Vulnerability ********
*** **** ************ ******:
* ********* ******* **** request *** ******** ***** allow ** ******** ** gain ****** ** *** device ********** **** **** admin ********** ******* ****** authentication.
****** **** **** **** ************* is ***** ** ***** cached ** * ********/******* from * ***** ***** admin ***** *******. **** claim **** ** ***** be *********** ********** *** an ******** *** *** not ********** ****** ********** access ** *** ******** through * ****** ***** to ******** **** ************* on * ****** ********.
** ** *******, * random ******** ******* * list ** ****** ********* on****** ***** *** ******* **** vulnerability ** **** "**** door" ****** ** ***** systems.
** ****** **** ** noted **** ** **** never ****** ****** *********, and ****** ***** ** dispute ****.
Units ********
******'* ***-**** ******** [**** ** longer *********] ** ****** ** the **** **** ********, though ****** *** ********* that *** ********* ****** all ****** **** *** the *** ********* *** were ********* ********:
- ***-**** ******** ***** ** v2.16_170401
- ***-***** ******** ***** ** v1.08_160811
- ***-**** ******** ***** ** **.*********
- ***-**** ******** ***** ** **.*********
******'* ************* ******, ***** **** *** sending ** *********, *** additional *******.
******** *** *** ******** units *** ** ********** from Hanwha's ******* ******** ****** [link ** ****** *********].
Hanwha ***** ******** *** ****
********* ** ******, **** were ***** ******** ***** this ***** ** *** 2016. ******** ****** *** vulnerability *** *** ***-****/***/**** models *** ******** ** August ****, *** ***-**** firmware *** *** ******* at *** **** ****, due ** ******** ******** constraints, *** *** **** released ** ***** ****. To ***** ******, ****** was *********** **** ******* surrounding *** ********* *** release *********, *** *** acknowledge **** ***-**** ******** patches ****** **** **** addressed ** *** **** time ** *** ***** units.
Pledge ****** ******* ** *** ******
****** **** **** *** adding * *************-******** ******* to ***** *******, *** are ********* ** ****** reaction *** ************ ***** for *** ****** *********.
Vulnerability ******/**********
****** **** ************* ** ***** a*********** ***** ** *.* by ***-****, *** ********* ** the **** ** ***** it *** ** ********, the *********** **** * user **** ********** ************ logged **** *** ******** limits **** **** ***** exploited ** ****** *********. Additionally, ******'* ********* *** less ******* **** ***** cameras, *** ** ******** the ***** ****** ** affected ***** ** ** in *** **'* ** thousands (** **********, ****** manufacturers **** ****** **** millions ** *******). ***** customers ****** *** **** this ** * ****** to ***** ********* ******** updates, *** ******** **** to ***** ** ***** recorders, *** *** ******** at ***** ** ***** than *************** **** ***** any ****** ******** ** access * ******.
Call *** ***********
** *** **** ******* have ********** *********** ** the *************, ********** ************* Hanwha's ***********, ****** ******* or ***** ** (****@****.***) and ** **** *********** that.
Comments (16)
Robert Shih
05/18/17 06:49pm
Notice how much less of a reaction this is getting from everyone, both from proponents and opponents. Hanwha is much less polarizing than Hik or Dahua and is much less in the spotlight these days, but these reporters are still doing their job and reporting on them. While in a few days or weeks, when the next Hikvision or Dahua scandal comes out, shills will complain that somehow the coverage from IPVM is unfair and they don't report on anyone else's problems.
This again, clearly shows that Chinese manufacturers have a persecution complex going on.
Create New Topic
Eddie Perry
Look what Saw on the home page there that pooped up this weekend
On the home page............
Create New Topic