential risks in the hazardous area – including the installation of electronics equipment like surveillance cameras. The provider may be asked to provide appropriate certification of the furnished equipment. 

In any case, it is important to base equipment specifications upon a valid assessment, as the cost of equipment certified as ‘safe for use’, or ‘intrinsically safe’, is significantly more expensive than non-certified equipment.

What does a particular 'hazard rating' mean?

Worldwide, a variety of hazardous area certification marks exist, and it is appropriate to furnish equipment that satisfies whichever prevailing standard applies to your application.

In the US, the widely adopted "National Electrical Code or 'NEC', defines environments by flammable volatility. The classification is segmented in three (3) classes, with a Class 1 environment being the most volatile typically including sites that handle gasoline and chemicals. An accompanying clarifier (the Division) denotes the default danger ‘type of condition’, being Division 1 – normal, or Division 2 – abnormal.

In this manner, the risk of fire or explosion in a hazardous location can be qualified. For example, portions of a fuels transfer facility may be designated as a ‘Class1/Division1’ area, while a wood pulp storage facility may be designated as a ‘Class3/Division2’ facility. Both classifications denote some risk, but certainly the risk is qualified as being more significant in the area with the lower rating.

For readers who want to learn more about what sites are typically classified as Class 1 vs 2 and 3, review this US government explanation of hazardous types.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

In the EU, a rough equivalent for the NEC’s Class/Division rating is noted by the ‘ATEX directives, 95/137’. While technical definitions of hazardous areas differ (and may not overlap) among standards, the ATEX directive seeks to quantify hazardous areas in the same manner.

In South America, especially Brazil, the INMETRO risk classification system performs the same function as the bodies listed above.

While independent of each other, these ratings all seek to explicitly define hazardous areas.  

What equipment satisfies this requirement?

Hazardous environments require specially rated electronics/electrical equipment that are certified to not precipitate ignition or cause ignition to spread to the surrounding environment.

There are two types or categories of equipment to choose from:

  • 3rd party rated enclosure + 'regular' COTS camera
  • Assembly/kit that pre-fabricates hazardous enclosure and camera

Examples of 3rd party 'explosion proof' or 'intrinsically safe' housings include:

The cost range for rated enclosures ranges is $900 - $1,700 USD.

The second category is a singular rated ‘assembly’ – camera, housing, enclosure, cabling – that has been previously certified as a unit.  No changes, beyond positioning the equipment, are allowed to be made during install for the assembly to retain this rating. Examples of 'intrinsically safe' assemblies include:

The cost range for rated assemblies is $8,000 - $14,000 USD.

Choosing Between these Categories

This is a hard decision as important tradeoffs exist.

The advantages of using 3rd party enclosures include:

  • Low Price: It will almost always be significantly cheaper to buy a 3rd party rated enclosure and COTS camera rather than an assembly.
  • Camera Selection: This allows freedom to pick your preferred camera
  • VMS Compatibility: This makes it easier to guarantee interoperability with VMS

However, there is a crucial disadvantage of using 3rd party enclosures:

  • The burden falls to the provider to ensure that all of the accompanying portions of equipment are also certified.  A significant amount of risk is accepted by the integrator when supplying a 'piecemeal' solution.

Supplying a rated 'assembly' might ultimately prove to be a better decision depending upon how stringently the requirements are interpreted, and how willing the supplier is to accept risk for nonconforming performance of a 'piecemeal' assembly. A rated assembly that is installed properly serves to indemnify the supplier of risk.

Whichever option you choose, make sure the AHJ signs off in writing beforehand.

What alternatives do I have rather than placing this type of equipment?

You can try to avoid this type of equipment.

Rated equipment is much more costly. While $800 USD might cover an outdoor ready box camera in weatherized housing, furnishing and maintaining a certified solution can be 5 to 10 times more expensive.

Additionally, maintaining rated equipment can be more costly. This equipment often requires positive pressure environment is maintained in the sealed housing, and an inert gas (such as Nitrogen) renders the interior environment void of combustible Oxygen.  This aspect of the camera must be maintained over time

Because of the significant increase in cost, locating standard equipment outside of the hazardous area is a common alternative.  Even if this strategy results in requiring more (remotely located) standard cameras, they often can be added in combinations that still fall beneath the cost of a single rated camera.

Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports on Tutorials

Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
Installation Hardware for Video Surveillance - Indoor Fasteners on Jun 22, 2018
As part of our Installation for Video Surveillance series, in this note, we cover drywall anchors. A key part of installing security hardware is...
Introducing Effective PPF (ePPF) - Improving Video Surveillance Designs on Jun 11, 2018
Pixel density (PPF / PPM) is the best metric the industry has to define and project video quality. It allows simple communication of estimated...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jun 07, 2018
H.265 support has improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and more manufacturers...
Keypads For Access Control Tutorial on May 31, 2018
Keypad readers present huge risks to even the best access systems. If deployed improperly, keypads let people through locked doors almost as if...
Installing Box Cameras Indoors Tutorial on May 22, 2018
This tutorial starts our physical installation for video surveillance series, starting with Box Cameras, one of the oldest and most basic types....
Installing Cameras in Plenums Tutorial on May 15, 2018
There is often confusion about plenum ceilings, with misinformation about what is required when running cables through them and mounting cameras...
Access Visitor Management Systems Guide on May 11, 2018
"Who are you, and why are you here?" Facilities that implement Visitor Management Systems hope they never need to ask that question to anyone,...
Access Control Card Printers Guide on May 03, 2018
Card printers are a core component of professional access control systems, often used as photos IDs and prominently displayed. Modern badges put...
Access Control Levels and Schedules Tutorial on May 01, 2018
Configuring access levels and setting up schedules is central to maintaining facility security. Many people may need to enter areas but most do not...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...
Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 13, 2018
Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security Sales Course Summer 2018 This...
US Tariffs Hit China Video Surveillance on Jul 13, 2018
Chinese video surveillance products avoided tariffs for the first two rounds. Now, in the third round, many video surveillance products will be...
Last Chance - July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration ends today, Thursday. Register now. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
4 Most Difficult Camera Installs (Statistics) on Jul 12, 2018
Heavy housings, cumbersome brackets, heavy ladders required, and tricky field of view requirements will cause difficulties no matter the camera...
Axis Perimeter Defender Video Analytics Tested on Jul 12, 2018
Axis 'high security' video analytics offering is Perimeter Defender, OEMed / developed with Digital Barriers. But how good is Perimeter Defender?...
Hikvision Fights Ban - Claims 'Red Scare', Hires 14 Term Ex-Congressman on Jul 11, 2018
Hikvision is fighting back against the House Bill Ban of their products. Hikvision has hired one of the biggest lobbying firms, led by a 14 term...
Arecont Acquisition By Costar on Jul 11, 2018
Arecont Vision acquisition by Costar Technologies has been approved by the court, concluding the bankruptcy process triggered by Arecont's...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact