Video Surveillance Hard Drive Size Statistics 2016

Author: Brian Karas, Published on Jul 18, 2016

Many low end NVRs still use 1TB hard drives, but 10TB drives hit in the market in January 2016.

So what size do integrators use most often? 90 integrators told us in a new IPVM survey, and the answers show that bigger is not always better.

**** *** *** **** ***** *** *** **** ******, *** 10TB ****** *** ** *** ****** ** ******* ****.

** **** **** ** *********** *** **** *****? ** *********** told ** ** * *** **** ******, *** *** ******* show **** ****** ** *** ****** ******.

[***************]

*******

  • *** ****** *** *** **** ****** ****** ** *********** ** 2016, ******** * **** ***** ** **** *****, *** ****** performance
  • *** ****** *** ***** **** ******** ****, ********* ** ******* systems
  • ******* ***** *** **** ******, *** ***** ** ****** *********** amounts ** *****, *** **** ******* *********** **** ***** >*** drives **** *****
  • *** ****** *** *** ******* **** *********** ******** ***** *** security

Hard ***** ***** ****

** *** **** ** **** ******, **** ****, ******* ****** price/price *** ** *** ************-***** ****** ***:

  • ***: $**, $**/**
  • ***: $**, $**/**
  • ***: $***, $**/**
  • ***: $***, $**/**
  • ***: $***, $**/**
  • ***: $***, $**/**

Drive ***** **** ** ************

*** ********* ***** ***** *** ************ ** ******* ** *** question "**** **** **** ***** (** ***) ** *** **** commonly ***? ***? **** ****** *** **** ***** ****** **** hard ******?":

4TB ***** ****

*** ****** **** *** **** ******* ****** ***** **** ***********. Comments ***** ***** *** *********** ** ******* ******* *** ******** this ****.

  • "* ****** *** *** ****** *** ** ***** ********** **** vs ********."
  • "*** ******* ** *** ****** *** *** ******* *********."
  • "***. **** **** ********* *** **** ****** *** ******* ********* time. **** ** *** **** **** ****** ****** *** ** cost *** ****. **** ******** ** *** ***** ****** ****** (8TB) ***** *** ******** ******** ** ********"
  • "*** - ** ****** *** ** ****** **** ****** ** failure, **** ****** **** **** **** *** **** ***** **** at *** **** ****. ** ** **** * * *** hard ****** ** *** *** (** ******* ** * * 8TB) ** **** ** ******* **'** **** ****** ** **** as **** ***** *******."
  • "*** *********, **** **** * *** * ** *** *****. Cost/TB ** *** **** ******."
  • "***. ****** *** ******** ****. ** *** ******** ** *** 6TB ****** **** ********** ** *** ***** *** ** *** dropped ** **** **** *** * ** ******."
  • "***. *** ***** ** **** *** **** *** *** ****** to *********** **** **** ** *** ********* ****."
  • "*** - ******* ************* ** *** *** ****** *******"
  • "*** ** *** **** ****** ***** **** ** ***. ** until ***, *** ****** ****-***-** ** ****** ****** **** *** is **** ******* ** **** ***** ****** ***** ******."
  • "* **. ******** ***** **** *** *** ******** ******* **. Also * **** ******."
  • "** ********* *** *** *** ******. **** **** ** ** the **** **** ********* *** **."
  • "*********** *** **** *** ******* *** *** ******* *** *** using ****** **** *****. *** *** *** **** ** ** the **** ******"

1-2TB ****** ** ******* *******

******* ******** ***** **** * *** * ** ****** **** adequate *** ******* ******* *** ****** ********* *********.

  • "***, ******* ****** **********."
  • "***. *******, ** ** ****** ** ***** ************ ** ***** 15-20 **** ** *********."
  • "*** ** ***'* *** ****** ****** ** ******* ***** ** the **** *** ****** ** **** **** ****** * ***** fail ** **** ** * **** ******* *** **** ******* system ***** ******** ** *** *** **** ********** *** ****** the ******* ***** ******** ** **** ** ***"
  • "***, **** ** ****** *** **** **********. **'* ******* ** RAID ******** ******* ****** **** *** * ** * ***** drives. **** **** *** *** *** ****** ***** ****** *** multiple *******."
  • "** ***** *******, ** ********* ******* *** * ** ******, while ** **** *** *** *********** ******* ** **** **** if * ****** ***** ***** *** ****** **** ** *******."
  • "*** ******* ******* *****."
  • "***, *** ****** ******* ******* ** ***** *** ***** ** the ***********."
  • "*** *** ******** *** * ** *** ****** *****"
  • "*** ******, ** **** *** ***** ****** ** ****** *** load *** **** ********* ****** *** ***** **** *** **** of *** ******* *****."
  • "**** ****** *** * *** * **. ******* ***** *** the ***** **** **** **** *** ****. ** *****'* **** a **** *** ****** ****** ***."
  • "** **** * ** ******, *** ******* ** *** ***** high ***** ***** **** *********."
  • "********* * ** ** ******* ***********, *** ** ******."
  • "*-* ******* * **, *-** ******* * **, **-** ******* 6TB. "

Large **** ***** ***** ********

****** *** ** ****** ** *-* ** ******, * *** 8 ** ***** **** **** ** ~**% ** ***********. ******** indicate **** ***** ***** *** ******** **** **** *********, ************ when *********** **** ** ******** ******* *******:

  • "** *** *** ****** ******. *** ** ********* ******* ** local *******." (******* ** **** *********)
  • "*** ** *** ****, *** *** ********* ** *** ***"
  • "***, ** **** ** ******** *** **** ** **** ** possible."
  • "** **** ** *** ****** ******* *** ****** ***** ********, so ** **** ************ **** * *** ******* ** * server."
  • "**** *** **** ** ****** ** *** ***** **** *** more *** *** *** ****** ***** ** ***."
  • "*** *** *** - ******* *** ****** ** ******* *****."
  • "* ** ** ***** ****. ********* *-* ** ** ****** builds."
  • "**-** ******* * **."
  • "** *** *** *** ********* ** ******** **** ** *******."
  • "******** ** ******** ** ***** ****** **** *** ** ** drive ** * ** ** ****** ******. **'** *** ** they ****."

Reasons *** *** ***** ****** ******

**** ******* *****, **** ** ******* ** **** ***********, *** loss ** ***** ***** **** ***** ** ******* *********** ***** not ** *** ****** ******.

  • "** *** *** *** ***** **** ** **** * ** use ****** *****. *** ********* ** * **** ******* **** 4TB ** ***** * **** **** *** ** **** **** it ***** **** ******* ****."
  • "**** ** ******* * ****-* ***** ** * **** *******/***** upwards ** *****"
  • "**** * *** **** ****** ****** ****** ** **** ******."
  • "* *** * **. *** ************ ** *** ***** **** is **** ****** *****."
***** *** ** *** **** * ******* ********* ** *********** when ** **** ** ***** ****** ******:
  • "**** ** *** **** **** ****** ****** *** ** **** per ****. "
  • "*** ******* ********** ** ***** ** *** ****** ****** ****** the ******** ***** *** **** ************. "
  • "* **** *** *** * ** ***'* ** **** *** still **** *********. *** **** ****** * ***** *** **** in *** **** ****** *** ** * ****** * ****'* needed *** ***** *** ****'* **** *** ***** ***** ****** to ******* ** ***** ********* ** ******* ******."
  • "** ******* ** *** *** *** *** **** ******, ** would *** **** ** ****. ***** *** ***** ** * price ******* *** ** *** *** ****** ******."
*** ******** ****** ** ****** **** ****** ** ************ ************ was **** * ****** ****** *** ******** ****:
  • "*** *** *** *** **** ****** ***** ****** ***, *** not ********** ********* ** *** **** ***** ***. **** ***** delta ** ***** ****** ****."
  • "**** *** *** **** *** ****** ******, **** ***** ** get *** *********, *** * **** * **** ** ******* that **** **** ** * ****** *****. ****** * ** afraid ** *** *********** ** ****** ******."
  • "* ** ******** ** *** *** ******* **** **** ****** as **** ***'* **** * **** ****** ******* ** **** if **** *** ********."
  • "**** ******** ** *** ***** ****** ****** (***) ***** *** supplier ******** ** ********"

Comments (5)

For the person who said they cram 8 WD Purple drives in a server, do you use the regular Purple drives or the Purple NV drives?

Hello Jon,

We have been using WD RE enterprise drives in our NVR systems for 8 years. When the Purple models came out we started using them in our small (24 ~ 36 cameras) desktop 4 and 8 drive NVR's. The Purple drive performance is good for these smaller systems. We use the Purple NV drives in our 12 ~ 16 drive Performance NVR's (36 ~ 72 cameras) and WD GOLD in our 16 ~ 24 drive Enterprise NVR's (72 ~ UP cameras) . We do 48 hour burn in and performance tests on our systems before we deploy them. This weeds out any marginal drives so our field reliably of the purple drive has been excellent. I hope this helps.

Richard

Thanks for the great info!

How often do you find an underperforming drive?

What models do you think are the most common to have issues?

Have you ever had issues with the non-NV Purple drives in rack mounted equipment?

This is somewhat backward looking, but of the infrastructure we're monitoring, 2TB drives dominate the list (37%), followed by 1TB drives at 24%. Drives larger that 4TBs represent around 1.5% of our population with most of that being 6TB drives.

Drive Distribution of Viakoo Monitored Infrastructure

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
Surveillance Codec Guide on Jan 03, 2019
Codecs are core to surveillance, with names like H.264, H.265, and MJPEG commonly cited. How do they work? Why should you use them? What issues may...
The Battle For The VSaaS Market Begins 2019 - Alarm.com, Arcules, Eagle Eye, OpenEye, Qumulex, Verkada, More on Jan 02, 2019
2019 will be the year that VSaaS finally becomes a real factor for professional video surveillance. While Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS)...
US Gov China Ban Rules Process, SIA Lobbies Against 'Blacklisting', For 'Risk-Based Protocol' on Dec 27, 2018
Details have emerged about when the rules implementing the federal ban on Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei and others will be made public for official...
Combating Vaping Epidemic - Halo Smart Sensor Profile on Dec 21, 2018
Youth vaping has become an epidemic, according to the US Surgeon General, while the market leader, Juul, just received a $12.8 billion investment...
Cisco Meraki New Cameras and AI Analytics on Dec 14, 2018
Meraki has released their second generation of video surveillance with 3 new cameras, AI-based video analytics, and 2 cloud-based storage...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Cable Trenching for Surveillance on Jan 21, 2019
Trenching cable for surveillance is surprisingly complex. While using shovels, picks, and hoes is not advanced technology, the proper planning,...
Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
Intersec 2019 Live Day 1 - Massive China Presence on Jan 21, 2019
There’s a massive presence from Chinese or China-focused video surveillance firms, chiefly Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei, and Infinova, at...
The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact